cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols
TRANSCRIPT
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 1/52
Chapter 3
Dynamic Routing Protocols
CIS 82 Routing Protocols and Concepts
Rick GrazianiCabrillo College
Spring 2010
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 2/52
2
Note
My web site is www.cabrillo.edu/~rgraziani.
For access to these PowerPoint presentations and othermaterials, please email me at [email protected].
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 3/52
3
For further information
This presentation is an
overview of what iscovered in thecurriculum/book.
For further explanationand details, please readthe chapter/curriculum.
Book:
Routing Protocolsand Concepts
By Rick Graziani and Allan Johnson
ISBN: 1-58713-206-0
ISBN-13: 978-58713-206-3
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 4/52
4
Topics
Introduction to Dynamic Routing
Protocols Perspective and Background
Network Discovery and
Routing Table Maintenance
Dynamic Routing Protocol
Advantages Classifying Dynamic Routing
Protocols
IGP and EGP
Distance Vector and Link-
State
Classful and Classless
Convergence
Metrics
Purpose of the Metric
Metrics and Routing Protocols
Load Balancing
Administrative Distance
Purpose of AdministrativeDistance
Dynamic Routing Protocolsand Administrative Distance
Static Routes and Administrative Distance
Directly Connected Networksand Administrative Distance
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 5/52
Introduction to Dynamic Routing
Protocols Perspective and Background
Network Discovery and Routing Table Maintenance
Dynamic Routing Protocol Advantages
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 6/52
6
Perspective and Background
Dynamic routing protocols have evolved over several years
As networks have evolved and become more complex, new routing
protocols have emerged.
Most institutions have migrated to new protocols, others are still in use.
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 7/52
7
Perspective and
Background
Interior Routing Protocols or Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP)
Distance Vector
RIPv1 – Simple, Classful, limited metrics (hop count)
RIPv2 – Simple, Classless, limited metrics (hop count)
Cisco Proprietary IGRP – Simple, Classful, better metric (BW, delay, reliab., load)
EIGRP – Simple, Classless, same metric, DUAL (backup routes)
Link State
OSPF – Perceived complex, classless, Cisco metric BW, IETF
IS-IS - Perceived complex, classless, metric ―default‖, ISO
Classful (does not support
CIDR and VLSM)
Classless (supports CIDR
and VSLM)
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 8/52
8
Perspective and
Background
Exterior Routing Protocols or Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGP)
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
Between ISPs (Internet service providers)
Between ISPs and their larger private clients
Path Vector routing protocol, metric – attributes (policies)
Replaced EGP
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 9/52
9
Role of Dynamic Routing Protocol
Dynamic Routing Protocols:
Exchange of routing information between routers
Dynamically learn information about remote networks Determines the best path to each network
Automatically learn about new networks
Automatically finds alternate paths if needed (link failure in current path)
Update
Update
UpdateUpdate
Update
Update
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 10/52
10
Role of Dynamic Routing Protocol
What is an advantage of dynamic routing protocols compared to
static routes?
Less administrative overhead (change modifications)
More work and more chances to make a mistake.
Make additions, deletions, and
modifications to static routes!
Add new static routes…
Static Routes
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 11/52
11
Role of Dynamic Routing Protocol
Change in network using a dynamic routing protocol.
Dynamic routing protocols automatically adjust to changes in the network:
New networks
Deleted networks
Changes in topology
Configuration is less error-prone
Scales better with larger networks
No changes!
Add dynamic routing
protocol…
Dynamic Routing Protocol
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 12/52
12
Role of Dynamic Routing Protocol
Disadvantages of using Dynamic routing protocol
More CPU and memory requirements (not usually a problem)
This is not that big an issue in most networks and withmodern routers.
―Less secure‖ if routing updates are sent unencrypted.
Most networks use both dynamic and static routes
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 13/52
13
Purpose of Dynamic Routing Protocols
A routing protocol is a set of processes, algorithms, and messages thatare used to exchange routing information and populate the routing tablewith the routing protocol’s choice of best paths.
Components of a routing protocol (depending upon the routing protocol):
Data structures: Tables or databases for their operations, kept in RAM.
Algorithm:
Routing protocols use algorithms for processing routing informationand for best-path determination.
Routing protocol messages:
Discover neighboring routers
Exchange routing information
Learn and maintain accurate information about the network
I’m R1 I’m R3
My routesMy routes
ChangesChanges
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 14/52
14
Dynamic Routing Protocol Operation
The operations of a dynamic routing protocol vary depending on the type ofrouting protocol, but in general:
1. The router shares routing messages and routing information with otherrouters that are using the same routing protocol.
2. The router sends and receives routing messages on its interfaces.
3. Routers exchange routing information to learn about remote networks.
4. When a router detects a topology change, the routing protocol can advertisethis change to other routers.
Update
Update
UpdateUpdate
Update
Update
I’m running RIP and
will share with other
routers running RIP.
I’m running RIP too.
I’m running RIP too.
I just learned
about remote
networks
from R2 and
R3.
I just learned about
remote networks from
R1 and R3.
I just learned about
remote networks from
R1 and R2.
X
I no longer have a
connection to
this network!
Got it, I will tellR3…
Got it!
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 15/52
15
Static Routing
Usage,
Advantages, andDisadvantages
When would you use a static route?
With smaller networks that are not expected to grow significantly.
Routing to and from stub networks
Default route
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 16/52
Classifying Dynamic Routing
Protocols IGP and EGP
Distance Vector and Link-State
Classful and Classless
Convergence
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 17/52
17
Classifying Routing Protocols
Routing Protocols can be classified by:
IGP or EGP
Distance vector or link-state
Classful or classless
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 18/52
18
IGP and EGP
An autonomous sys tem (AS)—otherwise known as a rout ing dom ain —isa collection of routers under a common administration.
Company’s internal network
An ISP’s network.
Because the Internet is based on the autonomous system concept, twotypes of routing protocols are required:
Interior routing protocols: Within Cabrillo College & within CENIC
Routing inside an autonomous system
Exterior routing protocols: Between ISPs, CENIC and PAIX
Routing between autonomous systems
PAIX
Palo AltoCENIC BGP
Cabrillo
College
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 19/52
19
Distance Vector and Link-State Routing Protocols
Interior gateway protocols (IGP) can be classified as two types:
Distance vector routing protocols
Link-state routing protocols
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 20/52
20
Distance Vector Routing
Protocol Operation
What does a street sign like this tellyou?
How far (distance)
Which way (direction)
Distance vecto r
Routes are advertised as vectors
of distance and direction.
Distance is defined in terms of a
metric
Such as hop count
Direction is simply the:
Nexthop router or
Exit interface
Typically use the Bellman-Ford
algorithm for the best-path (shortest)route determination
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 21/52
21
Distance Vector Routing
Protocol Operation
Routing protocol
Does not know the topology of an
internetwork.
Only knows the routing information
received from its neighbors.
Does not know if another path
would actually be faster.
I don’t have a map
of the network.
All I know is how far
and which direction
(to next hop router)
Distance Vector routing protocols are like signposts along the path to the final destination.
Would another path
that is longeractually be faster?
(speed limit)
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 22/52
22
Distance Vector Routing
Protocol Operation
Where might you use a distancevector routing protocol?
Simple and flat network
The administrators do not have
enough knowledge about link-state
protocols.
Specific types of networks, such as
hub-and-spoke networks, are
being implemented.
Worst-case convergence times ina network are not a concern.
More in Chapter 4.
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 23/52
23
Link-State Protocol Operation
Link-state routing protocol can
create a ―complete view,‖ ortopology, of the network.
Link-state protocols are
associated with Shortest Path
First (SPF) calculations.
A l ink -state rou ter uses the link-state information to:
Create a topology map
Select the best path to all
destination networks in the
topology.
Each router makes the
decision!
Link State routing protocols is like having a complete map of the network topology
OR
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 24/52
24
Link-State Protocol Operation
Link-state protocols work best
in situations where
The network design is
hierarchical, usually occurring
in large networks.
The administrators have a
good knowledge of theimplemented link-state routing
protocol.
Fast convergence of the
network is crucial.
More in later chapters.
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 25/52
25
Classful and Classless Routing Protocols
All routing protocols can also be classified as either
Classful routing protocols
Classless routing protocols
IPv6 routing protocols are classless
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 26/52
26
Classful
Routing
Protocols
Classful routing protocols do NOT send subnet mask informationin routing updates.
The first routing protocols, such as RIP
When network addresses were allocated based on classes.
Class A, B, or C.
Network mask determined based on value of first octet of thenetwork address.
172.16.0.0
192.168.1.0
192.168.2.0
172.16.0.0
192.168.1.0
192.168.2.0
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 27/52
27
Classful Routing Protocols
Classful routing protocols do not include the subnet mask
Therefore do not support VLSM and CIDR.
All subnets within the same “major classful network address” must have
the same mask.
More later!
172.16.0.0/16
Major Classful
Network
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 28/52
28
Classless routing Protocols
Today’s networks are no longer allocated based on classes
Subnet mask cannot be determined by the value of the firstoctet .
Classless routing protocols include the subnet mask with the
network address in routing updates.
172.16.0.0/28
192.168.1.0/24
192.168.2.0/30
172.16.1.0/28
192.168.1.0/24
192.168.2.4/30
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 29/52
29
Classless routing Protocols
Classless routing protocols are required in most networks today
because of their support for:
VLSM
CIDR
Discontiguous networks.
172.16.128.0/30 172.16.132.0/30
172.16.136.0/30
172.16.0.0/16
Major Classful
Network
/27 and /30
subnets
Dynamic Routing Protocols and Convergence
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 30/52
30
Convergence is when the routing tables of all routers are at a state of
consistency.
Network has converged: When all routers have complete and
accurate information about the network.
Convergence time is the time it takes routers to:
Share information
Calculate best paths
Update their routing tables
A network is not completely operable until the network has converged;
therefore, most networks require short convergence times.
Dynamic Routing Protocols and Convergence
XI no longer have a
connection to
this network!
Got it, I will tell
R3…
Got it!
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 31/52
31
Dynamic Routing Protocols and Convergence
Generally, convergence time:
Slow: RIP and IGRP
Faster: EIGRP, OSPF, and IS-IS
R2’s Routing
Table
R1’s Routing
TableR3’s Routing
Table
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 32/52
Metrics
Purpose of the Metric
Metrics and Routing Protocols
Load Balancing
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 33/52
33
Purpose of a Metric
Metrics are a way to measure or compare. Determine the best path.
Routing protocol learns multiple routes to the same destination.
Metric is used to determine which path is most preferable
?
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 34/52
34
Purpose of a Metric
What might be some ways (metrics) that routing protocols might use todetermine the ―best path?
Routing protocol metrics:
RIP: Hop count IGRP and EIGRP: Bandwidth, delay, reliability and load
OSPF (Cisco’s version): Bandwidth
IS-IS: Four values (Cisco uses ―default‖) – Covered in CCNP
BGP: Attributes – Covered in CCNP
More later
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 35/52
35
Metric
Parameters
R1 to reach the 172.16.1.0/24 network.
RIP: Fewest number of hops via R2.
OSPF: Path with the highest cumulative bandwidth through R3.
This results in faster packet delivery.
56 Kbps
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 36/52
36
Metric Field in the Routing Table
The routing table displays the metric for each dynamic and staticroute.
Static routes always have a metric of 0.
Routing protocols install route in routing table with the lowest metric.
R2# show ip route
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 172.16.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0/1
S 192.168.2.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1R 192.168.7.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.4.1, Serial0/0/1
R 192.168.8.0/24 [120/2] via 192.168.4.1, Serial0/0/1
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 37/52
37
All routers running RIP
What is the metric
(distance) for R2 to reachthe 192.168.8.0 network?
2 (hops away)
What is the direction(vector) for R2 to reach the192.168.8.0 network?
Serial 0/0/1 (via R3)
R2# show ip route
<output omitted>
Gateway of last resort is not set
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.1, 00:00:24, Serial0/0/0
C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0C 192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 192.168.4.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0/1
R 192.168.5.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.4.1, 00:00:26, Serial0/0/1
R 192.168.6.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.1, 00:00:24, Serial0/0/0
[120/1] via 192.168.4.1, 00:00:26, Serial0/0/1
R 192.168.7.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.4.1, 00:00:26, Serial0/0/1R 192.168.8.0/24 [120/2] via 192.168.4.1, 00:00:26, Serial0/0/1
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 38/52
38
What happens when two or more routes to the same destination have
identical metric values?
The router load balances between these equal-cost paths.
All routing protocols do equal cost load balancing.
EIGRP also does unequal cost load balancing.
Load
Balancing
R2# show ip route
<output omitted>
R 192.168.6.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.1, 00:00:24, Serial0/0/0
[120/1] via 192.168.4.1, 00:00:26, Serial0/0/1
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 39/52
Administrative Distance
Purpose of Administrative Distance
Dynamic Routing Protocols and Administrative
Distance
Static Routes and Administrative Distance Directly Connected Networks and Administrative
Distance
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 40/52
40
Purpose of Administrative Distance
What if a router learns about a remote
network from two different routingsources.
What if RIP advertises the network as
10 hops away but OSPF advertises it
as a cumulative bandwidth of 100,000.
Which is better RIP or OSPF?
Can’t tell
Can’t compare apples and oranges.
Note: This is not common.
Adm inistrat ive distance (AD) is:
Used to determine which routing
source takes precedence.
Used when there are multiple
routing sources for the same
destination network address.
Lower the AD the more preferred the
routing source.
RIP: 1.1.1.1.
is 10 hops
OSPF: 1.1.1.1.
is 100,000 BW
?
So, which one would
be preferred RIP or
OSPF? OSPF
Which route would be
preferred, OSPF or a Static
Route to the same
network? Static Route
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 41/52
41
Purpose of Administrative Distance
Cisco uses Administrative distance
(AD) to define the preference of arouting source.
Routing sources:
Directly connected networks
Static routes
Specific routing protocols
AD for static and dynamic can bemodifed (in CCNP)
Note
The term t rustwor th iness iscommonly used when definingadministrative distance.
The lower the administrative distancevalue, the more trustworthy the route.
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 42/52
42
Purpose of Administrative Distance
AD: 0 to 255.
The lower the value, the morepreferred the route source.
AD of 0 is the most preferred.
Only a directly connectednetwork has an administrative
distance of 0, which cannot bechanged.
No better route to a networkthan being directly connectedto that network.
AD of 255 means the router willnot believe the source of that route
Route will not be installed inthe routing table.
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 43/52
43
Verifying AD: show ip route
R2# show ip route
D 192.168.6.0/24 [90/2172416] via 192.168.2.1, 00:00:24, Serial0/0/0
What is the AD of this route? 90
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 44/52
44
Verifying AD: show ip protocols
R2# show ip protocols
Routing Protocol is “eigrp 100 “ Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default networks accepted from incoming updates
EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
EIGRP maximum metric variance 1Redistributing: eigrp 100
Automatic network summarization is in effect
Automatic address summarization:
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
192.168.2.0
192.168.3.0
192.168.4.0
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
192.168.2.1 90 2366569
Distance: internal 90 external 170
<continued next slide?
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 45/52
45
show ip protocols (continued)
R2# show ip protocols
Routing Protocol is “rip”
Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 12 secondsInvalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Redistributing: rip
Default version control: send version 1, receive any version
Interface Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain
Serial0/0/1 1 2 1FastEthernet0/0 1 2 1
Automatic network summarization is in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
192.168.3.0
192.168.4.0
Passive Interface(s):
Routing Information Sources:Gateway Distance Last Update
192.168.4.1 120
Distance: (default is 120)
More on show ip protocols later
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 46/52
46
Static Routes and Administrative Distance
Static routes
Default AD = 1 After directly connected networks (AD = 0), static routes are the
most preferred route source.
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 47/52
47
Static Routes and Administrative Distance
R2# show ip route
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 172.16.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
S 172.16.3.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0/1
S 192.168.2.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
What is the AD of a Static Route? Static route: default AD = 1 (never 0)
Exit-interface: AD = 1
Next-hop IP address: AD = 1
After directly connected networks (AD = 0), static routes are themost preferred route source.
Exit Interface: ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 serial 0/0/0
Next-hop: ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 48/52
48
Static Routes and Administrative Distance
R2# show ip route
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 172.16.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
S 172.16.3.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0/1
S 192.168.2.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
The static route to 172.16.3.0 is listed as ―directly connected‖.
It is common misconception to assume that the AD value of this routemust be 0 because it states “directly connected a” - false assumption.
Exit Interface: ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 serial 0/0/0
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 49/52
49
Static Routes and Administrative Distance
R2# show ip route 172.16.3.0
Routing entry for 172.16.3.0/24
Known via “static”, distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via Serial0/0/0Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
View AD value this static route with an exit-interface, use command show iproute [route] option.
Exit Interface: ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 serial 0/0/0
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 50/52
50
Directly Connected Networks and Administrative Distance
To see the AD value of a directly connected network, use the commandshow ip route [route] option.
R2# show ip route 172.16.3.0
Routing entry for 172.16.1.0/24Known via “connected”, distance 0, metric 0
(connected, via interface)
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 51/52
51
Floating Static
Route (Extra)
There are situations when an administrator will configure a static route to
the same destination that is learned using a dynamic routing protocol, but
using a different path.
The static route will be configured with an AD greater than that of the
routing protocol.
If there is a link failure in the path used by the dynamic routing protocol, the
route entered by the routing protocol is removed from the routing table.
The static route will then become the only source and will automatically be
added to the routing table.
This is known as a f loat ing stat ic rou te and is discussed in CCNP courses.
R2: ip route 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 5
R2: ip route 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.4.1
X
8/12/2019 cis82-E2-3-DynamicRoutingProtocols
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cis82-e2-3-dynamicroutingprotocols 52/52
Chapter 3
Dynamic Routing Protocols
CIS 82 Routing Protocols and Concepts
Rick Graziani
Cabrillo College