civilizimi’’ amerikan nga julius evola -1945- american civilization … · 2020. 9. 14. · do...
TRANSCRIPT
1
[“Civilizimi’’ Amerikan nga Julius Evola
-1945- American "Civilization"
by Julius Evola] English|Page 12
2
ohn Dewey, i vdekur se fundmi, eshte duartrokitur nga shtypi
amerikan si figura me perfaqesuese e civilizimit amerikan. Dhe
kane te drejte. Teorite e tij jane teresisht perfaqesuese te vizionit
te njeriut dhe jetes te Amerikanizmit dhe demokracise te lidhur me
kete te fundit.
Thelbi i ketyre teorive eshte ky: aty kushdo mund te behet cfare te
doje, dhe limitet ia kushtezon vetem teknologjia dhe mjetet materiale
qe ka ne dispozicion. Analog me kete, nje person nuk eshte cka ai
eshte ne te vertete prej natyre, pas nuk ka ndonje diference te vertete
thelbesore mes njerezve, vetem diferenca ne kualifikime. Sipas kesaj
teorie, kushdo mund te behet cfare te doje, nese stervitet ne menyren
e duhur.
Keshtu ndodh me te ashtuquajturin 'self-made man'; ne nje shoqeri qe
ka humbur cdo sens tradite, nocioni i ngritjes ne ekzagjerim te vetes
dhe vlerave te vetes do te shtrihet ne cdo aspekt te ekzistenes
njerezore, duke perforcuar doktrinen egalitariane te demokracise se
paster. Nese baza per keto ide pranohet, atehere gjithe diversiteti
natyror eshte braktisur. Cdo person ka te drejten te kete potencialin e
te gjithe te tjereve dhe termat 'superior' dhe 'inferior' humbasin
kuptimin; gjithe stilet e jeteses jane te hapur ndaj te gjitheve. Gjithe
konceptimeve organike te jetes amerikanet i kundervene nje konceptim
mekanicist. Ne shoqerine amerikane nuk ka fytyra, por maska. Ne te
njejten kohe, mbeshtetesit e stilit te jeteses amerikan jane armiqesore
ndaj personalitetit.
J
3
"Mendje-haptesia" amerikane,qe shpeshhere cilesohet si nje
karakteristike e mire, eshte nje aspekt tjeter i mungeses se formes se
brendshme. E njejta gje vlen edhe per "individualizmin". Individualizmi
dhe personaliteti nuk jane e njejta gje: njeri i perket botes te paforme
te sasise, tjetri i perket botes se cilesise dhe hierarkise. Amerikanet
jane nje refuzim i gjalle i aksiomes "Mendoj, pra jam (pra ekzistoj).":
Amerikanet nuk mendojne, prapeseprape ekzistojne. 'Mendja' Amerikane
eshte femijenore dhe primitive, i mungon forma karakteristike dhe
eshte e hapur ndaj cdo lloj standardizimi.
Ne nje civilizim superior si pershembull indo-arjanet, ata pa forme
karakteristike (apo pa kaste), qe i mungon edhe kasta e sherbetorit
apo shudras, diskriminohet nga shoqeria. Nga ky kendveshtrim,
Amerika eshte nje shoqeri te diskriminuarish. Ka nje rol per te
diskriminuarin. Eshte t'i nenshtrohet qenieve format dhe ligjet e
brendshme te te cilave jane te percaktuara ne menyre definitive. Por
ne fakt, te diskrimininuarit moderne deshirojne te behen vete
dominante dhe te vene boten nen kontrollin e tyre.
Ka nje opinion qe qarkullon gjere mbi ShBA-te, qe eshte "komb i ri"
me "nje te ardhme te ndritur perpara". Defektet amerikane jane vetem
'gabimet e rinise' apo 'dhimbjet e kockave kur rritesh'. Nuk eshte e
veshtire te shikosh qe miti i 'progresit' luan nje rol te madh ne kete
gjykim. Sipas idese qe cdo gje e re eshte e mire, Amerika ka nje rol
te privilegjuar mes kombeve te civilizuara. Ne Luften e Pare, Shtetet e
Bashkuara nderhyne per te luajtur nje rol ne 'boten e civilizuar'.
4
Kombi 'me i evoluar' jo vetem qe ka te drejten, por detyren per te
nderhyre tek fatet e popujve te tjere.
Struktura e historise eshte ciklike, jo evolucionare. Civilizimet me te
reja nuk jane aspak 'superiore'. Ato mund te jene ne fakt me
dekadentet. Fazat e fundit te nje civilizimi jane cuditerisht te
ngjashme me fazat me primitive. Amerika eshte faza finale e Evropes
moderne. Guenon e quan Ameriken 'Perendimi i Larget', dhe me kete
do te thote qe Amerika perfaqeson deri ne piken e absurditetit,
aspektet me negative dhe budallaqe te Civilizimit Perendimor. Ajo cka
ne Evrope gjendet vetem ne forme te 'holluar', gjendet ne Amerike ne
forme 'te koncentruar', ku dalin simptomat e verteta te shperberjes dhe
regresit kulturor dhe njerezor. Mentaliteti amerikan mund te
interpretohet vetem si nje shembull regresi, qe e tregon veten tek
paaftesia mendore ndaj gjithe interesave me te larta dhe
pakuptueshmeria e ndjesive me te larta.
Mendja amerikane ka horizonte te limituara, e dedikuar ndaj vetem
asaj cka eshte e menjehershme dhe e thjeshte, me pasojen e
paevitueshme qe cdo gje behet banale, bazike dhe e niveluar drejt
poshtes derisa i mohohet gjithe jeta shpirterore. Jeta vete eshte
mekaniciste per Amerikanin. Kuptimi i 'Unit' ne Amerike i perket
teresisht nivelit fizik te ekzistences. Amerikani tipik nuk ka as dilema
e as komplikime shpirterore: ai eshte nje konformist dhe ndjekes i
natyrshem.
5
Mendja primitive amerikane eshte nje mendje qe ne vetem ne
siperfaqe eshte mendje e re. Mendja amerikane eshte nje karakteristike
e nje shoqerie regresive.
Moraliteti amerikan
Sex-appeali i famshem i grave amerikane ka marre reputacionin nga
filmat, revistat dhe posterat me modele; ky sex-appeal eshte per pjesen
me te madhe fabrikim. Nje studim i fundit mjekesor ne Shtetet e
Bashkuara ka treguar qe diku tek 75% e grave amerikane nuk kane
ndjenja te forta seksuale, dhe gjejne me shume kenaqesi ne
ekzibicionizmin narcizist dhe tek kulti i fitnessit dhe shendetit ne
menyre gati sterile. Vajzat amerikane nuk kane 'probleme' me gjetjen e
maredhenieve seksuale, ato jane 'te lehta' per ate burre qe e shikon
aktin seksual si vetem dicka 'per te mbaruar pune'. Pasi eshte cuar ne
kinema apo per te kercyer, eshte gati e sjellshme qe gruaja amerikane
ta lere burrin ta puthe, por per ate kjo puthje nuk do te thote asgje.
Grate amerikane jane brenda tejet te ftohta dhe materialiste. Burri qe
kryen maredhenie me nje vajze amerikane eshte praktikisht borxhli
ndaj saj ne menyren me materialiste. Fundja, gruaja i ka bere nje
nder. Ne rastet e divorcit, ligji amerikan favorizon gati gjithnje gruan.
Grate amerikane nuk kane problem te divorcohen nese nuhasin nje
pazar me te mire. Ndosh shpesh neAmerike qe nje grua eshte e
6
martuar me nje burre dhe ne koken e saj ajo eshte 'e fejuar' me
burrin e ardhshem, burrin qe do te martoje pas divorcit.
Media "jone" amerikane
Amerikanizimi i Evropes eshte i perhapur dhe i vetekuptueshem. Ne
Itali ka filluar qe ne vitet e pasluftes, dhe nese italianet nuk e presin
me entuziazem, te pakten e shohin si nje hap te natyrshem. Para disa
kohesh shkruajta dicka mbi rreziqet qe i kanosen Evropes -
Amerikanizmi dhe Komunizmi - dhe rreziku i pare eshte me tinezar.
Komunizmi nuk mund te jete rrezik pervecse nese merret pushteti me
dhune nga komunistet. Nga ana tjeter, Amerikanizimi fiton terren
nepermjet nje inflitrimi te ngadalte, duke futur ne mendjet tona
mentalitete dhe zakone qe ne vetvete jane te pafajshem, por jane nje
perversion themelor dhe degradim kunder asaj qe nuk mund ta luftosh
asgjekundi pervecse brenda vetes.
Dhe ne lidhje me kete lufte, shumica e italianeve duken te dobet.
Harrojne trashegimine e tyre kulturore dhe kthehen me gadishmeri nga
Amerika, sikur te ishte prind qe te meson per jeten. Kushdo qe
deshiron te jete modern duhet ta mase veten sipas standardid
amerikan. Eshte per gjynah qe nje shtet Evropian e ul veten kaq
shume. Adhurimi per Ameriken nuk ka te beje fare me nje interes
kulturor ne nje popull tjeter. Ne te kundert, servilizmi ndaj Amerikes te
con ne perfundimin qe asnje jete tjeter nuk vlen te jetohet pervec asaj
amerikanes.
7
Mediat radiofonike jane te amerikanizuara. Pa asnje lloj kriteri ndaj
cfare eshte superiore e cfare inferiore, thjesht ndjek ate cka eshte
moda e momentit dhe se cfare tregu ka quajtur 'te pranueshme' - e
pranueshme, pra, per sektoret me te amerikanizuar te publikut, pra me
te degjeneruarit. Pjesa tjeter e jona terhiqet zvarre ne kete cmenduri.
Edhe stili i prezantimit ne radio eshte amerikanizuar. "Kush, pasi ka
degjuar programet radiofonike amerikane, nuk dridhet kur mendon se e
vetjma menyre per te shpetuar nga komunizmi eshte te vete-
amerikanizohesh?" Keto nuk jane fjalet e nje njeriu te rendomte, por
ato te sociologut Amerikan, James Burnham, profesor ne universitetin e
Princeton. Ky gjykim nga nje vete amerikan, duhet t'i beje radio-
programuesit italiane te turperohen.
Pasoja e mentalitetit demokratik 'le te beje gjithsekushi cfare te doje'
eshte intoksikimi i popullit te thjeshte i cili nuk eshte i afte per
vetvete, i cili kur nuk udhehiqet nga nje fuqi dhe nga nje ideal,
humbet shume shpejt sensin e identitetit.
Rendi industrial ne Amerike
Ne studimin e tij klasik te kapitalizmit, Werner Sombart tha qe faza e
fundit e kapitalizmit eshte faza e Fiat producto, pareat homo; pra faza
ku sistemi hyn ne formen e tij me ekstreme dhe vlera e njeriut eshte
e barabarte me efikasitetin e tij ne pune dhe vleren e mallit qe shet.
Doktrinat socialiste linden si reaksion ndaj faktit qe elementi njerezor
nuk merret fare ne konsiderate ne kete lloj sistemi.
8
Nje faze e re ka filluar ne Shtetet e Bashkuara ku ka patur nje
uzurpim interesi ne te ashtuquajturat relata te punes. Ne pamjen e
pare duket si nje permiresim: ne realitet eshte nje fenomen i demshem.
Sipermarresit dhe punonjesit kane kuptuar rendesine e faktorit njerezor
ne nje ekonomi produktive dhe kane kuptuar qe eshte gabim te
injorosh njeriun e perfshire ne industri: motivet e tij, ndenjat e tij,
jeten e perditshme etj. Pra, nje shkolle e tere studimesh mbi relatat
njerezore ka dale nga industria, bazuar tek sjelljet e njeriut. Studime
si 'Human Relations in Industry' nga B. Gardner dhe G. Moore kane
dhene nje analize te detajuar te punetoreve dhe motiveve te tyre me
qellim qe te percaktojne mjetet me te mira per te hequr qafe faktoret
qe pengojne maksimizimin e prodhimit. Disa studime ama nuk vijne
nga dyshemeja e dyqanit, por nga menaxheret, mbeshtetur nga
specialiste nga kolegje te ndryshme. Dhe sa shume studime ka patur
deri tani! Ky lloj studimi ka nje qellim praktik: mireqenia psikologjike
te punetorit eshte po aq e rendesishme sa mireqenia fizike. Halli i
vertete eshte tek punetoret qe kane nje pune monotone qe nuk kerkon
perqendrim te madh, studimet sjellin vemendje tek 'rreziku i madh' se
mendja e tij mund te mos jete teresisht e fokusuar ke puna gjithe
kohes, dhe kjo reflekton keqazi tek qendrimi i tij ndaj punes.
Nuk harrohen as jetet private te punetoreve - prandaj vihet re rritja e
te ashtuquajturave konsultime personale. Specialiste thirren qe te heqin
ankthet dhe shqetesimet psikologjike dhe 'komplekseve' te
keqpershtatjes, deri ne piken ku japin keshilla tek ceshtjet me private.
Nje teknike psiko-analitike qe perdoret ketu eshte te lejosh subjektin te
9
'flase lirisht' dhe t'i quash katarsisin e perjetuar ne kete moment si
rezultat te suksesshem.
Asgje nga te lartpermendurat nuk ka te beje me permiresimin
shpirteror te njeriut apo me problemet e verteta njerezore, ashtu si nje
Evropian do t'i kuptonte ne kete 'epoke ekonomie'. Ne anen tjeter te
Perdes se Hekurt, njeriu trajtohet si kafshe barre dhe bindja e tij
mbahet nepermjet terrorit dhe urise. Ne Shtetet e Bashkuara njeriu
shihet gjithashtu vetem si nje faktor pune dhe konsumi, dhe asnje
faktor i brendshem i tij nuk neglizhohet dhe cdo faktor i ekzistences
se tij trajtohet si faktor pune dhe konsumi. Ne 'Vendin e te Lireve', ne
te gjitha mediat, njeriut i thuhet qe ka arritur nje grade lumturie te
papare kurre me pare. Por ai harron kush eshte, nga vjen, dhe jeton
vetem per te tashmen.
Demokracia amerikane ne industri
Ka nje diskrepance te madhe - dhe ne rritje - midis parullave te
ideologjise dominuese politike dhe strukturave ekonomike te kombit.
Nje rol te madh ne studimet ndaj njeriut e luan 'morfologjia e
biznesit'. Studimet vertetojne pershtypjen qe biznesi amerikan eshte
shume i ndryshem nga ideali demokratik i propagandes se Shteteve te
Bashkuara. Biznesi amerikan ka nje strukture piramidale. Bizneset e
medha menaxhohen njesoj si ministrite e qeverise dhe organizohen ne
menyre te ngjashme. Ato kane trupa kontrolluese dhe koordinuese qe
ndajne liderat e bizneseve nga masa e punetoreve. Ne vend qe te
10
behen me fleksible ne kuptimin social, "elita" e menaxhereve behet
gjithnje e me autokratike - dicka qe duhet dhe tek politikat e jashtme
te ShBA-se.
Kjo eshte, si shume gjera te tjera, nje iluzion amerikan. Amerika:
'vendi i mundesive', ku cdo mundesi eshte aty per ate qe mund ta
kapin, nje vend ku kushdo mund te ngrihet nga rreckat tek luksi. Ne
fillim kishte nje frontiere te hapur drejt te ciles mund te udhetonte
kushdo. Ajo frontiere e hapur nuk eshte me tani, por 'limiti eshte
qielli', shprehje qe vlen per potencialin e palimituar te industrise dhe
tregetise. Por ashtu sic kane thene Gardner dhe Moore dhe shume te
tjere, edhe ketu limitet po mbyllen. Duke pare se si puna po
specializohet gjithnje e me shume, dhe rendesia gjithnje me e madhe e
'kualifikimeve' per te gjetur pune ben qe siguria e jeteses qe eshte
afermendsh per amerikanin e sotem nuk do te jete me afermendsh per
femijet e tyre. Pra, ne te ashtuquajtur demokraci e Shteteve te
Bashkuara, burimi i vertete pushtetit i ketij vendi, pra industria dhe
ekonomia po behen gjithnje me jo-demokratike.
Problemi atehere eshte: a duhet te ndryshohet realiteti ne menyre qe
t'i pershtatet ideologjise, apo e anasjellta? Deri se fundmi kerkasa ka
qene qe te behet e para; britma kerkon nje kthim tek 'Amerika e
vertete' e biznesit pa rregullime dhe individit te lire nga kontrolli i
qeverise qendrore. Sidoqofte, ka edhe ata qe deshirojne te limitohet
demokracia ne menyre qe t'i pershtasin teorine politike realitetit
komercial. Nese maska e 'demokracise' amerikane hiqet, do te behet e
11
qarte deri ne cfare mase kjo 'demokraci' eshte vetem nje instrument i
nje oligarkie qe vepron ne menyre indirekte, duke siguruar qe
mashtrimet dhe abuzimet e saj ndaj shumices te pranohen nga kjo
shumice, pasi ata e mendojne kete lloj hierarkie nje hierarki te drejte.
Kjo dileme e 'demokracise' se Shteteve te Bashkuara do te sjelle nje
dite disa zhvillime interesante.
Artikulli i Julius Evola "Civilta" Americana ("Qytetërimi" Amerikan) u botua për herë të parë në 1945 dhe u ribotua në 1983 nga Fondacioni Julius Evola në Romë.
12
(English)
he recently deceased John Dewey was applauded by the
American press as the most representative figure of American
civilisation. This is quite right. His theories are entirely
representative of the vision of man and life which is the premise of
Americanism and its 'democracy'.
The essence of such theories is this: that everyone can become what
he wants to, within the limits of the technological means at his
disposal. Equally, a person is not what he is from his true nature and
there is no real difference between people, only differences in
qualifications. According to this theory anyone can be anyone he
wants to be if he knows how to train himself.
This is obviously the case with the 'self-made man'; in a society
which has lost all sense of tradition the notion of personal
aggrandisement will extend into every aspect of human existence,
reinforcing the egalitarian doctrine of pure democracy. If the basis of
such ideas is accepted, then all natural diversity has to be abandoned.
Each person can presume to possess the potential of everyone else and
the terms 'superior' and 'inferior' lose their meaning; every notion of
distance and respect loses meaning; all life-styles are open to all. To
all organic conceptions of life Americans oppose a mechanistic
T
13
conception. In a society which has 'started from scratch', everything
has the characteristic of being fabricated. In American society
appearances are masks not faces. At the same time, proponents of the
American way of life are hostile to personality.
The Americans' 'open-mindedness', which is sometimes cited in their
favour, is the other side of their interior formlessness. The same goes
for their 'individualism'. Individualism and personality are not the
same: the one belongs to the formless world of quantity, the other to
the world of quality and hierarchy. The Americans are the living
refutation of the Cartesian axiom, "I think, therefore I am": Americans
do not think, yet they are. The American 'mind', puerile and primitive,
lacks characteristic form and is therefore open to every kind of
standardisation.
In a superior civilisation, as, for example, that of the Indo-Aryans, the
being who is without a characteristic form or caste (in the original
meaning of the word), not even that of servant or shudra, would
emerge as a pariah. In this respect America is a society of pariahs.
There is a role for pariahs. It is to be subjected to beings whose form
and internal laws are precisely defined. Instead the modern pariahs
seek to become dominant themselves and to exercise their dominion
over all the world.
There is a popular notion about the United States that it is a 'young
nation' with a 'great future before it'. Apparent American defects are
then described as the 'faults of youth' or 'growing pains'. It is not
14
difficult to see that the myth of 'progress' plays a large part in this
judgement. According to the idea that everything new is good, America
has a privileged role to play among civilised nations. In the First
World War the United States intervened in the role of 'the civilised
world' par excellence. The 'most evolved' nation had not only a right
but a duty to interfere in the destinies of other peoples.
The structure of history is, however, cyclical not evolutionary. It is
far from being the case that the most recent civilisations are
necessarily 'superior'. They may be, in fact, senile and decadent. There
is a necessary correspondence between the most advanced stages of a
historical cycle and the most primitive. America is the final stage of
modern Europe. Guenon called the United States 'the far West', in the
novel sense that the United States represents the reductio ad
absurdum of the negative and the most senile aspects of Western
civilisation. What in Europe exist in diluted form are magnified and
concentrated in the United States whereby they are revealed as the
symptoms of disintegration and cultural and human regression. The
American mentality can only be interpreted as an example of
regression, which shows itself in the mental atrophy towards all
higher interests and incomprehension of higher sensibility.
The American mind has limited horizons, one conscribed to everything
which is immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence
that everything is made banal, basic and levelled down until it is
deprived of all spiritual life. Life itself in American terms is entirely
15
mechanistic. The sense of 'I' in America belongs entirely to the
physical level of existence. The typical American neither has spiritual
dilemmas nor complications: he is a 'natural' joiner and conformist.
The primitive American mind can only superficially be compared to a
young mind. The American mind is a feature of the regressive society
to which I have already referred.
American Morality
The much-vaunted sex appeal of American women is drawn from films,
reviews and pin-ups, and is in large print fictitious. A recent medical
survey in the United States showed that 75 per cent of young
American women are without strong sexual feeling and instead of
satisfying their libido they seek pleasure narcissistically in
exhibitionism, vanity and the cult of fitness and health in a sterile
sense. American girls have 'no hang-ups about sex'; they are 'easy
going' for the man who sees the whole sexual process as something in
isolation thereby making it uninteresting and matter-of-fact, which, at
such a level, it is meant to be. Thus, after she has been taken to the
cinema or a dance, it is something like American good manners for the
girl to let herself be kissed - this doesn't mean anything. American
women are characteristically frigid and materialistic. The man who
'has his way' with an American girl is under a material obligation to
16
her. The woman has granted a material favour. In cases of divorce
American law overwhelmingly favours the woman. American women
will divorce readily enough when they see a better bargain. It is
frequently the case in America that a woman will be married to one
man but already 'engaged' to a future husband, the man she plans to
marry after a profitable divorce.
"Our" American Media
Americanisation in Europe is widespread and evident. In Italy it is a
phenomenon which is rapidly developing in these post-war years and
is considered by most people, if not enthusiastically, at least as
something natural. Some time ago I wrote that of the two great
dangers confronting Europe - Americanism and Communism - the first
is the more insidious. Communism cannot be a danger other than in
the brutal and catastrophic form of a direct seizure of power by
communists. On the other hand Americanisation gains ground by a
process of gradual infiltration, effecting modifications of mentalities
and customs which seem inoffensive in themselves but which end in a
fundamental perversion and degradation against which it is impossible
to fight other than within oneself.
It is precisely with respect to such internal opposition that most
Italians seem weak. Forgetting their own cultural inheritance they
17
readily turn to the United States as something akin to the parent
guide of the world. Whoever wants to be modern has to measure
himself according to the American standard. It is pitiable to witness a
European country so debase itself. Veneration for America has nothing
to do with a cultured interest in the way other people live. On the
contrary, servility towards the United States leads one to think that
there is no other way of life worth considering on the same level as
the American one.
Our radio service is Americanised. Without any criterion of superior
and inferior it just follows the fashionable themes of the moment and
markets what is considered 'acceptable' - acceptable, that is, to the
most Americanised section of the public, which is to say the most
degenerate. The rest of us are dragged along in its wake. Even the
style of presentation on radio has become Americanised. "Who, after
listening to an American radio programme, can suppress a shudder
when he considers that the only way of escaping communism is by
becoming Americanised?" Those are not the words of an outsider but
of an American sociologist, James Burnham, professor at the University
of Princeton. Such a judgement from an American should make Italian
radio programmers blush for shame.
The consequence of the 'do your own thing' democracy is the
intoxication of the greater part of the population which is not capable
of discriminating for itself, which, when not guided by a power and
an ideal, all too easily loses sense of its own identity.
18
The Industrial Order in America
In his classic study of capitalism Werner Sombart summarised the late
capitalist phase in the adage Fiat producto, pareat homo. In its
extreme form capitalism is a system in which a man's value is
estimated solely in terms of the production of merchandise and the
invention of the means of production. Socialist doctrines grew out of a
reaction to the lack of human consideration in this system.
A new phase has begun in the United States where there has been an
upsurge of interest in so-called labor relations. In appearance it would
seem to signify an improvement: in reality this is a deleterious
phenomenon. The entrepreneurs and employers have come to realise
the importance of the 'human factor' in a productive economy, and
that it is a mistake to ignore the individual involved in industry: his
motives, his feelings, his working day life. Thus, a whole school of
study of human relations in industry has grown up, based on
behaviourism. Studies like Human Relations in Industry by B. Gardner
and G. Moore have supplied a minute analysis of the behaviour of
employees and their motivations with the precise aim of defining the
best means to obviate all factors that can hinder the maximisation of
production. Some studies certainly don't come from the shop floor but
from the management, abetted by specialists from various colleges. The
sociological investigations go as far! as analysing the employee's social
ambience. This kind of study has a practical purpose: the ma
intenance of the psychological contentment of the employee is as
19
important as the physical. In cases in which a worker is tied to a
monotonous job which doesn't demand a great deal of concentration,
the studies will draw attention to the 'danger' that his mind may tend
to wander in a way that may eventually reflect badly on his attitude
towards the job.
The private lives of employees are not forgotten - hence the increase
in so-called personal counselling. Specialists are called in to dispel
anxiety, psychological disturbances and non-adaptation 'complexes',
even to the point of giving advice in relation to the most personal
matters. A frankly psycho-analytic technique and one much used is to
make the subject 'talk freely' and put the results obtainable by this
'catharsis' into relief.
None of this is concerned with the spiritual betterment of human
beings or any real human problems, such as a European would
understand them in this "age of economics". On the other side of the
Iron Curtain man is treated as a beast of burden and his obedience is
maintained by terror and famine. In the United States man is also
seen as just a factor of labour and consumption, and no aspect of his
interior life is neglected and every factor of his existence is drawn to
the same end. In the 'Land of the Free', through every medium, man is
told he has reached a degree of happiness hitherto undreamed of. He
forgets who he is, where he came from, and basks in the present.
20
American "Democracy" in Industry
There is a significant and growing discrepancy in the United States
between the shibboleths of the prevailing political ideology and the
effective economic structures of the nation. A large part of studies of
the subject is played by the 'morphology of business'. Studies
corroborate the impression that American business is a long way from
the type of organization which corresponds to the democratic ideal of
U.S. propaganda. American businesses have a 'pyramid' structure. They
constitute at the top an articulate hierarchy. The big businesses are
run in the same way as government ministries and are organized
along similar lines. They have co-ordinating and controlling bodies
which separate the business leaders from the mass of employees.
Rather than becoming more flexible in a social sense the "managerial
elite" (Burnham) is becoming more autocratic than ever - something
not unrelated to American foreign policy.
This is the end of yet another American illusion. America: the 'land of
opportunity', where every possibility is there for the person who can
grasp it, a land where anyone can rise from rags to riches. At first
there was the 'open frontier' for all to ride out across. That closed and
the new 'open frontier' was the sky, the limitless potential of industry
and commerce. As Gardner, Moore and many others have shown, this
too is no longer limitless, and the opportunities are thinning out. Given
the ever increasing specialization of labour in the productive process
and the increasing emphasis on 'qualifications', what used to seem
21
obvious to Americans - that their children would 'go further' than they
would - is for many people no longer obvious at all. Thus it is that in
the so-called political democracy of the United States, the force and
the power in the land, that is to say the industry and the economy,
are becoming ever more self-evidently undemocratic.
The problem then is: should reality be made to fit ideology or vice-
versa? Until recently the overwhelming demand has been for the
former course of action; the cry goes out for a return to the 'real
America' of unfettered enterprise and the individual free of central
government control. Nevertheless, there are also those who would
prefer to limit democracy in order to adapt political theory to
commercial reality. If the mask of American 'democracy' were thereby
removed, it would become clear to what extent 'democracy' in America
(and elsewhere) is only the instrument of an oligarchy which pursues
a method of 'indirect action', assuring the possibility of abuse and
deception on a large scale of those many who accept a hierarchical
system because they think it is justly such. This dilemma of
'democracy' in the United States may one day give place to some
interesting developments.
Julius Evola's article "Civilta" Americana (American "Civilization") was first published in 1945, and reprinted in 1983 by the Julius Evola Foundation in Rome.