cnie: toward quality in k-12 dl practice
DESCRIPTION
Presentation April 28, 2008 at the CNIE 2008 Banff ConferenceTRANSCRIPT
Toward Quality in DL PracticeToward Quality in DL Practice
What is it?What is it?
How do we know it?How do we know it?
Randy LaBonteRandy LaBonte
DL ConsultantDL Consultant
Ministry of EducationMinistry of Education
604-983-0636604-983-0636
[email protected]@shaw.ca
What is distributed learning?
• In policy: “A method of instruction that relies primarily on indirect communication between students and teachers, including internet or other electronic-based delivery, teleconferencing, or correspondence.”
• DL is a method of instruction that takes place when a student is primarily at a distance from the teacher, whether at home or connecting from another facility
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 2
The Vision for DLThe Vision for DL
Distributed learning in BC will be a quality, dynamic and engaging learning environment that all students in the province can access.
It will not be limited by schedules, calendars, facilities or locations.
DL will provide equitable access to education, specifically providing choice for students who have restricted options.
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 3
DL is GrowingDL is Growing
• In the US by 25 percent each year• In BC DL student enrolment headcount 5000
in 2003 – project 50,000 in 2008• Most growth is in the cross-enrolled students
in grades 10-12• Most DL schools hiring new teachers and
coping with staff turnover• Changes & growth have led to confusion
4DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
Recognizing Quality in DL PracticeRecognizing Quality in DL Practice
While quality is difficult to define, its importance is universally appreciated (Garvin 1988).
Quality's economical importance comes from its perceived ability to lower costs, improve employee commitment, and ensure continuous improvement within a dynamic environment (Dawson&Palmer 1995).
Its pedagogical meaning focuses at enhancing the process of learning and the interaction between the learner and the learning environment.
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 5
Defining QualityDefining Quality
Quality: “the non-inferiority, superiority, or usefulness of something” – the perception of the degree to which a product or service meets the customer's expectations. Quality has no specific meaning unless related to a specific function and/or object. Quality is a perceptual, conditional and somewhat subjective attribute.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality
"Measures of learning--and of quality--are elusive and often controversial ..."
Oblinger, Barone, Hawkins, 2001, p. 19
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 6
Garrison & Anderson (2003)
• “Like bandwidth, content per se will have little direct value in the near future… [as] there will be virtually unlimited bandwidth and unlimited content storage at very little cost”. Institutions need to focus on “adding value to the context or interactive side of the educational equation, creating quality-learning experiences that are engaging, relevant, and responsive.” (p.116)
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 7
Principles of LearningPrinciples of Learning
Three principles of learning guide educational practice in British Columbia:
1. Learning requires the active participation of the student.
2. Students learn in a variety of ways and at different rates.
3. Learning is both an individual and a social process.
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 8
How People Learn How People Learn (National Research Council)
• Schools must be learner centred– Students come to the classroom with preconceptions about how the
world works. If their initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for purposes of a test but revert to their preconceptions outside the classroom.
– To develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: (a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, (b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application.
– A "metacognitive" approach to instruction can help students learn to take control of their own learning by defining learning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them.
9DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
BC Premiers’ Technology CouncilBC Premiers’ Technology Council
• That the Ministry develop Key Performance Indicators to measure the success of programs that encompass learning technology and use those KPI to ensure quality. (Recommendation 10.2)
10DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
DL policies and agreementDL policies and agreement
• Focus on quality – DL Standards articulate quality learning in a DL environment
• Focus on engagement – no funding without active learning
• Focus on achievement – continuous enrolment and Ministry data collections
• Focus on transparency – clear flow of Ministry funding with no money directly paid to parents
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 11
StandardsStandards
Purposes:
Improve quality
Provide a framework for accountability and continuous improvement
Guide development and evaluation of instructional practice
Describe baseline for content and resources
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 12
13DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
14DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
JK Rice (2003)JK Rice (2003)
• Analysis of 400,000 students in 3000 schools found the most important predictor of quality was the teacher
• Teacher effect on student achievement was both additive and cumulative
15DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
DL Schools in BCDL Schools in BC
16DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
DL School Programs – 3 typesDL School Programs – 3 types
• Home-based (K-7)
• Online school-based (10-12 x-enrolled)
• Blended (F2F, online, home)
17DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
A Continuum for DLA Continuum for DL
Geography
Size
Site attendanceRequired
Provincial
Small Large
Local
Optional
Primarily local Primarily at a distanceInstruction
Blended Community-centric
Home-Based Learner-centric
Virtual Provincial -centric
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 18
How are we doing?How are we doing?
19DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
No Significant Difference?No Significant Difference?
• Shepherd (2001) review of 300 studies on education medium – ‘no significant difference’ http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/
• "... when compared, face to face education with Internet Based Distance Education, there is a significant difference in favor of the Internet Based Distance education." – Significant Difference - Better Results with Technology
– 2006 - Sahin, C. S. Overcoming the "No Significant Difference" Phenomenon in Distance Education by Internet Andolu University, Turkey http://aof.edu.tr/iodl2006
20DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
DL Quality ReviewDL Quality Review
1. Foster improved quality in distributed learning practice
2. Support implementation of Ministry legislation, policy and DL Agreement requirements
3. Assist in establishing and confirming sound practice in all DL schools
While audits guide compliance in funding and reporting, the quality review is intended to guide improved student achievement, choice and satisfaction while meeting DL standards
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 22
Data-driven Process Analyzing
Student Success – based on: DL achievement data, provincial exam data, FSA results, satisfaction surveys, district and school-level data, observations of learning
Instructional Practice – based on: DL standards, research on emerging DL instructional practice, DL staff experience and training, integration and use of educational technologies, strategies for supporting learner engagement, DL materials used
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 23
DL Quality Review ProcessDL Quality Review Process1. Internal review by DL educators
Rubrics including DL standards, data sets, support planning processes Collection and monitoring of above data to shape DL practice
2. External Review Team
Initial meeting(s) with school staff and district staff Observation/discussion with instructional, support and admin staff Discussion of observations – external team and district/school staff
3. Post site review meeting
Observations and data analysis, areas of strength /improvement
4. Publication of external review formal report
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 24
What did we find in the pilots?What did we find in the pilots?
25DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
Quality Review PilotsQuality Review Pilots
• 10 sites (SD8/22/23/34/35/37/41/59/60/63)• DL viewed differently by districts (special
program, alternate school, home schooling, continuing education) – not a ‘cash cow’
• Innovation with educational technologies was found in the DL school and/or in the district
• Some still using old methodologies from correspondence school days
• Focus was on completion and satisfaction
26DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
Interesting practices...Interesting practices...
• Use of synchronous tools and events• Development of online presence• Creation of cohort groups• Blending learning (F2F with online)• Project-based work• Portfolio assessment strategies• Enhanced use of video• Student-led and controlled technologies
27DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008
Finalizing the Process
• Publication of best and emerging practices• Working group established to debrief qualtiy
review process/results• Input sought to published documents• June publication of Quality Review Process • Implementation September 2008
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 28
LinksLinks
BC Ministry of Education Distributed Learning http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/dist_learning/
BC Distributed Learning Agreement http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/dist_learning/documents/dist_learn_agmt.pdf
BC Distributed Learning Standards http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/dist_learning/documents/dl_standards.pdf
LearnNow BC http://www.learnnowbc.gov.bc.ca
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 29
Toward Quality in DLToward Quality in DL
DL ConsultantDL Consultant
Ministry of EducationMinistry of Education
Randy LaBonteRandy LaBonte
Direct: 604-983-0636Direct: 604-983-0636
[email protected]@shaw.ca
DL Quality Overview ~ Randy LaBonteApril 2008 30