compound f derivatives:

9
CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SSCH 3 CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 COCH 3 O CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 SO 2 CH 3 CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SS CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SS OCH 3 CH 3 SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SS NO 2 SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SSCH 3 H 3 C SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SS H 3 C H 3 C SO 2 CH 2 CH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 SO 2 CH 3 CH 3 OCCH 2 SSCH 3 O O CH 3 OCCH 2 CH 2 SSCH 3 O CH 3 OCCH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 CH 3 O CH 3 OCCH 2 SS OCH 3 O CH 3 OCCH 2 SS O CH 3 OCCH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OCCH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 CH 3 O CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 OCCH 2 SS O O CH 3 OCCH 2 SS NO 2 CH 3 SCH 2 SSCH 3 CH 3 SCH 2 SSCH 2 SCH 2 SO 2 CH 3 CH 3 SCH 2 SSCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 SO 2 CH 3 ompound F Derivatives: ompound H Derivatives: ompound N Derivatives: F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 N1 N2 Supplementary Figure 1: Chemical structures of novel derivatives of compounds F, H, and N. The common functional group for all relatives is underlined in the parental structure (F, H, and N) F H N

Upload: donna-deleon

Post on 02-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Compound F Derivatives:. F. F1. F2. F3. F4. F5. F6. F7. F8. Compound H Derivatives:. H. H1. H2. H3. H4. H5. H6. H7. H8. Compound N Derivatives:. N. N1. N2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Compound F Derivatives:

CH 3SO 2CH 2CH 2SSCH 3

CH 3SO 2CH 2SSCH 2CH 2CO CH 3

O

CH 3SO 2CH 2CH 2SSCH 2CH 2SO 2CH 3 CH 3SO 2CH 2CH 2SS

CH 3SO 2CH 2CH 2SS O CH 3 CH 3SO 2CH 2CH 2SS NO 2 SO 2CH 2CH 2SSCH 3H 3C

SO 2CH 2CH 2SSH 3C H 3C SO 2CH 2CH 2SSCH 2CH 2SO 2CH 3

CH 3O CCH 2SSCH 3

O

O

CH 3O CCH 2CH 2SSCH 3

O

CH 3O CCH 2SSCH 2CH 2CH 3

O

CH 3O CCH 2SS O CH 3

O

CH 3O CCH 2SS

O

CH 3O CCH 2SSCH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 3 CH 3CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2O CCH 2SSCH 2CH 2CH 3

O

CH 3CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2O CCH 2SS

O O

CH 3O CCH 2SS NO 2

CH 3SCH 2SSCH 3

CH 3SCH 2SSCH 2SCH 2SO 2CH 3 CH 3SCH 2SSCH 2CH 2CH 2SO 2CH 3

Compound F Derivatives:

Compound H Derivatives:

Compound N Derivatives:

F1 F2 F3

F4 F5 F6

F7 F8

H1 H2 H3

H4 H5 H6

H7 H8

N1 N2

Supplementary Figure 1: Chemical structures of novel derivatives of compounds F, H, and N. The common functional group for all relatives is underlined in the parental structure (F, H, and N)

F

H

N

Page 2: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 2: The extent of apoptosis induced by each OSC was determined using two techniques, Fixed-PI and TUNE, in normal diploid (WI38) and leukemic (AML-3 and KK) cells. (A) The mean percentage of cells staining in pre-G1 region (apoptotic) was determined for KK and WI38 cells. The ratio of these two values for each OSC is a proxy for their therapeutic ratio. A similar analysis was performed for AML-3 cells (Figure 2A). (B) The mean percentage of cells staining TUNEL positive (apoptotic) was determined for each OSC in both AML-3 and WI38 cells. The ratio of these two values is a proxy for their therapeutic ratio. A similar analysis was performed for KK cells (Figure 2B).

A) B)

Page 3: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 3: (A) Boxplots of raw and normalized signal intensity for the red and green channels of the microarray data. Normalization increases distributional similarity. (B) & (C) Gaussian densities of the red and green channel intensities from the microarray data before (B) and after (C) normalization. Normalization increased the inter-experiment homogeneity.

Red GreenA)

Raw

Norm

B) C)

Page 4: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 4: Array data was pre-processed using the VSN algorithm and then each compound was tested for differential expression relative to the acetone control using a general linear model. Genes were selected using an F-test of this model at a threshold of p < 10-3 and subjected to divisive hierarchical clustering using the DIANA algorithm.

Page 5: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 5: Array data was pre-processed using the VSN algorithm and then each compound was tested for differential expression relative to the acetone control using a general linear model. Genes were selected using an F-test of this model at a threshold of p < 10-6 and subjected to divisive hierarchical clustering using the DIANA algorithm.

Page 6: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 6: Array data was pre-processed using the VSN algorithm and then each compound was tested for differential expression relative to the acetone control using a general linear model. Genes were selected using an F-test of this model at a threshold of p < 10-9 and subjected to divisive hierarchical clustering using the DIANA algorithm.

Page 7: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 7: Following VSN pre-processing, genes whose mRNA levels were altered by each compound relative to acetone control were identified using a general linear model at padjusted < 0.05 and subjected to GO enrichment analysis. The log10|P| values from this GO analysis were extracted and GO terms showing Pcumulative < 10-5 were subjected to divisive hierarchical clustering using the DIANA algorithm.

Page 8: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 8: Following VSN pre-processing, genes whose mRNA levels were altered by each compound relative to acetone control were identified using a general linear model at padjusted < 0.05 and subjected to GO enrichment analysis. The log10|P| values from this GO analysis were extracted and GO terms showing Pcumulative < 10-7.5 were subjected to divisive hierarchical clustering using the DIANA algorithm.

Page 9: Compound F Derivatives:

Supplementary Figure 9: Following VSN pre-processing, genes whose mRNA levels were altered by each compound relative to acetone control were identified using a general linear model at padjusted < 0.05 and subjected to GO enrichment analysis. The log10|P| values from this GO analysis were extracted and GO terms showing Pcumulative < 10-12.5 were subjected to divisive hierarchical clustering using the DIANA algorithm.