chapter 24 long-run economic growth gottheil — principles of economics, 6e © 2010 cengage...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 24Chapter 24
LONG-RUN ECONOMIC LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTHGROWTH
Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e© 2010 Cengage Learning1
Economic PrinciplesEconomic Principles
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e2
Capital-labor and capital-output ratios
Technology and labor productivity
Labor productivity and economic growth
Saving, investment, and economic growth
Long-Run Economic GrowthLong-Run Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e3
The “trajectory” of world GDP over the course of 400 years is a lot like the take-off a jet airliner on 7,000 feet of runway. See Exhibit 1.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e4
EXHIBIT 1 GROWTH of GDP By REGION: 1600–2001(in 1990 International Dollars)
Source: Maddison (2003).
Exhibit 1: Growth of GDP by Exhibit 1: Growth of GDP by Region: 1600–2001Region: 1600–2001
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e5
Where has the “take-off” in GDP been less dramatic and why?• Africa because that continent did not
experience the Industrial Revolution of Western Europe and North American.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e6
EXHIBIT 2 ESTIMATES OF WORLD GDP: YEARS 100–1998 (bills of international PPP dollars)
Source: Angus Maddison, University of Greningen.
Exhibit 2: Estimates of World Exhibit 2: Estimates of World GDP: Years 100–1998GDP: Years 100–1998
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e7
While long-run economic growth has been part of the human experience, what does Exhibit 2 tell us?
• The last two centuries of world GDP stand in very sharp contrast to the millennia of previous GDPs.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e8
EXHIBIT 3 SHARE OF WORLD GDP, BY SELECTEDCOUNTRY OR REGION: 100–1998 (%)
Source: Angus Maddison, University of Greningen.
Exhibit 3: Share of World GDP, by Exhibit 3: Share of World GDP, by Selected Country or Region: Selected Country or Region:
100–1998 (%)100–1998 (%)
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e9
Who were the world’s economic superpowers over most of the past 2,000 years?I. India and China
II. The United States and Russia
III. Western Europe and Japan
Exhibit 3: Share of World GDP, by Exhibit 3: Share of World GDP, by Selected Country or Region: Selected Country or Region:
100–1998 (%)100–1998 (%)
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e10
Who were the world’s economic superpowers over most of the past 2,000 years?I. India and China
II. The United States and Russia
III. Western Europe and Japan
Reaching BackReaching Back
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e11
If long-run GDP growth is an indicator, then economic progress is what world societies have experienced from time immemorial.
Reaching BackReaching Back
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e12
Measured in production, labor force, capital and productivity per worker, technology, or living standards, the economies of the modern world dwarf the accomplishments of the economies of ancient civilizations.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e13
EXHIBIT 4 WORLD GDP PER CAPITA: YEAR 1 to 2000(in U.S. $)
Source: Angus Maddison, University of Greningen.
Exhibit 4: World GDP per Capita: Exhibit 4: World GDP per Capita: Year 1 to 2000Year 1 to 2000
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e14
What parallel can you see in Exhibit 4 in relation to world GDP?• The long-run rate of population growth
matches the long-run growth in world GDP.
• Thus, the standard of living—measured by GDP per capita—has remained virtually unchanged.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e15
EXHIBIT 5 GROWTH IN GDP PER CAPITA BY REGION:YEAR 1 to 2000
Source: Angus Maddison, The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective (OECD, 2001).
Exhibit 5: Growth in GDP per Capita Exhibit 5: Growth in GDP per Capita by Region:by Region: Year 1 to 2000Year 1 to 2000
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e16
While historically the world’s standard of living has increased dramatically from 1900 to 2000, what is obvious in Exhibit 5? • Only a few economies, that of Western
Europe and its offshoots, have enjoyed a greater part of this increase.
Long-Run Economic GrowthLong-Run Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e17
What caused the upsurge in GDP during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries?
I. The Whiskey Rebellion
II. The European Enlightenment
III. Isaac Newton
Long-Run Economic GrowthLong-Run Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e18
What caused the upsurge in GDP during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries?
I. The Whiskey Rebellion
II. The European Enlightenment
III. Isaac Newton
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e19
EXHIBIT 6 LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH
Exhibit 6: Long Run Economic Exhibit 6: Long Run Economic GrowthGrowth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e20
Points a and b in Panel a shows real GDP on the aggregate supply curve AS1 with a fixed set of resources. Panel b shows the possibilities of higher levels of real GDP with changing levels of economic resources.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e21
Economic growth
• An increase in real GDP, typically expressed as an annual rate of real GDP growth.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e22
In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith identified four principal factors that contribute to a nation’s economic growth. What are they?
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e23
a. The size of its labor force.
Smith’s principal factors that contribute to a nation’s economic growth:
b. The degree of labor specialization.
c. The size of its capital stock.
d. The level of its technology
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e24
Labor productivity
• The quantity of GDP produced per worker, typically measured in quantity of GDP per hour of labor.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e25
Capital deepening
• A rise in the ratio of capital to labor.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e26
Labor skills
• The proficiency to perform actual tasks and technical functions required in specific occupational fields. These skills reflect the laborer’s natural ability, experience-on-job, and education.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e27
Efficiency gains
• The increase in productivity associated with adoption of new technology and the reorganization of the workplace to accommodate the technology.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e28
Entrepreneurship
• A person who alone assumes the risks and uncertainties of business.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e29
EXHIBIT 7 THE LABOR PRODUCTIVITY CURVE
Exhibit 7: The Labor Exhibit 7: The Labor Productivity CurveProductivity Curve
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e30
How does capital deepening affect labor productivity?• The more capital per laborer, the greater the
laborer’s productivity. Moreover, new technology can shift upwards the labor productivity curve.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e31
Capital-labor ratio
• The ratio of capital to labor, reflecting the quantity of capital used by each laborer in production.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e32
1. If capital is $50,000 and labor is 200, what is the capital-labor ratio?
• The capital-labor ratio is ($50,000/200) = $250.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e33
2. If real GDP increases from $10,000 to $12,000, and labor rises from 100 to 105, what has happened to labor productivity?
• Output per laborer rises from ($10,000)/100 = $100 to ($12,000)/105 = $114.29
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e34
3. Which of the following represents capital deepening?
a. Increased worker experience
b. Increased worker training
c. Increased capital-labor ratio
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e35
3. Which of the following represents capital deepening?
a. Increased worker experience
b. Increased worker training
c. Increased capital-labor ratio
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e36
Capital-output ratio
• The ratio of capital stock to GDP.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e37
According to Adam Smith and many economists today, savings automatically convert to investment spending, so that investment-induced growth is dependent on savings.
Modern Economic GrowthModern Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e38
Changes in technology can increase labor productivity and GDP without there being any change in the value of the capital stock.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e39
EXHIBIT 8 THE GROWTH PROCESS
Exhibit 8: The Growth ProcessExhibit 8: The Growth Process
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e40
1. According to Exhibit 8, what will happen to consumption and investment next year as a consequence of investment this year?
• Investment this year increases next year’s capital stock, which in turn generates an increase in next year’s consumption and investment spending.
Exhibit 8: The Growth ProcessExhibit 8: The Growth Process
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e41
2. What will happen to potential future economic growth if more of GDP is consumed and less is invested?
• Less investment today means less economic growth in the future.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e42
EXHIBIT 9 GROSS NATIONAL SAVING IN THE UNITED STATES: 1960–2007
Source: Council of Economic Advisors, Economic Report of the President (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 2007). P. 73.
Exhibit 9: Gross National Savings in Exhibit 9: Gross National Savings in the United States: 1960–2007the United States: 1960–2007
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e43
According to Exhibit 9, what is the relationship between personal savings and government savings?• It appears that they may be inversely
proportional.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e44
EXHIBIT 10 AVERAGE ANNUAL PRODUCTIVITYGROWTH, SELECTED COUNTRIES: 1990–2005
Source: Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President, 2007 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2007).
Exhibit 10: Average Annual Exhibit 10: Average Annual Productivity Growth, Selected Productivity Growth, Selected
Countries: 1990–2005Countries: 1990–2005
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e45
What is noteworthy about the productivity of the United States compared to other nations?• U.S. annual productivity growth has
consistently risen over this 16-year period.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e46
EXHIBIT 11 SOURCES OF LABOR PRODUCTIVITYGROWTH: 1990–2005
Source: Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President, 2007 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2007).
Exhibit 11: Sources of Labor Exhibit 11: Sources of Labor Productivity Growth: 1990–2005Productivity Growth: 1990–2005
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e47
What increases brought about the rise in U.S. productivity in Exhibit 10? Examine Exhibit 11. • Labor skills
• Capital deepening via major investment
• Efficiency gains through technological change
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e48
EXHIBIT 12 REAL GDP AND ANNUAL RATE OF GDPGROWTH: 1990–2005 (billions 2000 $ and percent)
Source: Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President, 2007 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2008).
Exhibit 12: Real GDP and Annual Exhibit 12: Real GDP and Annual Rate of GDP Growth: 1990–2005 Rate of GDP Growth: 1990–2005
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e49
Despite business cycles, the rate of GDP grown in Exhibit 12 can be averaged out to show? • Eight of the 16 years were greater than 3%.
• The performance of the U.S. economy is exemplary.
How Economics Growth Affects How Economics Growth Affects Your LifeYour Life
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e50
One way of measuring the gains you personally derive from years of previous economic growth is to compare the cost your grandparents or perhaps great-grandparents had to pay to acquire things to the cost you pay now..
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e51
EXHIBIT 13 COST OF AQUIRING A 3-POUND CHICKEN
While the money price of a 3-pound fryer has risen from $1.23 in 1919 to $3.15 today, its real price—work time—has fallen from 2 hours 37 minutes to just 14 minutes.
Exhibit 13: Cost of Acquiring a Exhibit 13: Cost of Acquiring a 3-Pound Chicken3-Pound Chicken
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e52
In terms of dollar cost, your great-grandparents in 1919 bought a chicken for $1.13. You paid $3.15 for it in 1997. Have costs really tripled? Were your great-grandparents that much better off?• The gains of economic growth is masked by the use
of “dollar value.” Instead of dollars, calculate the number of minutes of a day’s work it takes to buy that chicken.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e53
EXHIBIT 14 SELECTED GOODS, IN MINUTES OR HOURSOF WORK TIME: THEN AND NOW
Source: W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm, Time Well Spent, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Annual Report, 1997, pp. 2–14.
Exhibit 14: Selected Goods, in Exhibit 14: Selected Goods, in Minutes or Hours of Work TimeMinutes or Hours of Work Time
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e54
While a double-decker hamburger cost’s less now, women’s haircuts are actually more expensive today than in 1920. New homes are only slightly less costly. Why?• The explanation is due to the labor intensity of their
production.
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e55
EXHIBIT 15 PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS ENJOYINGTHE BOUNTY OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
Exhibit 15: Percentage of Exhibit 15: Percentage of Households Enjoying the Households Enjoying the
Bounty of Economic GrowthBounty of Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e56
What is the most recent evidence of economic growth to have achieved an over 90 percent presence in U.S. households?
a. Computer
b. Wireless phone
c. Microwave oven
Exhibit 15: Percentage of Exhibit 15: Percentage of Households Enjoying the Households Enjoying the
Bounty of Economic GrowthBounty of Economic Growth
© 2010 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 6e57
What is the most recent evidence of economic growth to have achieved an over 90 percent presence in U.S. households?
a. Microwave oven
b. Wireless phone
c. Computer