characterization of hydrogenotrophic methanogenic archaea ... · to begin enrichments, serum...
TRANSCRIPT
1
CharacterizationofhydrogenotrophicmethanogenicArchaeaenrichedfromTrunkRiver
BrittniL.Bertolet
MicrobialDiversity2018-MarineBiologicalLaboratoriesWoodsHole,MA
INTRODUCTION
Inlandlakes,rivers,andreservoirsareincreasinglyrecognizedfortheircontributiontoatmosphericmethane(CH4)concentrations.Globally,inlandwatersareestimatedtoproduced25%ofthecontinentallandsinkinCH4everyyear(Bastvikenetal.2011).However,inachangingworld,theseestimatesaredifficulttoprojectandthisislargelyduetoalackofprocess-basedmodelsthatconsiderthebiologicalcomplexityofthesebiogeochemicalprocesses.Ininlandfreshwaterandbrackishecosystems,CH4isprimarilyproducedbiologicallybymethanogenicArchaea(hereafterreferredtoas“methanogens”),whichregulatetherateofsedimentdiagenesisandcarbonfate(Borreletal.2011).Despitethis,fewecosystemmodelsofCH4productionexplicitlyconsiderthemicrobialcommunityandlittleisknownabouthowdifferencesbetweenmethanogensmaycontributetovariationinecosystemCH4production.
Biologicalmethanogenesisoccursviathreemajormetabolicpathways,characterizedbytheirelectrondonorsandterminalacceptors:acetoclastic(usingacetate),hydrogenotrophic,(usingH2/CO2),andmethylotrophic(usingmethyl-compoundsassubstrates)(Liu&Whitman2008).Infreshwaterandbrackishsediments,methaneisassumedtoresultprimarilyfromtheacetoclasticpathway(Conrad1999),withmanysuggestingthatthegenusMethanosaetatodominatelakesedimentcommunities(ZeppFalzetal.1999;Chanetal.2002).However,communitybiomarkersurveys(16SrRNAandmcrAgenes)increasinglydocumenthigher-than-expectedrelativeabundancesofknownorputativehydrogenotrophicmethanogensinlakesandsoilsenvironments(Nussleinetal.2001;Conradetal.2010).Althoughsequence-basedanalysesdonotdirectlyconsidertheactivecomponentofamicrobialcommunity,thepervasivenessofthesegroupsacrossregionsandecosystemssuggeststheymaybefunctionallyimportantconstituentsofsedimentmethanogencommunities.Unfortunately,fewmethanogenshaveeverbeenisolatedfromsedimentsandmuchisstilltobeunderstoodaboutthedistributionofphysiologicaltraits,suchassubstrateuse,growthrate,andCH4yield.
Inthepresentstudy,IsoughttoisolateandcharacterizehydrogenotrophicmethanogensfromTrunkRiversedimentsusingbothphysiologicalassaysandgenomics.Althoughisolationwasunsuccessful,Ideterminedhowthemethanogenicconsortiumrespondedtotheavailabilityofalternativeelectrondonorsusingexperimentalincubationswithformateadditions.Additionally,usingshotgunmetagenomics,fivemetagenomeassembledgenomes(MAGs)wereconstructedandusedtodeterminebothphylogenyandmetabolicpotentialofthemethanogenicconsortium.
2
METHODS
Samplecollectionandenrichment:Sedimentwascollectedfromthesediment-waterinterfaceofTrunkRiver(TR),a
brackishriverinWoodsHole,MA(Lat:41.534850,Long:-70.641458).Sedimentwastransportedbacktothelaboratoryandplacedinananaerobicchamberuntilinoculation.
Priortoinoculation,selectivemediatoenrichforhydrogenotrophicmethanogenswaspreparedanaerobically.Toprepare1literofmedia,5mLof1Mammoniumchloridesolution,0.1mLof100mMpotassiumphosphate(pH7.2)solution,5mLof1MMESbuffer(pH5.5),1mLoftraceelements,0.1mLof1%Resazurin,and10mLof100Xfreshwaterbase(consistingof100gNaCl,40gMgCl2.6H2O,10gCaCl2.H2O,50gKClperliter)wereaddedperliterofdeionizedwater.Themediawasthenboiledfor10minutesunderastreamofN2/CO2(80%:20%)gastoboiloutoxygen.ThemediawasalsocooledunderN2/CO2.Oncecooled,1mLofmultivitaminsolution,25mLof1Msodiumbicarbonate,and1mLof1Msodiumsulfidewereadded.Mediawasthenbroughtinsidetheanaerobicchamber,andoncethemediabecameclear,25mLofmediawasdispensedinto100mLserumbottles.Serumbottleswerethencrimpedshutwithair-tightrubberseptaandautoclaved.Aftercoolingfromtheautoclave,0.5mLofantibacterialsolution(1gRifampcinSVper100mLwater)wasaddedtoeachbottle.
Tobeginenrichments,serumbottlescontainingsterileanaerobicmethanogenmediawerebroughtintotheanaerobicchamberanduncrimped.Approximately1goffreshsedimentwastheninoculatedintoeachbottleandserumbottleswerecrimpedshutwithair-tightrubbersepta.Atthegassingstation,headspacewasreplacedwithaH2:CO2gasmixture(20%:80%),usingthreeroundsofrepeatedvacuumandgasreplacement.Afterheadspacereplacement,allenrichmentswerestoredinthedarkat30degreesCelsius,wheretheyremainedforthedurationofthestudy.
Liquidenrichmentswerepassagedevery7-9daysinthesameliquidmediausingananaerobicsyringe.Atotalofthreepassageswereconductedbeforeisolationstrategieswereemployed.Ateachstepofpassage,productionofCH4wasdeterminedthroughgaschromatographywithaflameionizationdetector(FID)andenrichmentswerevisualizedforauto-florescenceat420nmusingaflorescentmicroscopeandtheAlexa488filter.EnrichmentswithoutCH4productionwerediscarded.Isolationapproaches:
Toisolatehydrogenotrophicmethanogens,anumberofdifferentstrategieswereemployed.First,enrichmentswereseriallydilutedwiththeintenttodilute-to-extinctioninliquidmedia.Thisoccurredinthesamemediadescribedpriorinthesame100mLserumbottleswithaH2/CO2headspace.Toobtaincolonies,agarshakes,flat-bottombottles,andplateswereprepared(Fig.1).Agarosewasaddedtothemethanogenmediadescribedabovetoafinalconcentrationof1%agarforeachmethod.
Shakeswereconstructedin25mLBalchtubes,inwhich9mLofsterileanoxic1%agarmediawereaddedtoeachandmixedwith1mLofinoculumbeforesolidification.MediaandinoculationwaspreparedunderunderastreamofN2/CO2atthegassingstation.Fortheflat-bottombottles,mediawaspreparedasdescribedaboveandinoculumwasspreadonthesurfaceoftheagaraftersolidificationandoccurredintheanaerobicchamber.Forplates,two
3
differentstrategieswereemployed:topagarandnotopagar.Forallthreemethods,inoculumwasseriallydilutedtodeterminebestinoculationconcentration.Additionally,forallthreemethods,headspacewasreplacedwiththesameH2:CO2gasmixtureandreplenishedeverydaytocontinuouslysupplythenecessarysubstrates.Allcultureswerestoredinthedarkat30degreesCelsiusforthelengthofthestudy.
Figure1.Agarshakes(A),flat-bottombottles(B),andpetriplates(C)usedtoisolatehydrogenotrophicmethanogencolonies.Formategrowthexperiment:
TodeterminehowtheavailabilityofformateaffectedCH4productionratesoftheenrichmentmethanogenicconsortium,experimentalincubationswereconstructedin25mLanaerobicBalchtubes(Fig.2).EachBalchtubecontainedafinalvolumeof12mL(10mLofselectivemethanogenmedia,1mLofinoculationfromasinglesourceenrichment,and1mLofadditionalmediabasedontreatment).Theconsortiumwassubjectedtothreedifferenttreatmentsinwhichtheavailabilityofelectrondonorswasmanipulated.TreatmentsincludedH2-only,formate-only,andH2-formate.Fortreatmentsreceivingformate,formicacidwasaddedtoafinalconcentrationof2mMformate.Additionally,theformate-onlytreatmentcontainedaN2/CO2headspaceinsteadofH2/CO2.Finally,1mLofsterileultra-purewaterwasaddedtotheH2-onlytreatmentstokeeptotalvolumeconstantacrosstreatments.
AB
C
H2-only
H2+Formate
Formate-only
Figure2.Experimentalincubationsfortheformategrowthexperiment.
4
CH4productionwasmonitoredeverydayuntiltheconcentrationofCH4wasunchangingandstationaryphasewasobtained.H2/CO2wasneverreplenished.Incubationswerevisualizedusingmicroscopytodetermineanycursorychangesinrelativeabundancesofuniquecelltypes.
TocalculateCH4productionrates,peakareawasfirstconvertedtopartspermillion(ppm)ofCH4usingastandardcurveproducedonJuly7th,2018.TheconcentrationofCH4(ppm)wasthenconvertedtomicromolar(umol)usingtheidealgaslawandnormalizedbythevolumeofthemedia(mL).TodeterminetherateofCH4production,onlydatafromthegrowthstageoftheexperiment(8/13/2018-8/15/2018)wasusedinalinearregressionagainsttime.Thus,theCH4productionrateisreportedasumolCH4mL-1hr-1.TodeterminedifferencesinCH4productionratesbetweensamples,aone-wayANOVAwasperformedinR.
Metagenomicanalyses:
DNAwasextractedusingaPowerFecalextractionkitfromtheinitialenrichmentsafter21daysofgrowth.DNAwassequencedonanIlluminaHiSeq.RawreadsweretrimmedusingTrimmomatic,co-assembledusingMegaHit,mappedusingBowtie,andbinnedusingconcoct.Oncebinned,MAGswerecheckedforcompletionusingCheckM,whichconsidersthepresenceofsinglecopygenes.TodeterminethephylogenyofconstructedMAGS,16ribosomalproteinsusedinHugetal.2016wereextractedusingaphylogeneticworkflowdescribedinGrahametal.2018.ThisworkflowusesacuratedreferencedatabaseofthesameribosomalproteinsextractedfromavailablemethanogengenomesfromNCBI.Severalphylogenetictreeswereconstructedwiththeentiredatabase,aswellasonlysubsetsofthedatabase.Finally,MAGswereannotatedusingtheRapidAnnotationusingSubsystemTechnology(RAST)platformandmetabolicmodelswerebuiltusingModelSeedinKbase.
RESULTSANDDISCUSSION
Microscopycharacterizationandisolation:ThreeuniquemethanogeniccelltypeswereconfirmedintheTRenrichmentsthrough
microscopy(cocci,rod-like,andspiralshaped)(Fig.3).Additionally,2non-florescentcelltypeswerealsoobserved,withonehighlymotilenon-florescentcelltype.Allcelltypeswereobservedineverypassage,withnonoticeabledifferencebetweenpassagesafterafewdaysofgrowthhadoccurred.However,furtherquantification,eitherwithflowcytometryorspecificFISHprobes,wouldhavegreatlybenefittedthis
Dilution-to-extinctioninliquidmediawasunsuccessfulinproducingpurecultures.CultureseitherproducedCH4andcontinuedtohaveamixedconsortium,ornoCH4wasproducedandfewcellswereeverdetected.Shakesandflat-bottombottleswerealsounsuccessfulinproducingcolonies,howeverallculturesproducedCH4.Theagarplateswerethemostsuccessful.AlthoughIneverobtainedcolonies,onthelastdayofincubation,smallspeckswerenoticeableonthesurfaceoftheagarthatmayhaveproducedcoloniesiflongergrowthwaspossible.Thispotentialforcolonyformationislikelyduetotheincreasedsurfaceareaoftheplates,aswellasthelargeamountofheadspaceavailableintheplatecanisters(Fig.1C).Itisalsoworthnotingthatthesespeckswereobservedonplateswithouttopagarandinoculatedwithundilutedinoculum,sodilutionsarelikelyunnecessaryinfutureattempts.
5
Figure3.WetmountfromTRmethanogenenrichments,visualizedunderafilter(Alexa488).Methanogensarevisualizedbasedonauto-florescenceat420nm,whichisduetothepresenceofredoxcofactorF420.Uniquecelltypesaredenotedwitharrows.EffectsofformateavailabilityonCH4productionratesofenrichments: FormateavailabilityhadasignificanteffectonconsortiumCH4productionrates(Fig.3B).Alltreatmentsweresignificantlydifferentfromeachother,andincubationswithbothformateandH2hadthehighestrateofCH4production.Interestingly,incubationsreceivingonlyformateasthesoleelectrondonorhadnegligibleCH4production.WhileatraceamountofCH4wasdetectedonthefirstdayofsampling,thisismostlikelyduetoresidualH2thatwasintroducedintheinoculationasCH4concentrationsdidnotincreaseotherwisethroughoutthelengthoftheincubation.However,thisisunconfirmed.
ItisworthnotingthatthesignificantincreaseinCH4productionwhenbothelectrondonorsarepresentisgreaterthanthesumoftheH2-onlyandformate-onlytreatments,suggestingsomeinteractionthatispromotingCH4productionwhenbothelectronacceptorsareavailable.Previousresearchershaveseenevidenceofformate-dependentreductionofCO2withH2inothermembersofMethanobacteriales(Yangetal.2016),whichmaybecontributingtohigherCH4productionrates.However,becausecommunityassemblywasnotdeterminedattheendoftheexperiment,itisdifficulttodeterminethemechanismbehindthiseffect.AnalysesofmetabolicmodelsfromtheconstructedMAGsmayprovidefurtherinsight.
6
Figure3.AverageCH4concentrationintheheadspaceofexperimentalincubationsforeachdayandtreatment(A).CH4productionrateofeachtreatmentduringthegrowthphase(8/13/18-8/15/18)(B).Errorbarsrepresentstandarderror.Metagenomicanalysisofenrichments:
Shotgunmetagenomicsequencingoftheconsortiumenrichmentsretrievedfourmethanogenbins(M1-M4)andonebacterialbin(B1)(Fig.4).MAGsM1-M3werenearcomplete(90.1-98.9%)withlessthan1%contamination.MAGM4wasmoderatelycomplete(65.8%)withlessthan1%ofcontamination,andMAGB1wassemi-complete(82.7%)with1.3%contamination.TheseMAGsconstitutedonly25.4%ofthetotalbase-pairssequenced,andfurtherrefinementofotherbinscouldprovideadditionalcompleteorsemi-completeMAGs.
Figure4.Visualizationofcompletemetagenomeassembledgenomes(MAGs)constructedfromshotgunmetagenomicsequencingofTRsedimentenrichments.VisualizationwasgeneratedusingAnvi’o.
0
10
20
30
40
8/13/18 8/15/18 8/17/18Date
CH
4 con
cent
ratio
n (u
mol
)Treatment
Formate
H2
H2+Formate
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Formate H2 H2 + FormateTreatment
CH
4 pro
duct
ion
(um
ol m
L-1 h
r-1)
*
**
***A B
ParentLengthGC-contentbrit2brit4Ribosomal RNAs
M2
M3
M4
B1
M1
7
Phylogeneticanalysisof16ribosomalproteinsextractedfromtheconstructedMAGsplacedallmethanogenMAGswithinknownhydrogenotrophicmethanogengenerawithhighconfidence(Fig.5).Fourdifferenttreesweregenerated,eachwithadifferentnumberofreferencegenomes,andalltreesdisplayedthesameplacementofMAGs.Thus,thephylogenyisvisualizedinFigure5withonlyasubsetofthereferencedatabase.
ThephylogeneticanalysisofMAGB1wasnotasconclusive.RibosomalproteinsplacedB1withintheTenericutesphylum,withintheMollicutesclass.Althoughno16Sor23SrRNAgeneswereassembled,one5SrRNAgenecouldbeextractedfromtheMAG,andthiswas92%identicaltothegeneinaTenericutesMAGassembledfromenrichmentsfromamethaneseep(Skennertonetal.2016).Membersfromthisgrouparehypothesizedtobeanaerobicfermenters,thatmaysupplymethanogenswithsubstratessuchasacetateandethanol.Itisinconclusive,however,whetherthisisatruesyntrophicrelationship,andfurtherresearchisstillneededtounderstandtheroleofthefree-livingTenericuteswithinmethanogeniccommunities.MembersofMollicuteshavealsobeenshowntopossessresistancetoRifampicinantibiotics,whichmayexplainthepresenceofthisgroupinourenrichments.
Figure5.PhylogenyofmethanogenMAGsconstructedfromTRsedimentenrichments.Desulfurococcusamylolyticuswasusedasanout-groupandbootstrapvaluesarereported.
0.2
Methanococcus maripaludis
Methanocella arvoryzae
TR M4
Candidatus Methanomethylophilus alvus
Methanothermus fervidus
Methermicoccus shengliensis
Methanobacterium formicicum
Methanobrevibacter smithii
Methanofollis ethanolicus
Methanosphaerula palustris
Methanosphaera sp. WGK6
Methanothermobacter marburgensis
Methanococcus aeolicus
Methanobacterium congolense
TR M2
Methanoplanus limicola
Methanococcoides burtonii
Methanocorpusculum bavaricum
Methanosaeta concilii
Methanobrevibacter wolinii
Methanobacterium paludis
Methanopyrus kandleri
Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus
Methanobacterium lacus
Methanospirillum hungatei
TR M1
Methanococcus voltae
Methanoculleus bourgensis
Methanofollis liminatans
Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus
TR M3
Methanolinea tarda
Methanocorpusculum labreanum
Methanotorris formicicus
Methanoregula boonei
Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens
Methanoregula formicica
Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis
Desulfurococcus amylolyticus
0.98
0.86
1
0.97
1
1
0.91
1
1
0.98
1
0.92
1
1
0.96
1
0.28
0.66
0.991
1
1
1
1
1
0.98
1
1
0.37
0.69
1
0.83
0.98
1
1
1
8
CONCLUSIONSANDFURTHERDIRECTIONS
HydrogenotrophicmethanogenicconsortiumfromTRsedimentswereenrichedandcharacterized.Atleast5distinctmicroorganismswerepresentandCH4productionratesweresensitivetotheavailabilityofelectrondonors.AdditionsofformatesignificantlyincreasedCH4
productionascomparedwithincubationsreceivingonlyH2.Thishasimplicationsforunderstandingmethanogenesisinnature,asrarelyarecommunitiesisolatedwithonlyoneavailableelectrondonor,andmaypointtoecologicallyimportantmetabolisms.Further,analysisofconstructedMAGsalsosupportedtheuseofformateasanimportantintermediateinthereductionofCO2tomethaneinthishydrogenotrophiccommunity.InbothMAGsM2andM3,formatedehydrogenaseswerepresent,whicharenecessaryforformatedonationofelectronstoheterodisulfideinthelaststepofmethanogenesis.However,furtherresearchisneededtoconfirmthemechanismforhowformateisbeingutilizedbythisconsortium.
Inthisstudy,thecoupleduseoffunctionalassaysandgenomicsanalyseswasapowerfultoolforunderstandingthemetaboliccapacityofmicrobialcommunities,butfurtherworkwouldgreatlybenefittheseconclusions.Particularly,understandingdynamicchangesinthemicrobialconsortiumafterexperimentationwouldhavehelpedsupporthypothesesforhowformateadditionsaffectedCH4production.Thiscouldhavebeenaccomplishedthrougheither16Ssequencing,flowcytometry,orFISHvisualizationoranyotherwaytoquantifymicrobialcommunities,andsubsequentexperimentsshouldconsideremployingsuchmonitoring.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ThankyoutoMadelineLopezMunozandGeorgeO’Toole,whomadealltheanaerobicworkpossible.ElainaGrahamforcontributingsomuchcodeandsupportwiththebioinformatics.RachelWhitaker,GabriellaKovacikova,ScottDawson,NickiLimoli,andJamieHallforendlessencouragement.AlloftheMBLMicrobialDiversitycoursestafffortheincrediblehelpandsupportandknowledge.
REFERENCES
BastvikenD,TranvikLJ,DowningJA,CrillPM,Enrich-PrastA.2011.Freshwatermethaneemissionsoffsetthecontinentalcarbonsink.Science331:50.
BorrelG,JézéquelD,Biderre-PetitC,Morel-DesrosiersN,MorelJP,PeyretP,FontyG,LehoursAC.2011.Productionandconsumptionofmethaneinfreshwaterlakeecosystems.Researchinmicrobiology162(9):832-47.
ChanOC,WolfM,HepperleD,CasperP.2002.Methanogenicarchaealcommunityinthesedimentofanartificiallypartitionedacidicboglake.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology42:119-129.
ConradR.1999.Contributionofhydrogentomethaneproductionandcontrolofhydrogenconcentrationsinmethanogenicsoilsandsediments.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology28:193-202.
9
ConradR,KloseM,ClausP,Enrich-PrastA.2010.Methanogenicpathway,13Cisotopefractionation,andarchaelcommunitycompositioninthesedimentoftwoclear-waterlakesofAmazonia.LimnologyandOceanography55:689-702.
GrahamED,HeidelbergJF,andTullyBJ.2018.Potentialforprimaryproductivityinaglobally-distributedbacterialphototroph.TheISMEJournal12:1861-1866.
LiuY,WhitmanWB.2008.Metabolic,phylogenetic,andecologicaldiversityofmethanogenicarchaea.Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci.1125:171–189.
NussleinB,ChinKJ,EckertW,ConradR.2001.EvidenceofanaerobicsyntrophicacetateoxidationduringmethaneproductionintheprofundalsedimentofsubtropicalLakeKinneret(Israel).EnvironmentalMicrobiology3:460-470.
SkennertonCT,HaroonMF,BriegelA,ShiJ,JensenGJ,TysonGW,OrphanVJ.2016.PhylogeneticanalysisofCandidatus‘Izimaplasma’species:free-livingrepresentativesfromTenericutescladefoundinmethaneseeps.TheISMEJournal10:2679-2692.
YangGC,ZhouL,MbadingaSM,LiuJF,YangSZ,GuJD,MuBZ.2016.Formate-dependentmicrobialconversionofCO2anddominantpathwaysofmethanogenesisinproductionwaterofhigh-temperatureoilreservoirsamendedwithbicarbonate.FrontiersinMicrobiology7:365.
ZeppFalzK,HolligerC,GrobkopfR,LiesackW,NozhevnikovaAN,MullerB,WehrliB,HahnD.1999.VerticledistributionofmethanogensinanoxicsedimentofRotsee(Switzerland).Appliedandenvironmentalmicrobiology65:2402-2408.