choice of law 2013
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
1/78
1
Chapter Three : Positive Rules of Conflict of
Laws1
Introduction
Though the Egyptian legal system does not contain
a specific legislation on conflict of laws, most of the
Egyptian rules of the conflict of laws can be found in the
Egyptian Civil Code. However, many other rules of
conflict of laws can be found in other different statutes
such as the Commercial Code Act no 17 /1999 and theArbitration Act no 27 /1994. These rules of conflict of
laws are therefore qualified as positive rules.
The Egyptian Positive rules for the conflict of laws
cover two main categories of relations. The First category
includes matters relating to persons while the second
group is concerned with pecuniary transactions. It is to be
noted that both topics share similar questions of formality
which can be solved by similar rules.
Therefore, this chapter will contain the following
three sections:
Section One : Conflict of laws in Formality.
Section Two: Conflict of laws in Personal Status
Section Three: Conflict of laws in Assets.
1 This part is an update and an addition to a previous treaties on private
international law published by Prof. Dr. Hisham A. Sadek, Prof.Dr Ibrahim
N. Saad, Prof. Dr. Hafiza E. Al Haddad, Dr. Nader M. Ibrahim, Private
International Law: Selective Basics Under Egyptian Law, 1st edition,
Alexandria 2000/2001. I thank them all for allowing me to perform the update
and addition to their valuable work and I would like to express my gratitude
for their permission.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
2/78
2
Section One : Conflict of Laws in Formality.
1-IntroductionFormality is a term general refers to
"procedure" in contrast to "substance". The Majority of
modern legal systems have been settled on the adoption
of the "Locus Regit Actum" rule in regard to matters of
formality. This rule means that "...when a legal
transaction complies with the formalities required by the
law of the state where the transaction is done, it is alsovalid in the state where it is to be given effect although by
the law of that state other formalities are required..."2
The Egyptian law adopted the above mentioned
rule in Art (20) of the Civil Code. However, the
contracting parties were permitted to apply to of formality
irrespectively, the law of the state in which the
transactions were concluded, the law applicable to the
matters of substance, i.e. Lex Causae, the law of the
parties common domicile or the law of the parties
common nationality.
Art (20) of the Civil Code provides that:
"Contracts between living persons are governed as
regards their formalities by law of the state in which the
contracts are concluded. They may also be governed by
the law regulating the substantive issues of a contract, by
the law of the common domicile of the parties or their
common law of nationality"
2
SeeBLACKS LAW DICTIONARY (6th ed.1990) 941.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
3/78
3
2- Historical Background
Questions of conflict of laws first appeared in themiddle ages within the context of business relations
among the cities of north Italy. Therefore, the first
solutions for conflict of laws can be traced back to the
Glossoe of the old Roman law doctrine (Glossators). In
the 12th and 13th century those lawyers subjected all
transactions to the law of the place where they have been
made. However, these early glossators did not
differentiate between "substance" and "formality". Thedistinction did not take place until the times of the roman
glossator, Curtius, in the later 15th century.
Curtuis is considered to be the first lawyer to
differentiate between "substance" and "formality" in
transaction. This accidently took place by when he
explained the application of the "Locus Regit Actum" rule
to the substance of the transaction. He founded theapplication of that rule upon the implied will of the
parties. This interpretation opened the path for the party
autonomy rule that was advocated by the French lawyer,
Dumoulin, in the 16th Century. Dumoulin, argued for the
recognition of the contracting parties authority to subject
their contract to law other than the law of the place of
contract. I.e.Lex Loci Contractus. His argument was that
an express will is better for consideration that an impliedwill.
At the 16th
century it was settled the "Locus Regit
Actum" rule was applicable only to the formal aspects of
transactions. The substantive aspect of transactions was
allowed be governed by another law at that time. It is
worthy to mention that the the "Locus Regit Actum" rule
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
4/78
4
disappeared temporarily in the era of the domination of
the territorial school which prevailed in the 16 th century.
Under such school, conflict of laws was solved byanalyzing the laws themselves and not by analyzing the
transactions and since that most of the laws were
considered territorial the transaction's formality became
subject to the law of the where the transaction was
created.
The the "Locus Regit Actum" rule reemerged in
modern time under practical reasons. These reasonsaimed at facilitating the creation of transactions. They
took into consideration that the concerned parties may
face difficulty in knowing the details of formalities in
other laws beside that of the place where the transaction
was created. In addition, some types of formalities cannot
be satisfied in any place. E.g. interference of a public
notary.
3- Is the "Locus Regit Actum" rule Facultative?
Those who explained the application of the "Locus
Regit Actum" rule through the territorial application of
law have, logically, reached the conclusion that this rule
is a mandatory one. However, such conclusion does not
suit the modern philosophy for the "Locus Regit Actum"
rule which is the facilitation. This philosophy directstowards considering the "Locus Regit Actum" rule as a
facultative rule.
The Egyptian legislator opted for the modern
philosophy. This can be induced for the facility which has
been granted to the Egyptian judge to apply the law
which applicable to the substance, or the law applicable
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
5/78
5
to the common domicile of the contracting parties, or
their law of common nationality, which ever validates the
transaction, i.e. Lex Validatus. Therefore, The Egyptianpositive rule applicable to formality is not as the rest of
the traditional conflict of law rues, neutral. It is rather of a
material objective.
4- What is meant by the concept of formality?
Distinction between "substance" and "formality"
can be of no importance when the contracting partiessatisfy the formality requirements provided for under the
law applicable to "substance". However, the applicable
law to "substance" can different than that which is
applicable to "formality", hence it is useful to highlight
the criterion by which distinction is made between these
different matters.
(a) Matters excluded from formalities
i- Matters of procedure.
The dominant doctrine differentiates between the
concept of "formality" and "matters of procedure".
Matters of procedure contain the required procedures for
filing a lawsuit before the court which relates to the
judicial authority of the state while formality is concerned
with the actives of the individuals. Although bothformality and procedure may eventually be subject to the
same law, i.e. the law which is applicable at the place of
the procedure and the law applicable at the place where
the transaction is created, only formality can be subject to
another applicable law. The "Locus Regit Actum" rule is
facultative rule but procedure cannot be subject to other
law other than that of the place of procedure., i.e. the Lex
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
6/78
6
Fori, because it is mandatory to follow that law in all
matters relating to the filing a lawsuit before the court.
ii-Matters of Publicity
By the same token, matters of publicity are
different than matters of formality. Publicity is required
sometimes for the creation of rights such as the case with
principal in rem rights (e.g. ownership) and sometimes
publicity is required for the enforcement of the right
against third parties as in the case with accessory in rimrights (e.g. pledge). Though matters can be subject to the
same law i.e. the applicable law at the place of publicity
(publicity) and law at the place of the creation of the
transaction (formality). Only formality can be subject to
another applicable law, because it is subject to a
facultative rule. Nevertheless, publicity cannot be subject
other law that the applicable law at the place of publicity,
because this is a public rule of a territorial application.
(b) Matters which fall into the concept for
formality.
Formality is the means by which the will is
expressed to the external world. Such means can be
required for the creation of the transaction or its evidence.
(i) Formality for Creation
Laws may require the satisfaction of certain
formalities for the creation of certain transactions as in
the case of the contract of donation of an immovable
property and the contract of pledge. According to some
scholars the decision of determining whether the
formability is necessary for the creation of the transaction
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
7/78
7
or as evidence should be left to the Lex Causae. Such
interpretation finds support in Egypt in the explanatory
memorandum of the Civil Code.
The explanatory memorandum of the Civil Code
said that "... it should be take into consideration that the
scope of the law applicable to formality.... covers only
elements of external formality, however, essential mattes
of formality, and determining the essential elements for
creation of the transaction as in authentication and
security-pledge are subject to nothing but the lawapplicable to the settlement of the transactions in
substance.."3
Therefore, recourse has to be made to the law
applicable to matters of "substance" in order to decide
whether authentication is required for the creation of the
transaction or not. If such authentication is required it
should be satisfied even if it is not required by the law atthe place of creation of the transaction. However, the
place of creation of the transaction will decide the way
according to which authentication should be satisfied. As
a result, the concept of formality will be restricted to a
narrow concept to contain what the explanatory
memorandum called "essential matters", i.e. the question
whether formality is required for the creation of the
transaction or not.
Nevertheless, the above mentioned doctrine is
criticized by some Egyptian scholars who argue for full
recourse to the law applicable at the place of the creation
of the transaction for determining whether authentication
is an essential element for creating the transaction or not.
3
SeeCollection of Act Prparatoires, Part I , 269
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
8/78
8
Their arguments are based upon the philosophy of
facilitation which constitutes the modern background for
the place of creation of the transaction. First, why shouldwe burden the parties with authentication required by the
law of substance while the law at the place of the creation
of the transaction does not require such element?
Second, the parties may be ignorant of the rules of
formality under the applicable law to the "substance"
while they are aware only of the formality requirements
at the place of transaction. Third, the other doctrinerender the "Locus Regit Actum" rule idle, because if we
restrict the parties choice of law to the application of the
formalities provided by the law of "substance" what shall
be left to the place of creation of the transaction. Fourth,
what if the law of "substance" required a particular
formality which cannot be satisfied in places other than
the place of that law e.g. interference of a particular
official clerk? Does not this lead to an impossiblecreation of the transaction at places other than the place to
which the law "substance" pertains?
Consequently, adopting of a wide concept of
formality is required to the extent of including the
question of whether particular formality is required or
not. Such a doctrine fits the requirements of facilitation
and which are vital for international transactions. Hence,if the law of "substance" requires an authentic formality
but the law at the place of the creation of the transaction
does not require more than the existence of a customary
formality then satisfaction of the latter law will suffice.
(ii) Formality for evidence
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
9/78
9
The majority of the Egyptian scholars agree to the
application of the "Locus Regit Actum" rule to the
question of whether documentary evidence is required forthe proof of the existence of a certain transaction, and the
probative authority of the different means of evidence.
Therefore, if the law at the place of the transaction does
not require documentary evidence while the applicable
law to the transaction's substance requires such evidence
then the transaction may be proved by testimonial
evidence.
Some of the Egyptian scholars argue for releasing
the parties form the required documentary evidence
provided for by the applicable law at the place of creation
of the transaction if the Lex Loci does not require such
type of evidence. Those scholars relay on the modern
philosophy of the "Locus Regit Actum" rule which is
facilitation of transactions.
Section Two : Conflict of Laws in Personal Status
1- Introduction
The treatment of the Egyptian statutory rules
for conflict of laws in matters related o persons requires
the discussion of the following: the preliminary topics,
marriage, capacity, heritage and will. We shall devote to
each of these topics a distinct subsection.
2-Plan
Subsection One : Introductory issues
Subsection Two: Marriage
Subsection Three: Capacity
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
10/78
10
Subsection Four: Inheritance and Will
Subsection One: Introductory IssuesThe Egyptian Quest to Independence & the
Abolishment of Foreign Capitulations
Before examining the choice of law rules on
Personal Status it is important for us to understand the
historical background of those rules to highlight some of
the above rules' unique aspects. During the period from
the sixteenth century up to the nineteenth century theMamluk and the Ottoman Empire resort to signing trade
treaties with European and other Western powers to
facilitate trade and entry of foreigner into Egypt and the
adjourning provinces. This was a part of development
strategy that aimed at encourage foreign investment.
Nonetheless, the European and other Western
powers were interested in establishing a foothold in theregion through the direct presence of their subjects and
direct engagement of foreign firms in the day to day
economic activity. Knowing that the Ottoman Empire
was already facing dare economic situations, hence it was
called "Europe's Sick Man", the Western powers
demanded that their subjects receive preferential
treatment vis-a-vis the local government. The foreigners
were not subject to local law nor local courts but they
were accountable only to consular courts established by
their states. This preferential treatment included the
establishment of a system known as "Foreign
Capitulations".
In Egypt foreign capitulations were inherited from
the Ottoman Empire. However, after the British Invasion
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
11/78
11
of Egypt in 1882 there were fears among other European
States that the British will move to abolish the foreign
capitulations enjoyed by their subjects as a part of aBritish plan to consolidate their power in Egypt. Using
their influence through their subjects, who were the
creditors of Egypt's sovereign debt, the European powers
succeeded in establishing the Mixed Courts System in
align with the National Court System.
The Mixed Court System was in fact a judicial
body composed of several courts organized in ahierarchy. The panels in those courts consisted only of
foreigner judges. The Mixed Court was competent to hear
cases where the plaintiff was a foreigner and applied the
Mixed Civil Code that did not contain choice of law
rules. On the other hand, the National Courts were only
competent to hear a case when both parties are Egyptians
and applied only the National Civil Code. Therefore,
under the dual court system choice of law situations wereonly possible before the Mixed Courts. The Mixed
Court's Council later on issued a set of procedural rules,
known are the "Rglement d'organisation judiciaire mixte
" which contained, ironically, the choice of law rules to
be used by the Mixed Courts.
This state of affairs was not acceptable to the
patriotic forces in Egypt and foreign capitulations,especially the Dual Court System, was a daily reminder to
all Egyptians that their country was not independent and
it is subject to foreign dominance. Thus, it was a share
view among all political powers around the political
spectrum in Egypt that the foreign capitulations must
come to an end.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
12/78
12
It was not until 1936 when the United Kingdom
sought to reach an agreement with the Patriotic Egyptian
forces in order to answer some of their demands. TheUnited Kingdom wanted to assure its position in Egypt
ahead of an escalating military confrontation with Nazi
Germany. As a result, both parties signed the Anglo-
Egyptian Friendship treaty that explicitly called upon the
abolishment of the Foreign Capitulations.
The United Kingdom mobilized its diplomacy to
set out a conference held at Montreux, Switzerland in1937. In that conference the foreign states that enjoyed
foreign capitulations expressed their concerns for the
future welfare of their citizens after the planned
abolishment of the Mixed Courts System. In particular,
the above states sought to have assurances that their
subjects will not be governed by Islamic Shariah when an
Egyptian Court faces choice of law situation involving a
foreign party.
In order, to easy their worries the Egyptian
Government did give the following assurances. First, as a
general rule it was agreed that the concept of "Personal
Status" as defined in Article 28 of theRglement
d'organisation judiciaire mixte will be retained. This
allowed the application of foreign personal law to issues
that are generally not considered a part of the "PersonalStatus" as it is understood under most Western choice of
law doctrines such as inheritance, wills and other
dispositions mortis causa.
Second, the Egyptian Government has agreed to
retain the same choice of law rules that were included in
Article 29 of theRglement d'organisation judiciaire
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
13/78
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
14/78
14
The Egyptian government even agreed to express state
the rejection of the Renvoi in order to prevent the
Egyptian Courts form using the foreign choice of rulesthat uses the domicile as a connecting criterion for
personal status choice of law rules as a means to apply
Islamic Sharia law on lawsuits involving foreigners6.
Thus, the will be no change in the foreigners' legal status
before or after the abolishment of the Mixed Courts
because the same issues governed by their personal law
will continue to be governed by the same law in the
future.
The third assurance given by the Egyptian
government is the adoption the "personal law" as a
connecting criterion for all future legislations that affect
the personal status of the foreigners. This continuous
assurance was meant to address the foreign states'
concern that the Egyptian Government might seize the
opportunity after the abolishment of the foreigncapitulations and enact new choice of law rules that might
lead to the application of the Islamic Shariah on
foreigners7.
Gifts shall be governed by the national law of the donor at the time of the gift.
The rules of the present Article shall not affect provisions relating to the legal
position of immovable property in Egypt.
6This was done by incorporating Art 31 of theReglement"The term "national
law" shall be understood to mean the municipal law of the country in question to
the exclusion of its provisions of private international law " into the Egyptian
Civil Code.7DECLARATION BY THE ROYAL EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT
"The undersigned, acting in virtue of their full powers, make the following
declaration:...............
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
15/78
15
1- The Concept of " Personal Status "
As we have seen earlier, the concept of "Personal Status"under Egyptian choice of law rules is an enlarged concept
unlike that adopted under other choice of law rules.
According to the Article 28 of theRglement
d'organisation judiciaire mixte Personal Status include"suits and matters relating to the status and capacity of
persons, legal relations between members of a family, more
particularly betrothal, marriage, the reciprocal rights and
duties of husband and wife, dowry and their rights ofproperty during marriage, divorce, repudiation, separation,
legitimacy, recognition and repudiation of paternity, the
relation between ascendants and descendants, the duty of
support as between relatives by blood or marriage,
legitimization, adoption, guardianship, curatorship,
interdiction, emancipation and also gifts, inheritance, wills
and other dispositions mortis causa, absence and the
presumption of death."
This enlarged definition of "Personal Status" drove
some scholars to suggest replacing the term "Personal
Status" with "Personal Status" in order to reflect the true
3. PERSONAL STATUS
The Royal Egyptian Government, having already, and more particularly in theEstablishment Treaties which it has concluded with Iran and Turkey,
spontaneously adopted the principle that, in matters of personal status, the
personal law should apply, intends to adopt the same principle with regard
thereto in the future.
As regards the rules of procedure, which the Royal Egyptian Government intends
to enact for cases of personal status, these will be applied provided that no
substantive rule of the foreign national law prevents their application."
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
16/78
16
meaning of the concept. Personally, I find that such
alteration is not necessary since as we have seen earlier
on the characterization of any concept used in theEgyptian choice of law rules is done according to the
Egyptian law.
2-Applicable Law to "Personal Status "
Personal Status is governed by the personal law (
Lex Personae). In most Common Law jurisdictions Lex
Personaeis the law of domicile (Lex Domicilii) while inmost of the Civil Law jurisdictions it is the law of
nationality (Lex Patriae). The domicile is the place in
which a person has voluntarily fixed his residence while
nationality is the individual's allegiance to a particular
state.
As we have seen the concept of Personal Status is
defined under Egyptian Law according to the Montreux
Convention 1937. This same thing applies the selection of
personal law as a connecting criterion for the choice of
law rules used by the Egyptian Legislator designed the
Personal Status choice of law rules.
An Appraisal of theLex Patriae
As we have seen earlier, the foreign states agreed
with the Egyptian Government to use Lex Patriae as achoice of law criterion. This in turn, drives us to evaluate
how suitable was the choice of Lex Patriae as a choice of
law criterion.
(a) The Advantages of Lex Patriae
Lex Patriae as a choice of law criterion has two
main advantages. First, it is easily ascertainable because a
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
17/78
17
person's nationality is usually officially documented
either through the person's possession of a passport or
other equivalent documents such as birth certificates,school records, etc. The Judge does not have to conduct
an extensive investigation, which is usually needed to
determine a person's domicile, to determine a person's
nationality. This saves the Court time and effort allowing
it to deal with the issue swiftly before examining the
substantive aspects of the dispute.
Second, a change of nationality is usually wellevidenced since a person normally cannot change his
nationality without recourse to a set of official procedures
that will produce official documents to establish the
occurred change of nationality.
Nonetheless, the application ofLex Partriaecan be
criticized for the following: First, as a result of increase
social mobility it is now uncommon to find persons whohold dual nationalities. This could be the outcome of
deliberate immigration form one state to another or the
person himself was the product of a mixed marriage. In
the latter case, the child may receive two nationalities, his
mother's nationality and his father's nationality8. In
addition, if the person is born in state that encourages
immigration he will receive that state's nationality as
well.
Second, it is possible that the person in question
belongs to a state that contains several distinct legal units
and the test of nationality may not, by itself, give us an
8This is now possible under the Egyptian Nationality Law which gives the right
to pass the Egyptian nationality to the children of an Egyptian parent whether
that parent is the child's mother or father. See Law no 154/2004.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
18/78
18
answer. Some jurisdictions follow a federal system which
leaves some areas of the law for the federal units to
regulate such as family law in the United States. UsingLex Partriaewill cause the Court to conduct an extensive
search over the applicable law. However, the Egyptian
Legislator has provided us with a solution which is to
delegate the matter to the internal choice of law rules in
that Jurisdiction.
The third, as is all too obvious today a person may be
stateless either as a result of being a member of a societythat does not adopt documentation as a means for
recording data or being an illegal alien who deliberately
concealed his identity.
(b) Difficulties in Ascertaining Nationality
Resort to Lex Partriae can be difficult. This takes
place in cases of multinational persons, stateless persons
and persons without a know nationality.
(i) Multinational Persons
In case that the person in question has the Egyptian
nationality among other nationalities that he pertains then
the Egyptian nationality will prevail over those
nationalities according to Art 25 (2) of the Civil Code.
However, if the Egyptian nationality is not among othernationalities that a person pertains then we will resort to
the de facto nationality. This is the solution adopted by
the International Court of Justice (April 6, 1955).
A de facto nationality can be ascertained through
several elements such as the person's domicile, interest,
social relations, his participation in public affairs and his
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
19/78
19
intentions. The explanatory memorandum of the Egyptian
Civil Code supports such solution. The determination of
the de factonationality is a fact left to the court to decide(trial courts and the appellate courts). However, we
support granting the Court of Cassation the authority to
review the lower court's findings on the de facto
nationality.
(ii) Stateless Persons and Persons without Known
Nationality.
If the person in question is stateless i.e. he does not
enjoy a nationality of a state or his nationality is unknown
then his personal law will be the law of the place to which
the person has the closest connection. This usually turns
out to be the law of domicile. If it was difficult to
determine the person's domicile, recourse will be made to
his place of residence. This solution finds support in the
explanatory memorandum of the Civil Code.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
20/78
20
Subsection Two Marriage:
1- IntroductionMarriage is a status conferred by the law upon a
union between a man and a woman whereby they assume
certain rights and duties. Treatment of conflict of laws in
matters of marriage requires determination of the
applicable law to the marriage's conclusion, effects,
nullity and dissolution. In addition, the treatment of the
exceptional application of the Egyptian law to themarriage contract will be relevant. Therefore, this
subsection will be divided into the following headings:
i- The Validity of the Contract of Marriage
ii-Effects of Marriage
iii- Nullity of Marriage
iv-Dissolution of Marriage
v-Exception application of the Egyptian Law
Heading One: The Validity of the Contract of
Marriage
(a) Formal Validity
According to Egyptian law the formal aspects ofmarriage are like any other formality governed by Art(20)
of the Civil Code. In pursue of Art(20) formality is valid
according to any of the following laws: the law of the
state in which the contract made, the law applicable to
matters of substance, the law of the common domicile of
the contracting parties or the law of their common
nationality. Since that the substantive aspects of the
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
21/78
21
marriage are governed by the law of the common
nationality of the spouses then the connecting factors for
the formal aspects of the marriage are: the law of theplace of conclusion, the law of the common nationality
of the spouses and the law of the common domicile.
The Place of Conclusion ( Lex Loci
Celebrationis)
Marriage is formally valid if it is made according
to the formality requirements at the place where themarriage was concluded. In such a case the marriage had
satisfied the local formality. The Egyptian law recognizes
many types of local formality for valid marriages.
The first type is the official formality and it is made
through the interference of a public official. Here we
have several different forms for the marriage depending
on the spouses' nationality and their faith. In case of
marriage between Egyptian Muslims the public official is
the Mazoon, while in the case of Egyptian Non-Muslims
sharing the same sect and denomination the official clerk
is the deputized authenticator. Foreigners and Egyptian
Non-Muslims who do not share the same sect and
denomination satisfy the official formality by recourse by
the public notary.
The second type of formality for marriage in Egypt
is the Islamic customary. However, satisfaction of the
Islamic customary formality is still disadvantageous since
that is does not proved the spouses with the same rights
and duties as in the formal marriage.
Therefore, marriage between foreigners in Egypt is
formally valid as long as it is made in accordance with
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
22/78
22
the official or the customary types of formality for
marriage in Egypt. By the same token marriage between
Egyptians taking place abroad is formally valid if it ismade in accordance with the formality requirements at
the place of the marriage. However, purely non-Muslim
and religious formality is not valid in case of a marriage
between Muslim spouses or in case the husband is
Muslim.
The Law of the Common Nationality
In addition to the local formality, the marriage can
be formally valid if it satisfies the formality requirements
under the law of the common nationality of the spouses.
If the spouses do not share the same nationality then the
formality requirements of the nationality laws of both
spouses must be satisfied.
Diplomatic or consular formality is considered
among the national forms. As a result, the marriage made
by foreigners in Egypt or by Egyptians abroad is valid
when it is made at their authorized embassy or consulate.
If one of the spouses is Egyptian the consular formality
by the Egyptian consulate abroad prerequisites
permission by the Foreign Minister ( Art (16) of the
Decree by law 8/5/1925). The Egyptian Consular service
is available to all Egyptians regardless of their faith.
The Law of the Common Domicile
Formal aspects of marriage can be valid if they
satisfy the legal requirement at the law of the spouses'
common domicile. Therefore, foreigners domiciled in
Egypt can validly conclude marriage in accordance with
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
23/78
23
the Egyptian official or customary forms even if they
were accidently residing outside Egypt.
Legal Category of the Contract of Marriage
Formal Validity
TheLex Foridetermines what constitutes formality
in the contract of marriage because it is a matter of
characterization. According to the dominate Egyptian
doctrine the Egyptian Lex Fori which will decide theformal aspects is the Islamic law because it is the
common law in matters of marriage.
According to our general legal rules formality is
whatever affects the expression of the person's will to the
external world. It is worth to remind the reader that we
have previously supported leaving the determination of
formality as necessary prerequisite for the creation of thetransaction to the law applicable to the formal aspects of
the transaction.
Consequently, the witness requirement is a formal
aspect of the marriage because it not related to the
consent to enter into the marriage but it is related to the
publicity of the ceremony. Also, due to the civil aspect of
marriage under Islamic Sharia the applicable law in Egyptthe religious ceremony is considered among the formal
aspects of the marriage.
However, the requirement of the parent's consent to
their minors' marriage is a substantive issue because it
completes the minor's consent. The evidence of marriage
is subject to the law applicable to the formal aspects of
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
24/78
24
the marriage. Namely, this law will be applicable to the
required means of evidence for establishing the existence
of the marriage and it will determine the probative powerof each means of proof.
(b) Substantive Validity of the Contract of
Marriage
The Connecting Factor
The validity of the substantive aspects of the
marriage is left to the spouses' law of the commonnationality. There will be no problem for the application
of this rule of law in case both spouses enjoy the same
nationality. The problem is when the spouses do not share
the same nationality. Shall the spouse' law of common
nationality mean that the court should apply the laws of
both spouses cumulatively? or shall the court resort to
distributive application of the spouses laws by applying
the requirements of each spouse's law to that spouse
only?
Cumulative application was suggested as a means
for protecting the martial relation. However, modern
doctrine supports distributive application; this avoids the
application of a combination of the legal requirements
that may end up by being more severe than those of any
of the spouses' laws. We support the modern doctrine;
however we should confess that sometimes the
distributive application will not be possible as in the case
for the prohibitions and other forms of negative
requirements which is usually called 'martial
forbiddances". For example, observance of a prohibition
against marriage between spouses of different creeds in
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
25/78
25
one spouse's personal law requires its application to the
other spouse even if the other spouse's law does not
recognize such negative requirement.
Legal Category
What is considered as a substantive aspect is a
question left to the law applicable to matters of
characterization the Lex Fori. As we have suggested
before, the Egyptian law will be the which determines
what is considered a formal aspect of the marriage andwhat is considered a substantive aspect of the marriage.
We remind the reader that we have concluded that
witness requirement and religious ceremony to be among
the formal aspects of the marriage. However, the essential
elements for the contract of marriage are left to the
concept of matters of substance.
Effects of the Public Policy
When the applicable foreign law is against the
Egyptian public policy then the Egyptian judge will not
apply it. Foreign laws applicable to the substantive
aspects of marriage are the most vulnerable laws to such
alienation due to their highly possible conflict with
Islamic Sharia which constitutes the basics of the public
policy in Egypt. As an example, our mandatory Islamic
law rules do not allow a female Muslim to marry a non-
Muslim male.
It is to be noted that public policy is operative only
with foreign Muslims or an Egyptian Muslim who got
nationalized after marriage. According to the Egyptian
conflict of law rules, Art 14 as we shall see later on, if
one of the spouses is an Egyptian at the time the marriage
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
26/78
26
was concluded that the substantive aspects of that
marriage will be governed by the Egyptian law.
Heading Two : The Effects of Marriage
Connecting Factor
According to Egyptian law Art13 "... the effects of
marriage, including its effects upon the property of the
spouses, are regulated by the law of the country to which
the husband belongs at the time of the conclusion of the
marriage...". Therefore, the connecting factor for theeffects of the marriage is the nationality of the husband at
the time of concluding the marriage. This means that we
have adopted one law to govern the effects of the
marriage to avoid the problematic consequences of the
distributive and cumulative application of the spouse's
personal laws.
The national law of the husband is supported by thefact that the husband is the master of the family. It is
worth to mention that the Egyptian legislator has adopted
the application of the national law of the husband at the
time of the conclusion of the marriage. In choosing such a
moment for determining the applicable law the Egyptian
legislator conclusively solved the problem of the mobile
conflict which takes place when the husband changes his
nationality at the time he files a lawsuit.
The positive solution that the Egyptian legislator
adopted here was found unconstitutional in other
countries. In Germany, such solution was ruled to be in
violation with the principle of equality between women
and men. Other suggested connecting factor is the
application of the law of the matrimonial domicile.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
27/78
27
Legal Category
The legal category of effects of marriage includestwo different groups, the personal and pecuniary effects
of the marriage.
(a) Personal Effects of Marriage
Personal effects of marriage may be purely
personal and may include certain pecuniary aspects.
Purely personal effects of marriage include the wife's
obligation to obey her husband, to be present at themarital domicile and the service to husband and children.
Also they may include the husband's duty to act justly
among his wives, if polygamous marriages were
permitted, and the wife's right to hold the family name of
her husband.
However, the personal effects that contain some
pecuniary aspects include the right of the wife to herdower, and the right of each spouse to matrimonial
alimony. They also include the payment of damages to
the other spouse to the other spouse in case of breach of
the contract of marriage.
Nevertheless, the alimony pendete lite paid to the
wife is subject to the Lex Fori. An alimonypendete lite is
a temporary alimony, which a husband by a court orderpays his wife for maintenance while the spouses are
pending a suit for divorce. Such alimony is established
for the conservation of public safety and order in the
community, and therefore its rules of law are directly
applicable regardless to the connected foreign laws to
marriage. Actually such rules of law belong to the
mandatory rules of law.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
28/78
28
According to the dominant doctrine, the wife's lack
of capacity subsequent to her marriage is considered as an
effect of marriage. This characterization is based on thefact that such lack of capacity is not established for the
protection of the wife but rather for the protection of the
family. Therefore, such lack of capacity will be subject to
the law of the family's master, the husband. Nevertheless,
the Egyptian trade law 17/1999 adopted the wife's law of
nationality to determine her capacity to trade. According
to Art 14 "... the law of state to which a married woman
belongs by her nationality shall regulate her capacity to
trade.."
Nevertheless, in order protect bona fide persons
trading with foreign married businesswomen Art 14 (2) of
the Egyptian Commercial code provides that "A Foreign
wife exercising trade as a profession shall be assumed to
be exercising it with her husband's permission. If the
applicable law allows the husband to object to herexercise of trade as a profession, or withdrawals his
previous permission then that permission shall be
recorded in the register of trade and shall be published in
the register's journal. The objection or withdrawal of
permission shall have no effect except form the date of
completing such publication..."Besides, ".. The objection
or withdrawal of the permission shall not affect the
acquired rights by the bona fide party...."
(b) Pecuniary Effects of the Marriage
We mean with 'pecuniary effects of the marriage',
the matrimonial regime recognized by certain legal
systems, as in the French system of rgime matrimonial.
By virtue of this legal system the spouses will arrange the
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
29/78
29
system by which their matrimonial estate will be
organized, before, through and after marriage. The
matrimonial regime is unknown to the Egyptian laws(whether the laws applicable to Muslims or those which
are applicable to non-Muslims). This explain the
Egyptian legislator's adoption of a legislative
qualification for such concept.
According to Egyptian law, in principle, the
matrimonial regime is subject to the law applicable to the
effects of marriage, i.e. the national law of the husband atthe conclusion of the marriage. However, the above-
mentioned rule is restricted by the obligatory respect of
the law of the place of the property, the Lex Rei Sitae.
The Lex Rei Sitae is applicable to possession, ownership
and other rights in rem on the matrimonial regime
regardless of the husband's national law.
In addition, bona fide third parties should not beharmed by the application of the husband's law to the
matrimonial regime. In this context art 15 (1) of the
Egyptian trade code provides that " ....A foreign wife
practicing trade shall be supposed to have got married
according to a the system of separation of estates unless
otherwise stipulated by the terms of the pecuniary
agreement between both spouses...".In order to support
the publication of the peculiar aspects of the matrimonialregime art 15 (2) provides that ".... the terms of pecuniary
agreement between the two spouses shall not be invoked
against third parties except after its notarization by
recording it in the register of trade and publishing its
summary in the register's journal.."
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
30/78
30
However, the bona fide third party should not be
harmed by the fact of not publishing a suitable
matrimonial regime to his interests. Therefore, theEgyptian trade code provides that "...in case of neglecting
the publication of the pecuniary terms of agreement
between the two spouses, the third party may prove that
the marriage had taken place according to a matrimonial
regime more suited to his interests than the system of
separation of estates". Also, according to art 15 (4) "...a
court ruling pronounced abroad concerning the separation
of estates shall not be invoked except from the date of
recording it in the register of trade and publishing its
summary in the register's journal.."
Contracts between Spouses
Besides the matrimonial regime which is subject to
the applicable law to the effects of marriage, there are
other pecuniary transactions between the spouses andwhich may take the form of sales, hire, donation and
matrimonial companies i.e. contracts between spouses.
Some of the scholars supports subjecting the contracts
between spouses to the law of autonomy as in the case
with any other contractual relationship. Nonetheless, we
support applying the law governing the matrimonial
regime to those contracts especially when such law
imposes restrictions on contracts between spouses. Theserestrictions should be observed because they were laid
down for the purpose of protecting the matrimonial
relationship.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
31/78
31
Heading Three Nullity of Marriage
1-Applicable LawIt happens that a formal or a substantive
requirement for the marriage may not be satisfied and
subsequently the marriage will be considered null and
void. The question is which law shall decide the effects of
such nullity? According to the dominant doctrine the
nullity of the marriage is subject to the law whose
requirements were not fulfilled. Therefore, in order for amarriage to be considered as a null under the Egyptian
private international law it must not fulfill the
requirements of either the law governing the formality of
the marriage or the law governing the substance of the
marriage , which called the essential elements in English
law.
2-Effects of the Nullity of Marriage and
Matrimonium Putativum
In principle when a marriage is judicially declared
null it will be considered as if it did not exist. However,
some legal systems do not apply the nullity effect
retroactively and they do tolerate some of the legal effects
generated by the null marriage. Such toleration is
required to protect the good faith of one of the spouses
and the rights of the children resulted from the null
marriage. In such a case the null marriage will be
considered as a valid marriage in the period preceding the
declaration of nullity. This is known as Matrimonium
Putativum.Nevertheless, the question is to what law will
govern theMatrimonium Putativum?
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
32/78
32
According to the dominant doctrine Matrimonium
Putativum is governed by the same law that led to the
nullity of the marriage because Matrimonium Putativumis an effect of nullity. However, the logical base of the
above mentioned doctrine is not sufficient to overcome
the practical obstacles such as in case if the nullity of the
marriage was caused by the national law of both spouses
who do not share a common nationality. Therefore, we
prefer to characterize the concept of Matrimonium
Putativum as a matter related to the effects of marriage
and apply the husband's national law at the time the
marriage was concluded. It is worthy to mention that the
concept Matrimonium Putativum is regarded as a matter
of public policy and if the husband's national law does not
recognize such a concept then that law will be substituted
with the forum's law.
Heading Four : Dissolution of Marriage
1-Connecting Factor
According to art 13 (2) of the Egyptian Civil Code
: "...Repudiation of the marriage is governed by the law
of the state to which the husband belongs at the time of
repudiation, whereas divorce and separation are governed
by the law of the state to with the husband belongs to at
the date of initiating the proceedings...". Dissolution ofthe marriage is recognized by the Egyptian legal system
and it may take one of the following forms: repudiation,
divorce, separation.
Repudiation is the voluntary dissolution of the
marriage and it is non-judicial because it is made by an
informal procedure conducted outside the courts. Under
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
33/78
33
Islamic shaira a husband may be able to divorce his wife
by uttering the work "talaq" with the intention of
dissolving the marriage. However, divorce or moreparticularly divorce by decree is a dissolution of the
marriage after a judicial interference.
Separation or divorce a mensa et thoro is the
dissolution of the marriage by which the spouses are
separated and forbidden to live and cohabit together,
without affecting the marriage itself. This is why such
type of dissolution is sometimes qualified as being adivorce for bed and bread.
The applicable law to the marriage's dissolution is
the law of the husband, and unlike the effects of the
marriage it is the law of the husband at the moment of
repudiation and it is his law at the time of lodging his
lawsuit in case of divorce or separation unlike the effects
of the marriage. The above mentioned connecting factorhas been criticized for allowing the wife to be taken by
surprise due to the husband's change of nationality at the
time of the repudiation or at the time of lodging the
lawsuit in case of divorce or separation.
It is true that the change of the connecting factors
with the intention to curtail illegal the applicable law is
considered fraud upon law and it is punished but suchfraud is sometimes difficult to prove. In addition, the
above mentioned connecting factor does not observe the
principle of equality between women and men. Therefore,
some legal systems adopted other connecting factors such
as the German legal system which adopted the place of
matrimonial domicile.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
34/78
34
2- Legal Category
The Legal Category of dissolving the marriageincludes: conditions for dissolution, its consequences and
procedure.
Conditions of Dissolution
The legal category of the dissolution of marriage
includes its legal conditions e.g. who can seek the
dissolution, the grounds for dissolution, the burden of
proof, the means of proof and its probative power.However, the procedure for presenting the proof before
the court is subject to the forum's law because it is a
matter of procedure. Also, determining what constitute a
repudiation, divorce or separation is governed by forum's
law because it is a matter of characterization
Consequences of Dissolution
The legal category of the marriage's dissolution
also includes the consequences of the dissolution and
namely its personal consequences. The personal
consequences of the marriage dissolution include the
divorced wife's alimony , the divorced wife's domicile,
the preceding period of separation which is converted into
divorce, the divorced wife's right to keep her ex-
husband's family name and the right to receive damagesfor breach of contract of marriage.
However, the pecuniary consequences of the
marriage dissolution, the matrimonial regime, are
excluded from the effects of the dissolution and they
belong to the pecuniary effects of the marriage which is
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
35/78
35
governed by the husband's law of nationality at the time
of concluding the marriage.
Excluded Matters: Procedures for Dissolution
The procedural matters are governed by the forum's
law, the Egyptian law, according to art (22) of the
Egyptian Civil Code which states that "... all questions of
procedure are governed by the law of the statein which
the lawsuit is brought or in the statein with the
proceedings are taken place..." However, some lawsrequires religious or legislative interference in order to
obtain divorce. Though characterization of such matter is
left to the forum's law the modern doctrine characterize
such interference as procedures subject to the forum's
law.
Sometimes interlocutory procedures takes place
during the divorce or separation lawsuit such as
temporarily alimony , alimony pendete lite, residence of
with and her receipt of daily support property. These
matters are directly subject to the forum's law because
they fall into the scope of the forum's law mandatory
rules.
Effects of Public Policy on Dissolution of
Marriage
The applicable foreign laws in matters of
dissolving the marriage which contradicts with the
Islamic sharia are not necessarily against the public
policy in Egypt. This is a normal consequence of the
Egyptian recognition for the application of other religious
rules to matter of persons. However, Islamic sharia as an
ingredient of the Egyptian public policy may be engaged
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
36/78
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
37/78
37
Egyptian husband and a foreign non-Muslim wife if the
latter denied the validity of that marriage.
The above mentioned precaution is criticized for
providing an unnecessary protective mechanism. The
protection provided by the public policy defense is
sufficient because it will allow the Egyptian court to
disregard the foreign non-Muslim wife's personal law if it
contradicts the Islamic Sharia. Additionally, the
exception does not protect all Egyptians. It protects only
those who enjoy the Egyptian nationality beforeconcluding the marriage but not those who acquired the
Egyptian nationality after concluding the marriage.
Ironically, this exception provides protections to those
who enjoyed the Egyptian nationality at the time their
marriage was concluded and lost it subsequently!!!
Needless to say that the application of the Egyptian
law does not necessarily mean that the Islamic sharia willbe applied. the Egyptian legal system recognizes the
application of the dual religious rules of non-Muslim
spouse if either one enjoys the Egyptian nationality and
both shared the same sect and denomination.
3- Exception to the Effects of the Marriage
The effects of the marriage is governed according
to Art 13 (1) by the husband's personal law at the time the
marriage is concluded. As a result, the exception is not
applicable unless the wife was an Egyptian when the
marriage was concluded. The rasion d' etre behind this
exception was to unify the laws that governs the marriage
substantive aspect and effects. However, this exception is
criticized because wives who acquired the Egyptian
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
38/78
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
39/78
39
3- The Concept of "Capacity"
(a) Excluded MattersThe following matters are excluded from the
category of capacity:
a- Capacity to enjoy: which is the ability to acquire
rights and assume obligations and it is subject to the law
applicable to the right in question e.g. Lex Causae.
b- Forbiddance from disposition: or specialincapability is subject to the law applicable to the
transaction concerned with that forbiddance. e.g.
forbidding judges and doctors from exercising certain
transactions.
(b) Included Matters
The included mattes among the concept of capacity
are those which are related to the idea of capacity toexercise which is the ability to exercise rights and assume
obligations. Therefore, these matters will include:
a-Age of majority
b-Extent of the capacity of the incapable
c-Incidents of incapacity such insanity, feeble
mindedness, prodigality and imbecile.
d-Obstacles to capacity such as absence, double or
serious disability, conviction of a felony.
A remark should be made to the fact that incidents
and obstacles of capacity are required to be declared by
court decisions. Therefore, such court decisions should be
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
40/78
40
recognizable and enforceable in Egypt so that it could be
given effect.
4-The Exception
(a) Lizardi Case
This is the exception was developed by the French
case Lizardi. Lizardi was a twenty three years old
Mexican who bought jewelry from a French merchant in
France. The French merchant accepted a promissory note
as a payment for the jewelry that Lizardi bought fromhim. However, we the note became due Lizardi refused to
pay it and he used his incapacity under the Mexican law ,
the age of majority was 25 years under the Mexican law
at that time, as a defense against the merchant's claim for
the unpaid price. The French Cour de Cassation
recognized that it should disregard the Mexican law
because it was not acceptable to assume that a French
citizen will be aware of all the law of the world. The
court concluded that the contract of sale should remain
valid as long as it was not made recklessly. The Lizardi
case laid down a principle that protects parties with good
faith who rely on ostensible situations in order to secure
the stability of transactions in national markets.
(b) Positive Provision
The Lizardi case principle was adopted in Art 11
that states "... however, if one the parties in a transaction
of a pecuniary nature, concluded and have effects in
Egypt is a foreigner without legal capacity and such lack
of capacity is due to a reason that is not apparent one
which cannot be easily detected by the other party then
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
41/78
41
that reason shall have no effect on that foreigner's legal
capacity..."
(c) Requirements of the Exception
in order to use the above exception there should be
the following :
a- A pecuniary transaction
b- The transaction is concluded and produces its
effects in Egypt
c- Lack of capacity is due to an obscure reason
d-the other contracting party was acting in good
faith
(d) The Effects of the Exception
If the requirements for the exception was fulfilledthen the foreign national law will be disregarded and will
be substituted with the Egyptian law.
(e) Particularity of Capacity to Trade
The capacity to trade is determined under Egyptian
law according to Art 11 of the law 17/1999 which
provides : "...1- The following, whether Egyptian or
foreigner, shall be qualified and eligible for the exerciseof trade:
a-Once he completes twenty one years of age even
though the law of the state to which he belongs by his
nationality considers him as a minor at that age
b-Whoever reaches the age of eighteen years under
the conditions prescribed in that law of the state to which
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
42/78
42
he belongs by his nationality after obtaining the
permission of the competent Egyptian court.
2- A person who is less than eighteen years old
shall not exercise the profession of trade in Egypt even
though the law of the state to which he belongs to by his
nationality considers him a major or allows him to
exercise trade
3- A minor who is authorized to trade shall have
the complete legal capacity to fulfill all legal dispositionrequired by his trade ...."
It is a opportunity to remind the reader the married
foreign females is determined by their national law
according to Art 14 of the trade law 17/1999
Section Four Inheritance and Will
1- Legal ProvisionArt 17 (1) of the Civil Code states that "....
inheritance, wills and other depositions taking effect after
death are governed by the national law of the ancestor,
the testator or the person disposing of property at
death...:
2- Inheritance
(a) Connecting Factor
The Egyptian law adopts a wide concept of
personal status which includes inheritance and will
among items of that concept so that it could be governed
by the person's nationality law. This attitude is justified
by the need for one applicable law to all matters of
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
43/78
43
succession regardless of the type of property within the
state i.e. whether the property is a movable or an
immovable.
(b) Concept of Inheritance
Protection of the rights of creditors and third
parties on succession belongs to the concept of the
property status, and procedure for inheritance is subject to
the forum's law.
(c) Included Matters
Matter of Inheritance include :
a- conditions for inheritance: Death of the ancestor,
lost persons, life of the heir, unborn children.
b- persons eligible for receiving inheritance, their
status and shares. This also include the case of
forbiddance from inheritance such as murder, differentfaiths, Hagb, Rad and Owl
c- The nature of the succession process whether it
was obligator or compulsory.
(d) Matters Related to the Status of Property
There are certain matters which are not included in
the legal category of inheritance and they are subject to
Lex Rei Sitae. These matters are
a- The ancestor's creditors rights on the property
under succession
b-Publication of the right to inherit
c- Co-ownership between heirs.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
44/78
44
(e) Vacant Succession
The determination of the vacant succession is leftto the forum's law because it is a matter of
characterization. Under the Egyptian law, vacant
successions exist when no one makes a claim against the
property of the ancestor as a heir or when all the eligible
heir have renounced the estate. According to Islamic
sharia vacant successions belongs to the public treasury
and this rule is applied because there are not any heirs not
because it is a matter of inheritance.
3-Will
The will is a transaction by which a person express
his wish to dispose his property in a certain way after his
death. This transaction is made by the testator's unilateral
will and it is not compulsory because it can be revoked
during the testator's life.
(a) Connecting Factor
The will is governed by the testator's national law
at the moment of his death. However, there are some
issue that require a special treatment.
(b) Substantive Issues in the Will
There are two types of substantive issues in thewill. The first type relates to the concept of succession
while the second type relates to the concept of the will as
an transaction. Issues of will that relate to the concept of
succession includes the testator's discretion, determining
the possible will-successors, cases of forbiddance from
enjoying a right under the will and the legal effects of the
will.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
45/78
45
Substantive issues that are not included in this
conflict of law rule are the capacity to exercise the will
and vices of consent. Some scholars support theapplication of the testator's national law at the time of
death to these issues. However, we support another
opinion. We believe that the testator's capacity to exercise
the will should be governed by both the law of the
testator at the moment of making the will and the
testator's national law at the time of death. In regards to
the vices of consent we support applying the testator's
national law at the moment of creating the will.
(c) Issues Related to the Status of Property
The law of the property's site will govern the
publication of the will and the creditor's rights in the
property. That law will also govern the co-ownership
between the heirs and will-successors.
(d) Formal Issues of the Will
The required formality for the will shall be
determined according to Art 17 (2) of the Egyptian Civil
Law which states that ".... the national law of the testator
at the time the will was made.. The same law will govern
the form of other dispositions taking effect after death..."
(e) Effects of the Public Policy on the ApplicableLaw on Inheritance & Will
Foreign laws applicable to inheritance and wills
can be disregarded if they violate the public policy. This
can take place is the following situations:
a- Denial of inheritance due to sexual or racial
discrimination
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
46/78
46
b-Allowing heirs who had deliberately killed their
ancestor to inherit
c-Allowing illegitimate children to inherit
d-Allowing inheritance between a Muslim and
non-Muslim
e-Denying females the right to inherit
f-Favoring the elder son.
Section Three Conflict of law rules in Pecuniary
Rights
1- Introduction
Pecuniary rights are those which have a monetary
value or forms the person's wealth. Usually, private
international law scholars in Egypt treat this topic under
the heading of "obligations". Here the concept ofobligations is used with its widest sense i.e. the concept
covers both topics of personal and real rights. The topic
of personal rights is usually treated under the heading
"the applicable law to obligations". However, since that
obligations are divided according to their sources into
contractual and non-contractual sources the dominant
doctrine in Egypt teats the conflict of laws in three
different sub headings which are the applicable law tocontractual obligations, the applicable law to non-
contractual obligations and the applicable law to the
status of property
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
47/78
47
2- Plan
This section will contain the following :Subsection One: The applicable law to contractual
obligations
Subsection Two : The applicable law to non-
contractual obligations
Subsection Three: The applicable law to status of
property
Subsection One : The Applicable Law to
Contractual Obligations
1- Introduction
Contractual obligations are those which are basedon contracts. Most of the international business
transactions are conducted through international
contracts. As a result, the proliferation of free market
concepts has increased the likelihood of conflict of law
issues raised by international contracts.
2- Positive Provision
The determination of the applicable law tointernational contracts depends of the competent forum
whether it was a court or an arbitration panel. We will
concentrate on the first case which determining the
applicable law to an international contract before a court.
According to Art 19 of the Egyptian Civil Code "...the
contractual obligations are governed by the law of the
domicile when such domicile is common to the
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
48/78
48
contracting parties, and in the absence of a common
domicile by the law of the place where the contract was
concluded. These provisions are applicable unless theparties agree, or the circumstances indicate that it is
intended to apply another law. However, contracts
relating to immovable are governed by the law of the
place in which the immovable in situated..."
We will start our analysis of this article by pointing
to its correct construction since that it was, unfortunately,
poorly drafted. Art 19 clearly adopts the party autonomychoice of law rule for contracts. According to this rule
that parties are free , within certain limits, to choose any
law to govern their contract whether their choice was
express, in the form of a choice of law clause within the
contract in question, or a tacit choice of law that can be
inferred from the circumstances surrounding the
conclusion of the contract itself.
However, if the parties were not able to reach an
agreement on the law governing the contract the Egyptian
Judge should revert to any of the alternative choice of law
rules contained in Art 19 which are , the contracting
parties place of common domicile, the law of the place
where the contract is concluded respectively9.
9 Under Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations
No 593/2008 of 17 June 2008 Article 3 "..1. A contract shall be governed by the
law chosen by the parties. The choice shall be made expressly or clearly
demonstrated by the terms of the contract or the circumstances of the case. By
their choice the parties can select the law applicable to the whole or to part only
of the contract..."
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
49/78
49
3- Connecting Factor
According to the Art 19 a distinction must bemade between an existing choice of law , express or tacit,
and the absence of an agreement on choice of law.
I- An Existing Express Choice of Law
The correct construction of Art 19 direct us to
search for the parties' express choice of law before
searching for the parties' implied choice of law through
conducting an examination of the circumstancessurrounding the contract.
(a) Express Choice
The Egyptian legislator, like most modern
legislators, gave the parties the right to choose the law
governing their contract. This freedom of choice is based
on the parties freedom to tailor their contract specificallyfor their needs10
. In addition, an express choice of law for
the contract has its advantages. First, the parties will be
able to determine beforehand the rules applicable to their
contract. This eliminates the uncertainty about the
applicable law to the contract11
. Second, express choice
of law is more efficient in terms of costs and time when a
dispute arises between the parties before the Court or the
Arbitration panel. The Judge, or Arbitrator, will focus onapplying the chosen law and not on finding the law
applicable to the contract which the parties' tacit consent
was inclined to choose.
10Peter M. North, "General Course on Private International Law", Receuil Des
Cours, Volume 220, Year 1990, page 15311
Ibid
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
50/78
50
(b) Extent of Freedom of Choice.
The extent of freedom given to the parties tochoose the law governing their contract is an issue that is
heavily debated between choice of law scholar between
those who see that parties are completely free to make
their choice and those who prefer setting some restraints
on the parties freedom of choice such as selecting the law
of a state that has a genuine connection to the
contract..,etc.
What makes this debate relevant under Art19 is
that there is no limits imposed by the wording of the
article on the parties' freedom of choice. Therefore, it is
acceptable to say that once the parties choose a foreign
law that law becomes incorporated into the contract as a
contractual stipulation. Consequently, the parties may
adopt certain rules and leave others. The parties my adopt
rules form several different foreign laws , depecage, andthey may even detach their contract from the ambit of any
national law, contract sans loi . This is supported by the
modern legislations on contractual choice of law12
.
However, there is within the choice of law scholars
those who believe that the parties freedom in choosing
the law of their contract is not absolute. They restrict the
parties choice of law by requiring that the chosen lawshould be connected to the international contract in
question. Otherwise, all choice of unconnected laws will
be disregarded13
. The same applies to the parties choice
12 Recital 13 of the Rome I Regulation stated that " This Regulation does not
preclude parties from incorporating by reference a non-state body of law or an
international convention.13 subsection 2 187 of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws (1971)
states that ".... The law of the state chosen by the parties to govern their
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
51/78
51
of international customs and rules known as Lex
Mercatoria14
or the parties attempt to freeze the rules
chosen by inserting a "Gel de Droit" clause15.
In my opinion, it does not matter whether the
parties have absolute freedom to choose the law of
contract or if their freedom is subjected to certain
requirements in order to have effect. The real issue at
stake is the parties' ability to bypass the application of
certain mandatory rules of a connected state or to enforce
an agreement which is intrinsically against the publicpolicy of that jurisdiction. If we reach an agreement that
none of the above will be allowed then the debate about
the parties' scope of freedom will lose its relevance.
This is currently the view adopted by the Rome I
regulation. In subsection four, article three of the
regulation there is an express statement that " Where all
other elements relevant to the situation at the time ofchoice are located in one or more Member States, the
parties' choice of applicable law other than that of a
Member State shall not prejudice the application of
provisions of Community law, where appropriate as
implemented in the Member State forum, which cannot
be derogated form by agreement.." This means that under
Rome I regulation the parties can choose whatever rules
they want to govern their contract with two main
contractual rights and duties will be applied, even if the particular issue is one
which the parties could not have resolved by an explicit provision in their
agreement directed to that issue, unless either
(a) the chosen state has no substantial relationship to the parties or the
transaction and there is no other reasonable basis for the parties' choice, or..."14Peter M North, Supra note (10 ) at 162.15Pierre Mayer et Vicent Heuz, " Droit International Priv", 7eedition,
Montchrestien, 2001 page 481.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
52/78
52
exception. First, the mandatory rules of a connected
Member State. Second, the European Union Regulations
and Directives that are applicable in the Member Statewhere the dispute concerning the contract itself is being
adjudicated. Here the parties freedom of choice is
checked by preventing them from evading the mandatory
rules.
(c) The Timing of Express Choice
The parties may choose the law governing theircontract when the contract concluded or afterwards
provided that the contract is valid from the outset
according to one the connecting factors included in Art
19. However, floating choice of law clauses where the
choice of law is dependent upon the occurrence of a
certain event such as a clause stating that "the ownership
of the goods shall be determined by the law of the place
where it exists during maritime shipping"
Floating choice of law clauses may not provide us
with an answer as to which law is applicable.
Furthermore, floating choice of law clauses will give rise
to the following problem: Which law should determine if
the choice of law event has occurred?
(d) Validity of the Choice of Law Clause
The choice of law clause, as any other clause in the
contract, must be valid in order to produce the required
legal effect, which is submitting the contract to the rules
of the applicable law. Although Art 19 did not state when
should we consider the choice of law valid we can at least
deduct from the general principles of law the following
requirements:_
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
53/78
53
1) The choice of law must be clear. A choice of law
clause in a contract must be clear in indicating which law
should govern the contract. If the clause is not clear thenwe might face a situation where the Judge will resort to
applying a law according to the implicit choice made by
the parties or to resort to the alternative connecting
factors in Art 19. This lack of clarity will virtual render
the choice of law useless.
2) The choice of law must be made in Bona Fide. If
the choice of law clause was made in bad faith , eitherthrough use of misrepresentation, mistake, undue
influence,...etc. then the clause will have no effect and it
will be vitiated by the Court. The choice of law clause, as
any other clause, is the product of the parties mutual
consent so it comes to no surprise that a defective consent
cannot produce a valid choice of law clause.
3) The choice of law must be legal. The choice oflaw clause as any other clause in the contract should not
be used to attain illicit gains such as evading mandatory
rules or to bypass the public policy of a certain
jurisdiction16
. As I have mentioned before, the parties'
scope of freedom to choose the law for their contract is
does not allow them to choose a law solely for the
purpose of avoiding certain rules in order to give the
parties to the contract the opportunity to maximize theirgains
17. Mandatory rules and the public policy will
16Peter M North, Supra note (10 ) at 165
17 Article 9 of Rome I Regulation states that Article 9
"1. Overriding mandatory provisions are provisions the respect for which is
regarded as crucial by a country for safeguarding its public interests, such as its
political, social or economic organization, to such an extent that they are
applicable to any situation falling within their scope, irrespective of the law
otherwise applicable to the contract under this Regulation.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
54/78
54
always have an overriding effect over the law of contract
chosen by the parties18
.
II- An Existing Implied Choice of Law
According to Art 19 the choice of law may be
express or implied although this poses a challenge for the
Judge to ascertain the law chosen by the parties to govern
their contract. This a de facto issue that is left to the trial
court's full discretion as a fact finder and escapes thereview by the court of cassation. Nonetheless we can give
examples of circumstances that may lead to the deduction
of an implied choice of law such as:
a-choice of the forum may indicate the choice of
that forum's law because the choice of forum might
reflect the parties' wish to entrust the resolution of any
future disputes concerning the contract to the forum's lawas it is applied by the forum.
b-The parties' usage of a certain terminology
belonging to a certain law may indicate the parties
intention to choose that law. In this case it is reasonable
2. Nothing in this Regulation shall restrict the application of the overriding
mandatory provisions of the law of the forum.
3. Effect may be given to the overriding mandatory provisions of the law of the
country where the obligations arising out of the contract have to be or have been
performed, in so far as those overriding mandatory provisions render the
performance of the contract unlawful. In considering whether to give effect to
those provisions, regard shall be had to their nature and purpose and to the
consequences of their application or non-application."18 Frank Vischer, "General Course on Private International Law", Recueil Des
Cours, Volume 232, Year 1992. page 154
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
55/78
55
to expect that the parties' willful use of certain terms that
has a certain legal connotation of a certain law could
indicate their desire to choose that law to govern theircontract .
c-The recourse to the authentication in a certain
state may indicate the choice of that jurisdiction's law
because authentication is a requirement to render a certain
type of transactions effective vis-a-vis third parties.
Usually, the parties to a contract will not burden
themselves to authenticate their contract unless theywished to render it effective under the law of the place
where the authentication took place. This in turn, leads us
to conclude that the parties wish to have their contract
governed by that law.
d- The parties' use of model contract which is
drafted according to a certain state's law19
such as
maritime insurance model contracts drafted by theLyold's syndicates based on English law or grain future
contracts prepared by Chicago Board of Trade based on
the law of the state of Illinois.
IV-Criticism
The doctrine of implied choice of law is criticized
for allowing the court to conclude the parties choice of
law form silence. The Judge's conclusions is ,at best,
second guessing the parties real intention without
asserting his findings on credible evidence. Indeed, some
choice of law scholars point that the absence of an
express choice of law is an evidence on none choice of
19Bernard Audit, "Droit International Priv", 3eedition, Economica, Paris, 2000,
page 680.
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
56/78
56
law. However, this criticism cannot be positively
supported by the law in Egypt because the implied choice
of law is clearly adopted within the wording of Art 19 ofthe Civil Code.
III-Clear Absence of Choice of Law
If there was no choice of law, express or implied,
then we can resort to certain legislative localizations for
the international contract. According to Art 19 the court
will be obliged to apply the law of the parties commondomicile and if there was not a common domicile then the
court will apply the law of the place where the contract
was made,Lex Loci Contratus
The legislative localization was praised for
protecting the justified expectations of the contracting
parties since they will know beforehand that the
applicable law if they did not make a choice of law.
Nevertheless, the above localization is criticized for
making it easy for the court to apply a law that may not
reflect the international contract's center of gravity. This
goes against the philosophy of private international law.
As a result, a substantial number of Egyptian conflict of
laws scholars suggested alternative judicial localizations.
one of the solutions adopted by modern choice of
law legislation is the application of the law of the place
where the habitual residence of the party required to
effect the characteristic performance of the contract. For
instance, in contracts of sale it is the seller's habitual
residence because his duty to deliver the goods and
transfer ownership is the characteristic performance to be
made under the contract of sale while in the contract of
-
8/9/2019 Choice of Law 2013
57/78
57
services it is the service provider's habitual residence..and
so on20
.
20article 4 of Rome I Regulation Article 4
".....1. To the extent that the law applicable to the contract has not been chosen in
accordance with Article 3 and without prejudice to Articles 5 to 8, the law
governing the contract