chapter 11 chang.1

34
Dynamic Behavior of Closed-Loop Control Systems Chapter 11 4-20 mA

Upload: satya-sagar

Post on 09-Apr-2016

248 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

DYNAMICS OF CONTROL SYSTEM

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Dynamic Behavior of Closed-Loop Control Systems

Cha

pter

11 4-20 mA

Page 2: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 3: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Next, we develop a transfer function for each of the five elements in the feedback control loop. For the sake of simplicity, flow rate w1 is assumed to be constant, and the system is initially operating at the nominal steady rate.

ProcessIn section 4.3 the approximate dynamic model of a stirred-tank blending system was developed:

1 21 2 (11-1)

τ 1 τ 1K KX s X s W ss s

where

11 2

ρ 1, , and (11-2)wV xK Kw w w

Cha

pter

11

Page 4: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 5: Chapter 11 Chang.1

(11-5)sp me t x t x t

or after taking Laplace transforms,

(11-6)sp mE s X s X s

The symbol denotes the internal set-point composition expressed as an equivalent electrical current signal. This signal is used internally by the controller. is related to the actual composition set point by the composition sensor-transmitter gain Km:

spx t

spx t spx t

(11-7)sp m spx t K x t

Thus

(11-8)spm

sp

X sK

X s

Cha

pter

11

Page 6: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Current-to-Pressure (I/P) TransducerBecause transducers are usually designed to have linear characteristics and negligible (fast) dynamics, we assume that the transducer transfer function merely consists of a steady-state gain KIP:

(11-9)tIP

P sK

P s

Control ValveAs discussed in Section 9.2, control valves are usually designed so that the flow rate through the valve is a nearly linear function of the signal to the valve actuator. Therefore, a first-order transfer function usually provides an adequate model for operation of an installed valve in the vicinity of a nominal steady state. Thus, we assume that the control valve can be modeled as

2 (11-10)τ 1

v

t v

W s KP s s

Cha

pter

11

Page 7: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Composition Sensor-Transmitter (Analyzer)We assume that the dynamic behavior of the composition sensor-transmitter can be approximated by a first-order transfer function:

(11-3)τ 1

m m

m

X s KX s s

ControllerSuppose that an electronic proportional plus integral controller is used. From Chapter 8, the controller transfer function is

11 (11-4)τc

I

P sK

E s s

where and E(s) are the Laplace transforms of the controller output and the error signal e(t). Note that and e are electrical signals that have units of mA, while Kc is dimensionless. The error signal is expressed as

P s p t p

Cha

pter

11

Page 8: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 9: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Transfer Functions of Control Systems

1

Set-Point Change: ?

Load Change: ?

sp

X sX s

X sX s

Page 10: Chapter 11 Chang.1

1. Summer

2. Comparator

3. Block

• Blocks in Series

are equivalent to...

G(s)X(s)Y(s) Cha

pter

11

Page 11: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 12: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Transfer Function for Set-Point Change (Servo

Problem)

2

0

1

p v p

v p c

v p c sp

v p c m sp m

m c v p

sp c v p m

D s

Y s X s G s U s G s G s P s

G s G s G s E s

G s G s G s Y s B s

G s G s G s K Y s G Y s

K G G GY sY s G G G G

Page 13: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Transfer Function for Load Change (Regulator

Problem)

1 2

0

1

sp

d p

d v p c m

d v p c

m s

m

d

c v m

p

p

Y s

Y s X s X s

G s D s G s U s

G s D s G s G s G s GK Y Y s

G s D s G s G s G s G Y s

Y s GD s G G

s

G G

Page 14: Chapter 11 Chang.1

General Expression of Closed-Loop Transfer Function

1where

, : any two variables in block diagram: product of the transfer functions in the

path from to : product of the transfer functions in the

feedback loop.

f

e

f

e

YX

X Y

X Y

Page 15: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Servo Problem

open-loop transfer function

sp

f m c v p

e c v p m OL

X Y

Y YK G G G

G G G G G

Page 16: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Regulator Problem

open-loop transfer function

f d

e c v p m OL

X DY Y

G

G G G G G

Page 17: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

I O

Page 18: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Example2 1

42 1 2

1 1 2 3

1 2 3 1

1 1 2 3

1 2 3 1

1 1 2 1 2 3

2 1 2 1 2 1

4

4

2 3 1

2 1

2 1 2

2 1

2 1 2

1

1

1

11

1

c

c m

m c

sp c m

m c

c m

c

c m

c

c

m c c

c m c c m

m

GG

G GG G

G GO GI G G G

K G G GCY G

G

G G G

K G G G

G G G G

K G G G G GG G G G G G

GG G

G

G

G

G

G

Page 19: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 20: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 21: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with P Control (Set-Point Change)

1

1

1

1

111

1where

and open-loop gain = 01

1

pm c v

pspc v m

OLOL m c v p

OL

OL

KK K KH s Ks

KH s sK K Ks

KK K K K K KK

K

Page 22: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with P Control (Set-Point Change)

1/1

1

1

1

offset1

offset and

sp sp

t

spOL

OL

Mh t M S t H ss

h t K M e

Mh h M K MK

K

Page 23: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 24: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 25: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with P Control (Load Change)

1

2

1 1

2

/1 1 2

2

1

11

11

where 1

1

offset 01

offset and

p

pc v m

p

OL

t

psp

OL

OL

KH s Ks

KQ s sK K K

sK

KK

Mq t M S t Q s h t K M es

K Mh h K M

K

K

Page 26: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Cha

pter

11

Page 27: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with PI Control (Set-Point Change)

11

11

1 1

1

111

1

1

c cI

ppm vm v

p pspv mc m

ccI

cI

v

G

K

s Ks

KK K KK KH s ssK KH s

G s

K K K Ks

Ks s

G

Page 28: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with PI Control (Load Change)

2 23

1

3

2 3 3

3 3 3

1 1

1 11 1

11

where

1

11

2 1

1, , 2

p p

p pv m v m

I

c v m

OLII

OL OL

OLI I I

c v m O

c

O

I

L

c

L

K KH s s s

K KQ sK K K K

s s

sK K K K s

Ks s

K K

KK

K

G

K K K K

Ks

s s

Page 29: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with PI Control (Load Change)

3

3

1 1

32 23 3 3

233

233 3

1

2 1

1sin

1

Note that offset is eliminated!

t

q t S t Q ss

KH ss s

Kh t e t

Page 30: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Closed-Loop Response with PI Control (Load Change)

3 3

3 3

faster response , less oscillatory

faster response , more oscillatory

c

I

K

Page 31: Chapter 11 Chang.1

EXAMPLE 1: P.I. control of liquid level

Block Diagram:

Cha

pter

11

Page 32: Chapter 11 Chang.1

Assumptions

1. q1, varies with time; q2 is constant.

2. Constant density and x-sectional area of tank, A.

3. (for uncontrolled process)

4. The transmitter and control valve have negligible dynamics (compared with dynamics of tank).

5. Ideal PI controller is used (direct-acting).

)h(fq3

0KAs1)s(G

As1)s(G

K)s(G

K)s(Gs

11K)s(G

CL

P

VV

MMI

CC

For these assumptions, the transfer functions are:

Cha

pter

11

Page 33: Chapter 11 Chang.1

MPVC

L

GGGGG

QH

DY

11

MVI

C KAs

Ks

K

AsDY

1111

1

MPCIMVCI

I

KKKsKKKsAs

DY

2

02 MPCIMVCI KKKsKKKsA

1s2sK)s(G 22

The closed-loop transfer function is:

Substitute,

Simplify,

Characteristic Equation:

Recall the standard 2nd Order Transfer Function:

(11-68)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Cha

pter

11

Page 34: Chapter 11 Chang.1

For 0 < < 1 , closed-loop response is oscillatory. Thus decreased degree of oscillation by increasing Kc or I (for constantKv, KM, and A).

To place Eqn. (4) in the same form as the denominator of the T.F. in Eqn. (5), divide by Kc, KV, KM :

01ssKKK

AI

2

MVC

I

AKKK

21 IMVC

10

Comparing coefficients (5) and (6) gives:

Substitute,

22

KKKA

KKKA

II

MVC

I

MVC

I2

• unusual property of PI control of integrating system• better to use P only

Cha

pter

11