commissioned by jumpstart tulsa prepared by the community service council october 2011
TRANSCRIPT
STATE OF HUNGER TULSA COUNTY
Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service CouncilOctober 2011
TULSA COUNTY
Demographic Trends Economics Health Indicators
Dem
og
rap
hic
s
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
Population change--migration to suburban areas of Tulsa and Oklahoma City MSA with an overall decrease in new births
Age--aging population Race and ethnicity--more culturally
diverse Living arrangements--transitional for
family living arrangement
Dem
og
rap
hic
s
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Dem
og
rap
hic
sRace Comparison for Total Population and Children under 5
Oklahoma and Tulsa County, 2010
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
59.3%
8.2%11.0%
1.6%
19.8%54.9%
12.6%
7.3%
2.5%
22.8%
72.2%
7.4%
8.6%
1.7%
10.1%
69.2%
10.7%
6.0%
2.3%
11.7%
White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races
Oklahoma Tulsa County
Under 5
Total Population
N = 591,982
N = 48,035N = 266,547
N = 3,642,361
Hispanic16.8%
Hispanic20.6%
Hispanic8.9%
Hispanic11.0%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
6.3
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.5
16.6
17.1
18.2
18.9
18.4
19.8
25.9
9.2
9.7
10.1
10
10.1
13.5
10.7
47.8
50.5
52.5
51.9
52.2
49.1
46.2
17.5
14.1
10.6
10.4
10.4
9
8.1
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
1.9
1.4
1.2
.9
.6
Pro
ject
ions 2.5
2.1
Demographics
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18Tulsa County, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2005-07 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005-07.
Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005-07 est.
1970 82% 1% 11% 4%
1980 74% 2% 16% 6%
1990 71% 3% 18% 5%
2000 65% 5% 21% 7%
2005-07 est. 61% 6% 25% 8%
Children living with 1 or both parents
Demographics
ECONOMICS AND EMPLOYMENT
Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Children
Tulsa County, 2005-09
Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-09 American Community Survey.
Total population Under 18 Under 6 6-170%
25%
50%
75%
Percentage of population
Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%
Below 100% 19.8% 22.2% 26.8% 19.6%
Below 185% 41.6% 42.1% 47.9% 38.7%
Below 200% 45.4% 45.4% 51.1% 42.1%
EC
ON
OM
ICS
& E
MP
LO
YM
EN
T
Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2010*
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2009 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 74, No. 14, January 23, 2009, p. 4200; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-08 American Community Survey.
$73,324
$52,870
$36,832
$10,309$15,312
$18,310
$33,874
$21,551
WelfareWage
MinimumWage
PovertyWage
185% PovertyWage
Median FamilyIncome
(2006-08 ACS)
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000Annual Wage
Self-Sufficiency Wage = $39,978 ($18.93/hr)
Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income
($4.88/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($8.67/hr) ($16.04/hr)
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. The 2009 poverty guidelines are being used until at least March 1, 2010. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC.
Married-couple families w/ children <18($34.72/hr)
All families w/ children <18
Male-headed families w/ children <18
Female-headed families w/ children <18
($17.44/hr)
($25.03/hr)
($10.20/hr)
Eco
nom
ics
& E
mp
loym
en
t
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
Tulsa County, 2011
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2011; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2010-11; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, August 2011.
129,750
73,002
4,152
9,972
4,231
87,852
2,533
31,732
4,946
21.5%
44.9%
47.1%
22.3%
9.5%
14.6%
1.6%
52.8%
8.2%
Soonercare Total (185%/100%) (8/11)
Soonercare <19 (185%) (8/11)
WIC Infants (185%) (8/11)
WIC age 1-5 (185%) (8/11)
Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%) 6/11)
SNAP Total (130%) (6/11)
TANF <18 (50%) (6/11)
Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)(SY 2010-11)
Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)(SY 2010-11)
050,000100,000150,000
Number of Participants
0% 20% 40% 60%
Percent of Population
Eco
nom
ics
& E
mp
loym
en
t
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderTulsa County, 2006-08 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-08.
15.1%
33%
22.8%
6.7%
15.1%
5.1%
1.4%
0.8%
Less than high school
High school graduate
Some college
Associate degree
Bachelor's degree
Master's degree
Professional school degree
Doctorate degree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Percent of persons 25+
Eco
nom
ics
& E
mp
loym
en
t
HEALTH INDICATORS
WHAT IS OKLAHOMA’S RISK FOR HUNGER?
8th in the nation per capita of people hungry 13% of population food insecure compared to 11.3%
nationally 1 in 5 children and 1 in 3 elderly are food insecure 32 of 77 counties are food deserts with at least 25
percent of the population living ten miles or more from a supermarket or supercenter
9 of those counties are "severe food deserts," meaning that the entire population has limited access to such food outlets. These counties are Cimarron, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Hughes and Jefferson Counties.
Oklahoma loses an estimated $1.4 billion each year from hunger through illness, increased illness and decreased academic achievement alone. (Oklahoma Food Bank Network, (2010). Retrieved http://www.hungerinoklahoma.org/facts.html)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY PYRAMID
Early Death
Disease, Disability and
Social Problems
Adoption of Health-risk Behaviors
Social, Emotional and Cognitive Impairment
Disrupted Neurodevelopment
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Conception
Death
Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”
ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…
Recurrent physical abuse
Recurrent emotional abuse
Sexual abuse An alcohol or drug
abuser An incarcerated
household member
Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill
Mother being treated violently
One or no parents Emotional or
physical neglectSource: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH:
…LEAD TO HEALTH-RISK BEHAVIORS…
Smoking Overeating Physical inactivity Heavy alcohol use Drug use Promiscuity
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
…WHICH CAUSE DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN ADULTHOOD
Heart disease Cancer Chronic lung and
liver disease Stroke Diabetes Sexually transmitted
diseases
Nicotine addiction Alcoholism Drug addiction Obesity Depression Suicide Injuries Unintentional
pregnancy
Source: Felitti, Vincent J., “The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences to Adult Health: Turning gold into lead;” CDC Media Relations, May 14, 1998, “Adult Health Problems Linked to Traumatic Childhood Experiences.”
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and Oklahoma, 2008
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
12.1%
43.9%
8%
23.2%
7%
1.8%
31.5%
17.6%
12.2%
13.7%
42.3%
5.4%
21.4%
6.9%
1.4%
34.8%
20.5%
11%
Teen mother(age 15-19)
Unmarried mother
Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)
Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)
Premature(<37 weeks gest.)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Percent of Births
Tulsa Co.
Oklahoma
Tulsa County births: 9,530 Oklahoma births: 54,753
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2007
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
75
12 13
1821
16 16
24
31
2325
18
38
2023
3134
29
4245
47 48
3835
27
51
40
32
39
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT
In Tulsa County in FY 2009, there were 3,933 reports of child abuse and/or neglect accepted for investigation or assessment. 6,583 children were involved in these reports (duplicated count).
1,248 children were confirmed victims of child abuse and/or neglect. 89 were abused, 992 were neglected, 167 were victims of both abuse and neglect.
Eight of every 1,000 children in Tulsa County are victims of abuse and/or neglect. In Oklahoma, the rate is 10 of every 1,000 children.
Oklahoma ranks #35 in the nation in the rate of children who are victims of abuse and/or neglect.
Parents make up 73.7% of all perpetrators, followed by “no relation” at 6.9%, step-parents at 5.9%, and grandparents at 3.5%.
Substance abuse is a major contributing factor to child neglect.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, FY 2009
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
Under 11,492 (17.3%)
1-21,480 (17.2%)
3-62,351 (27.3%)
7-111,883 (21.9%)
12 & older1,399 (16.3%)
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program
By School District, Tulsa County, 2010-2011 School Year
Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2009-2010.
52.8%
78.2%
64.5%
50.1%
51.4%
50.7%
51.6%
40.1%
43.1%
31.5%
31%
29.9%
24.7%
26.3%
20.5%
8.2%
8.3%
7%
17.2%
13.6%
12.1%
9.7%
12.3%
8.6%
12%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
5.4%
4.2%
Tulsa County Total
Tulsa
Sperry
Keystone
Sand Springs
Liberty
Union
Glenpool
Skiatook
Collinsville
Broken Arrow
Berryhill
Owasso
Jenks
Bixby
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of Students Eligible
Free
Reduced
Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $24,089 for a family of three.
Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $34,281 for a family of three.
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.
47.8%
22%
9.9%
22.2%
26.5%
17.5%
30.6%
40.5%
18.7%
7.1%
18.4%
28.6%
12.3%
25.8%
43.1%
15.9%
5.5%
19.1%
23.2%
13.3%
26.8%
39%
17.2%
4.8%
16.8%
22.6%
11%
23.1%
44.7%
19.7%
4.4%
22.3%
20%
10.5%
29.1%
Alcohol
Marijuana
Methamphetamine
Offered/sold/givenillegal drugs at school
Smoked cigarettesduring past month
Drove after drinkingalcohol in past month
Rode with drinkingdriver in past month
0% 20%40%60%80%100%
2003 Oklahoma
2005 Oklahoma
2007 Oklahoma
2009 Oklahoma
2007 US
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007
Used once or more during past 30 days...
Ever used...
Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.
50%
5.8%
64.3%
17.7%
7%
14.2%
49.3%
6.5%
61.7%
16.4%
7.9%
15.9%
38.2%
50.9%
5.8%
59.6%
16.7%
5.9%
15.2%
49.6%
51.1%
4.7%
56.7%
22.7%
7%
16.4%
47.4%
47.8%
7.1%
61.5%
16%
6.9%
15.8%
34.7%
Ever hadsexual intercourse
Had sex before age 13
Used condom last time
Used birth controlpills last time
Attempted suicidein past year
Overweight(according to BMI)
Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2003 Oklahoma
2005 Oklahoma
2007 Oklahoma
2009 Oklahoma
2007 US
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007
Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.
na
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health StatusOklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2009
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Pe
rce
nt a
du
lt s r
ep
ort
ing
f air
or
po
or
he
alt h
0
10
20
30
40
50
Sta
te ra
nk
Oklahoma Rank US
Oklahoma 13.1% 14% 13.4% 12.6% 17.4% 15.3% 19.6% 17.7% 17.8% 19.7% 18.7% 20.2% 19.2% 18.7%
Rank 26 32 28 25 42 34 45 41 41 44 42 46 43 42
US 12.9% 12.9% 12.8% 12.6% 13% 13.9% 14% 14.7% 14.7% 14.9% 14.8% 14.7% 14.9% 14.4%
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prevalence of ObesityOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2009
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Pe
rce
nt o
f po
pu
l ati o
n e
stim
at e
d t o
be
ob
ese
0
10
20
30
40
50
Sta
te ra
nk
Oklahoma Rank US
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prevalence of SmokingOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2009
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Pe
rce
nt o
f po
pu
l ati o
n o
ver
18
t ha
t sm
oke
re
gu
lar l
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sta
te ra
nk
Oklahoma Rank US
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2007-2008
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation.
1,714,100 (48.5%)
156,600 (4.4%)
505,000 (14.3%)
590,500 (16.7%)
564,700 (16.0%)
456,300 (47.0%)
38,900 (4.0%)
337,000 (34.7%)
38,600 (4.0%)101,000 (10.4%)
1,255,500 (60.6%)
114,800 (5.5%)
146,300 (7.1%)
96,800 (4.7%)
457,500 (22.1%)
2,300 (0.5%)2,900 (0.6%)21,700 (4.4%)
455,100 (93.2%)
6,200 (1.3%)
Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare/Other Public Uninsured
Total Population Under Age 19
Age 19-64 Age 65 & over
Ch
ild In
dic
ato
rs
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2010 (part 1)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
#48
#10
#46
#23
#40
#44
#28
#31
#24
Personal Behaviors
Prevalence of smoking
Prevalence of Binge Drinking
Prevalence of obesity
Community & Environment
High school graduation
Violent crime
Occupational fatalities
Infectious disease
Children in poverty
Air pollution
#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50
1990 2010
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
HE
AL
TH
I
ND
IC
AT
OR
S
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2010 (part 2)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
#35
#14
#18
#47
#49
#46
#45
Public & Health Policies
Lack of health insurance
Public health funding (per capita)
Immunization coverage
Clinical Care
Early prenatal care
Primary Care Physicians
Preventable Hospitalizations
All Determinants
#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50
1990 2010
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
HE
AL
TH
I
ND
IC
AT
OR
S
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2010According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
#48
#46
#21
#44
#48
#40
#46
#46
Poor mental health days
Poor physical health days
Geographic disparity
Infant mortality
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
All Health Outcomes
#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50
1990 2010
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Oklahoma’s overall health ranking for 2010 is # 46
HE
AL
TH
I
ND
IC
AT
OR
S
…IN SUMMARY
STATE OF HUNGER TULSA COUNTY
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater TulsaOctober 2011
…is available on our website:www.csctulsa.org