christa sys@bdm2014

25
20/03/2014

Upload: bdm2014

Post on 28-May-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Christa sys@bdm2014

20/03/2014

Page 2: Christa sys@bdm2014

Important Developments in the European Port Industry and Consequences

- Focus on the Antwerp Port -

Dr. Christa Sys20/03/2014

Page 3: Christa sys@bdm2014

Port of AntwerpSome facts

• Ranking: 16th global | 2nd European port (2013) • Accessible for world‘s largest container vessels of 18.000 TEU• State-of-the-art automized installations • Highest handling productivity in Europe: up to 42 moves/hour/crane• Excellent hinterland connections• Collaboration with hinterland hubs• Added value: 19.2 billion euros (in 2011) or 8.9% of Flemish GDP |5.1% of Belgian GDP• Employment: 142,972 jobs (≈ 40% direct employment)(FTE 2011)

Maritime cargo turnover 2012 2013 2012-2013Liquid bulk 45.275.901 t 59.493.776 t 31,4%

petrol products 34.541.000 tDry bulk 19.106.424 t 14.376.834 t -24,8%General cargo 119.753.000 t 116.978.469 t -2,3%

containers 104.060.000 t 102.325.934 t -1,7%8.635.169 TEU 8.578.269 TEU -0,7%

Total 184.136.000 t 190.849.079 t 3,6%Number of seagoing vessels 14.556 14.220 -2,3%Gross tonnage 318.481.084 329.636.387 t 3,5%

Page 4: Christa sys@bdm2014

4

Container liner shipping

Page 5: Christa sys@bdm2014

5

North Range container handling

Page 6: Christa sys@bdm2014

Key drivers

Economies of scale

P3 Alliance

Environmental issues

Page 8: Christa sys@bdm2014

8

Door to door

Port to port

Page 9: Christa sys@bdm2014

9

Page 11: Christa sys@bdm2014

Future?

David Tozer, global manager for container ships at Lloyd's Register Group, warned that even bigger – 25,000-container capable ships – are perfectly feasible.

Page 12: Christa sys@bdm2014

12

Page 14: Christa sys@bdm2014

Effect …

• An increasing pressure to optimize operations at ports

• Container terminals under pressure to improve productivity and efficiency to minimize disruptions in the supply chain

• Putting inland operations under pressure (intermodal road, rail and inland waterways)

• Cascading effect of larger vessels into East-West/South-North routes concentration of volumes on ports and terminals

• Pressure for more alliances and cooperation to fill the ships

+ 16,000 TEU ports

Page 15: Christa sys@bdm2014

Klik op het pictogram om een afbeelding toe te voegen

P3 Network

Voer hier het bestand ‘UA_pp_footer_groot’ in.

Page 16: Christa sys@bdm2014

Rationale of Top 3 carriers to step into P3

This is a REACTION!o Too low freight rateso Overcapacity (or too little demand)Two developmentso Daily Maersk experimento Increased cooperation MSC-CMA CGM

PURPOSE?- Management capacity - Higher freight rates

MARKET POWER - 255 ships / 2.6 million TEU / 3 trades- Stability?

Page 17: Christa sys@bdm2014

Implications…

A significant impact on ports worldwide, but who will win and who will lose?• More ports, less terminals? • Reduction in the number of terminal calls/port. • Improve service offerings to shippers• ‘smaller’ ports (with a combined volume of the P3 partners of

about 500,000-2m teu) • Increase of direct calls

Previously one carrier would have to reach a certain minimum threshold to make a direct call to a port attractive - about 50,000-200,000 teu per year

Page 18: Christa sys@bdm2014
Page 19: Christa sys@bdm2014

Hinterland connections: Modal split Container Transport

5643

9

15

3542

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Today 2030

Mo

dal s

hare

(%

)

Barge

Rail

Road

Page 20: Christa sys@bdm2014

20

Reaction…• Re-design network

• For the associated terminal operators• For feeder and intermodal operations, both beyond the scope of

P3 cooperation. • For the remaining operations of the partners• For all trades apart from the three East-West trades remain

outside P3.• Due to the fact that in many ports the different trades intersect

and the P3 operations cannot be seen in isolation. • Increased cooperation

• P3 network (to be agreed by FMC)• G6 plans expansion to Transpacific West Coast and Transatlantic

trades• CKYH alliance CKYHE Alliance (on Asia-Europe) • Collaboration COSCO and CSCL

• No consolidation• Hapag-Lloyd and CSAV in mergers talk

Page 21: Christa sys@bdm2014

Environmental issues

21

Page 22: Christa sys@bdm2014

Planet

Environmental control area’s Port shift? Reverse modal shift? Reverse globalisation?More efficient newbuildingsExisting ships Retrofitting Technologies (LNG,…) Coating “ a nose job” Cost …

Page 23: Christa sys@bdm2014

Planet

Without external costs With external costs

van Hassel, et al., 2013

Page 24: Christa sys@bdm2014

Thank you for your attention!Dr. Christa SysPrinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerpen@ www.uantwerpen.be/tpr [email protected]

Page 25: Christa sys@bdm2014