centerline cons.(final print)

70
A Proposed Five-Storey City Hall Building in Dagupan City, Pangasinan ___________________ A Thesis Presented to the College of Engineering and Architecture University of Pangasinan - Phinma Education Network Arellano St., Dagupan City ____________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING ________________ By ADRIAN JOHN B. ESGUERRA MARIEL L. ROSARIO MARK JEFRY LOPEZ DARYL CAPUA LAWRENCE LAROYA

Upload: mariel-rosario

Post on 23-Jan-2017

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

A Proposed Five-Storey City Hall Building

in Dagupan City, Pangasinan

___________________

A Thesis

Presented to the

College of Engineering and Architecture

University of Pangasinan - Phinma Education Network

Arellano St., Dagupan City

____________________

In Partial Fulfillment

Of the Requirements for the Degree

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

________________

By

ADRIAN JOHN B. ESGUERRA

MARIEL L. ROSARIO

MARK JEFRY LOPEZ

DARYL CAPUA

LAWRENCE LAROYA

Page 2: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

APPROVAL SHEET This is too certify that we have supervised the

preparation of and read the Thesis prepared by ADRIAN

JOHN ESGUERRA, MARIEL ROASARIO, MARK JEFRY LOPEZ,

DARYL CAPUA, LAWRENCE LAROYA entitled “ A PROSPOSED

FIVE-STOREY CITY HALL BUILDING IN DAGUPAN CITY,

PANGASINAN” and the said paper has been submitted for

final defense by the Oral Examination Committee.

___________________ Engr. Henry T. Amado

Thesis Adviser

As member of the Oral Examination Committee, we certify that we have examined this paper and hereby recommend that it be accepted as fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering.

___________________ ________________________ Engr. Noel L. Siapno Engr. Dorothy Jade Rosario Panel Member Panel Member 2

______________________ Engr. Venjo C. Quiambao

Panel Member 3

__________________________ Engr. John T. Zamora, MSME, Ed.D

Committee Chair

This practicum paper is hereby approved and accepted by the College of Engineering and Architecture as fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering.

________________________________ Engr. John T. Zamora, MSME, Ed.D Dean, College of Engineering

and Architecture

ii

Page 3: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First the group would like to acknowledge the one

who made everything possible, who comforted us in our

lowest state, who gave us strength from sleepless

nights and from 24 hours of work

of our instructors, consultants, and other expert

engineers who so bigheartedly shared all their

knowledge, experience, and expertise. Our thanks to

all, particularly who viewed and earlier draft, Engr.

Henry Amado, Engr. John T. Zamora, Engr. Noel L.

Siapno, Engr. Dorothy Jade Rosario and Engr, Venjo

Quiambao.

We the Centerline Construction company would also

want to thank the head of the department of Planning

and Development of city of Dagupan Engr. Rosario for

giving as the permit to do our thesis on one of the

future plans of the city. And also, to Engr. Clifford

H. Tarlit who lends a hand to develop this book and

being one of our consultant in structural analysis and

PERT-CPM. Finally.

And lastly to all our families, friends and

everyone who give their help to support us in their

own way, we offer the success of this book to all of

you.

<<iii>>

Page 4: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

APPROVAL SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . iv

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study. . . . . . . . . . . . .1

Project Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Project Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Problem Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7

Scope and Delimitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Definition of Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE. . . . . . . . . . . . .16

Foreign Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Local Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Feasibility Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

Research design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

Source of data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

Instrumentation and data collection . . . . .50

Tools for data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . .51

iv

Page 5: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

CHAPTER IV: PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA. . . . . . 53

Documentary Analysis and Interpretation. .......... 53

Architectural Plans. .............................. 58

Structural Plans. ................................. 73

Structural Analysis. ...............................95

Specifications. .............................. 100

Design and Computations

Seismic Analysis. ............................ 112

Design of Beams .............................. 195

Design of Columns. ........................... 236

Design of Piles. ............................. 248

Design of Staircase. ......................... 255

Plumbing Layout. .................................. 258

Electrical Layout. ................................ 272

Bill of Materials and Estimates. .................. ..295

Scope of Works .................................... ..309

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317

Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319

Recommendation. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . 320

Bibliography. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 321

Appendices . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .325

Curriculum vitae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335

Fire Extinguishing System..........................289

v

Page 6: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Chapter I

INTRODUCTION

This chapter presents the background of the study, the

problem, the objective and significance of the study, basic

assumptions and scope and delimitations.

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Engineer is a person who were trained and exposed in

designs and builds complicated products, machines, systems,

or structures. Also, Civil Engineer is a person who

practices civil engineering known as the application of

planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, and

operating infrastructures while protecting the public and

environmental health, as well as improving existing

infrastructures that have been neglected. Civil Engineers

in the Philippines mostly construct structures like

commercial buildings, storey houses, hotels and even

city/municipal halls.

On the other hand, a city hall is a structure that is

composed of important offices needed in a city. It is also

known as the main administrative building and houses of the

local government where the following departments are housed

and provide their services from the city hall namely

General Management, Revenue Generation, Legal or Public

Safety, Health, Infrastructure and Sanitation, Public

1

Page 7: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Welfare Service, Education, Media Bureau, Electronic Data

Processing Team, Emergency Team and Police Assistance,

comparing it in a human body city hall is like the skull of

the city where the head of the city lives.

Dagupan City is known as one of the major cities in

Pangasinan that has great trading products in the

Philippines and in other country. It has taken a great part

in the history of pioneer transportation in Northern Luzon.

The City Hall which reflects the whole of the city,

can be the parameter to measure how civilized a city is.

Not to mention that all public transactions are being made

in the said place. As of today, the City Hall of Dagupan is

located at the heart of the city and is obviously

congested; divided into different departments due to lack

of space. The City Library is far out from Downtown proper

while the City Engineer’s Office is located kilometers away

from the City Hall.

The demand for a new building is inevitable as the

population and businesses increase. There must be a

unification of the City Hall which includes added agencies

and departments of the government. It then deserves to have

a world class design that would cater a “One-stop-All-

shop”. If this happens, it would be a great help to hasten

all the processes the city has to offer. It would provide

2

Page 8: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

the people with a comfortable environment and a decongested

road which then leads the way for a happy, relax and fast

trip.

The researchers notice that Dagupan City must have a

Main City Hall that could supply all the important city

offices in one structure. Due to the need of the said city

and availability of the information needed, the researchers

decided to Proposed a Five-Storey City Hall located at De

Venecia Expressway Extension, Dagupan City Pangasinan.

We the researchers has been approved to study this

proposed case by the head of the actual and existing

proposed project, Engr. Romeo C. Rosario, City Planning and

Development Coordinator.

3

Page 9: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The researchers propose a five-storey City hall

located at De Venecia Extension road in dagupan with an

objective listed below:

• To resolve the scattered departments of the City hall

in dagupan.

• To unify the different department of the city hall

• To decongest traffic in the city.

• To materialize the face of dagupan.

As Lewis Mumford, The Culture of Cities describes how a

city hall should be “The city is a fact in nature, like a

cave, a run of mackerel or an ant heap. But it is also a

conscious work of art and it holds within its communal

framework many simpler and more personal forms of art. Mind

takes form in the city; and in turn, urban form conditions

minds. For spaces, no less than time, is artfully

organized; in boundary lines and silhouettes, in the fixing

of horizontal peaks and vertical peaks, in utilizing or

denying the natural site, the city records the attitude of

a culture and an epoch to the fundamental facts of its

existence”. With a total lot area of 20,359 sq. meters the

researchers has a lot of freedom to build a modernized and

4

Page 10: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

classical definition of it. Modified and well-spaced road

is used for convenient parking areas for all vehicles. In

lieu with the green building projects the company prepared

a proper waste disposal management for the building, a well

distributed recycled water would be supplying the structure

fixed with proper and efficient fixtures, and the last

thing is the reduction in the consumption of energy of the

structure, insolated wall and natural ventilations would be

provided as well as element in the building that would

provide the maximum effect of light from the sun. The

company prioritizes the environment, using environmental

materials and methods.

PROJECT LOCATION

The proposed project is to be situated in Brgy.

Pantal, Dagupan City, Pangasinan,along the Jose R. de

Venecia Expressway Extension, Dagupan City. With

approximately 2.4 km distance from the old city hall, it is

quiet far from center town but as quoted by Honorable Mayor

Belen T. Fernadez “Building the new city hall outside the

downtown area will also spur development in the others

parts of the city”.

(http://punch.dagupan.com/articles/news/2013/08/fernandez-

5

Page 11: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

sets-sights-on-new-city-hall/)

Dagupan is a Philippine City. It is located in the

province of Pangasinan in Region I Ilocos Region which it

is a part of Luzon group of Islands. The City of Dagupan is

seated about 11 km east-north-east of province capital

Lingayen about 178 km north-west of Philippine main capital

Manila. The geographic coordinates of Dagupan City are 16°

3' 0'' N, 120° 19' 59'' E.

According to the 2010 census, Dagupan City has a

population of 163, 676 inhabitants and belongs to the 106

emerging cities in the Philippines with more than 100,000

residents. Based on the number of its inhabitants Dagupan

City is number 75 of the most populous cities of the

Philippines and at 54 in Luzon group of islands. With an

area of 3723 hectares Dagupan City occupies a relatively

small urban area. Accordingly, there is a high population

density. In Dagupan City, by average, 4,017.03 people live

in one square kilometer. With this value, Dagupan City is

only number 32 in Luzon and is nationally ranked 36th of

the most densely populated cities in the Philippines.

According to the Philippine income classification for

provinces, cities and municipalities Dagupan City is a 2nd

class component city. The urbanization status of Dagupan

City is classified as urban. About one-fourth of this area

6

Page 12: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

is consists of bodies of water such as rivers, lake, creeks

and fishponds. Also, about 35.98% of its land area is used

primarily for agriculture, 22.88% is for residential and

the rest are for other purposes such as commercial,

industrial, institutional, government, parks and roads.

Among the bigger cities and municipalities in the

neighbourhood of Dagupan City there are Concepcion (Tarlac)

87 km south-south-east, City Of Tarlac (Tarlac) 70 km

south-south-east, San Carlos City 13 km south, Mabalacat

(Pampanga) 96 km south-south-east, Baguio City (Benguet) 49

km north-east, Cabanatuan City (Nueva Ecija) 92 km south-

east, Malasiqui 17 km south-south-east, San Jose City

(Nueva Ecija) 77 km east-south-east, Capas (Tarlac) 85 km

south-south-east as well as 26 km east-south-east of

Dagupan City the component city City Of Urdaneta.

7

Page 13: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

A paradigm showing the input, process and output of the study.

START INPUTPROBLEM STATEMENT

SURVEYS

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

PROCESSCOST ESTIMATES PREPARATION

SCHEDULING

PLANNING AND DESIGN

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

OUTPUT

EVALUATION

REVISIONS

END PROJECT EXECUTION

NOT ACCEPTABLE

ACCEPTABLE

BRAINSTORMING

8

Page 14: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

To make Dagupan City known around the world, this city

continues to devise new businesses focused on transforming

its vision to reality to make it globally competitive in

every way.

On July 8, 2013, Honorable Belen T. Fernandez, Mayor

of Dagupan City is shopping for a new possible site for a

New Dagupan City Hall since other offices including City

Health Office, Police Assistance, City Engineers office and

other are not intact in one structure.

(http://punch.dagupan.com/articles/news/2013/07/mayor-

belen-shopping-for-new-city-hall-and-fishport-sites/).

MAJOR PROBLEM

• What would be the relevant design of the City Hall

building that is to be constructed in Dagupan City having

2.035 Hectares?

MINOR PROBLEMS:

• What could be the additional offices that the city

hall could cater?

9

Page 15: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

• What should be the best materials to choose in the

pursuit of promoting Green Engineering and sustainability?

IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY

This project study will benefit all the drivers and

commuters around the city, decreasing their travel time and

money spent. More importantly, concerned citizens and

foreigners will have easy access to different government

transactions.

Dagupan, being one of the established cities around

Pangasinan, has an economy that continues to increase

through time. With a total lot area of 20,359 sq. meters,

the City Hall will be built with beautiful parks and

astounding views which will serve as a place of relaxation

for everyone who visits the City Hall. Having this kind of

cool and sociable atmosphere; tension, stress, fatigue and

other negativities will be decreased greatly resulting to

happy, convenient and more satisfying transactions.

SCOPE AND DELIMINATION

The feasibility study analysis is for the five-storey

unification and upgrade of the City Hall of Dagupan that

will be located at De Venecia Extension road, Dagupan City.

It has a total lot area of 20,359 sq. meters. The study is

10

Page 16: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

composed of the architectural design of the building,

including its structural design and analysis, plumbing

schedules, electrical plan, estimates and bills of the new

City Hall of Dagupan.

The project has reached all possible requirements in

its management, environmental, financial, and technical

aspect. Thus, the scope and delimitation of the project are

listed below: The group could not actually fill the

geotechnical investigation due to constriction of

resources, time and manpower. However, the soil bearing

capacities is made available by the City Engineering Office

of Dagupan.

Also, the proper bidding of the project has never

transpired due to lack of experience of such knowledge. On

the other hand, this project has been assumed as the

winning bidder for the New City Hall of Dagupan. Moreover,

fields such as mechanical and technical aspects will have

little observation and attention due to lack of knowledge

and experience in the said areas.

BASIC ASSUMPTIONS

These are the basic assumptions considered in the study:

1. The proposed project is a government property.

11

Page 17: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

2. Our company has won the bidding of the New City Hall

of Dagupan.

3. Proper rerouting of PUV, PUJ and PUB going to the New

City Hall “ Balon City Hall Ya Dagupan” has been

implemented.

4. It is assumed that all the requirements of mechanical,

technical, financial, social and environmental

management are met properly.

5. It is assumed that the safety of the residents

surrounding the site is observed to prevent accidents

during and after the construction.

6. Material test have been made in all materials to be

used and are meeting the ASTM standards.

7. It is assumed that the residents surrounding the site,

barangay, city officials, were fully informed of the

project and approved with complete knowledge and

agreed on the consequences that may occur during and

after the project construction.

8. It is assumed that all geotechnical data gathered and

used in the designs are reliable.

12

Page 18: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Agriculture

American Society for

Testing and Materials

(ASTM) Standard

City Hall

Commercial

A land or property use for

agricultural purposes like,

fishpond, rice fields, poultry etc.

A standard that develops and

publishes voluntary consensus

technical standards for a wide range of

materials, products, systems.

A building housing the

administrative offices of a

municipal government.

A land or property use for business

purposes. A business center spot.

Dagupan City is an independent component city in

the province of Pangasinan in the

Philippines

13

Page 19: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

De Venecia Extension part of Dagupan City located at latitude

(16.053242) and longtitude

(120.335884) on the map of

Philippines.

Industrialization

Institutional

One Stop Shop

the process in which a society or

country (or world) transforms itself

from a primarily agricultural

society into one based on the

manufacturing of goods and services.

Individual manual labor is often

replaced by mechanized mass

production and craftsmen are

replaced by assembly lines.

Location of schools, it is where the

government or the authorities allows

public or private schools to be

constructed.

A term used where multiple services

are offered

14

Page 20: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Soil bearing Capacity is the capacity of soil to support

the loads applied to the ground.

The bearing capacity of soil is the

maximum average

contact pressure between the

foundation and thesoil which should

not produce shear failure in

the soil.

Green Building

Silhouettes

refers to both a structure and the

using of processes that are

environmentally responsible and

resource-efficient throughout

a building's life-cycle

the dark shape and outline of

someone or something visible against

a lighter background, especially in

dim light.

15

Page 21: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter presents the literatures allied to the

current study. They are thoroughly reviewed and

meticulously analysed by the researchers to further

elucidate their study’s statement of problem, formulated

conceptual framework and to gather more information or data

by asking people using survey questionnaire or interviewing

people with authority if possible. Primarily, the focus of

this study is the design to be constructed for the New City

Hall of Dagupan City which will supply the most convenient

and most operative services to the people of dagupan and

the entire Pangasinan as well. The researchers continue to

be inspired by other cities around the world that allows

their city hall truly reflect what the city is made of,

with respect to the design and posture of the structure.

A city hall is a typology, that by definition, is

strongly influenced by history and part of its role is to

reflect and embody the specific history of a place. In that

it needs to be sensitive to the history of a place there is

an opportunity to set an important precedent as to how a

modern building should respond to the context. Therefore it

16

Page 22: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

can establish a pattern for future urban growth and form.

The typological study of a city hall is also a vehicle to

comment on the nature of a true public building.

On the other hand, the related literature and studies

that were reviewed to the present study focused mainly on

the topics indicated from the specific problems stated in

Chapter 1. These topics are as follows: (a) the present

condition of the existing city hall of dagupan; (b) the

feasibility of the new location proposed for the “New City

Hall of Dagupan”; (c) if the City Hall would be the face of

the city what should it look like?, what would be the most

suitable design to maximize its function as a government

structure.

FOREIGN LITERATURE

In July 2007, Council directed staff of Richmond Hill

Ontario, Canada bring a business case on relocating the

Town’s offices from 225 East Beaver Creek Road to the Town-

owned property at the south-west corner of Yonge Street and

Major Mackenzie Drive, in Downtown Richmond Hill. In

January 2008, Council approved a project budget for

retaining a consultant to complete a feasibility study for

relocation of Town hall, added the project to the ten year

capital forecast and directed staff to report back with

17

Page 23: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

results of the feasibility study in the fall of 2008. This

report addresses that direction.

4

History and Context of the Town-owned Lands at Yonge Street

and Major Mackenzire Drive

The Town-owned site at the south-west corner of Yonge

Street and Major Mackenzie Drive was previously considered

as a location for a new municipal office building in the

late 1980s and early 1990s as part of a plan to consolidate

Town staff in one location. The early vision for this site

was multi-functional and included both public and private

uses. However, at that time, the Town opted to relocate to

the current Town Hall at 225 East Beaver Creek Road and

proceed with the construction of the Central Library at the

site.

Study Approach and Process

As result of a request for proposal process approved by

Council in January 2008, a consulting team led by CS&P

Architects was selected to carry out the Town Hall

relocation Feasibility Study. This included examining the

need, objectives, opportunities created, opportunities

lost, cost and benefits of the project and preparing the

three building program options, ensuring that these can be

18

Page 24: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

accommodated at the site. They were also asked to provide

an estimated cost for each new Town Hall option including

the design, construction, furniture, fixtures and equipment

and occupancy and annual operating costs taking into

account the Town’s Sustainable Design and Construction

Policy. Finally, the consulting team was asked to develop a

realistic project schedule for the remainder of the

project, should Council choose to continue with the

relocation of the Town’s municipal offices.

The Feasibility Study

The Town Hall Relocation Feasibility Study prepared by the

Consulting Team is attached to this report as Appendix 1.

The Feasibility Study answers four key questions,

summarized below.

1. What do we need for our Town Hall in the future?

The Consulting Team reviewed the existing municipal offices

at 225 East Beaver Creek Road, interviewed key stakeholders

about how building met the Town’s needs, projected future

need of the organization and referenced the size and

building programs of the other municipalities. Their

conclusions were as follows:

19

Page 25: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

• The existing Town Hall does not have a high visibility

to the community and lacks civic character. It also

inadequate space for public meetings and other civic

functions. These constraints cannot be addressed by

renovation.

• When compared with six other municipalities of a

similar size, the size and ratio of population and

Town staff to floor area was consistent with these

other municipalities.

• Using a staff projection of 5.6 additional full time

staff per year (based on a five year average of staff

added to main municipal offices approved in the Town’s

budget), the existing Town hall provides room for

future growth to approximately 2028.

• Using the same staff projections, three program

options were developed for a new Town Hall to

accommodate 5, 10 and 20 years growth. The excess

space would be leased until the point at which growth

necessitated its use for Town purposes. These options

assumed a move-in date of 2013.

o Option 1: Five years growth to 2018(174,542

square feet of gross floor area)

o Option 2: Ten years growth to 2023 with

additional space for an expanded Council Chamber,

20

Page 26: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

multi-purpose room, child care centre and

cafeteria.(195,684 square feet of gross floor

area)

o Option 3: Twenty years growth 2033 with further

additional space for the Council Chamber, multi-

purpose room, child care centre and cafeteria.

(226,138 square feet of gross floor area)

• The number of parking spaces required, including

underground parking, was developed and included in the

three options.

The Consulting Team recommended that should the Town choose

to build a new Town Hall facility it be built to

accommodate growth to at least 2023 as identified in Option

2. They further recommended that parking be built on the

site at a rate of 2.1 spaces per 1000 square feet which

would translate into a modest incentive toward alternative

transportation use by staff, including transit, cycling and

carpooling.

2. Will the Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie Drive site

support what we need for a Town Hall?

The Consulting Team reviewed the site from a number of

perspectives to determine whether it can support what is

21

Page 27: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

needed for a Town Hall.

• Urban Design Analysis: The Yonge/Major Mackenzie site

can be developed in such a way as to maintain

important view corridors, be accessible to pedestrian

and vehicle circulation routes, including transit, and

integrate with the streetscape. Further, the site can

support the creation of a gateway type development as

an anchor to the downtown area.

• Transportation Analysis: The Yonge/Major Mackenzie

site can support parking requirements through a

variety of underground, surface and on-street parking.

It will also benefit from transit access, expected to

further improve over time.

• Site Location Assessment: The Consulting Team

evaluated the Yonge/Major Mackenzie site as well as

the site of the current Town Hall based on a number of

criteria commonly used in the industry. While some of

the criteria are less significant in assessing the

location of a public building, they concluded that the

Yonge/Major Mackenzie site was superior based on the

proximity of the Town’s population, the broader public

transit access and the place making capabilities of

the site.

22

Page 28: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

• Site Development Options: The Consulting Team

identified a preferred design option that incorporated

the urban design and transportation analyses as well

as providing space for civic square that would take

advantage of existing physical characteristics of the

site. This design option can include a tower of up to

nine stories (depending on the program option chosen)

and a 2 storey public arm to house Council Chambers

and other civic and public areas. The preferred design

option also allows for space for future development at

the south end of the site, either through private

partnerships or to meet future Town needs.

3. How much will it cost to relocate the municipal offices

to a new Town Hall at Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie

Drive?

Based on 2008 dollar values, the Consulting Team provided

total project order of magnitude cost estimates for each of

the three program options. A summary of these costs is

provided below.

Option 1

(5 years

growth)

Option 2

(10 years

growth)

Option 3

(20 years

growth)

23

Page 29: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Total Project Costs in

2008 dollars

$80,196,000 $92,080,000 $106,861,000

The Consulting Team’s cost analysis provides a range of

program options that would cost between $80 million and $

107 million for the construction of a Town Hall on the

Town-owned lands at the south west corner of Yonge Street

and Major Mackenzie Drive. These were order of magnitude

costs established for the purposes of the feasibility study

only. It is important to note that more accurate costing

will be determined during the design phase of the project.

4. Is it feasible to relocate the Town Hall?

The Consulting Team concluded that not only is feasible to

relocate the municipal offices from the existing location

to Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie Drive, it is

recommended. Based on an investigation of the current and

future needs of the municipality, the proposed site can

support the size and design of the building that would be

required, as well as a significant civic realm. Just as

importantly, the potential long term benefits to the

citizens, the business community, and the development of a

downtown core are significant. The ability of the well-

24

Page 30: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

designed civic centre complex to define a civic character,

create a place of identification and encourage

revitalization is well established by many precedents.

Relocating the Town hall aligns with two of the Town’s

priorities. Transit priorities for extending the Yonge

Subway to Richmond Hill within three kilometers of the

proposed site. As well as plans for Yonge Street to

accommodate bus rapid transit in the near future make the

priority, revitalization of the downtown, has seen Council

invest in this area by constructing the Richmond Hill

Centre for the Performing Arts, encouraging and supporting

the newly formed BIA, and directing that there be a

comprehensive land use and urban design study completed for

this area. Relocating the Town Hall to the downtown site

would provide further investment in the area. Although not

yet considered by Council, one of the preliminary

directions of the Downtown study is to relocate the Town

Hall and enhance civic presence downtown with additional

public facilities.

Conclusion:

In accordance with Council’s direction in January 2008,

this report has provided the results of a study completed

25

Page 31: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

by a Consulting Team led by CS&P Architects on the

feasibility of relocating the Town’s municipal offices from

current location at 225 East Beaver Creek Road to a Town-

owned site at the south-west corner Yonge Street and Major

Mackenzie Drive.

LOCAL LITERATURE

As the researchers gather data, one of the most

suitable references for the study is the Municipality of

Sta. Barbara it encountered things that the New City Hall

of Dagupan could be encountering in the future, the

researchers interviewed key people such as the head of the

planning and development team and the head engineer of sta.

Barbara.

The main reason of the interview is to know the

following:

1. What do we need for our Town Hall in the future?

• Problems of the previous Town hall.

o The old Town Hall cannot accommodate the other

offices such as the Engineering office, library

and others. As the population increase from 2000

with a 64,261 people to 76,637 by 2010, demand

26

Page 32: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

for service increases and the old town hall

cannot cater the demand for service.

o Parking spaces are limited due to population

increase.

o Traffic is continuously growing and cause a lot

of damage in the entire town.

o The old location of the town hall is not suitable

for all the future plans being plotted by the

head and officials of Sta. Barbara.

The listed problems are used to formulate the things

needed to properly serve and help the people of Sta.

Barbara.

• The barometer for the New Town Hall.

o An expose location to let people know that this

is the place of Sta. Barbara.

27

Page 33: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

o A well-spaced land for a bigger Town hall and a

larger parking space.

o It should be next to the national road to make it

know to all that this is where Sta. Barbara is

located, and with a wider road traffic would not

be a problem.

o A location suitable for development.

o A Structurally sound and artful designed building

for the people of Sta. Barbara.

2. Will the Maningding support what is needed for a Town

Hall?

As the researchers make a survey around the new town

hall of Sta. Barbara to determine the capability of the

new location to support the needs of the town hall, they

arrived at some conclusion as follows:

• Urban Design Analysis: Around the new town hall are

lots ready for development for business, hospitals and

others. Further, the site can support the creation of

28

Page 34: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

a gateway type development as an anchor to the

downtown area.

• Transportation Analysis: Public Utility Bus(PUB) going

to Manila take this route making the new Town Hall

visible and accessible to everyone, and Sta. Barbara

has a Public Utility Jeep(PUJ) circling dagupan going

to Sta. Barbara with the same route going to the new

town hall making it easy to reach it.

• Site Location Assessment: The research team continue

to dig data around the new site as well as the old

site of the Town hall, with a number of criteria

commonly used in the industry and based on the

interview, they concluded that Barangay Maningding is

superior based on the proximity of the Town’s

population, the broader public transit access cutting

the traffic effect from the old location and filling

the gap to an improved service for the people of Sta.

Barbara.

3. Is it feasible to relocate the Town Hall?

29

Page 35: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

As the research team gathered data from the old

and the new town hall up to its new location,

transportation accessibility, service capability, by

the process of interview, investigation and survey,

the proposed site is feasible to relocate, it reached

the required barometer for the new town hall and

gives a promising location for the near future.

Furthermore it assures the New Town Hall that it can

serve the people for a long time, and it can increase

its municipal income for the future business around

it.

4. Issues arise after the construction of the New Town

Hall.

• It gets farther away from the main town of Sta.

Barbara.

As the Head of the Engineering office of Sta.

Barbara was ask he answered “change is necessary and

it is just a small one compared to a the positive gain

it can give for the people, as Leo Tolstoy a well-

known Russian writer said “Everyone thinks of changing

the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” And

30

Page 36: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

it’s just one ride from the old town hall it’s not

that too far.”

• What could be the other structures to be built along

with the town hall?

The head of planning and development team answer and

said that an evacuation center will be constructed at the

back of the town hall, that can accommodate the people of

Sta. Barbara and if possible its surrounding

municipalities too.

5. What happened to the old town hall?

The old town hall still has the capability to be use

now it is being occupied by the COMELEC, the Engineering

department of Sta. Barbara and the fire station, having

the center as their location it would be easy for them to

respond and to do their community service or surveys

around the town.

6. What should be the best design of the New Town Hall?

• The face of the town hall was based on The Malacanang

Palace, the Greeks, and the Romans they considered a

31

Page 37: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

classical design picturing how we Filipinos love

classics, futuristic design was not considered for the

thought is only for the classic design. by definition

the Town Hall or City Hall is strongly influenced by

history and part of its role is to reflect and embody

the specific history of a place.

Conclusion:

With the information gathered by the team from

the interview, high officials of Sta. Barbara are

proud to say that they relocated the town hall as it

is stated above it gives a lot of positive outcome

whether it is about the present or the future state of

the town it was a move that keeps Sta. Barbara on the

map, it may have a negative effect but it was overcome

by the positive effect which is considerably a great

move.

Comparison:

This section shows the comparison of the main topic

(The reloation of the Existing City from the downtown of

the city to De Venecia Extension Road and making it “Balon

City Hall Ya Dagupan”) to the international literation (The

relocation of the Town’s offices from 225 East Beaver Creek

32

Page 38: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Road to the Town-owned property at the south-west corner of

Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie Drive, in Downtown

Richmond Hill.) and the local literature (The relocation of

the town hall of Sta. Barbara from the center of Sta. to

Barangay Maningding along the Highway going to Manila)

Main topic and international literature.

• Both have the similarity regarding their existing

city/town hall such as the inadequate space for public

meetings and other civic functions. These constraints

cannot be addressed by renovation.

Main topic and local literature.

To a more realistic or nearer reference for the main

topic, through the gathered information about the Town Hall

of Sta. Barbara the group compared the two topics to

further help.

• Both of them have the same problem regarding their

existing city/town hall that is

o The old Town Hall does not have inadequate space

for public meetings and other civic functions.

These constraints cannot be addressed by

renovation.

33

Page 39: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

o Parking spaces are limited due to population

increase.

o Traffic is continuously growing and causes a lot

of damage in the entire town.

o The old location of the town hall is not suitable

for all the future plans being plotted by the

head and officials of Sta. Barbara.

• The issues that arise after and before the relocation

and construction of the new Town hall of Sta. Barbara

could be the same for the New City Hall of Dagupan for

example.

o The issue about making a large gap between the

center of the town to the new proposed town hall.

o Where could the government get the money fund he

construction.

o The design for the new town hall.

34

Page 40: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE PROPOSED FIVE(5) STOREY CITY HALL

OF DAGUPAN.

Project Summary:

1. DESCRIPRTION OF THE

PROJECT:

A. NAME OF THE PROJECT:

The proposed project is the new city hall of

Dagupan, being relocated from the downtown of the

city going to De Venecia Extension Road, which will

be develop for the future industry of Dagupan.

B. LOCATION:

The proposed project is to be situated in Brgy.

Pantal, Dagupan City, Pangasinan, along the Jose R. de

Venecia Expressway Extension, Dagupan City. With

approximately 2.4 km distance from the old city hall,

it is quiet far from center town but as quoted by

Honorable Mayor Belen T. Fernadez “Building the new

city hall outside the downtown area will also spur

development in the others parts of the city”.

C. Highlights of the Project:

In this study, the researcher visited the new

35

Page 41: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

town hall of Sta. Barbara where interview was

conducted to authorize and credible personnel to

gather data and to provide a proper perspective for

the whole process of relocating and constructing the

new city hall.

Legal Feasibility

Building Permits

No person, firm or corporation, including any agency

or instrumentality of the government shall build,

construct, alter repair, move, convert or demolish any

structure or cause the same to be done without first

obtaining a building permit therefore from the Building

official assigned in the place where the subject building

is located or the building work is to be done.

Application for Permits

In order to obtain building permit, the applicant

shall file an application therefore in writing and on the

prescribed form with the Office of the Building Official.

Every application shall provide at least the following

information.

36

Page 42: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

(1) A description of the work to be covered by the

permit applied for;

(2) Description and ownership of the lot on which the

proposed work is to be done as evidenced by TCT

and/or copy of the contract of the lease over the

lot if applicant is not registered owner;

(3) The use of occupancy in which the proposed work

is intended;

(4) Estimated cost of the proposed work;

To be submitted together with such application are at

least five sets of corresponding plans and specifications

prepared, signed and sealed by duly licensed architect or

civil engineer in case of architectural plans and structural

plans, by an electrical engineer in case of electrical plans

and by a licensed sanitary engineer ir master plumber in

case of plumbing or sanitary installation plans except in

those case exempted or not required by the Building Official

under this code.

1. ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTS

A. Location of a plan within a two-kilometer radius for

commercial, industrial, institutional complex, and

37

Page 43: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

within a half-kilometer radius for residential

buildings, at any convenient scale.

B. Site development and/or location plan at scale of 1:200

M standard or any convenient scale for large-scale

development showing position of building in relation to

lot. Existing buildings within adjoining the lot shall

be hatched, and distances between the proposed project

and buildings shall be indicated.

C. Floor plans at scale of not less than 1:100 M.

D. Elevation (at least four) at scale of not less than

1:100 M.

E. Sections (at least two) at scale of 1:100 M.

F. Roof-framing plan of not less than 1:100.

I. Details of footing/column at any convenient scale.

J. Details of structural members at any convenient scale.

38

Page 44: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

2. ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS

Structural

a. Design analysis shall be required for all buildings

or structures except for the following:

1. Traditional indigenous family dwellings as

defined in Section 209 of the NBC.

2. Single detached residential buildings with a

total floor area up to 20 sq. m.

b. Boring and Plate Load Tests

Pursuant to section 7.03(Soil Classification) of the

National Structural Code for Buildings, it is the

responsibility of the designer to order adequate

soil exploration including test boring for any

building or Structure of any height, if in judgment

such is necessary. However, as a rule, test borings

or plate load tests shall be required for buildings

or

structures of four (4) storeys and higher.

c. Seismic Analysis

Pursuant to Section 2.01 (Earthquake Forces) of the

National Structural Code for Buildings, every

39

Page 45: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

building or structure and every portion thereof,

except

Category I of Group A Occupants which are less than

7.5 meters in height, shall be designed and

constructed to resist stresses produced by lateral

forces.

Sanitary/Plumbing

a. For new sanitary installation with more than twenty

(20) units of plumbing installation, water supply,

storm drainage, water purification and sewage

treatment plant, applications shall be accompanied

by sanitary plans and specifications signed and

sealed by duly licensed Sanitary Engineer containing

the following:

1) Sanitary Plan, layouts and details.

2) Isometric drawing of roughing-ins of sanitary

drainage, ventilation lines, hot and/or cold

distribution/supplies of plumbing fixtures and

equipment.

3) Detail drawings of septic tanks in the absence

of disposal to the street sanitary sewer, sewage

treatment plant.

40

Page 46: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

4) Riser diagram of drainage including details of

miscellaneous appurtenances such as manholes,

junction boxes, catch basins, water/sewer/storm

drainage connections.

5) Design analysis, technical specifications.

6) Estimate of cost (for statistical purposes

only).

7) Detail drawings of deep well water source and

water treatment device in the absence of

municipal water system.

b. For additional and/or alteration of existing

sanitary installation involving more than twenty

(20) units of plumbing installations, water supply,

storm drainage, water purification and sewerage

treatment plant, application shall be accompanied by

sanitary plans and specifications signed and sealed

by a duly licensed Sanitary Engineer, containing the

following:

1) Design analysis and plans of the original

installation.

2) Plans and detail drawings of the additional

installation.

41

Page 47: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

3) Estimated cost of the additional/altered

installation (for statistical purposes only).

C. For new sanitary installation with more than twenty

(20) units of plumbing installations and water supply,

the Engineering documents signed and sealed by a duly

licensed Master Plumber who has been issued a

Certificate of Recognition as a Designer by the Board

of Master

Plumbers include the following:

1) Sanitary Plan, layouts and details.

2) Isometric drawing of roughing-ins of sanitary

drainage, ventilation lines, hot and/or cold

distribution/supplies of plumbing fixtures and

equipment.

3) Design analysis, technical specifications.

4) Estimate of cost (for statistical purposes only).

d. For additional and/or alteration of existing

sanitary installation involving more than twenty

(20) units of plumbing installations and water

supply, the Engineering documents signed and sealed

by a duly licensed Master Plumber who has been

issued a Certificate of Recognition as a Designer

42

Page 48: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

by the Board of Master Plumbers include the

following:

1) Design analysis and plans of the original

installation.

2) Plans and detail drawings of the additional

installation.

3) Estimated cost of the additional/altered

installation (for statistical purposes only).

e. For new additional installation or altered plumbing

installation not exceeding twenty (20) units, the

Engineering Documents signed and sealed by a duly

licensed Master Plumber shall include the

following:

1) Plumbing plan and layout.

2) Isometric drawing.

3) Guide specifications and bill of materials.

4) Estimate of cost (for statistical purposes only).

Mechanical

The corresponding plans and specifications for 50hp or

43

Page 49: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

more, signed and sealed by a duly licensed Mechanical

Engineer shall contain the following:

1) General layout plan for each floor, to scale of not less

than 1:100m; indicating the equipment in heavier lines

than the building outline. Name of machinery and

corresponding break horsepower shall be indicated.

2) longitudinal and transverse action drawn to scale of at

least 1:100m showing inter floor relations and defining

of manner of support of machinery (whether though

building structure , by separate staging, or by

foundations resting on the ground).

3) Isometric drawing of piping system showing:

a. Assembly of pipes on racks and supports.

b. Complete individual piping system indicating terminal

to terminal valves, fittings, size and color coding.

4) Plan indicating location of store rooms, fuel

tanks, fire extinguishing system, fire doors, fire

escape ladders and other similar fire protective

facilities.

44

Page 50: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

5) Plans of all duct work installations indicating

dampers, controls, filters, fire proofing, acoustical

and thermal insulation.

6) Detailed plans of machinery foundations and

supports drawn to scale at least 1:50m.

7) Detailed plans of boilers and pressure vessel

with a working pressure of above 10 psig regardless of

Horsepower rating drawn to scale of at least 1:50m.

8) Computations and detailed plans of the elevators,

escalators and like, drawn to scale at least 1:50m.

9) Completely machinery list showing;

a. Name and type of machinery.

b. Make a catalog name, size, model, serial

number and capacity.

c. Revolution per minute (RPM) and drive (direct,

Vbelt or flat-belt, gear reducer, hydraulic,

magnetic, chain or line shafting)

Electrical

a) For new electrical installation with more than 20

outlet of a capacity more than 20 outlets of more than

a 20kW, of any voltage, application may be accompanied

45

Page 51: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

by a duly licensed Professional Electrical Engineer,

containing the following:

1. General electrical layouts and legends.

2. Single line diagram.

3. Riser diagram.

4. Schedule of loads.

5. Design analysis.

6. Estimate of cost (for statistical use only).

b) For addition and/or alteration of existing

electrical installation involving more than 20 outlets

or more than 4kW of any voltage application shall be

accompanied by electrical plans and specifications

signed and sealed by a duly Professional Electrical

Engineer containing the following:

1. Design analysis of the original service

entrance equipment, main feeder/branch

together with the additional installation.

2. Riser diagram or original and additional

installation.

3. Schedule of load of new installation.

46

Page 52: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

4. The General Electrical layout with legends.

5. Estimated cost of new installation and cost

of modification (for statistical purpose

only).

c) For new additional or altered electrical

installation not exceeding 20 outlets for a capacity

of 4kW up to 600 volts, applications shall be

accompanied by a bill of materials and a sketched

signed by a duly licensed Master

Electrician containing the following:

a. General electrical layouts and legends.

b. Bill of Rights.

c. Estimate of cost (for statistical use only).

47

Page 53: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the methodology of the study

covering the research design, the source of the data, the

instrumentation and data collection, together with the

tools used for data analysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study exhibits the descriptive-developmental

method of research using questionnaires, consultation,

interviews and document analysis. Descriptive research

design, in a sense that it helped the researchers determine

the respective attributes of the five-storey city hall

building in general and developmental aspect.

The descriptive study cannot determinatively give

exact answers to all questions, but it gives a rich data

that lead the researchers to important and valuable

recommendations. The researchers were able to obtain

further information as to the current status of the city

hall of dagupan in Urban Planning and design and had

described “What exists and what lacks” in the city with

regards to variables or conditions in the mentioned

situation.

CHAPTER III

48

Page 54: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

SOURCES OF DATA

The primary source of data on this study was the

residents of dagupan and neighboring towns encircling

Dagupan. The city’s residents and its neighboring towns

were chosen as respondents since they are the main

beneficiaries of the proposed city hall, and are more

knowledgeable and qualified in the fruits of the

availability of the structure. The Engineers were also

interviewed about the design and analysis of the city hall

since this is their field of expertise.

SAMPLE PROCEDURE

A formula formulated for solving the sample size:

𝑛𝑛 =𝑁𝑁

1 + 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁2

Where:

n Sample Size (Smaller group)

N Popular Size (Larger Group)

163,676 (Population of Dagupan listed in

2010 census’ record).

℮ Margin of error (the percentage of error is

allowed since only a sample is used and not the whole

population.)

49

Page 55: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

5% assumed margin of error

𝑛𝑛 =163,676

1 + (163,676)(.05)2

n = 399.5 say 400 respondents

To gather more data the surveyor will ask forty-five

respondents for this study based on the ranged of the

computation above. The frequencies of the study may come

from any in the age brockets in the questionnaires.

According to Dr. Garton, one method which is used in

identifying a sample size n from a population of size N is

the Random Sampling of which each possible sample size n

has the same chance of being selected. This strategy was

already proven to be the best procedure used by the

researchers for it renders every member of the population

an equal chance to be a sample.

INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA COLLECTION

The following instruments were used in gathering data

for this study:

• Questionnaires/Survey – was conducted and collected

nearby the proposed project location, around the

50

Page 56: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

city and neighboring towns in order to determine

necessary information about the proposed projects.

• Consultations – The group consulted veteran

companies, professional engineers and people

involved in the proposed project to assist us in the

design of the proposed project.

• Documentary Analysis – This helped the researchers

gather information for the design and specification

of the proposed project through books and other

document references.

TOOLS FOR DATA ANALYSIS

In the assessment of the project’s suitability from

the respondents’ perception, the researchers treated the

gathered data using a statistical tool refer to as the

Average Weighted Mean (Spiegel, p.45) with the formula:

𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊 = Σ𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑁𝑁

Where:

WM = the weighted mean

w = the weighted factor

x = the point value of the item

N = no. of respondents

The researchers adopted the ranking response mode

51

Page 57: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

where the respondents ranked a series of statements in

terms of the criterion presented to them. A numerical

boundary concept was used in interpreting the gathered

data. And so convert the computed Weighted Mean into its

descriptive rating, the following technique wad used.

RANK STATISTICAL LIMITS OF WEIGHTED

MEAN

DESCRIPTIVE

EQUIVALENT

1 1.5 – 2.0 PREFER

2 1.0 – 1.49 DO NOT PREFER

Before any action in gathering the data through the

questionnaires to be answered by the respondents,

permission was sought from our adviser as well as the

residents whom became our respondents. Our respondents were

guaranteed to be confidential with respect to their answer

and identities.

52

Page 58: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter represents the findings, interpretation

and analyses of the data gathered in light of the problems

presented in chapter 1.

Table 1

PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Profile of the Subjects Frequency count Percentage

Age:

Below 20 29 7.25%

20-29 32 8%

30-39 86 21.5%

40-49 95 23.75%

50-59 112 28%

60 and above 46 11.5%

Total: 400 100 %

Gender:

Male 256 64%

Female 144 36%

Total: 400 100

53

Page 59: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Interpretation of data:

The following interpretations aim to answer the

question. How acceptable is the proposed project.

1.) Is the existing city still feasible?

Base on the accumulated data that was gathered by

the researchers based on the survey conducted in

Dagupan, Pangasinan. As the pie graph shows the gap

between the yes and the no of the people concern

regarding the proposed project. It gives the

surveyor a result of 62% percent saying that the

existing city hall of Dagupan isn`t feasible no

more for the fast growing city.

2.) Would you agree for a new City hall?

38%

62%

DagupanYes No

54

54

Page 60: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

With the result shown by the graph the respondents

namely: the business persons, employee inside the

city hall, teachers, regular people living in

Dagupan and the politicians, needs a new city hall

to serve them efficiently and conveniently.

0 100 200 300 400

Yes

No

Dagupan

Dagupan

55

Page 61: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

3.) If the city hall would be relocated where would it

be?

The graph portrait that people around Dagupan

chooses to De Venecia Extension Road who has a

wider road easy to access than bonuan who at the

present about to suffer gridlock.

4.) Would you prefer a futuristic design?

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

BONUAN DE VENECIA EXTENSION ROAD

Dagupan

Dagupan

56

Page 62: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

The figure indicates that 81% of Dagupan wants new

development for the city, as the city hall being

develop as the face of the city the body will

follow, change is coming in Dagupan.

5.) Would you prefer to unify every scattered

government departments of Dagupan?

The figure shows that 69% of Dagupan wants to

unify all the scattered government department of Dagupan to

lessen the fare, stress and hassle of the citizens of

Dagupan.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Yes No

57

Page 63: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

ARCHITECTURAL PLANS

58

Page 64: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

PE

RS

PE

CT

IV

E

TIT

LE

DE

SIG

NE

RS

:

SH

EE

T C

ON

TE

NT

:S

HE

ET

N

O:

AS

S

HO

WN

14

PR

OJ

EC

T M

AN

AG

ER

:A

DR

IA

N JO

HN

B

. E

SG

UE

RR

A

AS

SIS

TA

NT

M

AN

AG

ER

:

MA

RIE

L L

. R

OS

AR

IO

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

E

NG

IN

EE

R :

MA

RK

JE

FR

Y D

. L

OP

EZ

AR

CH

IT

EC

TU

RA

L E

NG

IN

EE

R :

LA

UR

EN

CE

S

. L

AR

OY

A

ES

TIM

AT

OR

/ S

CH

ED

UL

ER

:

DA

RY

L Z

. C

AP

UA

"B

ALO

N C

IT

Y H

ALL Y

A

DA

GU

PA

N" :

A P

RO

PO

SE

D F

IV

E-S

TO

RE

Y

CIT

Y H

AL

L

AT

D

E V

EN

EC

IA

E

XP

RE

SS

WA

Y E

XT

.,

DA

GU

PA

N C

IT

Y

A

1

59

Page 65: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

E

X

IS

T

IN

G

C

I

T

Y

H

A

L

L

D

O

W

N

T

O

W

N

A

R

E

A

A.B

F

ER

NA

DE

Z A

VE

.

C

IT

Y

P

L

A

Z

A

M

E

T

R

O

P

L

A

Z

A

BA

RA

NG

AY

CA

LM

AY

UN

IV

ER

SIT

Y

OF

PA

NG

AS

IN

AN

BA

RA

NG

AY

P

AN

TA

L

P

A

N

T

A

L

R

IV

E

R

P

A

N

T

A

L

R

IV

E

R

P

A

N

TA

L R

IV

E

R

P

N

B

D

A

G

U

P

A

N

F

E

R

R

Y

T

E

R

M

IN

A

L

P

A

N

T

A

L

R

O

A

D

PA

NT

AL R

OA

D

TO

B

GR

Y. B

ON

UA

N

P

A

N

T

A

L

R

O

A

D

D

A

W

E

L

B

R

I

D

G

E

DA

GU

PA

N

ELE

CT

RIC

CO

RP

.

D

E

V

E

N

E

C

I

A

E

X

P

R

E

S

S

W

A

Y

E

X

T

.

C

I

T

Y

E

N

G

'G

O

F

F

IC

E

A

.B

F

E

R

N

A

D

E

Z W

A

V

E

.

M

A

G

S

A

Y

S

A

Y

B

R

I

D

G

E

N

B

I

L

T

O

NO

T DR

AWN

TO

SCA

LEV

IC

IN

IT

Y M

AP

D

E

V

E

N

E

C

I

A

E

X

P

R

E

S

S

W

A

Y

E

X

T

.

CA

LM

AY

RIV

ER

C

A

L

M

A

Y

R

I

V

E

R

C

A

L

M

A

Y

R

IV

E

R

TO

B

GR

Y. LU

CA

O

B

U

R

G

O

S

S

T

.

Z

A

M

O

R

A

S

T

.

G

A

L

V

A

N

S

T

.

NU

EV

A S

T

R

IZ

A

L

S

T

.

C

A

R

E

E

N

A

N

S

T

.

C

S

I M

A

R

K

E

T

S

Q

U

A

R

E

S

T

A

R

P

L

A

Z

A

TO

B

GR

Y. LU

CA

O

A

.

B

F

E

R

N

A

D

E

Z

E

A

V

E

.

TH

E S

IT

E

TIT

LE

DE

SIG

NE

RS

:

SH

EE

T C

ON

TE

NT

:S

HE

ET

N

O:

AS

S

HO

WN

A

2

PR

OJ

EC

T M

AN

AG

ER

:A

DR

IA

N JO

HN

B

. E

SG

UE

RR

A

AS

SIS

TA

NT

M

AN

AG

ER

:

MA

RIE

L L

. R

OS

AR

IO

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

E

NG

IN

EE

R :

MA

RK

JE

FR

Y D

. L

OP

EZ

AR

CH

IT

EC

TU

RA

L E

NG

IN

EE

R :

LA

UR

EN

CE

S

. L

AR

OY

A

ES

TIM

AT

OR

/ S

CH

ED

UL

ER

:

DA

RY

L Z

. C

AP

UA

"B

ALO

N C

IT

Y H

ALL Y

A

DA

GU

PA

N" :

A P

RO

PO

SE

D F

IV

E-S

TO

RE

Y

CIT

Y H

AL

L

AT

D

E V

EN

EC

IA

E

XP

RE

SS

WA

Y E

XT

.,

DA

GU

PA

N C

IT

Y

14

60

AutoCAD SHX Text
N
Page 66: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

S 31 ° 05 ' W 100.65 M

N 70

° 23 '

W

47.0

9 M

S 21° 56 ' W 44.59 M

S 79

° 30'

W

19.4

4 M

S 31° 37

' W

17.36

M

PT. 4

S 9° 12' W 27.00 M

S 5°

53' E

1

0.84 M

S 6°

15' E

1

.29 M

S 82

° 09'

W

10.9

5 M

N 12° 46' W 17.19 M

N 5° 49' W 45.15 M

N 14° 56' E 40.56 M

N 70

° 00'

W

22.6

3 M

N 26° 03' E 93.60 M

N 40° 11' W 33.23 M

S 46

° 40'

W

117

.72 M

TOTA

L AR

EA: 2

0,359

sq. m

.

ES

C . 1:100

NO

T DR

AWN

TO

SCA

LES

IT

E D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

P

LA

N

TE

CH

NIC

AL D

ES

CR

IP

TIO

N

LIN

EB

EA

RIN

GD

IS

TA

NC

E

1 - 2

2 - 3

3 - 4

4 - 5

5 - 6

6 - 7

7 - 8

8 - 9

9 - 1

0

10

- 1

1

11

- 1

2

12

- 1

3

13

- 1

4

14

- 1

5

15

- 1

6

16

- 1

7

S 3

1⁰ 0

5' W

10

0.6

5 M

N 7

0⁰ 2

3' W

47

.0

9 M

S 2

1⁰ 5

6' W

44

.5

9 M

S 9

⁰ 1

2' W

S 5

⁰ 5

3' E

S 6

⁰ 1

5' E

S 8

2⁰ 0

9' W

S 7

9⁰ 3

0' W

N 1

2⁰ 4

6' W

N 5

⁰ 4

9' W

N 1

4⁰ 5

6' E

N 7

0⁰ 0

0' W

N 2

6⁰ 0

3' E

N 1

3⁰ 3

1' E

N 4

0⁰ 1

1' E

S 4

6⁰ 4

0' E

17

- 1

S 3

1⁰ 3

7' E

27

.0

0 M

10

.8

4 M

1.2

9 M

10

.9

5 M

19

.4

4 M

17

.1

9 M

45

.1

5 M

40

.5

6 M

22

.6

3 M

93

.6

0 M

33

.9

3 M

22

.2

3 M

11

7.7

2 M

17

.3

6 M

TO

B

GR

Y. LU

CA

O

D

A

W

E

L

B

R

I

D

G

E

TO

B

GR

Y. B

ON

UA

N

TO

B

GR

Y P

AN

TA

L

TIT

LE

DE

SIG

NE

RS

:

SH

EE

T C

ON

TE

NT

:S

HE

ET

N

O:

AS

S

HO

WN

14

PR

OJ

EC

T M

AN

AG

ER

:A

DR

IA

N JO

HN

B

. E

SG

UE

RR

A

AS

SIS

TA

NT

M

AN

AG

ER

:

MA

RIE

L L

. R

OS

AR

IO

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

E

NG

IN

EE

R :

MA

RK

JE

FR

Y D

. L

OP

EZ

AR

CH

IT

EC

TU

RA

L E

NG

IN

EE

R :

LA

UR

EN

CE

S

. L

AR

OY

A

ES

TIM

AT

OR

/ S

CH

ED

UL

ER

:

DA

RY

L Z

. C

AP

UA

"B

ALO

N C

IT

Y H

ALL Y

A

DA

GU

PA

N" :

A P

RO

PO

SE

D F

IV

E-S

TO

RE

Y

CIT

Y H

AL

L

AT

D

E V

EN

EC

IA

E

XP

RE

SS

WA

Y E

XT

.,

DA

GU

PA

N C

IT

Y

A

3

61

AutoCAD SHX Text
N
Page 67: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

If you want a copy of this Thesis place ask the

Uploader. Thank you for not downloading or copying any part of this project.

Page 68: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Live in the FUTURE.

WHO WE ARE

CENTERLINE CONSTRUCTION provide professional client-focused construction

solutions. As an employee-owned

company, we go above and

beyond on every project and

deliver on our promises

with

integrity.

VISION

To be the general contractor and construction manager service provider of

choice in the Philippines and all over the world. To make the Philippines a world class

country with respect to structures

332

Page 69: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

MISSION

The mission of Centerline construction company, is to faithfully provide our clients

with world class quality construction designs and services, on to date completion and

competitive pricing while generating a fair and reasonable profit for our company.

CORE VALUES

• Commitment to client satisfaction

• Dedication of every accomplishment to God.

• Teamwork, collaboration and open communication.

• Fostering a culture of mutual trust and respect.

• Being leaders in our profession and our communities.

• Pride in our work and excellence in all we do.

333

Page 70: Centerline Cons.(Final Print)

Organizational Structure

ENGR. ADRIAN JOHN ESGURRAPROJECT MANAGER

ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEEREngr. Mark jefry lopezSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER

ESTIMATOR/ SCHEDULER

Engr. LAURENCE LAROYA

Engr. Mariel rosarioASSISTANT MANAGER

Engr. Daryl z. capua

334