contractor performance assessment

Upload: usernaga84

Post on 14-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    1/25

    Review of ContractorsPerformance Assessment System

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    2/25

    Objectives of Review

    Enhance objectivity and transparency

    Incorporate important performance criteriaand raise their weightage

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    3/25

    Assessment by consultants 170 points

    Assessment by HDB 80 points

    Total 250 points

    Current System of Assessment

    Assessed by both consultants and HDBs

    Project Director

    Performance scored to be concurred by DDs

    and approved by Directors Contract Performance Review chaired by GDBQ

    with Directors to review the performance score

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    4/25

    Overview

    Assessment by Consultant Progress of works

    M&E functional tests

    Critical C&S tests

    Handover inspection

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    5/25

    Overview

    Assessment by HDBAssessment criteria not quantifiable

    Reduce weightage

    More guidelines set

    Incorporate important criteria and new initiatives HDB audits

    Productivity and sustainable construction initiatives

    HDB PD to assess Arch functional tests, M&Efunctional tests, critical C&S tests and inspectioncarried out by HDB

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    6/25

    Progress of Works

    Progress Score

    More than 1 months ahead of schedule 30

    Up to 1 month ahead of schedule 27

    On schedule 24

    Up to 0.5 month behind schedule 18

    More than 0.5 to 1 month behind schedule 15

    More than 1 month to 2 months behind schedule 12More than 2 months behind schedule 0

    Old

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    7/25

    Progress of Works

    To allocate 5 points for meeting milestone of

    critical activities

    To reduce band and lower score for delay

    more than 0.5 month

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    8/25

    Progress of Works

    Progress of Works* Points

    More than 1 month ahead of schedule 25

    No delay and up to 1 month ahead of schedule 20

    Up to 0.5 month delay 16

    More than 0.5 month and up to 1 month delay 10

    More than 1 month and up to 2 months delay 5

    More than 2 months delay 0

    New

    * Take into account of Contractors entitled EOT excluding exceptionally

    inclement weather for ease of assessment

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    9/25

    Progress of Works

    Timeliness in meeting critical milestones / activities

    Submission and approval of ECM & SHMS

    Setting up and approval of timber mock up

    Submission of workshop drawings for cast-in windows and

    precast components

    Submission and approval of materials, method statements

    and trades demonstration

    Setting up and approval of sample units

    Handover of lift motor room

    Readiness of site for laying of services

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    10/25

    M&E Functional Tests(Total 6 points)

    Items to Assess

    Electrical

    Electrical substation

    Main switchboardLightning protection system

    Public lighting

    Unit testing

    TV system

    Fire alarm system

    Standby generator

    Mechanical

    Refuse handling plant

    Booster pumping system

    Rainwater pumping system

    Waste water pumping system

    Ejector / divertor system

    Dry / wet risers system

    Fire hosereel systemMechanical ventilation system

    Leakage test for gas pipe installation

    Sprinkler system

    Plumbing & sanitaryWater pressure test for concealed pipes

    Concealed stack leakage test

    * Base on the result of worst block tested during assessment period and deduct 0.4 pointfor each test failure

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    11/25

    Assessment by Consultants

    S/N Criteria Max. Score

    1 Quality of Works 105

    Structural Works 40

    Architectural Works 39

    M & E Works 16

    Handover Inspection Assessment 10

    2 Management 65

    Construction Planning & Management 10

    Response to Instructions 5

    Compliance with Environmental Requirements 10

    Progress of Works 30

    Safety 10

    50*

    * 10 points for quality of timber mock up and sample units

    15

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    12/25

    Assessment by HDB

    Description Points

    Contractors senior managements commitment 20

    Site management team 20

    Use of reliable subcontractors 20

    Innovation and initiatives 20

    Old

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    13/25

    Assessment by HDB

    Description Points

    Contractors senior managements commitment 10

    Site management team 10

    Handover inspection assessment 10

    Functional and critical C&S tests 10

    Productivity and sustainable construction initiatives 20

    HDB audit checks 20

    New

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    14/25

    Contractors Senior Management

    CommitmentDescription Points

    Minimum once a month visit to site by senior management 2

    Company Quality Management System

    Team for CONQUAS pre-inspection & rectification

    Formalised system for pre-handover inspection & rectification

    2

    Responsiveness to HDBs instruction in meeting project objectives

    Increase resources and special efforts to expedite the works

    Managing residents complaints

    Meeting safety & housekeeping and ECM objectives

    2

    Commitment over and above contractual requirements in meetingproject objectives

    2 Increase resources and special efforts

    To mitigate delay caused by others

    To exceed bonus threshold for CONQUAS

    Use of reliable subcontractors 2

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    15/25

    Site Management Team

    Description Points

    Experience of site team

    Project Managers experience in residential project

    Safety Officers experience in residential project

    Supervisors experience in residential project

    3

    Competency and adequacy of site team 3

    Ability of site team in solving problem

    Effectiveness

    Ability to foresee

    Proactive in highlighting and providing solutions

    4

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    16/25

    Review on Handover Inspection

    (a) BIT 1st Inspection Result ( 5 points )

    S/N No. Of Defects Per Unit In 1st BIT Inspection (D) Points Awarded

    1 2 and below 5

    2 2 < D < 3 4.5

    3 3 < D < 4 3.5

    4 4 < D < 5 3

    5 5 < D < 6 2

    6 6 < D < 8 2

    7 8 and above 0

    (b) No. Of Inspection Before Handover ( 5 points )

    S/N Number Of Inspections Before Handover Points Awarded

    1 1 5

    2 2 4

    3 3 and above 0

    Old

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    17/25

    Handover Inspection

    (a) BIT 1st Inspection Result ( 5 points )

    S/N No. Of Defects Per Unit In 1st BIT Inspection (D) Points

    1 1 and below 5

    2 1 < D < 2 4.5

    3 2 < D < 3 4

    4 4 < D < 5 2

    5 5 and above 0

    (b) No. Of Inspection Before Taking Over ( 5 points )

    S/N Number Of Inspections Per Block Before Handed Over Points

    1 1 5

    2 2 3.5

    3 3 and above 0

    New

    Base on the result of worst block inspected

    during assessment period

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    18/25

    Functional and Critical C&S Tests

    Type of Test Points

    Critical C&S tests 3

    Arch Functional tests 3.5

    M&E functional test 3.5

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    19/25

    Critical C&S Tests

    Critical C&S Tests

    Test cubes results at 28 days

    Steel reinforcement tensile test

    Deduct 0.2 point for each test failure during assessment

    period

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    20/25

    Arch Functional Tests

    Arch Functional Tests

    Water tightness test for windows & wall joints

    Water tightness test for precast wall joints

    Wet area water tightness testFlat roof water tightness test

    % Of Samples Failed The Test At First Attempt Points

    0% 3.5

    < 5% 2

    5% and above 0

    Base on the result of worst block tested during assessment period

    Use above table to assess each functional test and take average

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    21/25

    Review on M&E Functional Tests

    Items to Assess

    Electrical

    Main switchboard

    Lightning protection system

    Public lighting

    Unit testing

    TV system

    Mechanical

    Refuse handling plantTransfer pumping system

    Booster pumping system

    Rainwater pumping system

    Waste water pumping system

    Ejector / divertor system

    Fire alarm system

    Standby generatorDry / wet risers system

    Fire hosereel system

    Mechanical ventilation system

    Sprinkler system

    Plumbing & sanitary Water pressure test for concealed pipes

    * Base on the result of worst block tested during assessment period and deduct 0.2 pointfor each test failure

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    22/25

    Productivity and Sustainable

    Construction Initiatives

    Initiatives Points

    Productivity initiatives

    Adopt new methods of construction

    Use machinery for construction

    Adopt new materials for construction

    Effective resources planning and plan to improve

    productivity

    Partnering HDB in R & D projects 20

    Sustainable construction initiatives

    Use energy efficient appliances for site office

    Use UV film or blinds for site office window

    Use recycle water for toilet flushing Other initiatives promote sustainable construction

    Award 2 points for each productivity and sustainable construction

    initiatives adopted subject to maximum of 20 points

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    23/25

    HDB Audit Checks

    For our audits to be more impactful, the audit

    outcome shall be considered in the assessment

    Description Points

    Take the worst report during assessment period and

    deduct 0.4 point for each non-compliance and the

    minimum score would be 0

    PD / PDA audit

    CAT audit

    Safety audit by BID

    C&S audit by BID

    3

    33

    3

    Timeliness in closing up audit report 8

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    24/25

    Implementation

    To implement the proposed changes from next

    assessment period (Apr 12 to Sep 12) onwards

  • 7/27/2019 Contractor Performance Assessment

    25/25

    End