chem3115 synthetic medicinal chemistry - university of...
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture 19 Carbonyl Chemistry. Reducing reagents: Chemo and diatseteroselectivity;
Introduction to Felkin-Anh model.
Lecture 20 Carbonyl Chemistry. Organometallics: formation and reactivity; 1,2 vs 1,4 addition;
Felkin-Anh vs Chelation control
Lecture 21 Carbonyl Chemistry. Enolates: formation, regioselectivity; silylenol ethers:
thermodynamic vs kinetic control; enolate geometry with LDA
Lecture 22 Carbonyl Chemistry. Enolates: Aldol reactions; diastereoselectivity via Zimmerman
Traxler transition states. Auxillary approach to enantioselectivity.
Lecture 23 Chemistry of other sp2 centres. Alkenes: synthesis via Wittig, Julia and Metathesis
(RCM and cross metathesis).
Lecture 24 Chemistry of other sp2 centres. Palladium in Contemporary Synthesis: general
mechanism, Suzuki, Stille, Negeshi, Sonogashira and Heck reactions.
Lecture 25 Workshop problems; Recap and review.
Lecture outline
Selectivity
•Enantioselectivity
•Diastereoselecivity
•Chemoselectivity
•Regioselectivity
When building molecules there are selectivity issues that we need to be aware of .
Selectivity
Recall that enantiomers are non-superimposable
mirror images •Enantioselectivity
Nobel prize 2001
e.g. Sharpless Asymmetric Epoxidation
(SAE)
K. Barry Sharpless
•Enantioselectivity
•Diastereoselectivity
Selectivity
Diastereomers: stereoisomers that are NOT enantiomers
e.g. Mukaiyama aldol reaction
•Enantioselectivity
•Diastereoselectivity
•Chemoselectivity
Selectivity
One functional group reacts preferentially
“Chemoselectivity: the mother of invention in total synthesis”
–Phil S. Baran, 2009.
•Enantioselectivity
•Diastereoselectivity
•Chemoselectivity
•Regioselectivity
Selectivity
One functional group can react in different ways,
but reacts one way preferentially.
•Enantioselectivity
•Diastereoselectivity
•Chemoselectivity
•Regioselectivity
Selectivity vs Specificity
These involve a preference for one outcome over a another outcome,
i.e. the other products can be generated.
Contrast the above examples with an SN2
substitution reaction
This reaction is stereospecific; nucleophile must
attack from back side. Therefore it is the
stereochemistry of the starting material that dictates the
stereochemistry of the product.
Why is Selectivity important?
C129H223N3O54
Mol. Wt. = 2680
LD50 = 25 10-9 g/Kg
64 stereogenic centres (R or S)
7 geometric isomers (E or Z)
Therefore: 271 possible
stereoisomers (2.36 1021).
You would need to make 10.5 g to ensure
that 2 molecules are the same.
Yoshito Kishi
Palytoxin
Why is Selectivity important?
Yoshito Kishi
Marketed by Eisai Co. as „Halaven‟.
Anti-cancer drug of last resort
For metastatic breast cancer that has resisted
other treatments.
Therefore: 219 possible stereoisomers
(i.e. 524,288 isomers).
Lecture 19 Carbonyl Chemistry. Reducing reagents: Chemo and diatseteroselectivity;
Introduction to Felkin-Anh model.
Lecture 20 Carbonyl Chemistry. Organometallics: formation and reactivity; 1,2 vs 1,4 addition;
Felkin-Anh vs Chelation control
Lecture 21 Carbonyl Chemistry. Enolates: formation, regioselectivity; silylenol ethers:
thermodynamic vs kinetic control; enolate geometry with LDA
Lecture 22 Carbonyl Chemistry. Enolates: Aldol reactions; diastereoselectivity via Zimmerman
Traxler transition states. Auxillary approach to enantioselectivity.
Lecture 23 Chemistry of other sp2 centres. Alkenes: synthesis via Wittig, Julia and Metathesis
(RCM and cross metathesis).
Lecture 24 Chemistry of other sp2 centres. Palladium in Contemporary Synthesis: general
mechanism, Suzuki, Stille, Negeshi, Sonogashira and Heck reactions.
Lecture 25 Workshop problems; Recap and review.
Lecture outline
Hydride reducing agents
Lithium aluminium
hydride
LiAlH4
Lithium
borohydride
LiBH4
Sodium
borohydride
NaBH4
Diisobutyl aluminium
hydride
DiBAl-H ®
DiBAl
A hydride source;
H-
Lewis acid:
Electron pair
acceptor
Remember that curly arrows show electron movement.
You already know that nucleophile will attack
the carbon atom of the carbonyl.
So the reactivity of reducing
agents is governed by the
stability (nucleophilicity) of
hydride reagent and the
electrophilicity of carbonyl
group.
Hydride reducing agents: chemoselectivity
Hydride reducing agents: chemoselectivity
Aldehyde reacts fast whereas ester reacts very slowly chemoselective reduction.
Hydride reducing agents:
mechanistic considerations
Aldehyde Primary alcohol
Primary alcohol
Ester C=O bond strength
720 kJ mol-1
C-O bond strength
350 kJ mol-1
Hydride reducing agents:
mechanistic considerations
Amide
Primary amine
Has to be a powerful
reducing agent i.e. LiAlH4
Primary alcohol
Acid
Has to be a powerful
reducing agent i.e. LiAlH4
Hydride reducing agents:
mechanistic considerations
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
•Nucleophiles attack the carbon atom of the carbonyl group at an angle of 107o which
maximises bonding interactions whilst minimising anti-bonding and undesirable electrostatic
interactions.
•This is called the Burgi-Dunitz trajectory.
Diastereoselective reductions of some cyclic compounds:
For 6 membered rings: small nucleophiles approach from axial position
(large nucleophiles approach from equatorial position).
H – is the smallest nucleophile there is.
Cyclohexanone has
two conformations
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
•Nucleophiles attack the carbon atom of the carbonyl group at an angle of 107o which
maximises bonding interactions whilst minimising anti-bonding and undesirable electrostatic
interactions.
•This is called the Burgi-Dunitz trajectory.
Diastereoselective reductions of some cyclic compounds:
For 6 membered rings: small nucleophiles approach from axial position (large
nucleophiles approach from equatorial position).
H – is the smallest nucleophile there is.
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
A 5-membered ring has an „envelope‟ conformation.
The ring is rapidly ring flipping. Substituents can be in pseudoaxial or pseudoequatorial positions or on
the point position.
The result is a very flexible system that gives moderately stereoselective reactions.
The Me-susbstituent prefers a pseudoequatorial position and the two faces of the ketone are very
similar. The small reducing reagent prefers pseudoaxial attack.
(Large nucleophiles will approach from the least hindered face and give the expected cis-alcohol
product.)
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
Diastereoselective reductions of bridged cyclic compounds:
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
Diastereoselective reductions of bridged cyclic compounds:
For bridged compounds, nucleophiles
approach from the least hindered face.
Diastereoselectivity
It is easy to control the level of diastereoselectivity of reactions that occur on
cyclic substrates.
If you want good stereocontrol during a total synthesis…..try to make a ring.
R. B. Woodward
Nobel prize 1965
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
Diastereoselective reductions of acyclic compounds:
N.B. this ketone has an α-stereogenic centre.
Although the starting ketone has an infinite number of accessible conformations at the reaction temperature,
one leads to a lower energy transition state.
A guiding principle is that features which stabilise the starting material may stabilise the transition state as
well (recall the Hammond postulate).
What is most stable ground state conformation?
Felkin-Anh model
Least steric interaction, hence
proceeds through the lowest
energy transition state.
This is the favoured
conformation.
Nucleophile has to approach over
the top of the methyl group,
therefore large steric interaction.
Unfavoured
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
Felkin Anh Model.
If there is a stereogenic centre a to the carbonyl then:
•Draw the Newman projection with the stereogenic centre at the rear of the diagram;
•Rotate the group at the rear so that the large group is perpendicular to the carbonyl group
(there will be two possible conformations);
•The nucleophile will approach at the Burgi-Dunitz trajectory (107o) over the small group
(i.e. one conformation will react preferentially);
•Draw the product Newman projection;
•Draw the product in the standard fashion along the longest carbon chain.
Steric clash; unfavoured Steric clash; unfavoured
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
Predict the stereochemical outcome of the following reduction:
Hydride reducing agents: diastereoselectivity
N.B. This is the kind of answer that will be
expected on an exam paper.
Next time
•Other nucleophiles
•Regioselectivity
•Diastereoselectivity
•Caveat to Felkin-Anh model