contact center cost & volumes may 14-16, 2014 nashville, tn 1 2014 customer service benchmarking...

38
Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Upload: sibyl-stewart

Post on 03-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Center Cost & Volumes

May 14-16, 2014

Nashville, TN

1

2014 Customer Service BenchmarkingData Review Conference

Page 2: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Agenda

◼ Guidelines Review

◼ Key Financial Measures

◼ Key Volume Measures

◼ Anomalies, Issues, Outliers and Corrections

◼ Next Steps

Page 3: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Customer Service Benchmark Study Organization

3

CS Support and CS ITCS Support and CS IT

Customer Contact• Contact Center• Local Office• Self Service• Contractors• Credit Inbound calls

Customer Contact• Contact Center• Local Office• Self Service• Contractors• Credit Inbound calls

Back Office•Billing•Billing Field Policies•Payment Processing

Back Office•Billing•Billing Field Policies•Payment Processing

Field Service• Change of Account• Billing Field Orders

(meter investigations)

• Credit Field Orders• Order Management

Field Service• Change of Account• Billing Field Orders

(meter investigations)

• Credit Field Orders• Order Management

Meter Reading• Manual• Mobile AMR• Fixed Network AMI

Meter Reading• Manual• Mobile AMR• Fixed Network AMI

Revenue Management• Credit Office and

Outbound calls• Credit Field and Inbound

Contact Policies• Revenue Protection:

Office and Field

Revenue Management• Credit Office and

Outbound calls• Credit Field and Inbound

Contact Policies• Revenue Protection:

Office and Field

Customer Life-cycle: Meter Set to Cash Measures, Policies & ProcessesCustomer Life-cycle: Meter Set to Cash Measures, Policies & Processes

Employees: Safety, StaffingEmployees: Safety, Staffing

Customer: Customer Satisfaction, First Contact Resolution, Customer ExperienceCustomer: Customer Satisfaction, First Contact Resolution, Customer Experience

Areas excluded:◼ Energy Audit/Energy

Efficiency Group◼ Meter Change-out◼ Account Executives

Page 4: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

4

Contact Center Introduction

◼ Contact Center covers the following areas of interest: Use of Call Center (internal and outsourced, including inbound

collections and small/mid-sized commercial and industrial account calls)

Use of Local Offices (there is a Local Office section for collecting costs separately from the Call Center)

Use of IVR (internal and outsourced) Use of Internet E-mail, fax, letter

◼ Enrollment and contract management for retailer (deregulated companies)

NOTE: Although payments by the above channels are included in Contact Center, do not include payment by check, at a kiosk or a payment center; these transactions are included in Payment Processing. Cashiers in Local Office who only take payments are part of Payment Processing.

Page 5: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

5

Contact Center Definitions

Contact Center Contacts (Inbound)

A completed customer call, local office transaction, IVR, or internet transaction. Do not include uncompleted transactions (e.g. abandons). Do not include general switchboard informational calls. The following is a description of some of the main types of transactions included:

• New Customer/Turn On/Off*/ Change of Account [excluding credit related turn on or off or any meter install] = A customer request for a turn-off of an existing account; a new customer requests a turn-on of an account.

• Billing issue (such as High Bill) = Any contact related to billing amount such as inquiries, adjustments, and high bill complaints.

• Make Payment (Pay Bill) via these channels = Include contacts for live call or other channel debit or credit card payments, IVR, electronic check payments, web.

• Credit [payment arrangement, credit extension, etc] = Any contact related to a past due notice, including payment arrangements and reconnect of service

• Report Gas/Water Leak or Electric Interruption/Outage = A contact about an electrical outage, gas leak, water leak or other premise-related issue of this nature.

Page 6: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Guidelines Review

Contact Center Cost

Page 7: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

7

Functional Cost Model

Our approach to collecting cost, performance and staffing information follows customer transactions through each functional area.

If you have significant costs in one of the shaded categories, you can enter your cost in the shaded box.

No boxes are shaded on line.

CS IT

CIS

What goes here?

Page 8: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Center:◼ IVR◼ ACD◼ Scheduling Software◼ Workforce Management (WFM)◼ Multi-channel processing◼ Web, Social Media technology costs◼ VOIP◼ Web/email routers◼ Virtual hold technology costs◼ 3rd party applications (OMS interface etc.)

Field:◼ Mobile data◼ Scheduling◼ GPS◼ Telecommunications◼ Routing software◼ Dispatching software

Revenue Protection◼ Tamper plug◼ Data mining software

Meter:◼ Handhelds◼ Routing software◼ Telecommunications◼ Remote disconnect◼ MV 90◼ GPS

Bills:◼ Inserters◼ Web/email, bill presentment◼ C/I billing software (MV 90)

Payment:◼ Image processer◼ Slitter/sorter◼ Interface w/kiosks◼ Routing software for off-site payments◼ Payment Kiosks

Credit:◼ Behavioral scoring◼ Predictive dialer◼ Credit optimization software

8

Technology – Contact Center

NOTE: CIS is a separate category

Technology Any technology specifically used for a function such as meter reading devices, mobile data technology, telephone switch or call routing software, call monitoring software etc.

8

Page 9: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Volumes

9

Guidelines

Page 10: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

10

Counting Contacts

◼ CSR answered calls & IVR calls – completed contacts (not abandons)◼ Local office – customer visits◼ Web contact – log-ons to account or hits to a specific type of page (some

judgement required, but includes pages that provide information that avoid a phone call)

◼ E-mail/Letters/faxes – incoming and outgoing◼ Social networking – outbound

Do not count paper bill presentments or mailed in customer payments in contact center

Page 11: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Inbound Contact Volumes

11

T = Transactional activitiesL =“ Look-up” activities

This matrix, CT305, serves to collect the detailed information on how many contacts come into the company for each type of inquiry.

Page 12: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

12

Addressing “Transactions” versus “look-up’ Activities…What counts as a transaction

◼ In 2014 again seek to better capture and address completed transactions versus what we are calling “look-up” activities: Transaction= customer executes an actual transaction with the utility- an

inquiry, an order, a request for service, payment, etc. Look-up= customer accesses a self-service channel, typically IVR or Web,

to view general information about the company or view Customer Service information about their account but does not transact or conduct a transaction

◼ If you have activities that represent a “look-up”, please place them in the Get Account or General Company Information category. These should go in either the Web or IVR category

◼ What should not count as a transaction by transaction category: Simple Web “hits” where the customer may hit the web site (and you capture

it) but there is no transaction or you don’t know the reason for the activity Accessing the IVR but then opting out to a CSR or Agent before completing

a transaction (the Agent live contact is a transaction, the initial IVR entry and opt out is not)

Do not count uncompleted transactions in the IVR or web, or simply accessing these channels for information as completed transactions in a specific transaction category in CT305 other than “General Company Information” (for lookups)

Page 13: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Payment Channels & Options

◼ We ask you to provide information on payments both by channel and option.

◼ We also capture information in both the Contact Center (CT305) and Payment (PP5) areas about payments received. Be sure that data is reported in all areas.

13

In some cases, customers opt out of a transaction before it’s completed. So your call center considers it a payment call, but payment did’nt receive the payment. So numbers may not match.

Page 14: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

OUtbound Contact Volumes

14

Page 15: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Key Financial measures

Contact Center Cost

Page 16: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Center Profiles

    Mean Q1 Q2 Q3 Bars Mean Q1 Q2 Q3 Bars

Cost                    Combined Contact Center & Local Office Cost per Account * Commodity

$8.49 $7.87 $9.03 $9.93 12 $9.29 $8.23 $9.83 $10.59 14

Contact Center Cost Per Account * Commodity

$7.97 $7.09 $8.40 $9.58 12 $8.49 $7.25 $9.18 $10.06 14

Local Office Costs per Account * Commodity $1.03 $0.49 $1.18 $1.26 6 $1.39 $0.86 $1.38 $2.01 8 Service Level                    

Average Speed Of Answer For Calls Answered By CSR (Contact Center)

121.8 48.1 76.5 128.0 12 68.9 26.3 57.6 95.3 14

Service level including abandoned calls using a 30 second target but without IVR calls: Overall

62.3% 72.6% 67.0% 55.1% 0 66.6% 77.3% 67.1% 55.0% 0

Live calls abandoned as a percent of live incoming calls offered

8.5% 4.0% 5.6% 8.3% 0 7.4% 4.0% 7.1% 8.6% 0

16

2013YE 2012YE

Page 17: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Center 2nd Draft Cost Scan (From F5)

Several companies are yet to enter any data Some companies show no technology costs and or phone service charges- please

review and provide

OLD

Page 18: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Detailed Cost Breakouts- Contact Center Contribution to Credit Costs…

In order to better understand costs we not only ask for them at the high level, but ask for some breakouts of cost by activity. The diagram shows how the costs relate to each other.

18

Page 19: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Combined CONTACT CENTER & LOCAL OFFICE COST PER ACCOUNT * COMMODITY [V.10]

19

Companies should all provide telephone service and technology charges

Companies 24, 26, 27, 30, and 34 are not reported

Page 3 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 20: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

CombiNED CONTACT CENTER & LOCAL OFFICE COST BY LOCATION PER ACCOUNT * COMMODITY [V.11]

20

Companies 24, 26, 27, 30, and 34 are not reported

Page 5 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 21: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Call CENTER COST PER Account * Commodity

21

Page 9 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 22: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Local Office COSTS PER ACCOUNT * COMMODITY [11]

Page 14 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 23: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Key Volume measures

Contact Center Volumes

Page 24: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Inbound Contact Volumes

24

T = Transactional activitiesL =“ Look-up” activities

This matrix, CT305, serves to collect the detailed information on how many contacts come into the company for each type of inquiry.

Page 25: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Center 2nd Draft Volume Scan(From CT305)…Please review these Outliers

Several companies are yet to enter any data, particularly in web self service

Several companies have high %/ excessive of “Get Account Info”, “Blended”, Other, General Company Info…?

At least 4 reporting companies report no live billing-related contacts Difficult to understand why your customers are contacting you if this

is the case

Page 26: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contacts PER ACCOUNTS * COMMODITY [V.14]

Page 17 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Companies 21, 32 and 33 show relatively higher contacts per acct*commodity

Page 27: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

INBOUND CONTACT BY TRANSACTION TYPE PER ACCOUNT * COMMODITY [V.14]

Page 19 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

For data validation purposes we want to check several of these categories for more detail

Page 28: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contacts PER ACCOUNT

Page 18 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 29: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

TOTAL INBOUND CONTACTS BY CHANNEL (PERCENT OF TOTAL) [V.13]

Page 22 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Several companies a have disproportionate number of “transactions” completed in IVR or web.

Page 30: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

INBoUND LIVE CALLS PERCENT OF CONTACTS [V.13]

Page 35 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Some companies also have high proportion of live calls that will be difficult to interpret when it comes to understanding the reasons for calling

Page 31: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Penetration OF SELF-SERVICE (WEB AND IVR) [V.14]

Page 39 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 32: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

IVR and Web Penetration By Type

PENETRATION OF SELF-SERVICE (IVR) BY TYPE [V.14] PENETRATION OF SELF-SERVICE (WEB) BY TYPE

Page 41 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Page 36 of V2 Contact Costs and Volumes Report

Check other, general company, blended

Page 33: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Anomalies, issues, outliers and Corrections

Page 34: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Issues found: Cost & Volumes

34

Page # Q # Primary Issue Who

FL5 Companies to review “technology” costs for missing Co 24

--- FL5 Companies not providing costs Co. 26, 27, 30

Cost

Page # Q # Primary Issue Who

CT305 Companies with high volume of contacts per account, please check Co. 33, 21, 22

CT305 Companies with excessively high % of web transactions or IVR Co. 32, 25, 22

CT305 (Live) Companies with high % of “Other”, “Blended” or Get Account info for “live” transactions

Co 21, 23, 31,32, 33, 34

CT305 (IVR) Companies with high % of “Other”, “Blended” or Get Account info for “IVR” transactions

Co 22, 36, 34, 29

CT305 (Web) Companies with high % of “Blended” or Get Account info for “Web” transactions

Co 23, 25, 26

Volumes

Page 35: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Status

35Based upon “completion reports” run on May 9.

• Minutes from this meeting will be available by May 23.• Next Deadline is June 2. This draft will be your last chance to see how your

data compares before the final report, so you need to have all of your data input and correct at this time. The final deadline is for ensuring all of your data is correct.

• Your data coach will help you finalize your data.

Page 36: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Further Breakout… Contact Center Volumes

Based upon “completion reports” run on May 9.

Contact Volumes

Organization Answered Not Applicable UnansweredCentral Maine Power 5 3

CPS Energy 1 7DTE Energy 8

Entergy 6 1 1Exelon - BGE 8

Exelon - ComEd 8Exelon - PECO Energy 5 2 1

Hydro-Québec 8New York State Electric & Gas 5 2 1

Oncor Electric Delivery 4 3 1PSE&G 3 5

PSE&G Long Island 8Rochester G&E 4 2 2

Tacoma Public Utilities 8We Energies 4 2 2

Westar Energy 5 3 Total 42 18 76

Page 37: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Contact Center, Contact Volumes, FCR

37

This is key functional data that is needed to understand impact across the entire “Customer Service” process.

Question # QuestionFunctional Process

Impact

CT305How many of each of the following inbound transactions were completed using each method?

Contact Center BillingPaymentField Service

FR7 What was your FCR last Year? (Percent of contacts resolved on the first contact)---this section links to FR and CT Volumes

Contact Center BillingPaymentField Service

Page 38: Contact Center Cost & Volumes May 14-16, 2014 Nashville, TN 1 2014 Customer Service Benchmarking Data Review Conference

Thank you for your Input and Participation!

38

Corporate Offices

California

400 Continental Blvd. Suite 600El Segundo, CA 90245(310) 426-2790

Maryland

3 Bethesda Metro Center Suite 700Bethesda, MD 20814

Ken Buckstaff [email protected]

Gene [email protected]

New York | Texas | Wyoming | Wisconsin

Rob [email protected]

Debi McLain [email protected]

Your Presenters

First Quartile Consulting is a utility-focused consultancy providing a full range of consulting services including continuous process improvement, change management, benchmarking and more. You can count on a proven process that assesses and optimizes your resources, processes, leadership management and technology to align your business needs with your customer’s needs.

Visit us at www.1stquartileconsulting.com | Follow our updates on LinkedIn

About 1QC

Satellite Offices