central community high school

Central Community High School 2004-2005 SIP Presentation

Welcome Kevin Meyer - Superintendent

IntroductionsSchool Improvement TeamMr. Kent Jones PrincipalMr. Pat Ashby Guidance, Careers, MediaMs. Andrea Bequette Special PopulationsMr. Kevin Crask Social StudiesMr. Dirk Garrett Physical Ed, Health, Drivers EdMr. Greg Kruse MathematicsMrs. Ami Shanafelt Language ArtsMr. Jeremy Shubert ScienceMrs. Lisa Wiegmann VocationalMr. Mike Wilimzig Foreign Language

Purpose of School Improvement TeamImprove instruction to enhance student skills by:Implementing a process to effectuate changeDeveloping a formative process of growth and improvementDeciding upon instructional and curricular strategiesServing as an advisory panel to the Administration and Board of EducationGenerating ownership and involving all staff members as stakeholdersViewing the improvement of student achievement as the main purpose

Components of SIPTeam Composition and ProcessSchool and Community ProfileAnalysis of DataTarget Area Goals and StrategiesProfessional DevelopmentRemediation Plans

Component I Team Composition and Process

Team Composition and ProcessSubject Area RepresentativesRegular Meetings and DiscussionInternal ReviewAnnual Development of SIP

2003-2004 ActivitiesSIP FoundationSIP StructureSubject Area IdentitiesEfforts at CollaborationCurriculum Study CycleAnalysis and Measurement FormsNeeds Assessment SurveyTarget Area GoalsProgram Recommendations04-05 SIP Sessions

Component II School and Community Profile

Community8 communities feed into Central Community High School District #71Clinton County is the 13th fastest growing county in the State, as seen by the enormous amount of construction taking place throughout the district.

School/DistrictProjection of continuous growth is predicted 1998 Enrollment: 5432004 Enrollment: 615Faculty: 35 Teachers23 Teachers have obtained their masters degree

Curriculum Levels OfferedHonors/College PrepGeneralTech PrepRemedial

Component III Analysis of Data

Data AnalysisSurveysCollege ArticulationHigh School ClassesIowa Test of Basic Skills ITBSPrairie State Achievement Exam PSAE

Sheet1

Total Students-131IEPs-14Non-IEP-117Females-57Males-74Low Income-11Not Low Income-120

#%##%#%#%#%#%

ReadingExceeds53.8054.335.322.70054.2

Meets5138.905143.63052.62128.4327.34840

Below4836.614740.22238.62635.1763.64134.2

Academic Warning2720.6131412.023.52533.819.12621.7

MathematicsExceeds21.5021.711.811.40021.7

Meets6549.606555.63663.22939.2654.55949.2

Below5138.954639.31933.33243.2436.44739.2

Academic Warning139.9943.411.81216.219.11210

WritingExceeds43.1043.435.311.40043.4

Meets5038.505042.73459.61621.9436.44638.7

Below6146.955647.92035.14156.2654.55546.2


ScienceExceeds75.3076.04734.10075.8

Meets4635.114538.52442.12229.7436.44235

Below6348.145950.42747.43648.6654.55747.5

Academic Warning1511.5965.123.51317.619.11411.7

Social ScienceExceeds96.9097.735.368.10097.5

Meets4836.624639.32340.42533.8654.54235

Below5642.735345.33152.62635.1436.45243.3


131 Total StudentsIEPs-14Non-IEP-117Females-57Males-74Low Income-11Not Low Income-120

#%##%#%#%#%#%

ReadingMeets & Exceeds5642.705647.93357.92331.1327.35344.2

Warning & Below7557.2146152.22442.15168.9872.76755.9

MathematicsMeets & Exceeds6751.106757.337653040.6654.56150.9

Warning & Below6448.8145042.72035.14459.4545.55949.2

WritingMeets & Exceeds5441.605446.13764.91723.3436.45042.1

Warning & Below7658.4136353.92035.15676.7763.66958

ScienceMeets & Exceeds5340.415244.52849.12533.8436.44940.8

Warning & Below7859.6136555.52950.94966.2763.67159.2

Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds5743.5255472645.73141.9654.55142.5

Warning & Below7456.41262533254.44358.1545.56957.5

&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &U2002-03 PSAE Breakdown/Comparison to the State AveragesClass of 2004

Sheet2

Sheet3

Data AnalysisSurveysCollege ArticulationHigh School ClassesIowa Test of Basic Skills ITBSPrairie State Achievement Exam PSAEACT

WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the females

Sheet1

Central StudentsFemalesMales

%%

ReadingMeets & Exceeds57.931.1

MathematicsMeets & Exceeds6540.6

WritingMeets & Exceeds64.923.3

ScienceMeets & Exceeds49.133.8

Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds45.741.9


Sheet2

Sheet3

WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the femalesReading & Writing scores are not where we want them

Sheet1

131 Central Students

%

ReadingMeets & Exceeds42.7

WritingMeets & Exceeds41.6


Sheet2

Sheet3

WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the femalesReading & Writing scores are not where we want themIEP students take the tests

Sheet1

14 - Central Students with IEPs

#

ReadingMeets & Exceeds0

Warning & Below14

MathematicsMeets & Exceeds0

Warning & Below14

WritingMeets & Exceeds0

Warning & Below14

ScienceMeets & Exceeds1

Warning & Below13

Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds2

Warning & Below12


Sheet2

Sheet3

WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the femalesReading & Writing scores are not where we want themIEP students take the testAs a public school, we are mandated to report all student scoresWe feel that the ITBS is a better and more reliable test than the state mandated PSAE

StrengthsFemale students are scoring well

Sheet1

Sheet1

57.931.1

6540.6

64.923.3

49.133.8

45.741.9

Females

Males

Percentage

2002-03 PSAE Students Who Meet and Exceed Class of 2004

Sheet2

Sheet3

StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive program

Sheet1

Class of 2004Class of 2005% +/- ChangeMeets&Exceeds

ReadingExceeds3.85.21.417

Meets38.954.515.6

Below36.632.8-3.8

Academic Warning20.67.5-13.1

MathematicsExceeds1.54.5315.3

Meets49.661.912.3

Below38.926.9-12


WritingExceeds3.13-0.117.4

Meets38.55617.5

Below46.935.8-11.1


ScienceExceeds5.38.22.918.5

Meets35.150.715.6

Below48.134.3-13.8


Social ScienceExceeds6.911.24.320.7

Meets36.65316.4

Below42.729.1-13.6

Academic Warning13.76.7-7

&C&18&UPercentage Change from the Class of 2004 & the Class of 2005

Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1

StateCentral

PercentagesPercentages


MathematicsMeets & Exceeds53.166.4

WritingMeets & Exceeds59.659



&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &UPSAE : Comparing Central to the StateClass of 2005

Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1

FemaleFemale

StateCentral








Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1

MaleMale

StateCentral








Sheet2

Sheet3

StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive programITBS at or above grade level in all areas

Sheet1

Sheet2

Sheet3

MBD000DE052.xls

2004readingvocab

9.58.89.1

10.19.910.1

11.710.611.2

Vocabulary

Reading

Reading Total

Grade Equivalent

Class of 2004 ITBS Reading/Vocabulary

Chart1

9.510.111.7

8.89.910.6

9.110.111.2

Grade 9

Grade 10

Grade 11

Grade Equivalent

2004 ITBS Vocabulary and Reading

Chart2

9.99.7

11.110.5

11.811.4

Written Expression Advanced Skills

Written Expression

Grade Equivalent

2004 ITBS Written Expression

Sheet1

Grade 9Grade 10Grade 11VocabularyReadingReading Total

Vocabulary9.510.111.7Grade 99.58.89.1

Reading8.89.910.6Grade 1010.19.910.1

Reading Total9.110.111.2Grade 1111.710.611.2

Written Expression Advanced9.911.111.8

Written Expression9.710.511.4

Math Concepts & Adv. Skills10.912.113.2Written Expression Advanced SkillsWritten Expression

Math Concepts & Problem Solving10.811.812.9Grade 99.99.7

Core Total9.910.912Grade 1011.110.5

Social Studies9.610.711.7Grade 1111.811.4

Science9.61111.9

Information Processing9.810.512

Composite9.810.911.9

Math Computation13.113.914.6

Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1

Sheet2

Sheet3

MBD000DE87D.xls

2004readingvocab

9.58.89.1

10.19.910.1

11.710.611.2

Vocabulary

Reading

Reading Total

Grade Equivalent

Class of 2004 ITBS Reading/Vocabulary

Chart1

9.510.111.7

8.89.910.6

9.110.111.2

Grade 9

Grade 10

Grade 11

Grade Equivalent

2004 ITBS Vocabulary and Reading

Chart2

9.99.7

11.110.5

11.811.4

Written Expression Advanced Skills

Written Expression

Grade Equivalent

2004 ITBS Written Expression

Sheet1

Grade 9Grade 10Grade 11VocabularyReadingReading Total

Vocabulary9.510.111.7Grade 99.58.89.1

Reading8.89.910.6Grade 1010.19.910.1

Reading Total9.110.111.2Grade 1111.710.611.2

Written Expression Advanced9.911.111.8

Written Expression9.710.511.4

Math Concepts & Adv. Skills10.912.113.2Written Expression Advanced SkillsWritten Expression

Math Concepts & Problem Solving10.811.812.9Grade 99.99.7

Core Total9.910.912Grade 1011.110.5

Social Studies9.610.711.7Grade 1111.811.4

Science9.61111.9

Information Processing9.810.512

Composite9.810.911.9

Math Computation13.113.914.6

Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1

Sheet1

10.912.113.2

10.811.812.9

9.910.912

13.113.914.6

Grade 9

Grade 10

Grade 11

Grade Equivalent

2004 ITBS Math

Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1

Sheet1

9.610.711.7

9.61111.9

9.810.512

9.810.911.9

Grade 9

Grade 10

Grade 11

Grade Equivalent

2004 ITBS Social Studies/Science/Info. Processing/Composite

Sheet2

Sheet3

StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive programITBS at or above grade level in all areasACT Core students at or above the state average in all areas most years

Sheet1

Sheet2

Sheet3

MBD000E09FF.xls

2000-01ACT overall

17.918.520.5

19.619.820.7

18.919.521.3

18.819.521

18.919.421

Central

State

National

2000-01 ACT Overall Average

2001-2002 ACT overall

17.418.820.2

18.919.720.6

17.319.621.1

18.819.520.8

18.219.520.8

Central

State

National

2001-02 Overall ACT Average


1718.720.3

19.219.520.6

17.319.621.2

18.519.520.8

18.119.420.8

Central

State

National


Chart1

21.221.6

23.922.1

22.322.1

23.321.7

22.922

Central

State

ACT AnalysisClass of 2004Core Students

Sheet1

2000-01 School YearClass of 2002

Core - 27 Students = 19%Non-Core - 115 Students = 81%Overall Average

CentralStateNationalCentralStateNationalCentralStateNational

English23.021.521.516.716.618.8English17.918.520.5

Math24.622.521.718.418.019.0Math19.619.820.7

Reading23.722.322.217.817.719.8Reading18.919.521.3

Science23.121.921.817.817.919.8Science18.819.521.0

Composite23.722.221.917.817.719.5Composite18.919.421.0




English19.821.921.417.116.918.4English17.418.820.2

Math20.822.621.618.617.918.8Math18.919.720.6

Reading20.622.422.216.917.919.5Reading17.319.621.1

Science20.722.121.718.517.919.4Science18.819.520.8





English21.221.621.416.216.718.5English17.018.720.3

Math23.922.121.618.317.818.9Math19.219.520.6

Reading22.322.122.216.317.919.7Reading17.319.621.2

Science23.321.721.717.518.119.5Science18.519.520.8


&C&"Arial,Italic"&18&UACT Analysis - Central Community High School

Core and Non-Core

1981

1288

1783

Core

Non-Core

Year

Percentage

Percentage of Students Core and Non-Core Curriculum

Sheet2

YearCoreNon-Core

2000-011981

2001-021288

2002-031783

Sheet3

StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive programITBS at or above grade level in all areasACT Core students at or above the state average in all areas most yearsStudents have a level of satisfaction from the school services offered to themParents have an overall good image of CentralGood Image is thought about schools technology

Component IV Target Area Goal and Strategies

Target Area GoalReading and Writing SkillsTeachers at CHS will develop and implement teaching and learning strategies throughout the curriculum that will improve the students reading comprehension and writing skills.

Strategies for Reading and Writing SkillsDevelop programs to enhance reading comprehensionDevelop ways to incorporate writing activities in all classesDevelop consistent expectations for written work

04-05 Reading Plans and TimelineAll teachers will develop at least one lesson each quarter that focuses on reading comprehension.The material will be related to the curriculum, but it will be from sources outside the textbook.Students will read in class and respond to critical thinking questions.A copy of the lesson will be submitted to the SIP team.Professional development activities will help teachers generate ideas and strategies.

04-05 Writing Plans and TimelineAll classes will continue to include writing in course work.Teachers will be encouraged to use writing in conjunction with the reading comprehension activity.Professional development will be offered to help teachers generate ideas for assignments.Consistent grading techniques will be shared with the faculty.

Target Area GoalArticulationTeachers at CHS will structure their respected curriculums in a vertical and horizontal manner to be most beneficial educationally to students.The Illinois State Learning Standards will serve as the foundation for aligning the individual subject areas.

Strategies for ArticulationDevelop a system of curriculum outlines for each course offered at CHS.Coordinate curriculum content between interdisciplinary subject areas with hopes to eliminate overlap.Communicate and establish lines of vertical articulation with elementary systems to ensure future preparation

04-05 Articulation Plans and TimelineSIP Team will develop a template to be used by all faculty for course outlines (October 1, 2004).Subject area teachers will submit their course outlines to their respected SIP Team member for review (February 1, 2005).SIP members will conduct periods of review and revisions for course outlines for all classes offered.Final and Complete submissions (May 6, 2005).

Target Area GoalCurricular ExpectationsCentral Community High School will review and develop curricular changes by researching what classes are offered, along with reviewing when they are offered.Restructuring classes, changing graduation requirements, new class offerings, and recognition programs will be recommended based on the needs of the student body.

Strategies for Curricular ExpectationsEstablish a subcommittee for detailed study of programmatic expectations for review and recommendationConduct a survey of students, graduates, school districts

04-05 Curricular Expectations Plans and TimelineThe School Improvement Team will establish a committee to serve as an advisory panel, represented by students, graduates, community members, guidance personnel and teachers. (October 1st)The SIP will develop a task list for the committee to include the study of programmatic expectations.Departments will be involved in curricular studies and reviews which will include studying existing courses, reviewing new textbooks, and recommending new classes.

Component V Professional Development

Professional DevelopmentFocus on Target Area GoalsInformation based upon interests and needs of facultySchool Improvement Team monitors effectiveness of presentations

2004-2005 Professional Development RecommendationsReading and Writing PresentationsCourse OutlinesDepartmental DiscussionsTeam Building RetreatFacilitated LearningOther Presentations

2004-2005 Professional Development Timeline & TopicFriday, September 3rdSIP Presentation to Faculty and Subject Area MeetingsFriday, October 8thReading Activities Training and Writing Skills and Assessment Training

Timeline ContinuedFriday, October 29thTechnology Training Session (a.m.)Team-Building Retreat (p.m.)Friday, January 14thFollow-up Session on Reading and Writing ActivitiesUpdate on Criterion ETS System

Timeline ContinuedFriday, April 15thInformational Presentations (NCLB)Friday, May 6thEnd of Year MeetingSubject Area Meetings

Component VI Remediation Plan

Rationale Promote student achievement, provide necessary educational services to at risk students, and fulfill the obligations mandated by recent Illinois State Board of Education guidelines.

CriteriaIn order to identify students who are in need of academic remediation, specific criteria must be followed which identifies the need for additional services and assistance.

Criterion #1A student will be identified as in need of remediation by lacking the number of sufficient credits earned during a school year.

Criterion #2Students will be identified in each subject area as at risk by performing sufficiently below expectations on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.

Remediation ServicesAt Risk ListIdentified students will be placed on an at risk designation list for progress toward graduation and subject area reference.

Referral to Tutorial ServicesStudents will be referred to tutorial services available at Central Community High School.

Referral to Summer SchoolCentral Community High School offers Summer School courses through the Regional Office of Education.

Other ServicesStudents in need of remediation can also be referred to other services as needed and appropriate to the individual situation.

Central Community High School 2004-2005 School Improvement Plan Presentation Summary

Question and Answer Session

central community high school

Documents