china dosri

42
Controlling Problematic Related Party Transactions of Banks in Asia Joseph P.H. Fan Center for Institutions and Governance Chinese University of Hong Kong OECD & BIS Seminar on Corporate Governance for Banks in Asia Hong Kong, June 19-20, 2006 ©The copyright of this document belongs to the author. Any use of the document, in part or in whole, should be subject to the author’s permission.

Upload: davidcarlgrimes

Post on 02-Oct-2015

14 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

China Financial Institutions Related Party Transactions

TRANSCRIPT

  • Controlling Problematic Related Party Transactions

    of Banks in Asia

    Joseph P.H. Fan

    Center for Institutions and GovernanceChinese University of Hong Kong

    OECD & BIS Seminar on Corporate Governance for Banks in Asia Hong Kong, June 19-20, 2006

    The copyright of this document belongs to the author. Any use of the document, in part or in whole, should be subject to the authors permission.

  • RPT Joseph Fan 2

    Outlinen What are related party transactions?n Disclosure of related party transactionsn Related party transactions in family

    controlled banksn Related party transactions in state owned

    banksn Controlling problematic related party

    transaction, what work?

  • RPT Joseph Fan 3

    What are related party transactions?

    n Business dealings between a party and an entity that is controlled/influenced by the party

    n How prevalent?n Almost all firms engage in RPTn Internal transactions are sometimes

    necessary for bypassing markets where business dealings are costly

  • RPT Joseph Fan 4

    Definition of Related Party (IAS 24)n A party is related to an entity if it

    n Directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the entity

    n Has significant influence over the entityn Has joint control over the entityn Is a close member of the family of any individual who controls,

    or has significant influence or joint control over, the entityn Is an associate of the entityn Is a joint venture in which the entity is a venturern Is a member of the key management personnel of the entity

    or its parentn Is a close member of the family of any of the aforementioned

    key management personneln Is an entity that is controlled, jointly controlled or

    significantly influenced by, or for which significant voting power in such entity resides with, any of the key management personnel or their close family members

    n Is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of the entity, or of any of its related parties

  • RPT Joseph Fan 5

    Disclosure requirements of RPT (IAS 24)n Nature of relationships between parents and

    subsidiaries, even if there were no transactionsn Name of the entitys parent and, if different, the

    ultimate controlling partyn Compensation of key management personneln For transactions between related parties

    n The nature of the relationship and info. About the transactions and outstanding balances

    n Separate reporting categories: the parent, entities with joint control or significant influences over the entity, subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures in which the entity is a venturer, key management personnel, and other related parties

  • RPT Joseph Fan 6

    Disclosure requirements of RPTn Typically disclose material RPT in

    footnotes of corporate reportsn Types and elementsn Volume, amountn Pricing policy

    n Transactions eliminated on consolidation are often exempted

    n Although various Asian economies require detailed disclosure, in practice such disclosure is limited

  • RPT Joseph Fan 7

    Types of Related Party Transactions

    n Loans/borrowings/guaranteesn Investment, M&Asn Purchases/salesn Consultingn Intercorporate dividendsn Executive/director compensation

  • RPT Joseph Fan 8

    Types of Reported Related Party Transactions in U.S. (S&P1500 firms, 2001, Kohlbeck and Mayhew, 2004)

    051015202530354045

    Loans

    Borrow

    ings

    Guarantees

    Consulting

    Legal & Investm

    entServices

    Leases

    Related B

    usinessA

    ctivities

    Unrelated B

    usinessA

    ctivities

    Overhead

    Reim

    bursement

    Stock Transactions

  • RPT Joseph Fan 9

    Types of Reported Related Party Transactions in China(1200 listed firms in China 1998-2002, Jian and Wong, 2006)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Sales

    Purchases

    Loans and B

    orrowings

    Services Revenues

    Services Expenses

    Interest Incomes

    Interest Expenses

    Asset Purchases

    Asset Sales

    Stock Purchases

    Stock Sales

    Rent R

    evenues

    Rent E

    xpenses

    Joint Investments

    Loan G

    uarantees for RP

    Loan G

    uarantees from R

    P

  • RPT Joseph Fan 10

    Extents of Reported Related Party Transactions by Industry(S&P1500 firms, 2001, Kohlbeck and Mayhew, 2004)

    0102030405060708090

    Natural R

    esources

    Manufacturing

    Equipment

    Technology

    Transportation

    Utilities

    Wholesale

    Retail

    Financial

    Business Services

    Other Services

    Total

  • RPT Joseph Fan 11

    Which RPT are problematic?n Transactions that transfer out cash or assets

    from an entity without immediate or future reciprocal compensation of cash or assets at fair prices

    n It is often difficult to determine whether an RPT is problematic or notn Difficulty of establishing a fair price

    due to lack of a liquid market, or during a period of high uncertainty

    n Relationship based transactionsn Discrepancy in the time and/or form of

    paymentn Accounting disclosure has limitation in dealing

    with RPT

  • RPT Joseph Fan 12

    Factors conducive to problematic RPTn Separation of ownership and control in complex

    organizationsn Intra-group dealings, insider dealings

    n Powerful/entrenched stakeholdersn Unionized laborn State and political influence

    Transaction made under the influence of a politician/bureaucrat or his allies (supporters, family members, colleagues, friends, bribers)

    More common among state owned enterprises/banks

    n More fundamentally weak institutionsn In the following, we separately examine RPT

    issues of family and state banks

  • RPT Joseph Fan 13

    Lius Holdings Ltd. Lius Family Other Investors

    45.33% 16.53% 38.14%

    Liu Chong Hing Investment Limited?

    LCH Insurance

    LCH Property Management and

    Agency

    100%100% 100%

    LCH Estate Company

    60%

    Guangzhou Chong Hing

    Property Dev.

    Other subsidiaries

    100%

    Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd.?

    45.11% 20%

    COSCO Pacific

    Other Investors

    23.55%9.66%

    Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Lius Family

    1.68%

    Separation of Ownership and Control of Bank in Family Group LCH Group and Liu Chong Hing Bank (HK)

    December 2003

  • RPT Joseph Fan 14

    Separation of Ownership and Control of Bank in Family Group LCH Group and Liu Chong Hing Bank (HK)

    n Liu family is the largest shareholder of LCH Bankn The family has at least 45% of voting rights of

    the Bank, while its ownership of the Bank is only 28% ((45.33%+16.53%)*100%*45.11%)

    n Potential conflict of interestn A decision maker benefits from a transaction but does

    not bear the full cost of his/her decisionn For every dollar taken away from the Bank, the family

    lost only 28 centn Significant RPT between the Bank and its

    affiliates during and shortly after the Asian Financial Crisis, but RPT declined substantially more recently

  • RPT Joseph Fan 15

    The Group borrows less from the Bank

    Data resource: annual reports of Liu Chong Hing Investment Ltd. (194)

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

    Interest expenses paid to associates/total interest expenses to bank loans(LCHI)

  • RPT Joseph Fan 16

    A decreasing trend in LCH Banks profit from RPT

    Data resources: annual reports of Liu Chong Hing Bank (1111)

    Profit from related party transactions/Operating profit

    0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%

    10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • RPT Joseph Fan 17

    Why fewer RPT?n New laws or stronger enforcement?

    Unlikelyn Most likely due to the Banks strategy

    changen Expanding into arms length businesses

    rather than depending on the family group

    n More professional, less family-influenceChong Hing Bank--Erasing the family surname from the name of the Bank in the new headquarters building

  • RPT Joseph Fan 18

    Controlling Problematic RPT in Family Controlled Banksn Family may have conflicts of interest with

    minority shareholders and/or depositorsn Reputation concern is typically sufficient

    to mitigate these conflicts during normal time

    n But during turbulent time, such as a deregulating market or a large negative profit shock, reputation and self-governance alone might not be sufficient to contain conflicts of interest of desperate controlling owners

  • RPT Joseph Fan 19

    Controlling Problematic RPT in Family Controlled Banksn Mechanisms that separate the banking and non-

    banking businesses (such as real estate investment)n Simplifying and disclosing

    organizational/ownership structuren Independent board committee that monitor

    material RPTn Board (independent of owners, managers, and

    bureaucrats) that monitor material RPTn Material RPT subject to regulatory approval during

    turbulent timesn Liberalizing the banking market to allow

    competitionn Let the market monitor the banks and the

    regulator monitor the market

  • RPT Joseph Fan 20

    RPT in state owned banks are more serious problemsn Practically, state banks and SOEs are related

    parties, transactions between them are therefore always RPT

    n Politicians and their allies have incentives to intervene state banks lending decisionsn Social welfare, votes, corruption

    n Internal monitoring is typically weak other peoples money

    n Regulators often fail to monitor problematic RPT of SOB, because of obvious conflicts of interest

    n Need an enforcement system independent of political influences, but this is hard to come by

  • RPT Joseph Fan 21

    A case in point China Construction Bank

    n CCB is one of four wholly government controlled specialized banks before 2004

    n Chinas third-largest lender, focusing on lending to infrastructure investment projects

    n The Banker magazine ranked CCB the 35th largest bank in the world based on total assets as of 2004

    n Since 2003, went through a series of restructurings: recapitalization, disposal and write-off non-performing loans, issuances of subordinate bonds, etc.

    n 2004.9, became joint-stock commercial bank n 2005.10, listed in Hong Kong exchange, from a

    wholly state to a state-controlled public bank

  • RPT Joseph Fan 22

    As December,2004

    100%10248.1100%14618.1100%16998.177992Total

    17.5%1797.118%2637.220.5%3489.611307Bank of China

    21.7%2225.623.9%3489.423%3904.814458China Construction Bank

    25.3%2590.123.9%3491.523.6%4013.831004Agriculture Bank of China

    35.5%3635.234.2%500032.9%5589.921223Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

    % of total

    Amount% of total

    Amount% of total

    Amount

    Loans(Billion RMB)

    Deposit(Billion RMB)

    Total Assets(Billion RMB)

    Branch

  • RPT Joseph Fan 23

    Lending Bias toward Related Partiesn An important but ignored fact: state banks

    and SOEs are related partiesn CCBs has been offering most of its loans

    to SOEsn By contrast, performance and growth of

    SOEs have been lagging behind the private sector

    n Most of its impaired loans resulted from the banks local branches lending to local government controlled entities

  • RPT Joseph Fan 24

    Most loans go to SOEs

    0

    300000

    600000

    900000

    1200000

    1500000

    1800000

    2002 2003 2004 2005

    SOE

    Total

    Collectivelycontrolled

  • RPT Joseph Fan 25

    Output and investment growth of SOEs have been lagging behind the private sector

    From: Allen et al 2005 JFE

  • RPT Joseph Fan 26

    Most impaired loans resulted from lending

    to local government controlled entities

    0.00%

    5.00%

    10.00%

    15.00%

    20.00%

    25.00%

    30.00%

    35.00%

    40.00%

    45.00%

    2002 2003 2004 2005

    SOE

    Total

    Collectivelycontrolled

    Joint Ventures

  • Two former chairmen and CEOs were caught in corruption scandals

    Wang Xuebing Zhang Enzhao

  • RPT Joseph Fan 28

    Can public listing mitigate unsound related party lendings?

    n The challenges with CCB are representative of Chinas bank sector

    n The government has been in process of listing its state banks, hoping problems will go away

    n Not clear how it will work, in particular on lending bias toward related parties (SOEs)

    n But lets look at how management and governance structures have changed

  • RPT Joseph Fan 29

    Ownership structure before IPO (as of 2004.12)

    HuiJin

    JianYin State Grid Shanghai Baosteel

    YangtzePower

    China Construction Bank (BBC)

    Jian XinBank Limited

    Sino-GermanBausparkasseCorporation

    Limited

    85.228% 10.653% 1.545% 1.545% 1.03%

    100%

    100% 75.1%

  • RPT Joseph Fan 30

    Ownership Structure on IPO(as of 2005.12)

    JianYin State Grid

    Shanghai Baosteel

    China Construction Bank (BBC)

    Jian XinBank Limited

    Sino-GermanBausparkasseCorporation

    Limited

    61.48% 9.21% 1.34% 1.34% 0.89%

    100%

    100% 75.1%

    HuiJin

    YangtzePower

    Bank of American

    AFH others

    Temasek

    8.52% 5.88% 11.34%

    CCB Principal Asset Management

    65%

    100%

  • RPT Joseph Fan 31

    Governance Structure of China Construction Bank before IPO (2004)

    China Construction BankChina Construction Bank

    Communist Party Committee

    *11 people, Zhang was the party secretary

    Communist Party Committee

    *11 people, Zhang was the party secretary

    Board of Directors*Zhang was the chairman, 3 out of 13 directors from

    the Party Committee

    Board of Directors*Zhang was the chairman, 3 out of 13 directors from

    the Party Committee

    Supervisory Board*4 members,

    chairman from the Party Committee

    Supervisory Board*4 members,

    chairman from the Party Committee

    Management*7 people

    , all from the Party Committee

    Management*7 people

    , all from the Party Committee

  • RPT Joseph Fan 32

    Governance Structure of China Construction Bank after IPO (2006)

    Shareholder General Meeting

    Shareholder General Meeting

    Board of Supervisors*7 members

    *4 shareholder representative Supervisors

    *2 external supervisors*Xie is chairman, also from the

    Party Committee

    Board of Supervisors*7 members

    *4 shareholder representative Supervisors

    *2 external supervisors*Xie is chairman, also from the

    Party Committee

    Board Of Directors*15 members

    *Guo is the chairman of directorAnd also secretary of party

    committee*4 executive directors,

    And all of them sit in the Party Committee

    *4 are independent director

    Board Of Directors*15 members

    *Guo is the chairman of directorAnd also secretary of party

    committee*4 executive directors,

    And all of them sit in the Party Committee

    *4 are independent director

    Strategy DevelopmentCommittee

    *12 members*Guo is chairman

    Strategy DevelopmentCommittee

    *12 members*Guo is chairman

    Risk ManagementCommittee7 member

    *chairman is oneNon-executive director

    Risk ManagementCommittee7 member

    *chairman is oneNon-executive director

    Nomination andCompensation

    Committee*7 member

    *chairman is oneIndependent director

    Nomination andCompensation

    Committee*7 member

    *chairman is oneIndependent director

    Related PartyTransaction Committee

    *3 member*chairman is independent

    director

    Related PartyTransaction Committee

    *3 member*chairman is independent

    director

    Performance and DueDiligence committee

    *4 member*xie is chairman

    Performance and DueDiligence committee

    *4 member*xie is chairman

    Financial and Internal Control

    Committee*3 member

    *chairman is external supervisor

    Financial and Internal Control

    Committee*3 member

    *chairman is external supervisor

    Audit Committee*7 member

    *chairman is one Independent director

    Audit Committee*7 member

    *chairman is one Independent director

    Presidents*7 top managements*all are in the party

    committee

  • Rent Seeking and Corporate Finance: Evidence from Corruption Cases

    Joseph P.H. Fan*Oliver M. Rui*

    Mengxin Zhao**

    *Chinese University of Hong Kong **Bentley College

  • RPT Joseph Fan 34

    Province Name Position Event Day Sentence Day Sentence Number of firms in the

    province

    The Bribing Firms

    The Connected Firms

    The Non-event Firms

    Anhui Wang Huizhong

    Vice-Province Governor 20010407 20031229 Death penalty 27 1 2 24

    Bank Liu Jinbao Vice-Chairman & CEO of Bank Of China (HK) 20030525 20050812 Suspended death penalty 5 5 0 0

    Bank Wang Xuebin CEO of China Construction Bank 20020111 20031210 12 years of imprisonment 5 5 0 0

    Beijing Chen Xitong CPC Secretary 19950426 19980731 16 years of imprisonment 11 5 3 3

    Central Li Daqiang Vice-Province Governor 20000925 20000925 Dismissal from the service and CPC 2 2 0 0

    Central Xu Penghang Vice chairman of national defense technology commission and national economics and trade commission

    20001011 20001011 Dismissal from the service 1 1 0 0

    Fujian Shi Zhaobin Vice-CPC Secretary 19990818 20010927 Dismissal from the service and CPC 34 5 3 26

    Guangxi Xu Binsong Vice-Chairman of Municipality 19980523 19990827 Life imprisonment 6 0 1 5

    Guangxi Chen Kejie Chairman of Municipality 20000111 20000731 Death penalty 10 2 1 7

    Guangxi Liu Zhibin Vice-Chairman of Municipality 20000319 20020624 15 years of imprisonment 10 2 2 6

    Guangxi Wang Qinglu Vice-Chairman of PPCC 20010222 20010222 Dismissal from the service and CPC 13 0 1 12

    Guizhou Liu Changgui Vice-Province Governor 20030417 20040430 11 years of imprisonment 12 1 3 8

    Guizhou Liu Fangren CPC Secretary & PC Chairman 20030422 20040629 Life imprisonment 12 1 1 10

    Hainan Xin Yejiang Vice-PC Chairman 19961227 19980526 5 years of imprisonment 10 2 0 8

    Hebei Jiang Dianwu Vice-PC Chairman 19971101 19981207 10 years of imprisonment 13 0 0 13

    Hebei Chen Weigao CPC Secretary & PC Chairman 20000301 20030809 Dismissal from CPC 25 1 3 21

    Hebei Cong Fukui Vice-Province Governor 20000627 20010518 Dismissal from the service and CPC 24 0 2 22

    Hubei Meng QingPing Vice-Province Governor 19980410 19991201 10 years of imprisonment 33 1 4 28

    Jiangxi Hu Changqing Vice-Province Governor 19990808 20000215 Death penalty 12 0 2 10

    Liaoning Mu TuoXing Vice-Province Governor 20010321 20011113 Death penalty 51 5 6 40

    Xingjiang Aman.Haji Vice-Province Governor 20031015 N/A N/A (Still under investigation) 25 1 1 23

    Yunnan Li Jiating Vice CPC Secretary & Province Governor 20010620 20030509 Death penalty 17 1 4 12

    Zhejiang Xu Yunhong Vice-Province Governor 19990922 20001017 10 years of imprisonment 35 2 3 30

    Total 393 43 42 308

    The Corruption List

  • RPT Joseph Fan 35

    Borrowing Pattern of Listed Companies Connected with Corrupt Bureaucrats /bank officers (Mean Total Debt/Assets)

  • RPT Joseph Fan 36

    Debt Maturity Pattern of Listed Companies Connected with Corrupt Bureaucrats/Bank Officers (Mean Long Term Debt/Total Debt)

  • RPT Joseph Fan 37

    Long-term Borrowing Pattern of Listed Companies Connected with Corrupt Bureaucrats /Bank Officers(Mean Long Term Debt/Assets)

  • RPT Joseph Fan 38

    What do we find?

    n An unhealthy trend of corporate financen Increasing trend of corporate debt load, but

    decreasing trend of debt maturityn Corrupt companies and/or companies connected

    with corrupt bureaucrats gain access to bank loans

    n Does corruption grease the wheel of commerce?n NO. We find little evidence suggesting that

    rent seeking facilitates capital allocation in China

    n Is corruption and crony lending unique to China?n On the contrary

  • RPT Joseph Fan 39

    Corruption in Asian Economies(Source: Transparency International: mean Corruption Perception Index 1992-2000)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Economy

    ChinaTaiwanHong KongIndonesiaJapanKorea (South)MalaysiaPhilippinesSingaporeThailandUnited StateUnited Kingdom

  • RPT Joseph Fan 40

    What do we push for?

    n Not just about catching scandalsn But, fundamental institutional

    improvements, i.e., transparent, merit based rather than connection based capital allocations

    n Taiwan could become a role model if its legal system and citizen properly deal with the first familys corruption scandals which involve government controlled banks and financial institutions

  • RPT Joseph Fan 41

    Controlling problematic RPT in State Owned Banks, what work?n Firewall between politicians/bureaucrats and banks

    n Away from bank key personnel (top managers and directors) decisions

    n Improving transparencyn Removing SOBs policy burdens

    n There is little evidence that SOB promote economic development, but abundant evidence that SOB slows it down

    n Freeing up restrictions of bank executive compensation

    n Privatizationn Ultimate solution. But be careful: several Asian

    economies are privatizing their SOB, generating immense incentive of self-dealings through RPT

  • RPT Joseph Fan 42

    Conclusionsn RPT in Asia are prevalent n The good news is that problematic transactions

    in private banks have largely been contained during normal time.

    n During turbulent time, more intense monitoring of RPT by regulators are needed

    n Problematic RPT can be further mitigated by market liberalization and improving legal institutions

    n State owned banks however post a challengen Laws and regulations are not effective,

    because of conflicts of interestn We need institutional reforms that improve

    government quality and reduce corruption