chapt 12 solid rockets(1)

Upload: alireza-ab

Post on 02-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    1/14

    Solid Propellant Rockets

    MAE 4930/7930 Aerospace Propulsion

    Prof. Craig A. Kluever

    University of Missouri-Columbia

    Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering

    Solid Propellant Rockets

    Solid rocket motors (SRMs) consist of a pressure vessel

    filled with a solid mixture of oxidizer and fuel

    Obviously no need for external storage tanks, feed systems,

    pumps, etc

    Solid rockets are relatively simple (compared to liquid

    propellant rockets) and reliable

    Applications of solid rocket motors: Military

    Sounding rockets

    Space boosters

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    2/14

    Solid Rocket Motors (SRMs)

    Advantages of solid propellant rockets

    Simplicity: no moving parts, no injection system, no need to fill

    with propellants before launch

    Storage, handling, and service is much easier compared to

    liquid-propellant rockets

    Highly reliable (no moving parts!)

    Payload mass ratio is high (lack of massive subsystems)

    Overall cost is low compared to liquid rockets

    Solid Rocket Motors (SRMs)

    Disadvantages of solid propellant rockets

    Because propellant mixture must be cast as a single piece,

    there are limitations in the size of a block. Therefore, clusters

    of smaller SRMs are often used

    Performance is lower than liquid-propellant rocket (lower Isp)

    Cannot turn off the thrust (unlike liquid rocket)

    Burn duration is relatively short, so total impulse is limited

    No means to cool nozzle compared to liquid-propellant rockets,

    which circulate liquid propellant through nozzle jackets

    Performance of solid propellant is sensitive to temperature, sothe associated manufacturing process is costly and difficult

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    3/14

    Solid Propellant Rockets:Characteristic Features

    Solid Rocket Motor (SRM) sizes can range from lbfthrust to 2.5 million lbf thrust (Shuttle SRB)

    The thrust profile can be ~constant, increase, or

    decrease with time (due to grain cross-section)

    The SRM has four components:

    Combustion chamber: stores and contains propellant during

    high-pressure burning

    Igniter

    Solid propellant (is burned for hot gases)

    Nozzle (expands gas to high velocity)

    Theory of Propulsion 6

    Motor casing

    Igniter

    Burning surface

    Solid propellant

    Throat

    Nozzle

    Combustion chamber

    Schematic diagram of solid rocket motor components

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    4/14

    SRM Combustion Chamber

    The combustion chamber is the mechanical casing

    which is normally a thin-walled cylindrical pressure

    vessel

    Aluminum, fiber-reinforced plastic, titanium

    Walls must withstand stresses from

    Pressure load during combustion

    Thermal stresses from high-temperature combustion

    Dynamic loads during launch

    Staging loads

    SRM Construction/Igniter

    O-rings are used as pressure seals between motor

    segments

    The igniter is located at the front end, and are either

    pyrotechnic or pyrogen igniters

    Pyrotechnic: explosives or high-energy chemical

    combinations (boron + potassium perchlorate) activated

    by electric current through a squib

    Pyrogen: small rocket motors that start the larger SRM;

    initiated by a pyrotechnic device

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    5/14

    Solid Rocket Propellants

    Three categories for solid propellants:

    Double-base or homogeneous propellant: chemical molecule

    contains both fuel and oxidizer. An example is nitroglycerin +

    nitrocellulose (highly explosive). Characteristics include low

    combustion temperature, low Isp (190-230 s), and almost

    smokeless exhaust gases

    Composite or heterogeneous propellant: crystalline oxidizer

    (e.g., ammonium perchlorate) + powdered fuel (e.g., aluminum)

    in a hydrocarbon binder (Shuttle SRB). This putty-like mixture is

    easily cast into any shape and cured between 100-180 deg F.

    Less hazardous to handle. Isp is 230-265 sec

    Composite double-based propellant: combination of the two

    types described above

    Theory of Propulsion 10

    Space Transportation System ISRB

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    6/14

    Theory of Propulsion 11

    Space Transportation System ISRB Components

    Theory of Propulsion 12

    Ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4) 70%

    Polybutadiene acrylonitrile (PBAN) 14%

    Aluminum powder 16%

    Iron oxidizer powder 0.07% (catalyst)

    Propellant mass fraction = 88%

    Ammonium perchlorate produces HCl in the combustion

    products and forms a white cloud when exhauseted into even

    mildly humid air.

    PBAN is a polymeric rubber-based binder that also serves as

    fuel

    Aluminum is added to enhance thrust (HV = 32 MJ/kg)

    Space Shuttle SRB propellant composition

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    7/14

    Theory of Propulsion 13

    SRB

    Thrust(lbs)

    Mission elapsed time (sec)

    2 million lbs

    3 million lbs

    100 sec

    Space Transportation System ISRB Performance

    Burning of Propellants Once propellant is ignited, burning takes place perpendicular to

    surface, and subsequent regression of burning surface is in parallel

    layers

    Rate of regression of the burning surface is the burning rate, r,

    characterized by the empirical relation

    Variablepc is the combustion chamber pressure

    Variable a is a function of propellant composition and temperature

    (ranges from 0.002 to 0.08 when ris in inch/s andpc in psia)

    Exponent n (combustion index) is independent of temperature

    n

    capr= inch/s or mm/s

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    8/14

    Burning of Propellants (2)

    Chamber pressure pc is determined by the equilibrium that shouldexists between gas generation rate (combustion) and nozzle

    exhaust flow rate

    Therefore, we can equate mass-flow rate at burning surface (gas

    generation) and mass-flow of hot gas out the nozzle

    The mass-rate generated by burning is

    Mass flow-rate of hot gas out the choked nozzle is

    n

    cbpbp apArAm ==&

    *c

    Ap

    RTApm tc

    c

    tc =

    =&

    whereAb = combustion surface area

    p = propellant density

    Burning of Propellants (3) Equate the two expressions for mass flow rate, and solve for area

    ratio

    Solving for chamber pressure

    cp

    n

    c

    t

    b

    RTa

    p

    A

    A =

    1

    n

    t

    b

    n

    t

    bcp

    cA

    AC

    A

    ARTap

    =

    =

    1

    11

    1

    where C= constant for a given propellant

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    9/14

    Stable Burn and Mass Flow Rate

    Mass-

    flow

    rate

    Nozzle dm/dt

    (choked flow)

    Chamber pressure,pc

    Stable

    equilibrium

    Gas generation dm/dt

    (burn surface)

    Combustion index 0 < n < 1

    n

    cbp apAm =&

    high pressure

    flow becomes unchoked, and

    pc drops back to stable point

    low

    pressure

    Low pressure: gas generation rate > nozzle flow rate, so

    chamber pressure increases to stable point

    c

    tcRT

    Apm

    =&

    Unstable Burn and Mass Flow Rate

    Mass-

    flow

    rate

    Nozzle dm/dt

    (choked flow)

    Chamber pressure,pc

    Unstable

    equilibrium

    Gas generation dm/dt

    (burn surface)

    Combustion index n > 1

    n

    cbp apAm =&

    high pressure

    more hot gas is generated than nozzle

    can accommodate, leading to explosionlow

    pressure

    Low pressure: gas generation rate < nozzle flow rate, so chamber pressure

    continues to decrease (no restoring mechanism), eventually

    leading to flame out

    c

    tcRT

    Apm

    =&

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    10/14

    Burning of Propellants (4)

    The previous slides show that for a stable burn, we require that thecombustion index 0 < n < 1

    In addition, n should be as small as possible

    For example, if n = 0.7 and a crack in the propellant develops so

    that the surface burn area increases by 20%, then we have

    1/(1 -n) = 3.333 and chamber pressure rise is

    If n = 0.2, then 1/(1 n ) = 1.25, so pressure rise is 1.21.25 = 1.26

    84.12.1 333.3333.3

    1

    1

    =

    =

    =

    t

    bn

    t

    bc

    A

    AC

    A

    ACp High stress

    (manageable stress)

    Propellant Surface Geometry The gas-generation mass rate is not necessarily constant, but

    depends on the surface burn area,Ab, and burn-rate r

    Of course, thrust profile depends on nozzle mass-flow rate

    Three schemes for shaping the thrust profile:

    Progressive burning: burn area, pc, and thrust increase with time Neutral burning: burn area, pc, and thrust remain constant

    Regressive burning: burn area, pc , and thrust decrease with time

    n

    cbp apAm =&

    n

    cbpsp apAIgT 0=

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    11/14

    Propellant Surface Geometry (2)

    Burn time

    Thrust

    Neutral End-burning

    ProgressiveCylindrical burning

    Regressive

    Rod burning

    Early SRMs used

    end burning or

    cigarette burning

    Propellant of density p Propellant burning areaAb

    Surface recession rate r

    Combustion chamber volume c(t)

    Throat areaAt

    Combustion chamber volume varies with time

    An end-burning grain is shown for illustration

    End-burning has problems with dramatic c.g. shift during burn

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    12/14

    Theory of Propulsion 23

    Star grain Cylindrical

    grain

    End-burning

    grain

    Propellant grain configurations

    Cruciform

    grain

    STS ISRM has 11-pointed star

    transitioning into cylindrical grain

    Propellant Surface Geometry (3) Tube-type burning (cylindrical burn) is a simple method for

    progressive burning, where burn areaAb and thrust increase with

    time

    Main disadvantage: initial burn surface may be too small and final

    surface too large (final thrust is excessive)

    Cruciform or rod-type burning are regressive: burn area decreases

    with time

    Can be used to limit acceleration of rocket

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    13/14

    Web Fraction

    Propellant grain selection and design depends on two importantgeometric parameters:

    Web fraction, wf Volumetric loading, VL

    Web fraction: ratio of propellant web to grain outer radius

    Web: minimum thickness of grain from the ignition surface to case wall

    D

    dDwf

    =Web fraction

    D

    d

    D

    rtw burnf

    2=or

    r= burning rate, mm/s or in/s

    Volumetric Loading Volumetric loading, VL: fraction of total available combustion

    chamber volume Va occupied by the propellant Vp

    a

    p

    LV

    VV =Volumetric loading

    0.70.1 0.25Wagon wheel

    0.75 0.90.3 0.4Starwf( 2 wf)0.7 0.8Internal burning

    11End burning

    VLwfConfiguration

  • 8/11/2019 Chapt 12 Solid Rockets(1)

    14/14

    SRM Design

    Start with specifications for thrust, burn time, and nature of mission

    Select a propellant based on experience, heritage, etc

    From propellant, estimate chamber pressure pc and temperature Tc From propellant, estimate and compute c*

    Compute burning rate rfrom propellant (function of pc)

    Select a grain profile

    Compute thrust coefficient cF and expansion ratioAe /At

    Compute Isp = cFc*/g0

    SRM Design (2) Compute propellant weight Wp = Ttburn / Isp

    Compute propellant volume: Vp = Wp / p

    Compute throat area:At = T / cF pc

    Compute burning areaAb fromAt , pc , a, p

    Assuming constantAb , compute web thickness = rtburn

    Compute geometric dimensions (case diameter D, length L) from

    web fraction and volumetric loading (previous table)