collecting and monitoring quality data

55
Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data Hillary Turner, MPH Kobra Eghtedary, PhD MDCH/WIC

Upload: others

Post on 16-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Collecting and

Monitoring Quality Data

Hillary Turner, MPHKobra Eghtedary, PhD

MDCH/WIC

Page 2: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Summary of Presentation

• Breastfeeding and Michigan WIC

• MI-WIC Breastfeeding Data Collection

• Data Quality

• Michigan WIC Data

• MI-WIC Reports

• MI-WIC and Data Quality Success

Page 3: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

MissionTo Improve:

– Maternal Health• Pre and post-natal care• Behavioral health• Maternal weight

– Pregnancy Outcomes• Birthweight• Gestational age

– Infant Health• Breastfeeding• Iron status

– Young Children• Growth pattern• Iron status

Page 4: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

The Best Beginning!

Breastfeeding

Page 5: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Benefits of BreastfeedingBabyBaby

• Protects baby from illness

• Helps brain development

• Lowers the risk of asthma

• Decreases chances of allergies

• Lessens the risk of developing juvenile diabetes

• Reduces the risk of: – SIDS– Type II Diabetes

MotherMother• Bonding• Reduces the risk of:

- Breast Cancer- Ovarian Cancer- Diabetes

AHRQ 2007

Page 6: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

WIC Provides

• Supplemental Nutritious Food

• Nutrition Education

• Breastfeeding Counseling & Support

Page 7: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

WIC Provides

Referrals to health care and social-service providers:– Prenatal care– Lactation Consultant– Lactation Peer Counselors– La Leche League– Breast Pump Rental Locations

Page 8: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

WIC Population, 2009

69,465

260,806

330,271

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

Mothers Infants & Children Total

Over 8.9 million infants and

children &

Over 1.3 million

mothers served

nationally(CDC 2009)

Michigan ranked 8th

(FY 2007)

Page 9: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Nutrition Surveillance Systems

• CDC Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System (PNSS)– Pre & post natal care, Maternal

Weight, Gestational Age, Behavior

• CDC Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System (PedNSS)– Breastfeeding, Growth, Iron status

Page 10: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Data Collection

• Now (required)

– Is this child currently breastfed?

• Initiation (required)

– Was this baby ever breastfed or fed breast milk?

• Duration– How old was this child when he/she completely stopped

breastfeeding or being fed breast milk? *Reason?

• Exclusivity/Formula Use– How old was this child when he/she was first fed something

other than breast milk? (months, weeks, days) *Type of Food

Page 11: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Initiation

Duration

Exclusivity

Page 12: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Definitions• Data Quality:

– Validity of the data and identifies questionable data items (completeness, accuracy, consistency)

• Completeness:– No missing data

• Accuracy:– Correctly reflects what it is describing

• Consistency:– Agreement between data items

Page 13: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

MI-WIC Data Quality Checks

• Below & Above Acceptable Range• Biologically Implausible Values (BIVs)• Unknown values

– Missing data (blue, required items)

• Cross-Check Errors– Data inconsistencies

Page 14: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Cross-check Error

(example)

Page 15: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Data Use Depends on Data Quality

Page 16: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Benefits of High Data Quality• Population specific information

– Assess needs of clients– Highlight critical periods for intervention– Compare to other LA

• Unique vs. shared data

• Community partnerships• Increased client satisfaction• Accuracy in Reporting

Page 17: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Challenges with Data Quality

• Missing values• Low Data Quality

May reflect:• Data processing problems• Measurement errors• Recording errors

• Inaccuracy in reports

MI-WIC System Checks

•Implausible values

•Inconsistencies

•Missing Values

The Quest for Quality!

Page 18: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

The Solution• Training on MI-WIC fields

• Training on Data Quality

• Utilize Data Quality Reports for Local Agencies (coming soon)

Page 19: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Data Use Depends on Data Quality

Starts with YOU!

Page 20: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

IndicatorsIndicators 2000 2009 Change

First Trimester Entry into the WIC Program 31.0 32.5

Birthweight: • LBW <2500 gHBW >4000 g

7.19.0

9.46.8

Breastfeeding: • Initiation• 6 Months Duration

46.912.4

53.518.5

Prenatal Weight Gain: • <Ideal• >Ideal

34.039.1

21.849.4

Body weight: • 85th -<95th %, ≥2yrs• ≥95th %, ≥2yrs

15.512.0

16.613.7

Iron Status, Low Hg/Hct, <5 years 14.6 15.0Short Stature, <5 years 7.5 5.6

Prenatal Smoking-Last Trimester 26.9 19.3First trimester Prenatal Care 71.9 86.8

Pre-pregnancy: • Overweight/Obese• Underweight

42.113.5

54.24.2

Michigan WIC Top Ten ListMichigan WIC Top Ten List

Page 21: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

2009 Participant Profile: Women

• 57.5% White• 27.4% Black• 10.6% Hispanic• 73.7% between 18-29 years• 72.2% at least high school

educated• 76.9% live at or below 150%

poverty line• 73.9% Medicaid

Page 22: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

2009 Participant Profile: Infants & Children

• 51.9% White• 25.5% Black• 14.4% Hispanic• 32.8% less than 12 months old• 53.5% Initiated Breastfeeding• 81.6% watched less than 2

hours/day of television

Page 23: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Initiation

50.9

58.5

51.2

60.1

51.8

59.8

52.5

61.7

53.5

61.7

01020304050607080

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Michigan National

Michigan WIC 5 Year Goal

(2008-2012) 65%

Page 24: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfed to at least 6 months

15.5

24.3

15.8

25.2

15.3

25.4

15.8

26.6

18.5

27

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Michigan National

Michigan WIC 5 Year Goal

24%

Page 25: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfed At Least 12 Months

12.2

17.7

12.9

18.1

12.4

17.5

12

18.7

7.8

18.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Michigan National

Page 26: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Initiation Trends by Race

20

40

60

80

100

White 55.2 55.1 56.4 57.7 59.2Black 37.7 38 37.8 39.2 39Hispanic 65.1 62.9 61.9 60.8 61All 50.9 51.2 51.8 52.5 53.5

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Page 27: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Initiation, LA 2009

82.276.1 72.7

62

53.5

42.8 4032.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

GrandTrav.

Benzie-Leelanau

Northwest National Michigan Genessee Detroit Urban L

Page 28: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Duration (Critical Periods of Interventions)

78

6557

51

21

30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2 Wks 4 Wks 6 Wks 2 Mo. 6 Mo. 11 Mo.

Point-in-time Report 3/17/2011*Of those that initiated breastfeeding

Page 29: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

MI-WIC Reports

Page 30: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Types of Breastfeeding Reports

• MI-WIC Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration Production Report

• MI-WIC Pre-Defined Report

• Breastfeeding Ad-hoc Report

Page 31: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration Production Report

Page 32: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Production Report

• Provides a point-in-time summary of breastfeeding statistics, active clients

• Count and Rate of BF Initiation for:– Infants only, Infants and Children combined, Infants of

prenatal WIC Moms

• Count and Rate of BF Duration– Infants and Children

• Count and Rate of BF Exclusivity– Infants and Children– 3 and 6 month durations

Page 33: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Production Report (continued)

• Information from infants and children records• Reported durations include those currently

breastfeeding and those that initiated breastfeeding but are no longer breastfeeding

Page 34: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

How is Duration Calculated?Clients who are no longer Breastfeeding

Clients who are currently BreastfeedingReport Run Date - Date of Birth = Duration

Page 35: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data
Page 36: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data
Page 37: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

• Screen Shot of BF Production Report

Page 38: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Pre-Defined Reports

Page 39: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Pre-Defined Reports• User customized, point-in-time look at

currently active clients• Pre-defined reports look at a user defined

subset of client population• User Options:

– the type of report– organizational level of analysis (role-approved)– output characteristics

BF Initiation, Duration and Exclusivity– filtering variables

Page 40: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Pre-defined Reports (continued)

• Information from infants and children records• Reported durations include those currently

breastfeeding and those that initiated breastfeeding but are no longer breastfeeding

Page 41: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

What is the rate of breastfeeding initiation for currently active, Hispanic infants and children on Medicaid for the state?

Page 42: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data
Page 43: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data
Page 44: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Questions on Pre-Defined Reports?

MPHI Events (https://events.mphi.org)• Upcoming Events• WIC Trainings• Archived Webcasts

Session with Richard Schneider at the Michigan WIC ConferenceTuesday, April 19, 2011

(Session 204)

Page 45: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Ad-hoc Report

Page 46: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Ad-hoc Report

• Point-in-time look at current breastfeeding duration statistics by state and local agency

• Currently active clients • Count and rate for each breastfed duration

interval-Infants and children

• Includes those currently breastfed and those that initiated breastfeeding but are no longer breastfeeding

Page 47: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Breastfeeding Ad-hoc Report (continued)

• Shows drop-off of clients at each breastfed time interval

• Highlights critical points of intervention for clients

• Best used for breastfeeding planning• Will be available twice a year• Available upon request for monitoring special

projects

Page 48: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Generated 3/17/11

Page 49: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

BF DURATION SUMMARY

03/17/11

LA #

No. of INFANTS INITIATE

D BF

TWO WEEKS FOUR WEEKS SIX WEEKS TWO

MONTHSSIX

MONTHSELEVEN MONTHS

# #Duratio

n #Durati

on #Durati

on #Durati

on #Durati

on #Durat

ion

STATE 0 34,198 26,801 78.37% 22,232 65.01% 19,454 56.89% 17,407 50.90% 7,175 20.98% 993 2.90%

Page 50: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

MI-WIC and

Data Quality Success

Page 51: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Verify mother and child’s category

Page 52: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Update Me

Accuracy

Every time a client is seen

Page 53: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Summary• Enter correct birth date• When known, add mother’s client ID to child’s

record• Verify mother and child’s client category• Update BF information every time you see a

child (accurately)• Utilize BF Reports to monitor your program

– BF Initiation and Duration Production Report– Pre-defined Report

• Frequency Tables • BF Initiation, Exclusivity, Duration

– BF Ad-hoc report when necessary (planning)• Published Reports (available soon)

Page 54: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

The Possibilities• Michigan WIC Five-Year-Plan (2012)

– Initiation to 65%– 6 Months to 24%

Healthy People 2020 Goals• Increase BF:

– Initiation to 81.9%– 6 Months to 60.9%– 12 Months to 34.1%

March 2011

Breastfeeding Initiation: 57%

Breastfed to 6 months: 21%

Page 55: Collecting and Monitoring Quality Data

Data Quality Depends on YOU!

Thank You

Hillary [email protected]

Kobra [email protected]