chapter eight tolerance charts.pptx

Upload: slitant

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    1/37

    Chapter Eight

    Tolerance Charts

    1

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    2/37

    INTRODUCTION

    A tolerance chart is a graphical method for presenting

    the manufacturing dimensions of a workpiece or

    assembly at all stages of its manufacturing dimensions

    of a workpiece.

    The chart provides an intermediate control system of

    checks and balances to insure that processing

    dimensions and tolerances will meet those specified on

    part prints The tolerance charts are useful in sorting dimensional

    problems on individual parts, and also useful in

    processing assemblies2

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    3/37

    Purpose and Utilization

    of Tolerance Charts

    1. It permits the process engineer to determine in

    advance of tooling whether or not the part can be

    made to part print tolerances. A surprising number of

    designs are actually dimensionally faulty and can notbe manufactured to print. If this condition can be

    discovered in advance, costly scrap can be prevented.

    2. It aids in developing proper manufacturing sequence.

    3. It provides a means of establishing the proper working

    tolerances for each operation in the sequence.

    3

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    4/37

    4. It provides assurance that sufficient stock removal will

    always be available for each operation in the sequence and

    what that amount is. If sufficient stock is not availabletolerance charts will disclose the same.

    5. When accuracy of the machine is known, the tolerance

    chart will indicate whether or not it is capable of meeting

    part print specifications.

    6. It provides an intelligent instrument for negotiating with

    product design when manufacturing specifications cannot

    be met economically.7. It offers a convenient and useful check on alternate

    methods of dimensioning the part for processing purpose.

    4

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    5/37

    8.It aids the process engineer in determining whether the part

    will arrive at its last operation with desired dimensions and

    tolerances.

    9. It helps to determine the practicability of combined tooling,

    such as form tools-or combinations of working and

    inspection gauging.

    10. It provides a means of reducing dimensional errors whichare likely to occur if complex parts are processed without

    the use of tolerance charts.

    11. It aids in determining the proper raw material sizes and in

    developing the necessary castings and forgings.12. Together with the process picture sheet, the tolerance

    chart provides an invaluable aid in the development of

    complete and accurate process routings.5

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    6/37

    Definitions and Symbols1. A working Dimensionis the distance between a

    locating surface and the surface being processed.2. Stock removal is the difference between the

    dimension that existed prior to machining andmachining dimension.

    3. Resultant dimensionis the difference between twodimensions or a dimension and an intermediateresultant. It is sometimes called as a balancedimension. An intermediate resultant occurs whenadditional stock removed in later operation willaffect its size.

    4. Total toleranceis the total variation from the basicstock removal dimension which can result from theoperation performed

    6

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    7/37

    7

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    8/37

    8

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    9/37

    9

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    10/37

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    11/37

    11

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    12/37

    12

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    13/37

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    14/37

    Assumptions

    Rough forging dimension = 2 in

    Nominal finish dimension = 1.920 in Difference = 0.080 in to be removed from two

    surfaces B and G

    Both B and G surfaces are to be machined,

    hardened and ground, therefore let us assumethat 0.010 in is left for grinding for each surface.

    Therefore stock to be removed from each surface= (0.080/2)-0.010= 0.030 in

    No change in dimensions due to heat treatment processes will be assumed in this example.

    14

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    15/37

    Operation 10

    15

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    16/37

    Operation 10: calculations

    Forging Dimension = 2.0000.010 in

    Operation 10, W.D. = 1.9700.002 in

    Stock removal = 0.0300.012 in

    Min. of 0.018 in and max. of 0.042 in. can beremoved.

    No final (resulting) dimension is resulted from

    this operation.

    16

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    17/37

    Operation 20

    17

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    18/37

    Operation 20: Calculations

    Three separate surfaces result from this operation. Location

    takes place on surface G which was machined in operation10. Surface A is faced, the center hole is core drilled and

    reamed, and the surface C is turned. Here, we concern with

    surfaces B and C. Here, as in previous operation, a nominal

    0.030 stock will be removed from A. The working toleranceis 0.002 as before. Therefore,

    Operation 10, working dimension 1.9700.002

    Operation 20, working dimension 1.9400.002

    Stock removal 0.0300.004

    18

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    19/37

    Operation 20 continued

    Surface C must be produced as a continuation of

    operation 20, using the same locating surface. Becausethe position of the surface C with respect to surface Gis affected by the amount which will later be removedfrom surface G by grinding, allowance must be made to

    insure that the final relationship between these twosurfaces is maintained. Since 0.010 is allowed for stockremoval in grinding, the working dimension will be1.7800.002. Therefore,

    Operation 20 (a), working dimension 1.9400.002 Operation 20(b), working dimension 1.7800.002

    Stock removal 0.1600.004

    19

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    20/37

    20

    Operation 30

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    21/37

    Operation 30: Calculation In the first step performed in operation 20,a nominal

    working dimension of 1.940 was established betweensurfaces B and G. To determine the nominal workingdimensions for operation 30, two things must beconsidered.

    1. The nominal dimension between surface G and surface F.2. The nominal stock removal from surface G by grinding inthe final operation. The nominal working dimension forthis operation is found by subtracting these twodimensions from the nominal working dimension from

    operation 20.1.940-0.200-0.010=1.730 with working tolerance as

    0.002.

    21

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    22/37

    Operation 30 continued

    Because this operation is carried out with a form

    tool, two surfaces are created simultaneously.This automatically fixes the relationship between

    surfaces E and F. The form tool dimension which

    relates the two surfaces can carry the full partprint tolerance. The resultant dimension between

    surfaces F and G can now be calculated as:

    Operation 20(a), working dimension 1.9400.002

    Operation 30, working dimension 1.7300.002

    Resultant (intermediate) 0.2100.004

    22

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    23/37

    Operation 40

    23

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    24/37

    Operation 40: calculations

    Working dimension for this operation must take into

    account the allowance for grinding after hardening.

    Because the nominal depth of this milling cut is 0.250

    and the nominal allowance for grinding is 0.010, the

    working dimension fro this operation is will be

    0.250+0.010=0.260 with working tolerance 0.002.

    24

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    25/37

    Operation 50

    The prints requires a finished hardness depth of0.0150.010. Actually, this depth can be

    controlled within 0.005. Because 0.010 is to be

    removed from each ground surface, the working

    case depth is set as 0.0250.005. Since nothing

    has been removed from the workpiece in

    carburizing and hardening, no stock removal is

    recorded. As indicated previously, there is nochange in workpiece dimension and hence no

    change in the resultant occurs.

    25

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    26/37

    Operation 60

    26

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    27/37

    Operation 60: Calculations

    The working tolerance on grinding can beachieved as 0.0005. Because 0.010 has been

    allowed for grinding, the working dimension that

    must be held in this operation is 1.9300.0005.Thus stock removal

    Operation 20, working dimension 1.9400.002

    Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.0005 Stock removal 0.0100.0025

    27

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    28/37

    Operation 60 continued With the completion of operation 60, the dimensions from

    surface G to , G to C, and F to E are now finalized. Since thedimension from F to E was established earlier by the form tooland is not affected by this operation, it can be recorded as aresultant as shown in figure. Operation 30 was the last to be

    performed on surface F before operation 60. The resultantfrom G to F can now be recorded.

    Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.0005

    Operation 30, working dimension 1.7300.002

    Resultant 0.2000.0025

    The resultant dimension between surfaces C and G now

    becomes final and can be checked. Its previous dimension wasattained in operation 2(b).

    Operation 20(b), working dimension 1.7800.002

    Operation 60, Stock removal 0.0100.0025

    Resultant 1.7700.0045

    28

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    29/37

    Operation 60 continued

    The case hardened depth of G must be checked to

    make certain the grinding operation did not cause

    it to fall below the depth specified.

    The case hardened depth is determined by the

    difference between the initial case depth workingdimension and the stock removal in grinding

    Operation 50, working dimension 0.0250.005

    Operation 60, Stock removal 0.0100.0025 Resultant 0.0150.0075

    29

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    30/37

    Operation 70

    30

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    31/37

    Operation 70: Calculations

    Aside from balancing final tolerances, operation 70 completesthe machining operations on the workpiece, unless it is foundthat additional operations must be performed to correct

    tolerance stacking. Stock removal may be calculated as Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.0005

    Operation 70, working dimension 1.9200.0005

    Stock removal 0.0100.001

    Other resulting dimension of B and D Operation 40, Working dimension 0.2600.002

    Operation 70, working dimension 0.0100.001

    Resultant 0.2500.003

    Dimension of B (case hardened depth)

    Operation 50, Working dimension 0.0250.005

    Operation 70, working dimension 0.0100.001

    Resultant 0.0150.006

    31

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    32/37

    32

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    33/37

    Balancing of Tolerance Chart

    If the developed tolerance chart is accepted at thisstage, tight and costly processing increases cost of the

    product. The first step in balancing the tolerance chart is to

    examine the final resultant dimensions and comparethem with those specified the part print.

    The resultant whose tolerance compare closest withthe part print tolerance will be the logical place tostart.

    As can be seen in the developed chart, the resultantdimension between surfaces C and G is 1.7700.0045,

    which compares with the print dimension of1.7700.005. This comparison is closer than the others,balancing will start from here.

    33

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    34/37

    Balancing operation 60

    Operation 60 can now be recalculated as: Operation 20(a), working dimension 1.9400.002

    Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.001

    Stock removal 0.0100.003

    Operation 20(b), working dimension 1.7800.002

    Operation 60, stock removal 0.0100.003

    Resultant 1.7700.005 The preceding resultant is now identical with the

    part print specifications.

    34

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    35/37

    An intermediate resultant between surfaces F and Gwas established as a result of operation 30. The finalresultant was obtained in Operation 60 . Because the

    relationship between surfaces E and F was determinedby form tool, an increase can be made in the workingtolerance of operation 30 without affecting othersurfaces. The working dimensions of operation 30 can

    be changed to 1.7300.004. The correct resultantbetween surfaces F and G will now be:

    Operation 60, working dimensions 1.9300.001

    Operation 30, working dimensions 1.7300.004

    Resultant 0.2000.005

    The dimension 0.1000.002 remains unchangedbecause it was established from the form tool.

    35

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    36/37

    Balancing Operation 70

    Operation 70 now can be recalculated as follows:

    Operation 60, Working dimension 1.9300.001 Operation 70, working dimension 1.9200.002

    Stock removal 0.0100.003

    Operation 40, working dimension 0.2600.002

    Operation 70, stock removal 0.0100.003

    Resultant 0.2500.005

    Operation 50, working dimension 0.0250.007 Operation 70, Stock removal 0.0100.003

    Resultant 0.0150.010

    36

  • 8/10/2019 Chapter Eight Tolerance Charts.pptx

    37/37

    Completed Tolerance Chart

    37