cigdem issever on the behalf of cdf collaboration
DESCRIPTION
Measurement of the Forward-Backward Charge Asymmetry from W -> e n Production in Collisions at = 1.96 TeV hep-ex/0501023. Cigdem Issever On the behalf of CDF Collaboration. more information: http://fcdfwww.fnal.gov/physics/ewk/2004/w_charge_asym/w_charge_asymmetry.html. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
1
Measurement of the Forward-Backward Charge Asymmetry from W -> e Production in Collisions at
= 1.96 TeV hep-ex/0501023
Cigdem IsseverOn the behalf of CDF Collaboration
s
pp
more information:http://fcdfwww.fnal.gov/physics/ewk/2004/w_charge_asym/
w_charge_asymmetry.html
CDF
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
2
PDFs significant for many measurements at the Tevatron
How can we gain insights into parton momentum distribution functions (PDFs) of the proton at the Tevatron???
Measure W Charge Asymmetry
Ad(W ) /dyW d (W ) /dyWd(W ) /dyW d (W ) /dyW
PDFs not well known at high x (high )Don’t already know the answer, need to measure.Can improve many of our upcoming measurements.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
3
Reason for W Charge Asymmetry?
u quarks carry more momentum than d quarks
xf(
x,Q
2)
x
Q2 = 100 GeV2
MRST2004NLO
u
d
10-3 10-2 10-1
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
4
Reason for W Charge Asymmetry?
W+
dp
u
u
d
pu
u
e+
W- W+
protonantiproton
W+ and W- boosted in forward and backward direction; Information about u(x)/d(x) convoluted in W Asymmetry
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
5
sensitive to PDF’s !
Measure Charge Asymmetry of Lepton Channel
Asymmetry in W production complicated by unknown pz
use lepton asymmetry:
which convolves W production with V-A decay.
uncertainty on PDF’s significant error in several measurements at CDF !
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
6
CDF Run1 Result
Forward Tracking and Charge ID is the key!!
Measurement at large has high impact on PDF fits
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
7
Calorimeter Seeded OI Si-Tracking (PHX)
Forward Tracking outside COT
Seed tracksSi-track
Si-Hit
1) Reconstruction of Seed Track with
o Calorimeter cluster position
o Event vertex
o Calorimeter cluster ET
2) Reconstruction of Si-Tracks
o Using same algorithm as the COT OI Si-Tracking to attach Si hits.
vertex
Seed tracks
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
8
W Event Selection• Baseline electron selection
• PHX track optimized for good charge identification:– #hits > 4
– 2 < 8
– 2 > 0.5
– Pull Ratio
• ET > 25 GeV
• Missing ET > 25 GeV
• 50 < MT < 100 GeV/c2
• No other EMO with ET>25 GeV to suppress QCD and DY
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
9
Needs to be corrected for
- background contributions and
- charge misidentification.
Raw, uncorrected Charge Asymmetry
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
10
Charge Identification
Incorrectly identified charge dilutes asymmetry.We can correct for it, if we know f=#wrong/total.
MC does not include residual misalignments. Must measure it in data as function of .
Measure f with Ze+e-.Use central (|| < 1.5) leg to tag charge of other leg.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
11
PHX Charge Misidentification Rate
Smaller than 6% in forward
Error calculated with Bayesian prescription
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
12
Correction of Raw Asymmetry for Charge MisID
with f+ charge mis-id rate of positrons, f- charge mis-id rate of electrons
A charge dependence of charge id would directly bias measurement, hence: A = (Araw+ f+ - f-) / (1 - f+ - f-)
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
13
We correct the asymmetry in each bin for backgrounds from
–W eAsymmetric, measured from MC, 4%
–Z e+ e-
Asymmetric, measured from MC, 1%
–QCDSymmetric, measured from data using
Isolation vs MEt.
Background Corrections
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
14
QCD Background (BKG)
upper limit
We use (0.5 ± 0.25)*BKG. Becomes significant for >1.8
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
15
Corrected Asymmetry with stat + total uncertainties
No evidence of CP asymmetry, level of agreement 2/dof=9.5/11.We are using method by R. Barlow, PHYSTAT2003, SLAC, Stanford, California, September 8-11, 2003, for incorporating the asymmetric uncertainties in the error propagation using likelihood distributions.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
16
For higher ET electrons, is closer to yW.
More information can be gained by
measuring A in bins of electron ET.
Current statistics allow use of two ET bins.
NEW : ET Dependence of Asymmetry
25 GeV < ET < 35 GeV
35 GeV < ET < 45 GeV
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
17
Results for 25 GeV < ET < 35 GeV
--- MRST02__ CTEQ6.1M
NLO RESBOS
Corrections for charge mis-id and backgrounds are measured and applied for each ET bin.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
18
Results for 35 GeV < ET < 45 GeV
--- MRST02__ CTEQ6.1M
NLO RESBOS
2 probabilities are 11% for CTEQ and 0.6% for MRSTInclusion of our results will further constrain fits and improve predictions.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
19
Outlook & Conclusion
• Results will be included into new PDF fits.
• CDF is beginning to explore a new method which fully reconstructs the W direction, see talk of Boyoung Han at APS 2005.
• CDF Run2 W Charge Asymmetry measurement provides new PDF constraints, particularly when separated by ET range.
• Measured Asymmetry for the first time in different ET bins.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
20
Backup Slides
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
21
Systematic• Statistical uncertainty on charge mis-id rate dominates
• Uncertainty from QCD jet background is small and other backgrounds are negligible
• Using COT tracks, when available, results in no significant difference
• Checked that variation of detector alignments within their uncertainty has no significant effect on asymmetry
• No difference between asymmetry in the EAST and WEST
• Studied possible biases introduced by detector effects in the MC and found no significant effects.
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
22
Results: W Charge Asymmetry w. total error
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
23
Corrected W Charge Asymmetry Et>25 GeV
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
24
CDF Run 2 Detector
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
25
Plug/PES Alignment Align PLUG calorimeter with COT tracks: allow offsets in x,y,z and a rotation in phi
global misalignments2<<8mrad;x,y ~3mm
internal misalignments~1mrad, r~1mm
PES Octant Boundary
22.05.2005IOP 2005
Cigdem Issever, University of Oxford
26
Background Determination Method Is
ola
tion
MET [GeV]
0.
1
0.
4
0.
7
1.0
20 60 100 140
Signal Region