center for school innovation a presentation at the bsu indianapolis center a high performance...
TRANSCRIPT
Center for School Innovation
A Presentationat the BSU Indianapolis Center
A High Performance Schools Workshop
29 January 2009
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Presentation Outline
Ways of Thinking Social Factors Environmental Factors Economic Factors State Mandates New Guidelines Resources
Walter Grondzik, PE
LEED-AP
Professor
Department of Architecture
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
These factors are often collectively referred to under the heading of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), but consist of distinct concerns related to how the human body receives and reacts to stimuli Thermal Comfort Visual Comfort Acoustical Comfort Indoor Air Quality
Environmental Factors
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Indoor Environmental Quality represents those many dimensions of a space that are not enscribed on drawings or described in specifications—yet are critical to occupant well-being and satisfaction
Indoor Environmental Quality
the space we draw the space we occupy
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Addressing the various contributors to Indoor Environmental Quality is particularly important in a high performance school as students, teachers, and staff are literally immersed in the many variables that constitute IEQ … and human performance will suffer if IEQ is not up to par
Indoor Environmental Quality
bad IEQ (artist’s
representation)
good IEQ
(artist’s
representation)
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Topic Area What Why Design Intent (general design direction) Design Criteria (specific design targets) Issues Important to High Performance
Schools Questions
Discussion Pattern for IEQ
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
What Thermal comfort is a state of mind that expresses
satisfaction with the surrounding thermal conditions It is an opinion … not a physical condition
It is a subjective response that is influenced by four key environmental variables, two physical personal variables, and several mental personal variables
Air temperatureRelative humidityAir speedRadiant conditionsClothing being wornActivity levelExpectations, mood, stress, …
Thermal Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Why
Building occupants are generally very sensitive to thermal conditions and deviations from desirable conditions lead to complaints, distraction, and coping behaviors that may be negative
Thermally comfortable conditions essentially place this particular aspect of the environment into the sub-conscious, allowing a greater focus on learning
Thermal Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Intent
All regularly occupied spaces should be deemed thermally comfortable
A design is a hypothesis (saying does not make it so)Comfort is a human response, not a set of physical
variables (measuring does not make it so)The above points strongly suggest that a post-occupancy
evaluation (POE) should be specified
Thermal comfort should be achieved with minimum required consumption of energy
It is easy to achieve thermal comfort is energy consumption is of no concern … that is not today’s case
Thermal Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Criteria Meet ASHRAE Standard 55 (period)
Thermal Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Issues Important to High Performance Schools Thermal comfort is not required by most building codes
Thermal comfort is sort of hit or miss in many green building guidelines (good intent may serve occupants better than a credit)
Providing thermal comfort requires a substantial consumption of energy resources (even “less” is still substantial)
Being in the center of the comfort zone is not demonstrably better than being on the edges (the boundaries are a threshold)
There are four environmental variables (design tools) to consider with respect to comfort—not just air temperature
Thermal Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Issues of Interest to High Performance Schools The concept of adaptive comfort may be used with
naturally ventilated schools (ASHRAE Standard 55)
Thermal Comfort
adaptive summer
comfort zone
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Questions
Thermal Comfort
?
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
What Visual comfort is a state of mind that expresses
satisfaction with the surrounding luminous conditions
It is a subjective response that is influenced by several quantitative and qualitative environmental variablesIlluminanceLuminance (brightness)Glare (lack thereof)AppropriatenessAestheticsSource/type of lightDiversity of views
Visual Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Why Building occupants are reasonably sensitive to
luminous conditions and deviations from desirable conditions lead to complaints, distraction, coping behaviors that may be non-productive
Visually comfortable conditions essentially place this aspect of the environment into the sub-conscious, allowing a focus on learning
Particularly bad lighting conditions can lead to health effects (eye strain, headaches) and loss of productivity (by diversion of energy into coping mechanisms or a measurable loss of visual acuity)
Visual Comfort
a th
eme
seem
s
to b
e de
velo
ping
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Intent
Provide conditions that will lead to expressions of comfort in all regularly occupied spaces—virtually every school space should be visually comfortable when occupied under defined visual task scenarios
Provide these conditions in a way that reduces energy demands
Visual Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Criteria
There is no single unified benchmark for visual comfort—no visual comfort zone has been defined (drat)
The design team needs to set individual targets for those aspects considered most important in each space and address them individuallyThere are guidelines for many specific issues such as
illuminance, brightness ratios, absolute brightness limits, color rendering
When individual aspects have been successfully addressed, look holistically at the resulting luminous
environment
Visual Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Criteria
Visual Comfort
one source for lighting criteria
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Issues Important to High Performance Schools
Daylighting is universally recommended and appreciatedFor its positive ambianceFor its energy efficiency
Ensure that the lighting system is first effective, and only then efficient
Efficient (and effective) lighting requires logical controls—that actually work
Daylighting controls must be commissioned; there should be a POE of lighting conditions; communicate intents with users
Visual Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Questions
Visual Comfort
?
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
What Acoustical comfort is a state of mind that expresses
satisfaction with the surrounding auditory conditions It is a subjective response that is influenced by
environmental variables established (for the most part) by the design teamLoudness of wanted sounds Loudness of unwanted sounds (noise)Reverberation timeArticulationAnd … more intriguing quality indicators in
music spaces
Acoustical Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Why
Building occupants are surprisingly insensitive to acoustical conditions … yet hearing is a critical part of the learning environment
Acoustically comfortable conditions will support and enhance learning—leading to higher performance
Acoustically uncomfortable conditions will detract from learning and may disadvantage a large number of students in any given class
Acoustical Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Intent
Provide conditions that will lead to expressions of comfort in all regularly occupied spacesEvery learning space should be acoustically
comfortable when occupied (as should most support spaces)
Ensure that room acoustics enhance learning rather than impeding learning
Acoustical Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Criteria There is no single unified benchmark for acoustical
comfort—no acoustical comfort zone The design team needs to set individual targets for
those aspects considered important to high performance (success), and address them individuallyThere are guidelines for a few issues such as
background noise (NC), reverberation time (RT), speech privacy
After addressing individual aspects, look holistically at
the resulting acoustical environment
Acoustical Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Criteria Meet Access Board “requirements” Comply with good practices
Acoustical Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Issues Important to High Performance Schools Poor school acoustics have been recognized by the
Access Board as a serious impediment to student learning—this is a widespread problem
Numerous otherwise good high performance design moves may seriously and negatively impact room acoustics and noise control (such as open plan spaces, flexible spaces, cross ventilation, …)
The acoustical conditions in most school spaces are the result of fundamental architectural design decisions (no consultants are involved)
Many architects have little grounding in acoustics (sorry to say)
Acoustical Comfort
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Questions
Acoustical Comfort
?
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
What Indoor air quality (IAQ) is a collective term that
describes the state of contamination of room air
It is a two-part proposition It involves quantitative (scientifically
established) limits on health-impacting contaminants (such as carbon dioxide, radon, or formaldehyde)
It involves qualitative (personally determined) limits on comfort-impacting contaminants (such as odors)
Indoor Air Quality
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Why Many air contaminants have
well-documented negative impacts
on health and well-being Although many of the health effects of
poor indoor air quality are long term,
students are in school for the long term Some air contaminants can act fairly quickly
and cause symptoms that require absences
from school and/or reduced productivity
Indoor Air Quality
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Intent
Provide acceptable indoor air qualityMore on “acceptable” in a minute
Do so with due regard to the substantial
energy impacts of ventilation
Indoor Air Quality
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Design Criteria Meet ASHRAE Standard 62.1
Prescriptive path (most common)Performance path
Indoor Air Quality
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Ventilation Design Criteria A people component A space component
Indoor Air Quality
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Issues Important to High Performance Schools
Poor air quality can destroy the effectiveness of a school
Providing good air quality is energy intensive, and the
energy impacts of IAQ decisions need to be considered
It is unclear what effect providing better than acceptable air quality will have on occupants (in other words, then benefits of exceeding ASHRAE Standard 62.1 are unclear)
Indoor Air Quality
A High Performance Schools Workshop 29 January 2009 Center for School Innovation
Questions
Indoor Air Quality
?