clinically enhanced risk: a payer-provider partnership · rowena bergmans l vice president,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Clinically Enhanced Risk: A Payer-Provider Partnership
Session 174, February 22, 2017
Rowena Bergmans, VP of Clinical Integration and Population Health,
Western Connecticut Health Network
2
Speaker Introduction
Rowena Bergmans
VP of Clinical Integration and
Population Health
Western Connecticut Health Network
3
Conflict of Interest
Rowena Bergmans
Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
4
Agenda
• Plan-Provider Partnerships Can Support Fee for Value Success
• Risk Adjusted Reimbursement
• A New Approach to Identifying Risk in a Patient Population
• Pilot Program with Health Plan: A Detailed View
• Recommendations: Ultimately, It’s About the Patient
5
Learning Objectives
• Apply lessons learned from this strong, data-focused payer-provider
collaboration to improve the health of a defined population.
• Define the five key types of data capture gaps that can impact risk adjustment
• Choose an appropriate intervention approach to close different types of prospective data capture gaps at the point of care
• Formulate a plan to close retrospective data capture gaps that directly impact risk-adjusted premiums for a prior plan year
6
An Introduction of How Benefits Were Realized for the Value of Health IT
Care teams see open risk, tied
to provider appointments
Risk can be assessed and
documented at the next point of
care opportunity.
Unlike claims-only reporting, this
is actionable by the practices in
a timely manner.
Integration of 3 EHR data
sources and 1 claims source -
with integration expanding to
include 8+ EHR platforms and
8+ claims feeds.
Management of patients with
complex or chronic conditions
System-wide view of patient
conditions and risk enables
appropriate planning and
deployment of care management
and other services
7
Plan-Provider CollaborationWhy working with a health plan made strategic sense for Western Connecticut Health Network
8
Western Connecticut Health Network
WCHN has made a commitment to value based care:
500,000+ lives In service area
100,000+ lives Managed under risk
Market threats:
taxes and competition!
9
WCHN and Health Plan
+ = SHARED
GOALS
Large community
hospital system,
with strong,
engaged network
Health plan with
resources to
support investment,
and claims data
Improved patient care
and more accurate
risk-adjusted
reimbursement
10
Why a Plan-Provider Partnership?
Transformed care delivery and ongoing care management
SHARED
CHALLENGES
• Moving from fee-
for-service to fee-
for-value is difficult
for both payers
and providers
• Requires upfront
investment for
success
SHARED
OPPORTUNITIES
• Health systems
that partner with
plans can create
shared
opportunities
• Improve patient
care while also
improving financial
performance
Comprehensive
data about patient
population
Appropriate network
development and
physician incentives
11
Priority: Improving Patient Care
RISK MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT
Investing in accurate
capture of patient risk
ensured funding that could
be directed to needed but
non-reimbursable
resources
DATA FOUNDATION
INVESTMENT
Data offers tremendous
clinical value beyond risk-
adjusted reimbursement,
and has changed how we
deliver care
COMMUNITY
HEALTH WORKERS
WORKFLOW
AND SERVICE
REDESIGN
CLINICS FOR
CHF, COPD
BH REFERRALS
12
Risk-Adjusted ReimbursementMedicare Advantage contracts reimburse providers based on documented patient risk
13
Risk-Adjusted CompensationWHCN takes on risk for Medicare Advantage, Commercial, and ACO populations, where payment
is adjusted based on patient risk scores – and is dependent on the quality of documentation.
MEDICARE
ADVANTAGE
• Risk-adjusted
premiums (HCC)
• Traditionally, plans
submit data from
claims to CMS
ACO (MSSP)
• Risk determined every
3 years or at renewal
• Adjustment down –
but not up – within
period
COMMERCIAL
• Private algorithms, but
similar documentation
requirements
• Full risk = critical to
understand
population’s health
14
From Data to a Risk Score
Image used courtesy of Arcadia Healthcare Solutions
15
Resolving Information Lost Along the Way
Claims data is often incomplete due to information loss – impacting
documentation collection and risk-based intervention efforts.
Retrospective Resolution
Required care often provided and
documented – but not submitted.
Data alone can improve risk
adjustment accuracy, without
burdening the provider.
Prospective Resolution
Historical information can suggest a
diagnosis that was not captured.
• Example: Antipsychotic Rx, but no
diagnosis of a psychiatric condition
Care teams can be engaged to
address (and document) risk.
16
A New Approach to Managing Risk
17
A New Approach to Managing RiskWCHN and the health plan adopted a four-part plan to improve risk documentation and patient care for Medicare Advantage members:
POINT OF CARE
WORKFLOWS
Integrate clinically
enhanced risk
information into
workflows at the
point of care
PROSPECTIVE
IMPROVEMENT
Identify current year
(prospective)
opportunities to
improve risk
documentation and
care
RETROSPECTIVE
RESUBMISSION
Identify retroactive
resubmission
opportunities
(improving accuracy
of prior year
premiums)
USE EHR AND
CLAIMS DATA
Supplement claims
data with robust EHR
data
1 2 3 4
18
Data Foundation
• Identification of
documentation gaps
• Identification of missing
clinical evidence
• Not just a point solution
for Medicare Advantage,
but a platform for all
initiatives
HEALTH PLAN
CLAIMSEHR #1 EHR #2 EHR #3
RETROACTIVE
RESUBMISSION
RAPS
Analytics
Data Warehouse
Data Extraction
Image used courtesy of Arcadia Healthcare Solutions
MEMBER #MEBXXXXRFemale 65-69 years old
Treated by Karen Tarbell in
August and December 2015.
Assessed with diabetes (250;
HCC 19), morbid obesity
(278.01; HCC 22), and CHF
(416.8; HCC 85) in signed
encounter. Also has history of
vascular disease (HCC 108).
Potential recovery of
assessments in PY16 through
confirmation with provider.
Est’d Value: $1,127 per month
MEMBER #MEBXXXXNFemale 70-74 years old
Prescriptions from Danbury
Primary Care and Med Assoc of
Danbury
Ongoing prescription for
Ropinirole (NDC 00054011625),
principally used to treat
Parkinson’s and Huntington’s
Diseases (HCC 78). Also has
outstanding Problem List entry
of vascular disease (HCC 108).
Est’d Value: $838 per month
MEMBER #MEBXXXXSMale 65-69 years old
Currently treated for
uncomplicated diabetes and
heart arrhythmias
Problem list and historical
claims indicate cancers (C73;
HCC 12), hematological
disorder (D69.6; HCC 48), and
complex diabetes (250.7; HCC
18).
Est’d value: $555 per month
Example (De-Identified) Opportunities
21
Retrospective Resubmission• CMS allows retrospective submission as much as 13 months after the end of the
service year for Medicare Advantage.
• EHR data can be used for resubmission with no provider effort when there are:
– Signed progress notes for face-to-face visit
– Assessments on encounters where diagnosis is present in face-to-face visit, but there is no signed note.
• EHR data can be used for highly targeted chart reviews when:
– Inactive prescription claims, medications on medication list typically associated with a disease, or diagnoses marked as active on problem list.
22
Prospective Opportunity Identification• Plans, providers, and patients benefit from early intervention and documentation –
but this is hard for a plan to do alone.
• EHR data can be used to support targeted reviews at the point of care when a patient has:
– Inactive prescription claims
– Medications on EHR medication list that indicate a diagnosis
– Diagnoses marked as active in EHR problem list
– Diagnoses present on a prior year claim with no E&M code
– Historical claim with no prior year entry
23
Point of Care SupportActing on current year or prospective opportunities requires tools that present the information at the point of care – and ongoing leadership and coaching.
To avoid
burdening
physicians…
WCHN used
medical
assistants.
• MAs use registries to
identify gaps
• Standing orders for MAs to
close routine gaps
• For non-routine items, MAs
put notes in the EHR
24
Challenges: Technical
Data Source Availability
Some members had data in EHRs that were not yet integrated into WCHN’s data asset
These members could not be analyzed
Time Constraints
WCHN and the health plan were under contracting-related time constraints, and had to move forward before all data elements were available
Results are likely understated
Avoiding False Positives
Not all gaps are actionable – for example, diagnoses stemming from pathology or radiology test offer too many false positives
Invest effort appropriately
25
Challenge: Operational• Driving improvement at the point of care is a challenge – traditional lists
generated by health plans are often rejected by practices
• WCHN approach:
– Suggestive analytics at the point of care
– Integrated data platform supports care teams
• Automated patient outreach
• Reminders about care gaps and upcoming appointments
• Workflows and analytics for care managers
26
Pilot: Population analyzedThe health plan provided details on 1587 MA members that were attributed to WCHN in 2015. WCHN
matched these to available clinical records and analyzed the performance of the health plan’s finalized
RAPS submission against the 1331 MA members with matching clinical data at WCHN.
RAPS and Historical Claims
data supplied for the 1587
MA members the health
plan attributes to WCHN.
WCHN has providers on 10+ different
EHRs. At the time, the data foundation
included the 3 EHRs that have the
most coverage of WCHN’s provider
network.
These 3 EHRs contain demographic
and/or clinical data on 1331 of those
MA members. It is expected that the
other 256 MA members are spread
across the other EHRs.
1587 MA LIVES 3 OF 10 EHRS 1331 MA LIVES
EHR #1
EHR #2
EHR #3
27
Opportunities Identified
12.3%
Premium
$687.91pmpm
$7.28pmpm
$77.65pmpm
$772.86pmpm+ + =
Finalized Premium from
RAPS & Demographic
Premium Adjustment from
Retrospective
Opportunities
Premium Adjustment from
Prospective
Opportunities
Total Premium
Opportunity
28
Recommendation: Data Foundation
• New approach to risk requires a data asset aggregating EHR and claims data
• Investment can be shared across a network or with a health plan
– Plans get straight-line ROI
– Providers get clinical value beyond risk documentation
29
Recommendation: Timing
• Factors to consider when planning a clinically enhanced risk project:
– Build in time for data quality
– Consider window of opportunity for retrospective resubmission to CMS
– ACO can only adjust risk every application period
30
Recommendation: Technology + Leadership
Two kinds of investments are necessary from the health plan and the health system to make this kind of collaboration work:
LEADERSHIP
• Ensure care teams incorporate risk
review into their workflow over the
course of the plan year
• In-practice training for front line
clinicians and pre-visit planning
TECHNOLOGY
• Identify prospective opportunities to
review risk and document at point of
care.
• Activation, engagement, and
management of high risk patients
managing complex conditions
31
Ultimately, It’s About the Patient
This plan-provider collaboration enabled WCHN to:
Accurately pinpoint patient need
Target resources appropriately
Measure intervention effectiveness
Support non-reimbursable services
32
A Summary of How Benefits Were Realized for the Value of Health IT
Care teams see open risk, tied
to provider appointments
Risk can be assessed and
documented at the next point of
care opportunity.
Unlike claims-only reporting, this
is actionable by the practices in
a timely manner.
Integration of 3 EHR data
sources and 1 claims source -
with integration expanding to
include 8+ EHR platforms and
8+ claims feeds.
Management of patients with
complex or chronic conditions
System-wide view of patient
conditions and risk enables
appropriate planning and
deployment of care management
and other services
33
Questions
Rowena Bergmans l Vice President, Clinical Integration and Population Health