click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 pearson education government actions in markets 7...

39
Click on the button to go to the problem

Upload: davon-walley

Post on 29-Mar-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Click on the button to go to the problem

Page 2: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

© 2011 Pearson Education

Government Actions in Markets

7CHECKPOINTS

Page 3: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Click on the button to go to the problem

Problem 1Problem 1

Problem 2Problem 2

Problem 3Problem 3 Clickerversion

Clickerversion

Problem 1Problem 1

Problem 2Problem 2 Problem 2Problem 2

Problem 1Problem 1

Clickerversion

ClickerversionProblem 3Problem 3

Checkpoint 7.1 Checkpoint 7.2 Checkpoint 7.3

Clickerversion

Clickerversion Problem 3Problem 3

Problem 1Problem 1

Problem 4Problem 4 Problem 4Problem 4 Problem 4Problem 4

Page 4: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 1The figure shows the rental market for apartments in Corsicana, Texas.

What is the rent in this city and how many apartments are rented?

If the city government imposes a rent ceiling of $900 a month, what is the rent, and how many apartments are rented?

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 5: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionA rent ceiling of $900 a month is above the equilibrium rent,

so the outcome is the market equilibrium rent of $800 a month with 3,000 apartments rented.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 6: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 2The figure shows the rental market for apartments in Corsicana, Texas.

If the city government imposes a rent ceiling of $600 a month, what is the rent, and how many apartments are rented?

If a black market develops, how high could the black market rent be? Explain your answer.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 7: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionWith the rent ceiling at $600 a month, the number of apartments rented is 1,000 and the rent is $600 a month.

In a black market, some people are willing to rent an apartment for more than the rent ceiling.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 8: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.1

The highest rent that someone would offer is $1200 a month.

This rent equals someone’s willingness to pay for the 1,000th apartment.

Page 9: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 3The figure shows the rental market for apartments in Corsicana, Texas.

With a strictly enforced rent ceiling of $600 a month, is the housing market efficient?

What is the deadweight loss?

Is the housing market fair? Explain why or why not.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 10: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionThe housing market is not efficient.

With 1,000 apartments rented, marginal benefit exceeds marginal cost and a deadweight loss arises.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 11: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

The deadweight loss equals the area of the gray triangle:

Deadweight loss equals ½ of (1,200 – 600) x (3,000 – 1,000).

Deadweight loss is $600,000.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 12: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

The rent ceiling makes the allocation of housing less fair in both views of fairness:

1. It blocks voluntary transactions,

2. It does not provide more housing to those in most need.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Page 13: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Study Plan Problem

With a strictly enforced rent ceiling of $600 a month, the housing market is _______.

A. efficient because a rent ceiling gives poorer people greater access to housing

B. efficient because the marginal cost of the last apartment rented is greater than its marginal benefit

C. inefficient because the marginal cost of the last apartment rented is greater than its marginal benefit

D. inefficient because the marginal benefit from the last apartment rented is greater than its marginal cost.

CHECKPOINT 7.1

The figure shows the rental market for apartments.

Page 14: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.1

Practice Problem 4

Oil price leaps to year’s highFor the first time in years, analysts forecast that proven reserves have fallen. On this news, the price of oil rose above $71 a barrel. Oil will last for years, but some analysts predict that the price could go as high as $250 a barrel.

Source: guardian.co.uk, June 10, 2009

If the government puts a price cap on gasoline at today’s average price of $2.60 a gallon, explain why a shortage will occur.

Which allocation method is mostly likely to be used to distribute gasoline?

Page 15: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.1

SolutionGasoline is made from oil, so a rise in the price of oil increases the cost of making gasoline and decreases the supply of oil.

The market price of gasoline will rise.

A price cap at $2.60 a gallon will create a shortage because the price cap is below the market equilibrium price.

Gasoline will be allocated by the first-come, first-served method unless the government rations gasoline, in which case it will be allocated by command.

Page 16: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 1The figure shows the market for tomato pickers in southern California.

What is the equilibrium wage rate and what is the equilibrium quantity of tomato pickers employed?

If California introduces a minimum wage of $4 an hour, how many tomato pickers are employed, and how many are unemployed?

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 17: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionThe equilibrium wage rate is $6 an hour, and 4,000 pickers are employed.

The minimum wage of $4 an hour is below the equilibrium wage rate, so 4,000 tomato pickers are employed and none are unemployed.

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 18: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 2The figure shows the market for tomato pickers in southern California.

If California introduces a minimum wage of $8 an hour, how many tomato pickers are employed and how many are unemployed?

What is the lowest wage that some workers might be able to earn if a black market developed?

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 19: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Solution

The minimum wage of $8 an hour is above the equilibrium wage rate:

3,000 pickers are employed (from the demand curve)

5,000 people would like to work as pickers for $8 an hour (from the supply curve),

2,000 pickers are unemployed.

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 20: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

If a black market developed, the lowest wage that some workers might be able to earn would be $4 an hour.

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 21: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 3The figure shows the market for tomato pickers in southern California.

Is the minimum wage of $8 an hour efficient?

Who gains and who loses from the minimum wage of $8 and hour?

Is the minimum wage of $8 an hour fair?

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 22: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionThe minimum wage of $8 an hour is not efficient because the marginal benefit to growers (on the demand curve) exceeds the marginal cost to pickers (on the supply curve).

The minimum wage creates a deadweight loss.

An additional loss arises as unemployed pickers search for jobs.

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 23: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

The tomato pickers who find work at $8 an hour gain.

The tomato growers and the unemployed pickers lose.

The minimum wage is unfair on both the fair rules and fair results views of fairness.

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 24: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Study Plan Problem

The figure shows the market for tomato pickers in southern California. If California introduces a minimum wage of $8.00 an hour, the minimum wage is __________.

A. inefficient and not fair

B. efficient and fair only if the workers can increase the number of hours they work

C. inefficient but fair

D. efficient and fair

E. efficient but not fair

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 25: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

The figure shows the market for tomato pickers in southern California. If California introduces a minimum wage of $8.00 an hour, ________gain and_______ lose.

A. unemployed pickers and tomato growers; employed pickers

B. unemployed pickers; tomato growers

C. tomato growers; tomato growers who find work

D. employed pickers; tomato growers and unemployed pickers

E. all pickers; tomato growers

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Page 26: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Practice Problem 4

India steps up pressure for minimum wage for its workers in the Gulf

India is pressuring the oil-rich countries in the [Persian] Gulf to pay minimum wages to the 5 million unskilled Indians working in the Gulf.

Source: International Herald Tribune, March 27, 2008

If the Persian Gulf countries paid Indian workers a minimum wage above the equilibrium wage paid to other unskilled workers, would migrant Indian workers be better off, worse off, or unaffected by the higher wage?

Page 27: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.2

Solution

The supply of immigrant workers in the gulf is perfectly elastic, with workers coming from most south asian countries.

If the wage paid to indian workers is above the equilibrium wage, the quantity of unskilled indians employed would decrease.

Most indians would be unemployed and sent back to india.

They would then compete to work in india and be worse off.

Page 28: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 1The figure shows the market for tomatoes.

What are the equilibrium price and quantity of tomatoes?

Is the market for tomatoes efficient?

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 29: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionThe equilibrium price is $6 per pound, and the equilibrium quantity is 2 billion pounds a year.

The market for tomatoes is efficient—marginal benefit equals marginal cost and total surplus is maximized.

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 30: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 2The figure shows the market for tomatoes.

The government introduces a price support for tomatoes at $8 per pound.

What is the quantity of tomatoes produced, the quantity demanded, and the subsidy received by tomato farmers?

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 31: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionAt a support price of $8 per pound, 3 billion pounds are produced and 1 billion pounds are demanded, so there is a surplus of 2 billion pounds.

The subsidy is $8 per pound on 2 billion pounds, which is $16 billion.

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 32: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Practice Problem 3The figure shows the market for tomatoes.

With the price support at $8 per pound, is the market for tomatoes efficient?

Who gains and who loses from the price support?

What is the deadweight loss? Could the price support be regarded as being fair?

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 33: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

SolutionThe market is not efficient because at the quantity produced, the marginal benefit (on the demand curve) is less than the marginal cost (on the supply curve).

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 34: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Farmers gain.

Farmers produce more and receive a higher price on what they sell in the market, and they receive the government subsidy.

Consumers/taxpayers lose. They pay more for tomatoes and pay taxes to fund the subsidy.

The deadweight loss is $2 billion (the area of the gray triangle).

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 35: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

The outcome is unfair on both views of fairness unless farmers are poorer than the consumers, in which case it might be fair to boost farmers’ incomes.

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 36: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

Study Plan Problem The figure shows the market for tomatoes. With the price support at $8 per pound, the quantity produced is ____ because _____ .

A. inefficient; marginal cost is less than marginal benefit

B. efficient; marginal cost equalsmarginal benefit

C. inefficient; marginal benefit is less than marginal cost

D. efficient; marginal benefit is less than marginal cost

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 37: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

The figure shows the market for tomatoes. The government introduces a price support for tomatoes at $8 per pound.

With the price support, _____ lose and ______ gain.

A. farmers; consumers and taxpayers

B. consumers and taxpayers; farmers and the government

C. taxpayers; farmers and consumers

D. consumers and taxpayers; farmers

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Page 38: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Practice Problem 4

French farmers man the blockades in Brussels

Farmers want the dairy industry to guarantee a minimum milk price of 300 euros a ton—against 210 euros a ton this month. Max Bottier, a dairy farmer said that he needs 300 euros a ton to break even.

Source: The Times, May 26, 2009

If a support price for milk set at 300 euros a ton, how will the support price change the quantity of milk produced, the quantity bought by consumers, and who buys the excess supply? Will the European milk market be more or less efficient than it is today?

Page 39: Click on the button to go to the problem. © 2011 Pearson Education Government Actions in Markets 7 CHECKPOINTS

CHECKPOINT 7.3

Solution

The market price today is 210 euros a ton.

A support price of 300 euros a ton will increase the quantity of milk supplied and decrease the quantity of milk demanded.

There will be a surplus of milk. To maintain the support price at 300 euros a ton, the government will have to buy the surplus of milk—that is, pay farmers a subsidy.

The market will be less efficient because it creates a deadweight loss.