comprehensive project[1][1]
TRANSCRIPT
A
COMPREHENSIVE PROJECT REPORTON
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ICICI BANK
AFTER MERGER &ACQUSITION
WITH BANK OF MADURA
Submitted toCHAUDHARY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THEREQUIREMENT OF THE AWARD FOR THE
DEGREE OFMASTER OF BUSINESS ASMINISTRATION
InGujarat Technological University
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OFProf. Manish Chaudhari
(Faculty of CTI-MBA)
Submitted by:Geetaba Zala (107080592056)
Sejal Prajapati (107080592058)
(Batch: 2010-12)
1
MBA SEMESTER III/IV(CHAUDHARY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE)
MBA PROGRAMMEAffiliated to Gujarat Technological University
Ahmedabad
CONTENTS
Serial no. Topic name Page no.
1. Conceptual Framework
2. Objectives of study
3 Significance of study
4. Literature Review
5. Introduction
6. Meaning of Merger and Acquisition
7 Types of Merger and Acquisition
8 Procedure of Merger and Acquisition
9 Conclusion
2
LITRATURE REVIEW:
Mergers and Acquisitions in Indian Industry
In Indian industry, the pace for mergers and acquisitions activity picked up
in response to various economic reforms introduced by the Government of
India since 1991, in its move towards liberalization and globalization.
The Indian economy has undergone a major transformation and structural
change following the economic reforms, and “size and competence" have
become the focus of business enterprises in India.
Indian companies realised the need to grow and expand in businesses
that they understood well, to face growing competition;several leading
corporates have undertaken restructuring exercises to sell off non-core
businesses, and to create stronger presence in their core areas of
business interest.
Mergers and acquisitions emerged as one of the most effective methods
of such corporate restructuring, and became an integral part of the long-
term business strategy of corporates in India.
Over the last decade, mergers and acquisitions in the Indian industry have
continuously increased in terms of number of deals and deal value.
3
A survey among Indian corporate managers in 2006 by Grant Thornton 2
found that Mergers & Acquisitions are a significant form of business
strategy today for Indian Corporates.
The three main objectives behind any M&A transaction, for corporates
today were found to be:
Improving Revenues and Profitability
Faster growth in scale and quicker time to market
Acquisition of new technology or competence
A firm can achieve growth both internally and externally. Internal growth
may be achieved if a firm expands its operations or up scales its
capacities by establishing new units or by entering new markets. But
internal growth may be faced by several challenges such as limited size of
the existing market or obsolete product category or various government
restrictions. Again firm may not have specialized knowledge to enter in to
new product market and above all it takes a longer period to establish
own units and yield positive return. In such cases, external mechanism of
growth namely M&As, Takeovers or Joint Ventures may be utilized.
Tambi (2005) attempts to evaluate the impact of such mergers on the
performance of a corporation. Though the theoretical assumption says
that mergers improve the overall performance of the company due to
increased market power and synergy impacts, Tambi uses his paper to
evaluate the same in the scenario of Indian economy. He has tested three
parameters – PBITDA, PAT and ROCE - for any change in their before
4
and after values by comparison of means using t-test. The results of his
study indicate that mergers have failed to contribute positively to the set of
companies chosen by him.
Lev and Mandelker (1972) evaluate the reduction is risk of the acquiring
firm. It is argued that unless returns of the parties involved in the merger
are perfectly co-related, the variances of the combined firms‟ returns will
be smaller than the weighted average of the variances of the returns of the
individual firms – Diversification principle of portfolio theory..
Under the financial services sector in India, the banking sector specifically
has seen a lot of M&A right from the early years. Historically, mergers and
acquisitions activity started way back in 1920 when the Imperial Bank of
India was born when three presidency banks (Bank of Bengal, Bank of
Bombay and Bank of Madras) were reorganized to form a single banking
entity, which was subsequently known as State Bank of India.
Ravichandran, Nor & Said (2010), in their paper, have tried to evaluate the
efficiency and performance for selected public and private banks before
and after the merger, as a result of market forces. After doing a factor
analysis, they narrow down the variables for their study to Profit Margin,
Current Ratio, Ratio of Advances to Total Assets, Cost Efficiency (ratio of
cost to total assets) and Interest Cover and thereafter a regression is run
to identify the relationship between these factors and return on
shareholders‟ funds. The results indicate that cost efficiency, advances to
total assets and interest cover are significant during both the pre and
5
post-merger phases. Also the returns on shareholders‟ funds is negatively
related to cost efficiency and interest cover but is positively related to ratio
of advances to total assets.
Rani, Yadav and Jain (2008) where they examine the short run abnormal
returns to India based mergers by using event study methodology. The
short term effects are of interest because of the immediate trading
opportunities that they create. They start by discussing the present state
of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry and go on to explore some specific
cases of acquisitions of foreign companies by Indian pharma majors. The
calculate the abnormal returns and cumulative abnormal returns for
foreign based acquisitions, mergers and Indian based acquisitions
separately and conclude that abnormal returns are highest in case of
foreign based acquisitions and lowest(negative) for India based mergers.
While going for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) management think of
financial synergy and/or operating synergy in different ways. But are they
actually able to generate any such potential synergy or not, is the
important issue.
Kumar &Bansal (2008), in their study, try to find out whether the claims
made by the corporate sector while going for M&As to generate synergy,
are being achieved or not in Indian context. They do so by studying the
impact of M&As on the financial performance of the outcomes in the long
run and compare and contrast the results of merger deals with acquisition
6
deals. This empirical study is based on secondary financial data and
tabulation. Ratio analysis and correlation are used for analysis.
The results indicate that in many cases of M&As, the acquiring firms were
able to generate synergy in long run, that may be in the form of higher
cash flow, more business, diversification, cost cuttings etc. A limitation of
their research is that it shows that management cannot take it for granted
that synergy can be generated and profits can be increased simply by
going for mergers and acquisitions. A case study based research parallel
to this study could be initiated to get nearer to reality show.
Horizontal merger, another possible avenue of inorganic growth has also
been a popular option of expansion amongst many companies in the
financial services sector. It basically means a merger occurring between
companies producing similar goods or offering similar services. Eckbo
(1983) tests the hypothesis that horizontal mergers generate positive
abnormal returns to stockholders of the bidder and target firms because
they increase the probability of successful collusion among rival
producers.
Deregulation of the European financial services market during the 1990s
led to an unprecedented wave of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in the
insurance industry. From 1990-2002 there were about 2,595 M&As
involving European insurers of which 1,669 resulted in a change in control.
Bhaumik and Selarka (2008) discuss the impact of concentration of
ownership on firm performance. On the one hand, concentration of
7
ownership that, in turn, concentrates management control in the hands of
a strategic investor, eliminates agency problems associated with
dispersed ownership. On the other hand, it may lead to entrenchment of
upper management which may be inconsistent with the objective of profit
(or value) maximization. Their paper examines the impact of M&A on
profitability of firms in India, where the corporate landscape is dominated
by family-owned and group-affiliated businesses, such that alignment of
management and ownership coexists with management entrenchment,
and draws conclusions about the impact of concentrated ownership and
entrenchment of owner managers on firm performance. Their results
indicate that, during the 1995-2002 period, M&A in India led to
deterioration in firm performance. They also found that neither the
investors in the equity market nor the debt holders can be relied upon to
discipline errant (and entrenched) management. In other words, on
balance, negative effects of entrenchment of owner manager strumps the
positive effects of reduction in owner-vs.-manager agency problems. Their
findings are consistent with bulk of the existing literature on family-owned
and group affiliated firms in India.
In today‟s globalized economy, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are being
increasingly used the world over, for improving competitiveness of
companies through gaining greater market share, broadening the portfolio
to reduce business risk, for entering new markets and geographies, and
capitalizing on economies of scale etc.
8
In particular, mergers seem to have had a slightly positive impact on
profitability of firms in the banking and finance industry, the
pharmaceuticals, textiles and lectrical equipment sectors saw a marginal
negative impact on operating performance (in erms of profitability and
returns on investment). For the Chemicals and Agri- products sectors,
mergers had caused a significant decline, both in terms of Profitability
margins and returns on investment and assets.
The beginning of an M&A process increases the odds for an individual
bank to become an acquisition target. The wave of M&A is rising without
there being any reasons of economic performance to justify such action.
Most bank employees regard M&A as a threat to their jobs, since
shareholders often demand limitations in the number of employed staff.
Mylonakis (2006) is to examine the impact of this phenomenon on
employment and on the efficiency of human resources. For the banks
selected in this study, all strategies followed within the Hellenic banking
sector are included: development through consecutive M&A (Eurobank,
Piraeus Bank) development through selective acquisitions (Alpha Credit
Bank), decreasing company size by selling of bank institutions (Emporiki
Bank) and self-sustainable growth (National Bank of Greece). For the
above five banks, data taken from published balance sheets for the 1998-
2003 accounting periods have been used. Based on these data, indicators
evaluating personnel efficiency have been calculated. M&A results in the
Hellenic bank market have been negative in terms of employment, since
9
3,627 jobs have been cancelled during the 1998-2003 period. These jobs
belonged to banks that were either merged or acquired. Regarding a more
efficient distribution of staff in the merged banks, data confirm that the
large Greek banks that chose to grow through mergers have so far been
justified in their choice.
Merging or acquiring has been a tactical practice for companies in order to
penetrate markets. As a means of foreign direct investment, it provides
plenty of comparative advantages against competitors.
Ottaviani(2007) is analyses competition and mergers among risk averse
banks. He shows that the correlation between the shocks to the demand
for loans and the shocks to the supply of deposits induces a strategic
interdependence between the two sides of the market. We characterize
the role of diversification as a motive for bank mergers and analyze the
consequences of mergers on loan and deposit rates. When the value of
diversification is sufficiently strong, bank mergers generate an increase in
the welfare of borrowers and depositors. If depositors have more
correlated shocks than borrowers, bank mergers are relatively worse for
depositors than for borrowers.
Examining the operating performance around commercial bank mergers,
Cornett, McNutt and Tehranian (2006) conduct a study to evaluate the
same. They find that industry-adjusted operating performance of merged
banks increases significantly after the merger, large bank mergers
produce greater performance gains than small bank mergers, activity
10
focusing mergers produce greater performance gains than activity
diversifying mergers, geographically focusing mergers produce greater
performance gains than geographically diversifying mergers, and
performance gains are larger after the implementation of nationwide
banking in 1997. Further, they find
11
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
The main objective is to study about post evaluation performance of
merger and acquisition.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
To study about the procedure of merger and acquisition.
To study about due dilligence of merger and acquisition.
To strategically evaluate the impact on shareholders wealth post merger
and acquisition.
12
SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
This project helps in understanding regarding how merger and acquisition
takes place.
This project helps in understanding impact of merger & acquisition on
different companies.
To study the financial condition of merged banks before and after merger.
13
Introduction of Merger and Acquisition
Mergers and Acquisition play a crucial economic role of moving resources from
zones of under-utilization to zones of better utilization. Poorly run companies are
more prone to being taken over by the powerful and managers have an incentive
to ensure that their company is governed properly and resources are used to
produce maximum value. Acquisition in the banking sector will ensure that the
boards and management of institutions will improve corporate governance to
avoid being targets in future. The abbreviation of merger is as follow:-
M= Mixing
E= Entities
R= Resources
G= Growth Enrichment and
R= Renovation
A merger occurs when two or more companies combines and the resulting firm
maintains the identity of one of the firms. One or more companies may merge
with an existing company or they may merge to form a new company. Usually the
assets and liabilities of the smaller firms are merged into those of larger firms.
Regulations regarding the Mergers in Indian Banking Sector Mergers and
Acquisition in India:
Before liberalization: In India the Companies Act 1956 and the Monopolies and
Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 are states governing mergers among
companies. In the Companies Act, a procedure has been laid down, in terms of
which the merger can effectuate. Sanction of the Company Court is essential
prerequisite for the effectiveness of and for effectuating a schemeof merger. The
other statue regulating mergers was the hit hero Monopolies and Restrictive
14
Trade Practices Act. After the amendments the statue does not regulate
mergers.
Post Liberalization period: Narsimham Committee (1998) : The Report of the
Narsimham Committee on the banking sector reforms on the structural issues
made recommendations that “Mergers between banks and between banks and
DFI’s and NBFC’s need to be based on synergies and vocational and business
specific complimentary of the concerned institutions and must obviously make
sound commercial sense. Mergers of public sector banks should emanate from
the managements of banks with the govt. as the common shareholder playing a
supportive role. Such mergers however can be worthwhile if they lead to
rationalization of workforce and branch network otherwise the mergers of public
sector banks would tie down the management with operational issues and
distract attention from the real issue. Mergers should not be seen as a means of
bailing out weak banks. Mergers between strong banks would make for greater
economic and commercial sense and would greater than the sum of its parts and
have a force multiplier effect. It can hence be seen from the recommendations of
the Narsimham Committee that mergers of the public sector banks were
expected to emanate from the managements of the banks with the Government
as common shareholder playing a supportive role.
Reserve Bank of India is required as stipulated under section 44A of the Banking
Regulation Act, 1949 and the role of the RBI is limited. No merger is allowed
unless the scheme of amalgamation draft has been placed before the
shareholders of the banking company and approved by a resolution passed by
the majority representing two-third value of the shareholders
15
Meaning of Merger and Acquisition
Merger:
Merger is said to occur when two or more companies combine in to one
company. Merger is defined transactation involving two or more companies in the
exchange of securities and only company one company to survives. When share
holder of more than one company, usually two decides to pool the resources of
the company under a common entity it is called merger.
Acquisition:
Acquisition is defined ‘’a purchase oa a company or a part of it so that
the acquired company is completely by the Acquiring company and thereby no
longer exists as a business entity.
16
INTRODUCTION OF ICICI Bank merged with
Bank of Madura
ICICI Bank merged with Bank of Madura in 2001: ICICI one of the largest
financial institution was formed in 1955 at the initiative of the World Bank,
the Government of India and representatives of Indian Industry.
The principal objective was to create a development financial institution
for providing medium term and long term project financing to Indian
Business.
In 1990’s, ICICI transformed its business from a development financial
institution offering only project finance to a diversified financial services
group offering a wide variety of products and services both directly and
through a number of subsidiaries and affiliates like ICICI Bank
In 2001,the ICICI merged with the Bank of Madura to expand
its customer base and branch network.
ICICI Bank Ltd wanted to spread its network, without acquiring RBI's
permission for branch expansion.
BoM was a plausible target since its cash management business was
among the top five in terms of volumes
BoM wanted a (financially and technologically) strong private sector bank
to add shareholder value, enhance career opportunities for its employees
and provide first rate, technology-based, modern banking services to its
customers.
17
TYPES OF MERGER & ACQUISITIONHorizontal Merger: Horizontal
merger is a combination of two or more corporate firms dealing in same lines of business
activity. Horizontal Merger is Co-centric Merger, which involves combination of two or
more business units related by technology, production process, marketing research and
development and management.
Vertical Merger: Vertical Merger is the joining of two or more firms
involved in different stages of production or distribution that are usually
separate. The Vertical Mergers chief gains are identified as the lower
buying cost of materials, minimization of distribution costs, assured
supplies and market increasing or creating barriers to entry for potential
competition or placing them at a cost disadvantage.
Conglomerate Merger: Conglomerate Merger is the combination of two
or more unrelated business units in respect of technology, production
process or market and management. In other words, firms engaged in the
different or unrelated activities are combined together. Diversification of
risk constitutes the rational for such merger moves.
Concentric Merger: Concentric Mergers are based on the Specific
Management functions whereas the Conglomerate Mergers are based on
General Management functions. If the activities of the segments brought
together are so related that there is carry over on Specific Management
functions. Such as marketing research, marketing, financing,
manufacturing and personnel.
18
Benefits of Mergers & Acquisitions:
1) Increase in the Growth & Expansion: Growth is the need of survival. A
corporate that shows growth and dynamism is very much able to attract and
retain talented executives. At the same time, it enriches the job perspectives of
the working executives by posing ever increasing challenges and hence has a
proportional effect on managerial efficiency.
2) Increase in Profit Margins: Profits increase due to the fact that a combination
of two or more banks may result into cost reduction due to operating
economies. This can happen as a combined entity, May avoid or at least reduce
overlapping functions and facilities. At the same time economies of scale may
also enhance profitability.
3) Strategic Benefit: This can be explained owing to the fact that in a saturated
market like that of India, simultaneous expansion and replacement (through
merger) may help the banks to reap profits rather than creation of additional
capacity through internal expansion.
4) Product Innovation: With the merger of two banks, it may be easier for them
to successfully bring about product innovations as their resources are more so
complementary.
19
Limitations of M & As:
1) Dysynergy Effect: It is very important that before merging the two banks
should take into Consideration the nature and extent of synergy which they have.
Generally it is seen that if the two combining entities differ in their work cultures
then the synergy might go negative and this brings about dysyergy.
2) Striving for Bigness: It is the matter of fact that size is taken to be the most
important yardstick for the measurement of success. But beyond a particular
size, the economies of scale turn into diseconomies of scale. . Thus while
evaluating a merger or acquisition proposal, the focus should be on to create or
maximize the shareholders’ wealth rather than increasing the size
3) Failure to Integrate Well: It is said that –“Sometimes even a best strategy
can be ruined by poor implementation.” A post merger or post acquisition
integration of the two banks is a must. Although this is an extremely complex task
– just like grinding east and west together
20
Procedure of Merger & Acquisition
The Merger & Acquisition Process can be broken down into five phases:
Phase 1 - Pre Acquisition Review : The first step is to assess your own situation
and determine if a merger and acquisition strategy should be implemented. If a
company expects difficulty in the future when it comes to maintaining core
competencies, market share, return on capital, or other key performance drivers,
then a merger and acquisition (M & A) program may be necessary.
It is also useful to ascertain if the company is undervalued. If a company fails to
protect its valuation, it may find itself the target of a merger. Therefore, the pre-
acquisition phase will often include a valuation of the company - Are we
undervalued? Would an M & A Program improve our valuations?
The primary focus within the Pre Acquisition Review is to determine if growth targets
(such as 10% market growth over the next 3 years) can be achieved internally. If not,
an M & A Team should be formed to establish a set of criteria whereby the company
can grow through acquisition. A complete rough plan should be developed on how
growth will occur through M & A, including responsibilities within the company, how
information will be gathered, etc.
Phase 2 - Search & Screen Targets: The second phase within the M & A Process
is to search for possible takeover candidates. Target companies must fulfill a set of
criteria so that the Target Company is a good strategic fit with the acquiring
company. For example, the target's drivers of performance should compliment the
acquiring company. Compatibility and fit should be assessed across a range of
criteria - relative size, type of business, capital structure, organizational strengths,
core competencies, market channels, etc.
It is worth noting that the search and screening process is performed in-house by the
Acquiring Company. Reliance on outside investment firms is kept to a minimum since
the preliminary stages of M & A must be highly guarded and independent.
21
Phase 3 - Investigate & Value the Target: The third phase of M & A is to perform a
more detail analysis of the target company. You want to confirm that the Target
Company is truly a good fit with the acquiring company. This will require a more
thorough review of operations, strategies, financials, and other aspects of the Target
Company. This detail review is called "due diligence." Specifically, Phase I Due
Diligence is initiated once a target company has been selected. The main objective is
to identify various synergy values that can be realized through an M & A of the Target
Company. Investment Bankers now enter into the M & A process to assist with this
evaluation.
A key part of due diligence is the valuation of the target company. In the preliminary
phases of M & A, we will calculate a total value for the combined company. We have
already calculated a value for our company (acquiring company). We now want to
calculate a value for the target as well as all other costs associated with the M & A.
The calculation can be
Phase 4 - Acquire through Negotiation: Now that we have selected our target
company, it's time to start the process of negotiating a M & A.
The most common approach to acquiring another company is for both companies to
reach agreement concerning the M & A; i.e. a negotiated merger will take place. This
negotiated arrangement is sometimes called a "bear hug." The negotiated merger or
bear hug is the preferred approach to a M & A since having both sides agree to the
deal will go a long way to making the M & A work. In cases where resistance is
expected from the target, the acquiring firm will acquire a partial interest in the target;
sometimes referred to as a "toehold position." This toehold position puts pressure on
the target to negotiate without sending the target into panic mode.
In cases where the target is expected to strongly fight a takeover attempt, the
acquiring company will make a tender offer directly to the shareholders of the
target, bypassing the target's management. Tender offers are characterized by the
following:
22
The price offered is above the target's prevailing market price.
The offer applies to a substantial, if not all, outstanding shares of stock.
The offer is open for a limited period of time.
The offer is made to the public shareholders of the target.
A few important points worth noting:
Generally, tender offers are more expensive than negotiated M & A's due to the
resistance of target management and the fact that the target is now "in play" and
may attract other bidders.
Partial offers as well as toehold positions are not as effective as a 100%
acquisition of "any and all" outstanding shares. When an acquiring firm makes a
100% offer for the outstanding stock of the target, it is very difficult to turn this
type of offer down.
Another important element when two companies merge is Phase II Due Diligence.
As you may recall, Phase I Due Diligence started when we selected our target
company. Once we start the negotiation process with the target company, a much
more intense level of due diligence (Phase II) will begin. Both companies, assuming
we have a negotiated merger, will launch a very detail review to determine if the
proposed merger will work. This requires a very detail review of the target company -
financials, operations, corporate culture, strategic issues, etc.
Phase 5 - Post Merger Integration: If all goes well, the two companies will
announce an agreement to merge the two companies. The deal is finalized in a
formal merger and acquisition agreement. This leads us to the fifth and final phase
within the M & A Process, the integration of the two companies.
Every company is different - differences in culture, differences in information
systems, differences in strategies, etc. As a result, the Post Merger Integration Phase
is the most difficult phase within the M & A Process. Now all of a sudden we have to
23
bring these two companies together and make the whole thing work. This requires
extensive planning and design throughout the entire organization. The integration
process can take place at three levels:
24
25