conclusion and summary
DESCRIPTION
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY. How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?. a) whether the project would enhance and protect the existing and future well-being of the residents and communities of the Nunavut Settlement Area, taking into account the interests of other Canadians; Answer: YES - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CONCLUSIONAND
SUMMARY
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
a) whether the project would enhance and protect the existing and
future well-being of the residents and communities of the Nunavut
Settlement Area, taking into account the interests of other Canadians;
Answer: YES
Final EIS, Socio-Economic Effects Assessment, Appendix C.1.2
Supplemental submissions: socio-economic report
• Public Hearing: socio-economic presentation
• Community Development: IIBA
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
b) whether the project would unduly prejudice the ecosystemic integrity of the Nunavut Settlement Area;
Answer: NO
Final EIS, Environmental Impact Assessment, Appendix B.2.1
Final EIS, Environmental Effects Assessment on Wildlife, Appendix B.2.2
Final EIS, Aquatic Impact Assessment, Appendix B.2.3
Final EIS, Environmental Cumulative Effects Assessment, Appendix B.2.4
Supplemental Report, various sections
Supplemental Report, Air Quality Studies
Supplemental Report, Aquatic Toxicology Report
Supplemental Report, Aquatic Biota Report
Supplemental Report, Cumulative Effects Assessment
Supplemental Report, Dilution Modelling
Supplemental Report, Heritage Studies
Supplemental Report, Spray Irrigation
Supplemental Report, Wildlife Studies
Public Hearing: environmental management presentation
Public Hearing: residual impacts presentation
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
c) whether the proposal reflects the priorities and values of
the residents of the Nunavut Settlement Area;
Answer: YES
Final EIS, Community Consultation, Appendix C.5
Jericho Pre-hearing, June 2001
Subsequent meetings by Tahera after June 2001
• Public Hearing: socio-economics presentation
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
d) steps which the proponent proposes to take to avoid and mitigate adverse impacts;
Answer:
Final EIS, Environmental Management Plan, Appendix B.3.1
Final EIS, Reclamation Plan, Appendix B.3.2
Final EIS, Occupational Health & Safety Plan, Appendix C.2
Final EIS, Socio-Economic Effects Assessment, Appendix C.1.2
Final EIS, Heritage Resources Impact Assessment, Appendix C.3.3
Final EIS, Mine Waste and Water Management, Appendix D.2.1
Final EIS, Spray Irrigation Report, Appendix D.2.2
Final EIS, Hazardous Materials Management Plan, Appendix D.2.3
Final EIS, Spill Prevention, Countermeasures and Control Plan, Appendix D.2.4
Final EIS, Emergency Response Plan, Appendix D.2.5
Supplemental Report, mass balance and geotechnical reports
Supplemental Report, spray irrigation studies
Supplemental Report, wildlife studies
Public Hearing, environmental management presentation
Public Hearing, socio-economic presentation
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
(e) steps the proponent proposes to take, or that should be taken, to compensate interests adversely affected by the project;
Answer:
Final EIS, Socio-Economic Effects Assessment, Appendix C.1.2
Supplemental Report, socio-economic report
Public Hearing, IIBA update
(f) posting of performance bonds;
Answer:
Bonding will be posted following consultation with KIA, NWB and DIAND
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
(g) the monitoring program that the proponent proposes to establish, or
that should be established, for ecosystemic and socio-economic impacts;
Answer:
Final EIS, Environmental Monitoring Plan, Appendix B.3.3
Final EIS, Socio-Economic Effects Assessment, Appendix C.1.2
Final EIS, Heritage Resources Impact Assessment, Appendix C.3.3
Final EIS, Traditional Knowledge, Appendix C.4
Supplemental Report, various sections
Supplemental Report, mass balance and geotechnical reports
Public Hearing, monitoring presentation
Public Hearing, socio-economics presentation
How has 12.5.5 (NLCA) been met?
(h) steps which the proponent proposes to take, or that should be taken, to restore ecosystemic integrity following project abandonment;
Answer:
Final EIS, Environmental Management Plan, Appendix B.3.1
Final EIS, Reclamation Plan, Appendix B.3.2 Supplemental Report, various sections Public Hearing, environmental management – reclamation
presentation
Proposed Schedule
Final EIS Submitted Jan. 2003
Final Hearings December 1 –5 , 2003
NIRB Decision January 2004
Approval from Minister for INAC March – April 2004
Permitting (Land and Water) April – June 2004
Procurement of Processing Plant July 2004
Mobilize Equipment and Supplies Q1 2005
Construction 1 Year
Full Diamond Production (earliest target) Q4 2005
Diamonds from the Jericho Kimberlite
Nunavut Diamond2.25 CaratsRound CutColor: Rare White (H)
Jericho Diamond Project
‘Building a New Industry for Nunavut’
Koana