city of farmington update on gold king mine spill

2
An important water update from the Farmington City Manager I would like to use this venue to answer five questions that I have been asked personally, or we continue to hear from a variety of sources. I will use a Q&A format for succinct readability. 1. Is Farmington city water safe to drink? Yes! All of our intake pumps from the Animas River were turned off and locked out long before the pollution arrived from the Gold King Mine spill near Silverton, CO. 2. How much water do we have in reserve? Lake Farmington holds in excess of a 3 ½ month supply of water at the highest “peak demand”. This means over 100 days at our very highest single day water usage in the history of the city if they all came in a row. At the non-peak usage level we see today, extrapolated out to usage on a historical curve for the next 5 months, we actually have 170 days, or over 5 ½ months, of water in reserve. And this takes into consideration meeting our current contractual obligations to the Navajo Nation (NTUA), Lower Valley, Upper La Plata, and Flora Vista, as well as adequate supply for Morningstar Water, if so requested. 3. Why hasn’t Farmington issued any mandatory water “restrictions”? Mandatory water “restrictions” are always a possibility, however in my judgment this measure for Farmington would be premature and ill-advised at this time for the following reasons: Due to proactive planning and investment by our citizens in the past, the City of Farmington is fortunate to have significant water reserves as outlined above. Creating financial penalty assessments on our citizens for water usage is difficult to enforce…so in reality still heavily reliant on the voluntary good faith and common sense of responsible citizens to be effective. The last time the City of Farmington implemented mandatory water restrictions in 2003, water consumption ironically actually went up immediately by 30% . Human nature I guess, people seem to respond better to requests than demands and threats, and perhaps panic may have caused people to hoard. I’m told this is not an uncommon phenomenon in other localities. We are closely monitoring this matter and are re-evaluating it on a weekly basis. 4. So what about “voluntary conservation” then? Absolutely! The fact is our message is always that we should not waste this valuable resource. Additionally, we are promoting through public information messages and requests for our citizens to voluntarily be respectful of this river crisis and to use their own common sense and best judgment to conserve water where they can . This message has been well received, in fact, unlike 2003 when usage went up 30% under restrictions …through a little luck from the rain and our citizens exercising their own voluntary common sense, we have seen nearly a 30% reduction in system-wide water consumption just since the spill event last Thursday . 5. What actions has the City itself done to set the conservation example? City departments are exercising the same balanced and reasonable response we are asking of citizens by evaluating measures to conserve water. However, at this time we are not cutting back on services to the community (like swimming pools) or jeopardizing valuable infrastructure such as medians, parks, and ball fields by eliminating irrigation and maintenance. Actions we

Upload: magdalena-wegrzyn

Post on 18-Aug-2015

973 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Farmington's city manager has issued a public notice about the city's water after the Gold King Mine spill.

TRANSCRIPT

An important water update from the Farmington City Manager I would like to use this venue to answer five questions that I have been asked personally, or we continue to hear from a variety of sources. I will use a Q&A format for succinct readability. 1.Is Farmington city water safe to drink? Yes! All of our intake pumps from the Animas River were turned off and locked out long before the pollution arrived from the Gold King Mine spill near Silverton, CO.2.How much water do we have in reserve? Lake Farmington holds in excess of a 3 month supply of water at the highest peak demand. This means over 100 days at our very highest single day water usage in the history of the city if they all came in a row.At the non-peak usage level we see today, extrapolated out to usage on a historical curve for the next 5 months, we actually have 170 days, or over 5 months, of water in reserve.And this takes into consideration meeting our current contractual obligations to the Navajo Nation (NTUA), Lower Valley, Upper La Plata, and Flora Vista, as well as adequate supply for Morningstar Water, if so requested. 3.Why hasnt Farmington issued any mandatory water restrictions? Mandatory water restrictions are always a possibility, however in my judgment this measure for Farmington would be premature and ill-advised at this time for the following reasons: Due to proactive planning and investment by our citizens in the past, the City of Farmington is fortunate to have significant water reserves as outlined above. Creating financial penalty assessments on our citizens for water usage is difficult to enforceso in reality still heavily reliant on the voluntary good faith and common sense of responsible citizens to be effective. The last time the City of Farmington implemented mandatory water restrictions in 2003, water consumption ironically actually went up immediately by 30%. Human nature I guess, people seem to respond better to requests than demands and threats, and perhaps panic may have caused people to hoard. Im told this is not an uncommon phenomenon in other localities. We are closely monitoring this matter and are re-evaluating it on a weekly basis. 4.So what about voluntary conservation then?Absolutely! The fact is our message is always that we should not waste this valuable resource. Additionally, we are promoting through public information messages and requests for our citizens to voluntarily be respectful of this river crisis and to use their own common sense and best judgment to conserve water where they can. This message has been well received, in fact, unlike 2003 when usage went up 30% under restrictionsthrough a little luck from the rain and our citizens exercising their own voluntary common sense, we have seen nearly a 30% reduction in system-wide water consumption just since the spill event last Thursday.5.What actions has the City itself done to set the conservation example? City departments are exercising the same balanced and reasonable response we are asking of citizens by evaluating measures to conserve water. However, at this time we are not cutting back on services to the community (like swimming pools) or jeopardizing valuable infrastructure such as medians, parks, and ball fields by eliminating irrigation and maintenance. Actions we have taken are reducing our city watering and irrigation by 20% and we have suspended street sweeping operations. Thank you for taking time to read this important update. Please help us spread accurate information and maintain a calm balanced and prudent response to the facts as they develop. As powerful as social media is to spread correct information, it is just as powerful a tool to spread misinformation and foster fear. Sometimes those who purvey misinformation do so through innocent ignorance and sometimes it is done willfully and with unconstructive purpose.We will remain vigilant at every step to continue to manage this crisis and maintain constant communication with the public. However, Farmington remains safe and open for business for our citizens and visitors to work, play, shop, enjoy, and stay. Sincerely, Rob Mayes, City Manager