chapter. improving organizational learning with concept maps a business case study
TRANSCRIPT
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
IMPROVING ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING WITH CONCEPT MAPS:
A BUSINESS CASE STUDY
Barberá-Tomás1, J. D.; Edwards Schachter
2, M. and Reyes-López
3, E. de los
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
1 Faculty of Business Administration and Management, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
Camino de Vera s/n, 46022-Valencia (Spain)
2,3 INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), www.ingenio.upv.es
Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
(Council for Scientific Research and Polytechnic University of Valencia)
Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación, Edif. 8E 4º. Camino de Vera S/N, Valencia (Spain)
TE +34 963 877 048 – fax +34 963 877 991
Keywords: Concept maps; computer-based mapping tools; organizational learning; knowledge
management; strategy alignment
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
INDICE
1. Introduction
2. Learning to learn in organizations: approach to an analytical framework
3. Novakian maps for knowledge transference in alignment with business strategy
3.1 Mapping tacit knowledge
3.2 Knowledge transfer
4. Complex Knowledge Transfer: a case study
4.1 Case study context
4.2 The problem
4.3 Methodology and problem resolution
5. Conclusion
1. Introduction
Along the last decades knowledge is increasingly being considered as an organization’s most
important resource for achieving and maintaining a competitive advantage (Drucker 1993, 1999;
Leonard-Barton 1995; Grant1996; Nonaka, Reinmoeller and Senoo, 1998). A considerable
amount of studies realized by Davenport and Prusack (1998); Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995);
Morey, Maybury and Thuraisingham (2002) and Ahmed, Lim and Loh (2002), among others,
demonstrate multiple examples that many of the world’s most successful and innovative
organizations are those that are best at managing their knowledge. Numerous theorists have
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
contributed to the evolution of the Knowledge Management (KM) field with different
perspectives. While several authors have stressed the growing importance of information and
explicit knowledge as organizational resource (Drucker 1993; Nonaka 1994; Wilkens, Menzel
and Pawlowsky 2004; Nonaka, Von Krogh and Voelpel 2006), others have focused on the
cultural dimension and the “learning organization” concept (Slater and Narver 1995; Argyris
1982; Argyris and Schon 1996). Other trends emphasize aspects of KM related to the
Organizational Learning (OL) and the dynamic capabilities (Leonard-Barton 1995; Teece,
Pisano and Shuen 1997) and, more recently, the OL alignment with the business and innovation
strategies (Johannessen, Olson and Olaisen 1999; Teece 1986; 2000; Hung, Lien and McLean
2009). KM includes a multi-disciplined approach to achieving organizational objectives by
making the best use of knowledge, focusing both on processes such as acquiring, creating and
sharing knowledge and the cultural and technical foundations that support them. Typically focus
on organizational objectives such as improved performance, competitive advantage, innovation,
the sharing of lessons learned, integration and continuous improvement of the organization,
overlapping synergistically with organizational learning.
OL is a concept dating from the early 1960s and defined in a wide variety of ways by researchers
(Argyris and Schon 1978, 1996; Dierkes et al. 2001; Lähteenmäki, Toivonen and Mattila 2002).
By the nineties, OL had become increasingly debated by economists and organizational studies’
practitioners and scholars. Although a widespread acceptance of the OL notion and its
importance to strategic performance, no theory or model of OL is still widely accepted (Daft and
Huber 1987; Dogson 1993; Kim, 1993; Lähteenmäki, Toivonen and Mattila 2002; Templeton,
Lewis and Snyder 2002). Questions about the interrelationships between individual learning and
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
OL and how OL can contribute to improve knowledge management are still without a clear
response (Argyris 1992; Pawlowsky 2001).
From a wider perspective, knowledge is a fluid mix of framed experience, values, contextual
information, and expert insight that provides a framework for evaluating and incorporating new
experiences and information. It is also common to distinguish between the creation of "new
knowledge" (i.e., innovation) and the transfer of "established knowledge" within a group,
organization, or community (Johannessen, Olson and Olaisen 1999). One of the most cited
models of OL, developed by Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995, 1996), differentiates Polanyi's concept
of "tacit knowledge" from "explicit knowledge" and describes a process of alternating between
the two. Tacit knowledge is personal, context specific, subjective, whereas explicit knowledge is
codified, systematic, formal, and relatively easy to handle and communicate (Senker 1995;
Rodhain 1999).
Kolb (1984:38) states that learning “is the process whereby knowledge is created through the
transformation of experience”. Both parts of his definition are important: what people learn
(know-how) and how they understand and apply that learning (know-why). Presumably, learning
facilitates behaviour change that leads to improved performance and the organizational learning
(Fiol and Lyles 1985; Lyles and Schwenk 1992; Senge 1990). Accepting the idea that OL means
the process of improving individual and group actions through better knowledge and
understanding, we are facing the problem of explain how transference and “appropriability”
knowledge occur and the nurture of the links between individual learning with organizational
one.
At present considerable diversity of methods and software tools are used with the purpose of
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
enabling the transference knowledge and supporting KM, but most of these tools, however, have
being developed as part unstructured technological thrust. They are more concerned with new
ways of storing and communicating information than with the actual ways in which people
create, acquire and use knowledge (i.e. how people learn in organizational environments and
how organizational learning is improved). Also OL is viewed as the process of acquisition or
development of competences at different levels of aggregation (individuals, groups, networks)
within the organization (ie, an ability to apply new knowledge to enhance the performance of an
existing activity or task, or to adapt to new circumstances). For Ahmed, Lim and Loh (2002:16)
“organizational learning therefore seeks to describe a process of increasing the overall
performance of an organization by encouraging knowledge creation and use in each of its value
chain functions, in order to render each a source of competitive advantage or core competence”.
In this sense, we agree with Argyris and Schön (1996) in that learning, to be considered
organizational, must be incorporated by means of epistemological artefacts (maps, memoranda
and programmes) that are found in the context of the organization. Collaborative environments
and the application of social computing tools can be used for both creation and transfer of
knowledge, contributing to organizational learning and knowledge management in alignment
with business strategy (Lee, Courtney and O'Keefe 1992; Davenport and Prusak 1998). Learners
can function as designers using the technology as tools for analyzing the world, accessing
information, interpreting and organizing their personal knowledge, and representing what they
know to others (their “mental models”). Concept maps can gather knowledge from both
individuals and groups, facilitate knowledge creation process, act as a discussion and
communication tool and assist in the diffusion of knowledge and learning processes within an
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
organization (Cañas et al. 2004).
Nevertheless, utilization of concept maps and concept mapping tools are still very limited in the
business environment when compared to educational. Additionally relatively little research has
been done on the contribution of concept maps to knowledge transference, organizational
learning and knowledge management (Fourie 2005; Henao-Cálad and Arango-Fonnegra 2007).
In this chapter we analyse some theoretical perspectives exploring the links between individual
and organizational learning (Ausubel, Novak and Hanesian 1978; Kim 1993; Pawlowsky 2001).
We also inquire into the potential of concept maps for supporting processes of organizational
learning (OL) (Reyes López and Barberá 2004; Sutherland and Katz 2005). And, finally, we
present a study case applying concept maps (using CmapTools) to improve understanding of
organizational learning and in particular the alignment of knowledge transfer with business
strategy in a technological firm.
2. Learning to learn in organizations: approach to an analytical framework
What’s the meaning of the expression “learn to learn” in relation to organizational learning? Is
it possible, for example, the integration between the Theory of Meaningful Learning (ML) and
the theoretical frameworks of organizational learning?
Several authors disagree with the possibility of comparability between individual learning and
organizational learning, but a considerable amount of literature considers that organizations can
learn. The problem of the conceptualization of OL goes beyond that they can learn despite they
cannot read a book or attend a course, implying psychological and epistemological constraints
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
(Cook and Brown 1999; Lähteenmäki, Toivonen and Mattila 2002). Huber (cited by Argyris
1992:7) suggest that “an organization has learned if any of its components have acquired
information and have this information available for use, either by other components or by itself,
on behalf of the organization” . Organizational learning must take account the interplay between
different levels of aggregation: actions and interactions of individuals and the actions and
interactions of high-level entities, as departments, divisions and networks within the
organization. Kim (1993:12) appoints that “although the meaning of the term ‘learning’ remains
essentially the same as in the individual case, the learning process is fundamentally different at
the organizational level. A model of organizational learning has to resolve somehow the
dilemma of imparting intelligence and learning capabilities to a nonhuman entity without
anthropomorphizing it”.
Meaningful Learning (as contrasted with rote learning) is differentiated from other types of
learning due the following key characteristics: is non-arbitrary and consists in a substantive
incorporation of new knowledge into the learner cognitive structure; is necessary for
development of conceptual understanding and sometimes is characterized as deep or dynamic
learning (opposite to surface or static learning), suppose a deliberate effort to link new
knowledge with the previous knowledge (prior learning), is related to experiences with objects
and events, and the learner must be encouraged to learn meaningfully. ML depends of the
quality of the materials and knowledge resources, an appropriate didactic instruction, the learner
motivation and the learning environment (Novak 1998). The theory of meaningful learning has
been essentially applicable to individuals, but its ulterior constructivist interpretations and
applications embrace the possible empowerment of each learner and the interrelationships
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
between learners as members of teams and groups.
Ausubel's theory of learning (Ausubel Novak and Hanesian 1978; Novak 1998) claims that new
concepts to be learned can be incorporated into more inclusive concepts or ideas in a hierarchical
structure. Meaningful Learning (ML) results when the learner chooses to relate new information
to ideas the learner already knows, and the more inclusive concepts or ideas are advance
organizers. Advance organizers can be verbal phrases or a graphic and, in any case, the advance
organizer is designed to provide what cognitive psychologists call the "mental scaffolding” to
learn new information. As we can observe in Figure 1, cognitive learning may be
representational (acquisition of concept names or labels), concept learning (acquisition of
concept meanings) and propositional learning (acquisition of propositional meanings). All these
kinds of cognitive learning may be used or shown in a concept map (Novak 1998:41).
ML occurs at individual levels and also at organizational levels throughout the integration and
shared of the minds (cognitive structures and mental models) of the organizational members
(Wilkens, Menzel and Pawlowsky 2004). But the empirical evidence obtained by an ample
research at individual level is still scarce in the black-box of the organizations and their complex
environments, where learn to learn seems be a more complex activity. In an organization, agents
(learners) are members of an interacted system and the environment can best be characterised as
enacted. Weick (1969) created the phrase “enacted environment” which means that “the human
being creates the environment, to which the system then adapts. The human actor does not react
to an environment, he enacts it” (Weick 1969:64). Subjective construction of meaning is
developed on the basis of symbols and language and organizational reality is constructed by
interaction of organisational members who develop a joint interpretation. The key element of
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
knowledge thus is not the intellectual capacity but the capacity to interact and develop a common
understanding and pattern of interpretation in turbulent fields. Organizational knowledge results
from former experiences in the enacted system and leads to organizational images,
organizational theories-in-action (Argyris and Schön 1978; Weick and Bougon 1986),
organizational interpretation systems or shared mental models (Senge 1990). From this
constructivist perspective, organizational knowledge can be defined as a result of the subjective
interpretation of its members and is not understood as an “objective” mental reflection of reality,
but essentially as a co-existing and conflicting interpretation of reality that is based on the history
of each participating member of a joint interaction system.
Pawlowsky (2001) has developed a conceptual framework for OL based on the common
elements of the different approaches since it first appeared in the literature (Cyert and March
1963). This model identifies the fundamental dimensions of the learning process, in order to
analyse the specific actions undertaken and to understand better their origins, their development
and their effects (Figure 1).
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework of Organizational Learning (adapted from Pawlowsky 2001)
The first of these dimensions is the level of the system at which the learning takes place
(individual, group, organization, inter-organizational). The second dimension is the orientation of
the learning undertaken: cognitive, cultural or conative (or learning through action), similar to
the three orientations proposed by the theory of Meaningful Learning (Ausubel Novak and
Hanesian 1978). The third dimension is the type of learning achieved by means of the tool used
or the action taken. Since the concept of OL arose as an attempt to incorporate within a theory
the efforts made by organizations to survive in increasingly competitive environments, the types
of learning described in Pawlowsky’s model have a strongly evolutionist character. Thus the
types described refer essentially to the degree of complexity and of self-awareness of the subject
Individual
Group
Organization
Inter-organizational
Identification
Generation
Difussion
Integration
Action
Cognitive
Conative
Cultural
Type I: Simple loop
Type II: Double loop
Type III: Deutero
Learning levels
Learning phases Learning orientation
Types of learning
Conceptual
Framework of OL
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
in his or her relationship to the environment and with him or herself as a learner.
Type I or “simple loop” learning is conceived as a correction of deviations in the behaviour of
the organization carried out through “normal” operations within the working of the organization.
Type II or “double loop” learning implies an adaptation to the environment, and therefore an
awareness (and perhaps a modification) of the models assumed by the organization in its
relationship with it. Lastly, “deutero-learning” or Type III learning refers to a type of analysis in
depth of the “cognitive” and behavioural structures of the organization.
Finally, Pawlowsky distinguishes between the various phases of the process of OL, in order to be
able to assign to each of these phases the resources and tools adequate for their objectives:
identification, generation or creation, diffusion or dissemination, integration and transformation.
The phase of identification consists of locating the information that may be relevant for the
learning; the generation or creation phase refers to the creation of new knowledge; the third
phase is the diffusion or dissemination of the knowledge through the different levels (individual,
group, organization) that participate in the process; the fourth phase consists of the integration of
the knowledge generated and disseminated into the “cognitive structures”, usually called the
“knowledge systems” of the organization (Pawlowsky 2001). The fifth and last phase is the
transformation of the knowledge into action and to its effect on the standard conduct of the
organization and its enacted environment. In the theory of meaningful learning, the three
operational phases are: the advance organizer, the presentation of learning task or material and
the phase of strengthening cognitive organization. In the cognitive structure of the learner it
produces a process of assimilation of knowledge (obliterative subsumption, progressive
differentiation, integrative reconciliation or superordinate learning). In sum, ML participates in
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
OL processes, but is no equivalent to it. Its presence can improve or no the OL; i.e, individuals
and a group within the organization can learn significantly determined knowledge but it does not
mean that the organization is doing it.
The role of socialization processes is very important for disseminating a “meaningful”
organizational learning. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) have called “externalization" to the
process throughout tacit knowledge of individuals within the organization can be made explicit
or codified. For opposition, “internalization” is the reverse process, identifying how formal
rules and procedures and process are “captured” by the employees. These researchers have
chosen the term "socialization" to denote the sharing of tacit knowledge, and the term
"combination" to represent the dissemination of codified knowledge. According to this model,
knowledge creation and organizational learning take a path of socialization, externalization,
combination, internalization, socialization, externalization, combination . . . etc. in an infinite
spiral.
3. Novakian maps for knowledge transference in alignment of business strategy
3.1 Mapping tacit knowledge
According Cañas and Novak (2006) a concept map is “a tool that allows one or more persons to
represent explicitly their understanding of a domain of knowledge”. From the perspective of
knowledge management is a tool for acquiring and representing tacit knowledge. In this sense,
although the graphical display of tacit knowledge has been in use for centuries as a method of
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
expressing individual thinking, CMs provide a functionality which enables the user to share his
or her knowledge, to collaborate with others, and to show the logical connection between
concepts (Huff 1990). Furthermore, concepts can be re-used, and information in the form of
voice, documents, or movie clips can be added. CMs are therefore a very useful cognitive tool in
acquiring knowledge and making it available to others in the enacted environment of
organizations. Despite there are other tools for elaborating ideas and cognitive maps, Novakian
CMs includes the possibility of describing objects and explaining events, formalising and
displaying tacit knowledge, as well as to transfer it with the help of pictures, movie clips, voice,
text, structure or other forms of description to explicit knowledge (Cañas and Novak 2006). CMs
facilitate sense-making and meaningful learning on the part of individuals who make or use
concept maps due they are constructed to reflect organization of the declarative memory system.
McAleese (1988) suggests that the process of making knowledge explicit, using nodes and
relationships, allows the individual to become aware of what they know and as a result to be able
to modify what they know. He proposed the methapor of the Knowledge Arena as a virtual space
where learners may explore what they know and what they do not know.
In the business knowledge arena, mapping tacit knowledge acquires special relevance for
capture a picture of the organizational learning within the knowledge management and strategy
dynamic (Bougon 1992; Fiol and Huff 1992; Markoczy and Goldberg 1993). CMs can also be
very useful for investigating the organizational learning in communities of practice, attending
their holistic interrelations between working, learning and innovation (Brown and Duguid 1991;
Wenger, McDermott and Snyder 2002).
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
3.2 Knowledge transfer
Knowledge transfer mechanism between individuals and organization is at the heart of
organizational learning, it represents the process through which individual learning becomes
embedded in an organization’s memory and structure (Kim, 1993; Busch, Richards and
Dampney, 2001). In spite technical expertise is of great importance in organizations that compete
in technological and scientific contexts, we know very little about how to transfer and improve
the “appropriability” of technological knowledge and expertise inside the organization (Teece
2000).
Moreover, the knowledge to be transferred in a firm is no only about technical specifications of a
product or not simply technological. Knowledge about competitors, customers and suppliers is
also part of the mix and is an important tacit dimension which is difficult to transfer without the
transfer of individuals (Teece 2000). In this sense, knowledge is often widely diffused in an
organization. Some of it may lie in R&D laboratories, some on the factory floor, and some
resides in the executive or managers knowledge. Sometimes what is critical is the capacity to
weave it all together, and in many circumstances organizations contract knowledge brokers and
other specialists in technology transfer for translating knowledge within the firm.
A concept map can seen as a tool for process of knowledge transfer, i. e., an instrument that
allows one or more persons collaborate synchronously or at different times in the process of
representing explicitly their understanding of a domain of knowledge (Cañas and Novak 2006).
Related to this process, Vygotsky (1978) stressed the importance of social exchange in learning,
especially with learners who are at about the same Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), that
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
is, learners who are at about the same level of cognitive development (same ZPD) on a given
topic will enhance each other’s earning if they engage in active exchange of ideas and can see.
From the perspective of the knowledge transfer, we consider that also is relevant still even in
those cases of individuals with different ZDP or which have a gap in a determined knowledge
area. For example, a conceptual map can be useful to explain the expert ideas on a specific topic
or question to other persons that haven’t this expertise knowledge. According Henao-Cálad and
Arango-Fonnegra (2007) “if experts are involved, the concept maps can continue representing
the problem as the profile of the problem becomes clearer. If the concept maps are stored, they
constitute part of the collective history and they serve as a starting point for the methodological
memory of the topic” Henao-Cálad and Arango-Fonnegra (2007:44). We agree with these
authors considering that CMs constitute a strategic instrument for knowledge preservation and
transfer and KM. But the use of CMs is a necessary but nor sufficient condition for the
successful of the organizational learning. The existence of a properly environment or the
individuals motivation are key premises for the meaningful learning and organizational learning
too. Motivation is intrinsically related with the concept of the alignment between the staff and
the strategy business (Teece 2000). Also alignment implies that the firm must have the potential
to learn, unlearn, or relearn based on its past behaviors. In this sense the process of learning
involves both individual and organizational levels at the creation and manipulation of this
tension between constancy and change. Hedberg states it this way: “Although organizational
learning occurs through individuals, it would be a mistake to conclude that organizational
learning is nothing but the cumulative result of their members' learning. Organizations do not
have brains, but they have cognitive systems and memories. As individuals develop their
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
personalities, personal habits, and beliefs over time, organizations develop world views and
ideologies. Members come and go, and leadership changes, but organizations' memories
preserve certain behaviors, mental maps, norms, and values over time” (1981:6).
4. Complex Knowledge Transfer: a case study
4.1 Case study context
The case study that we have considered deals with a company specialized on design,
development, production, marketing and sales of implants and instruments for orthopaedic and
trauma surgery. This firm is a leader in the Spanish orthopaedic industry and exports world wide
to more than forty countries competing in all continents. Their products include implants made
from advanced biomaterials with osteoinductive and resorbable properties like “Implants and
Gene-Activated Matrix”, designed to support the regenerative activity of the stem cells.
Since the date of its establishment at the middle of 1993, this firm followed one a precise
innovation policy with the clear idea of introducing to the market its own innovating products at
the Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery areas. Today is a medium-size firm with 40
employees, totally consolidated in its sector with a diversity of products (surgery instruments,
cervical and lumbar cages of porous material, prosthesis, etc.) and positioned in the highest part
of a market dominated by multinational companies.
4.2 The problem
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
In 1997 the firm developed spinal column implants, which is the sector with highest growth
potential in the market for surgical implants. These implants are considered to be “high range”,
since they are destined for a type of surgery treating pathologies of the spinal column of recent
application and highly complexity. To cope with this business opportunity the firm increased the
size of the R&D and the sales departments, hiring three new representatives for the Spanish
market and maintaining the same resources for the international market (a sales manager with
wide experience in the market for spinal implants). By mid-2000 the firm had a product ready to
be marketed -a “fijador transpedicular”- an implant considered to be the “gold standard” of
spinal surgery and necessary for the future development of a line of products for this type of
interventions.
Two and a half years later, the sales results of this product in Spain were well below
expectations, whereas international sales were growing as planned. Multiple and possible causes
of this problem were analyzed, concluding that the main reason laid in the slowness of local sales
staff to acquire the necessary knowledge about the product to face the market.
An efficient appropriability of knowledge was extremely important in the commercialization
process (so much so that it can be defined as one of the firm’s principal strategic objectives) that
the representative should be able to maintain a dialogue with the surgeon in scientific terms, at
least with regard to the matters surrounding the application of the implant. In this sense, a large
part of the marketing of the sector was dedicated to providing the manufacturer with a certain
scientific “legitimacy”, which must be confirmed by the firm’s representative to the customer.
Furthermore, at the end of this period the three sales representatives were hired by other firms,
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
and were replaced by new representatives with no experience in the sector. The firm was faced
with the problem of providing fast training with a complex knowledge package to the sales
representatives, i. e., how to deal with information, especially information acquired by staff in
the course of their previous years of experience in the organization and how to transfer this
expertise to novel employees (Heijst, Spek and Kruizinga 1997). This kind of situation, in words
of Novak (1998:34) is a problem in schools settings but “it is especially critical in corporate
settings where knowledge has become more important than the traditional resources of land,
labor and capital”. On other hand, this problem shows that the dividing frontier between tacit
and explicit knowledge not always may be totally defined. In this case, there was a high
interrelationship between the proper complex characteristics of the product (clearly established
in schemes provided by the R&D department) with contextual and tacit issues, as the specific
scientific and technological vocabulary and modes to explain functioning procedures.
Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995:239) stood out that “it is very important for the organization to
support and stimulate the knowledge-creating activities of individuals or to provide the
appropriate contexts for them. Organizational knowledge creation should be understood as a
process that organizationally amplifies the knowledge created by individuals and crystallizes it
at the group level through dialogue, discussion, experience sharing, or observation”.
4.3 Methodology and problem resolution
The firm took the decision of jointed an organizational learning project with the support of a
knowledge institute researcher with experience in using technological tools for KM, particularly
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
in the elaboration and use of concept maps. The project objectives were:
Problem identification and search of possible resolution, i. e., to identify the knowledge
gap which caused the problem and locate the specific knowledge capable of plugging this
gap
Knowledge generation, elaborating specifically concept maps. This step correspond with
conceptualization, included research, clarification and modelling of existent knowledge
Knowledge dissemination at the intra-organizational level (knowledge transference of
concept maps and their elicited contents)
Integration of this new knowledge content into the “knowledge systems” of the
organization
Transforming the transferred knowledge into organizational conduct, in alignment with
the business strategy of the firm
In this project CMs were used in three of the five phases of the Pawlowsky theoretical
framework: generation, dissemination and transformation. The use of this technique can also be
described in terms of the other dimensions in the analytical framework (Pawlowsky 2001).
Related to the learning levels, CMs were applied to individuals and groups, since they express
the propositional hierarchies realized by the members of a R&D department. The learning will be
of Type II or double loop, since it involves adaptation of the organization to the specific
characteristics of the spinal implants sector, more complex than the other sectors of the market
for implants for orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. Also the organization commits itself to
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
modifying its usual way of operating in order to undertake this adaptation. Finally, the
orientation of the learning was predominantly cognitive, but the cultural learning involved in the
use of a tool such as CMs was taken into account. Table 1 summarises this description of the
maps within the theoretical framework of organizational learning.
Table 1. Methodology and process of application of CMs
Tool Level of
learning
Type of
Learning
Orientation of
learning Phase of learning
Concept Maps Individual/
Group
Type II or
double loop
Cognitive/cultu
ral
Generation /
dissemination /
transformation
Throughout the exposition of the results of the first two phases of the project (identification and
generation of knowledge) we have used profusely concepts taken directly from the Theory of
Meaningful Learning. In the phase of identification several important obstacles were identified:
the des-contextualization of the learning respect to the salesmen ZPD (Vygostky 1978), the lack
in the previous knowledge and expertise level of the learners (with a very heterogeneous
background) and limitations of materials and training. Normally the training of sales staff was
limited to the reading of a series of basic medical manuals orientated to doctors or nurses
formation on the one hand, and of a biomechanical description of the product provided by the
R&D department, on the other. Salesmen were overwhelmed by concepts of pathological
anatomy or biomechanics, being very hard for them a clear knowledge related to the product they
must sell. On other hand, available schemes were elaborated by the R&D department employees
and while they considered them clear and appropriate, they were no understood by salesmen.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
One specific error in the schemes was a lack in the concepts identification of the product and a
deficient conceptual propositional hierarchy. These conditions did not favour a meaningful
learning and hinder the construction of new meanings. The errors arisen from the so-called
LIPH, Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies: as the meaning of every concept is
constructed by means of the series of propositions in which it is immersed, a learning based on
LIPH will lead to the erroneous incorporation of new meanings or will paralyse their effective
incorporation (Gonzalez, Morón and Novak 2001).
In addition to the technological support of knowledge management, employees received training
with regard to the exchange of knowledge, especially for the dissemination of best practises. The
company concentrated very much on product training and best practice seminars to facilitate
knowledge creation and its distribution.
The first step was to identify the experts whose knowledge could solve the gaps detected. The
experts were identified by qualitative methods, given the small size of the firm; the method of
nomination was used, based on the existence and acceptance of a qualified opinion. In this case,
the Technical Director -responsible to the General Management of the R&D and Manufacturing
departments- was chosen as the possessor of a qualified opinion, because he had held this post
since the foundation of the firm, and had been for four years in charge of the R&D department of
another multinational firm in the same sector. Other expert chosen was the R&D Engineer in
charge of the development of products for the spinal column. This expert operates under several
disciplines, but all of them product oriented, since his work is the development of the product.
We therefore conjectured that the propositional hierarchy that could be provided by the
representation of the expert’s knowledge was the resource that would make good the deficiency
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
detected in the sales department, if the knowledge generation phase could be carried out
correctly.
The first map made was for Cervical Plates: in this map it was decided to start from a concept
that would include a range of implants rather than one particular implant, since the firm intended
to launch at least two products of different characteristics within this range. The map therefore
explains the general attributes of cervical plates related to those of the most usual types of this
range of implants. The map was elaborated considering a set of core questions to delimit the
problem:
What is cervical plate?
What is cervical plate for?
In which context does cervical plate used?
What are the principal technical characteristics of a cervical plate?
How does a cervical plate “function”?
The following Figure 2 show the concept maps elaborated for cervical plates.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Figure 2. CM of Cervical Plates
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
The next map was that of the Tic-Tac Lumbar Plate: this product was the most innovative, being
based on a new surgical approach to a set of pathologies. For this reason, we labelled the
conceptual peak “tic-tac plate project” instead of the specific product, in order to develop in
greater depth links between surgery and biomechanical aspects whose newness would be
fundamental in achieving the initial acceptance of the product by the market (Figure 3)
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Figure 3. CM for the development of a Tic-Tac Plate Project.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Finally we drew up the map of the Porobloc Intersomatic Boxes, a specific product, whose
distinguishing characteristic is the use of a new material. The map therefore (Figure 4) illustrates
the general characteristics of the product, those of the new material, and the functional
advantages of this new material over those normally used.
Figure 4. CM for the development of POROBloc intersomatic cages.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
The maps repeat concepts and propositions regarding the fusion (or arthrodesis) of the vertebrae,
function for which the spinal implants are intended, which must be anchored as inclusive
concepts (Novak, 1998) Moreover, although in Figures 1, 2 and 3 the map concepts here do not
include links to other resources -a large number of images subordinated to the concepts, which
are fundamental in illustrating the concepts related to descriptive anatomy.
The remaining phases of the project were the dissemination throughout the elaboration and
diffusion of an instruction package for the commercial department of the three products,
followed by the integration within the sales department’s usual training procedure before the
launch of a new product. And finally, the transformation of the knowledge into action, which can
be evaluated and measured by reviewing the maps in the light of the learners’ commercial
experience of the new product, adding new concepts or modifying the existing hierarchies. Once
the use of concept maps had been incorporated into the normal working of the organization,
consideration can be given to making new maps, more focussed on marketing strategies, to
support the transformation of knowledge into action. When salesmen were asked to evaluate
their experience with regard to concept maps, they stated that concept maps are an excellent tool
for eliciting a clear representation of knowledge. Also R&D employee value positively the self-
explanatory structure of the CMs, considering that this technique is useful to transfer in a simple
mode the complexity associated to the technical diagrams.
5. Conclusion
In our case-study concept maps helped to individuals and the R&D group to explicit knowledge
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
which was masquerading in the enacted environment of the firm. R&D employees did not
understand the salesmen limitations and, in this sense, the concept mapping technique has
contributed to improve the data warehouse of the organization, integrating and clarifying the
transference of internal research reports and explicit internal best practices. In this study-case
concept maps have shown to be user-friendly analytical tools for delivering of improved
knowledge access and the enhancement of the organization’s knowledge environment, including
the willingness of individuals to freely share their knowledge and experiences. We consider that
CMs are potent and low cost tools for improving the transference knowledge process and the
organizational learning integrating both content and context learning aspects. From the above-
mentioned use of CMs it became apparent that concept map technology –i.e., CmapTools
software- provides excellent facilities for knowledge sharing and acquiring processes in complex
technological environment. Experts can make their knowledge available to other employees,
reinforcing the commitment in alignment with the business strategies of the firm. In this study-
case, it can observe that both salesmen and R&D experts acquired new knowledge meaningfully.
For this reason, we consider that the Theory of Meaningful Learning and the use of tools such
concept maps can make important contributions to investigate and to improve the organizational
learning and the knowledge management in organizations.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
References
Ahmed, P. K.; Lim, K. K. and Loh, A. Y. E. 2002. Learning through knowledge management.
Butterworth-Heinemann. UK.
Ausubel, D. P. Novak, J. D. and Hanesian, H. 1978. Educational psychology: a cognitive view
(2º edic). Rinehart and Winston: New York.
Argyris, C. 1982. Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C. 1992. On organizational learning. Blackwell Publishing. USA.
Argyris, C. and Schon D. A. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Argyris, C. and Schon D. A. 1996. Organizational Learning: Vol. 2. Theory, Method, and
Practice. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Bougon, M. G. 1992. Congregate cognitive maps: a unified dynamic theory of organization and
strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3):369-389.
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward
a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science 2(1):40-57.
Busch, P., Richards, D. and Dampney, C., 2001. Visual mapping of articulable tacit knowledge.
Proceedings of the 2001 Asia-Pacific symposium on Information visualisation - Volume 9,
Sydney, Australia, 37 - 47 .
Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., Eskridge, T., Gómez, G., Arroyo, M. and
Carvajal, R. 2004. CmapTools: A Knowledge Modeling and Sharing Environment. In Concept
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology, ed. A. J. Cañas; J. D. Novak and F. M. González.
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping. Universidad Pública de
Navarra: Pamplona, Spain. 125-133.
Cañas, A. J. and Novak, J. D. 2006. Re-examining the foundations for effective use of concept
maps. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, ed. A. J.
Cañas and J. D. Novak. San José, Costa Rica.
Cyert, R. M. and March, J.G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J. S. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between
organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10 (4):381-400.
Daft, R.L., and Huber, G.P. 1987. How organizations learn: a communication framework.
Research in the Sociology of Organizations 5:1-36.
Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. 1998. Working Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press:
Cambridge.
Dierkes, M., Antal, A.B., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. 2001. Handbook of Organizational Learning
and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Dodgson, M. 1993. Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization Studies
14(3):375-394
Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post-capitalist society. Butterworth Heinemann: London.
Drucker, P.F. 1999. Management challenges for the 21st century. Harper Business: New York.
Eden, C. 1992. On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies 29 (3):261-265.
Fiol, C. M. and Huff, A. S. 1992. Maps for managers: where are we? Where do we go from here?
Journal of management studies 29 (3):267-285.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Fiol, C. M. and Lyles, M.A. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review
10(4):803-813.
Fourie, L. C. H. 2005. Computer-based concept mapping tools in business. Proceedings of San
Diego International Systems Conference, San Diego, State University, USA, 8-10 July 2005.
González, F. M., Morón, C. and Novak, J.D. 2001. Errores conceptuales. Diagnosis, tratamiento
y reflexiones. Pamplona: Eunate.
Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: organizational
capability as knowledge integration. Organizational Science 7 (4):375-387.
Gurteen, D. 1998. Knowledge, creativity and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management 2:
5-13
Henao-Cálad, M. and Arango-Fonnegra, M. P. 2007. Concept maps as a strategy to convert
knowledge in knowledge management. VINE: The journal of information and knowledge
management systems. 37 (1):41-48.
Heijst, G., Spek, R., and Kruizinga, E. 1997. Corporate memories as a tool for knowledge
management. Expert Systems With Applications 13, 41- 54.
Herdberg, B. 1981. How organizations learn and unlearn. Handbook of organizational design.
Oxford University Press
Huff, A. S. 1990. Mapping strategic thought. New York: Wiley.
Hung, R. Y., Lien, B. Y. and McLean, G. N. 2009. Knowledge Management Initiatives,
Organizational Process Alignment, Social Capital, and Dynamic Capabilities. Advances in
Developing Human Resources 11 (3):320-333.
Johannessen, J. A.; Olson, B. and Olaisen, J. 1999. Aspects of innovation theory based on
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
knowledge-management. International Journal of Information Management 19 (2):121-139.
Kim, D. H. 1993. The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management
Review (fall 1993), 37-50.
Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development.
Englewood Cliffs: New-Jersey. Prentice-Hall.
Lähteenmäki, S.; Toivonen, J. and Mattila, M. 2002. Critical Aspects of Organizational Learning
Research and Proposals for Its Measurement. British Journal of Management Volume 12(2):
113-129.
Lee, S., Courtney, J. F., Jr. and O'Keefe, R. M. 1992. A system for organizational learning using
cognitive maps. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 20 (1):23-36.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge — Building and Sustaining Sources of
Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, USA.
Lyles, M.A. and Schwenk, C.R. 1992. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge
structures. Journal of Management Studies 29(2):155-174.
McAleese, R. 1988. The Knowledge Arena as an Extension to the Concept Map: Reflection in
Action. Interactive Learning Environments 6(1):1-22.
Markoczy, L. and Goldberg, J. 1993. A method for eliciting and computing causal maps.
International Workshop on Managerial and Organizational Cognition EIASM, Brusells, 11-15
May.
Morey, D.; Maybury, M. and Thuraisingham, B. 2002. Knowledge Management: Classic and
Contemporary Works. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nonaka, I. 1991. The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review 69 (6 Nov-
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Dec):96–104.
Nonaka, I. 1994. A Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science
5 (1):14-37.
Nonaka, I., Reinmoeller, P. and Senoo, D. 1998. The art of knowledge systems to capitalize on
market knowledge. European Management Journal 16 (6):673-684.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies
create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., Umemoto, K. 1996. A Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.
International Journal of Technology Management 11(7/8):833 – 845.
Nonaka, I.; Von Krogh, G. and Voelpel, S. 2006. Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory:
Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances. Organization Studies 27(8):1179-1208.
Novak, J. D. 1998. Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools
in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erbaum Associates Inc. Pub. USA.
Pawlowsky, P. 2001. The Treatment of Organizational Learning in Management Science. In
Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, ed. M. Dierkes; A. Berthoin-Antal, J.
Child and I. Nonaka. Oxford University Press: New York.
Polanyi, M., 1967. The tacit dimension Routledge and Kegan Paul London U.K.
De los Reyes, E. and Barberá, D. 2004. Los Mapas Conceptuales como Herramienta de
Aprendizaje Organizacional: Aproximación a un Marco Teórico y Presentación
de Resultados Parciales de un Proyecto. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on
Concept Mapping, ed. A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak and F. M. González. Pamplona,
2004.
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
Rodhain, F. 1999. Tacit to explicit: transforming knowledge through cognitive mapping: an
experiment. Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel
research. New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 51 - 56
Senge, P. M. 1990. The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Senker, J. 1995. Networks and tacit knowledge in innovation. Economies et societes 29(9) :99-
118.
Slater, S. F. and Narver, J. C. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of
Marketing 59 (3):63-74.
Sutherland, S. and Katz, S. 2005. Concept mapping methodology: A catalyst for organizational
learning. Evaluation and Program Planning 28 (3):257-269.
Teece, D. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation. Organizational arrangements for
regimes of rapid technological progress. Research Policy 15(6):285-305.
Teece, D. 2000. Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and
Industrial Context. Long Range Planning 33:35-54
Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In:
Strategic Management Journal (18):509-533.
Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R. and Snyder, C. A. 2002. Development of a Measure for the
Organizational Learning Construct. Journal of Management Information Systems.19(2):175-218.
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weick, K.E. and Bougon, M.G. 1986. Organizations as cognitive maps: charting ways to success
and failure. In The Thinking Organization: Dynamics of Organizational Cognition, ed. H. Sims
Published in Moon, B.; Hoffman, R. R.; Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (Eds.). Applied Concept Mapping Theory,
Techniques, and Case Studies in the Business Applications of Novakian Concept Mapping.
Productivity Press/CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. Pp. 253-274. ISBN 10: 1439828601 / 1-4398-
2860-1, ISBN 13: 9781439828601.
and D. Gioia. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 103-135.
Weick, K. E. 1969. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. and Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a
guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Wilkens, U.; Menzel, D. and Pawlowsky, P. 2004. Inside the Black-box: Analysing the
Generation of Core Competencies and Dynamic Capabilities by Exploring Collective Minds. An
Organisational Learning Perspective. Management Revue 15 (1):8-26.
Wilkens, U.; Menzel, D. and Pawlowsky, P. 2004. Inside the Black-box: Analysing the
Generation of Core Competencies and Dynamic Capabilities by Exploring Collective Minds. An
Organizational Learning Perspective. Management Revue 15(1), 8-26.