chemistry 125: lecture 50 february 12, 2010 more electrophilic addition to alkenes with nucleophilic...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
Chemistry 125: Lecture 50February 12, 2010
More Electrophilic Addition
to Alkenes withNucleophilic Participation This
For copyright notice see final page of this file
Although the above two-step mechanism with intermediate IZnCH2-CH2-CH2I is plausible,
addition of IZnCH2I to H2C=CH2 actually occurs in a single step,
according to quantum mechanical calculation*, with the bent
transition state shown below: * A DFT Study of the Simmons-Smith Cyclopropanation Reaction.
A. Bottoni, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1997, 119, 12300
ICH2ZnIZn
I
I
ICH2ZnI
(at TransitionState Geometry)
LUMO
Mixes with HOMO
HOMO-2
Mixes with * LUMO
Zn
I
I
Epoxidation by Peroxycarboxylic acids
(sec 10.4a 423-425)
LUMO
HOMO-3
200
0
-200
-400
Orb
ital E
nerg
y (k
cal/m
ole)
OMOs
etc.
Peroxyformic AcidDistorted to
Transition State for O Transfer
p(O
*O-O
“-allylic”
CH2
H2CCH2
H2C
O
OO C
H
H“SN2 at O”
“-allylic”
“SN2 at H”
p()O nucleophile
*O-O electrophile
All happening togetherto give
carboxylate “leaving group”
(but not strictly in parallel)
Transition State
GeometryO-O
Strongly Stretched(from ~1.5Å)
O-HHardly
Stretched(from ~1Å)
kH/kD ~ 1
“Butterfly” mechanism
(not spiro)
suggested by Paul D. Bartlett
(1950)
calculatedJ. Amer. Chem. Soc. (1991) pp. 2338-9
downhill motionafter TS
Only one TS :
“Concerted but not Synchronous”
“spiro” meanstwo perpendicular
rings sharing a common atom
(here O1)
Note that arrows were not used as carefully
in those days.
Bartlett 1950
Problem:How about now?
(compare arrows with mechanism on previous frames and try drawing
a more accurate diagram)
Concerted Syn Addition
CH2CHO
HCC
H
OH
CH2
H
OR
ORO
OEtO
O CO2Et
TiRO
O
Remember Sharpless Asymmetric Epoxidation
R
ROO ••
RO+Ti
O
O
O
R
OEtO
CO2Et
O
RO
Ti
O
O
O OEtO
CO2Et
*
RCH2
HC
CCH
H
allyl alcohol
(R)-“epoxide”
(S)-epoxide precursor
Chiral“Oxidizing Agent”
LUMO?
HOMO?
is diastereomeric!
( also pO + *C=C )
Cf. Sec. 10.4bp. 426
20,000,000 tons$20 billion
per year
OLDCAMPUS
H2C CH2
O H2C=CH2 + O2
Ag
250°C15 atm
ethylene oxide
(84%)
20,000,000 tons$20 billion
per year
H2C CH2
O
ethylene glycol(antifreeze)
polyethers(solvents)
Sec. 10.4cpp. 427-430
Regiospecificity
Protonated Isobutylene Oxide
1.47Å1.61Å
+195
+79
+141.5 +140.2
Cuprates (Carbon Nucleophiles)
Stereospecificity
More ImpressiveRegiospecificity
Ozonolysis by Cycloadditions
(sec 10.5a 436-439)
ConcertedTransition State
(calc by quantum mech)
H2C CH2
O O O
+_
Motion along Reaction Coordinate through Transition State
O3
C2H4
side view end view
HOMO
LUMO
HOMO
Transition StateOrbital Mixing
makes two new bonds O3
C2H4
HOMO
LUMO
HOMO-1
Cycloaddition ofAllylic 1,3-Dipoles to Alkenes
7. (5 min) Having learned that the allylic system of O3 forms two bonds at once to an alkene, as shown below, one might think to try the same thing with the apparently analogous boron compound (assuming it exists). Explain in terms of the orbitals involved why this might not be such a good idea.
O
O
OO
O
O
H2
C
B
C H2
B
C H3
C H3
?
7
Ozone (O3) from the “top” (rotate back to view the 3 MOs from the 3
“allylic” out-of-plane 2p orbitals of 3 O atoms)
1 No ABN (anti-bonding node)Middle AO is largest (it overlaps twice)
2 One ABN node. Middle AO is absent. No significant overlap, thus ~ same energy as isolated 2p AO.
3 Two ABNs - highest energy MO. (I’m not sure why the middle AO looks about the same size as the terminal ones, it must be larger to be orthogonal to 1.)
Another allylic systemCH2-BH-CH2 from “top” (rotate back to view 3 MOs)
1 (middle B AO about same
size as C AOs; overlaps twice, but has lower nuclear charge)
2 Note how C AOs look
larger than O AOs of O3, because C AO is less dense
near the nucleus)
3 Most of the lower-energy
C AOs were used up
in 1 and 2.
1 Partly C AO just
looks big (but also C=O is short,
which makes CO overlap important)
2node no longer in
exact center
3BIG C AO
for this high-energy MO
H2C=O O+ -
“carbonyl oxide”
+ pO
- pO
* - pO
pO
CO
*CO
Central O overlaps C better than O, so consider right O interacting weakly with C=O orbitals.
1
2
3
more mixing(better E-match)
less mixing
..
..
Number
of electrons
LUMO
HOMO
HOMO
LUMO
(ends match *alkene LUMO)
(ends match alkene HOMO) (ends match
alkene HOMO)
(No alkeneHOMO match)
(No alkeneLUMO match)
..
Can’t make two bonds simultaneously for
cycloaddition to alkene!
..
..HOMO
LUMO
(ends match *alkene LUMO)
*
* Don’t worry about apparent bad overlap with the blue lobe of the central oxygen. It is far enough away because of the bend in O3.
OO
O
4C
BCH
H H
H
H 2 4+
H
OO
HC
Makes two bonds Makes two bonds
CH2
H2C OO O
+
Ozonolysis (Text Section 10.5a, pp. 436-439)
O
CH2
H2C OO:
Undergoes a “reverse” of the
previous process.
“Molozonide” is rather unstable because of
-O-O-O- group’sHOMO-HOMO mix.
CH2
O
OH2C
O+
OCH2
Undergoes a “reverse” of the
previous process.
to give carbonyl oxide
and C=O
Re-adds after rotation (avoids -O-O-O-)
CH2
O-O
OH2C
Ozonide
a Double Acetal
Mechanism for Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Acetal
RO
ROCH2
+H
HOH
:
:
RO
ROCH2
+ H ROH
RO-CH2
+
HO
ROCH2+
H
First remove RO, and replace it by HO.
HO
ROCH2
Now remove second RO, then H (from HO) +H
:HO
ROCH2
+ H
RO=CH2
+
cation unusually stable;thus easily formed
ROH
H-O-CH2
+
O=CH2 O=CH2
ROH
ROH
RO
ROCH2 O
H
H
:Overall Transformation:
H2O + Acetal Carbonyl + 2 ROHH+
(pp. 785-787)
(hemiacetal)
End of Lecture 50Feb. 12, 2010
Copyright © J. M. McBride 2010. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0).
Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use.
Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol .
Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions.
The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content: J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0