center for remote sensing and spatial analysis, rutgers university remote sensing: digital image...
TRANSCRIPT
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Remote Sensing: Digital Image Analysis
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Lecture Notes 1: Overview of Remote Sensing
A number of these slides were originally produced by Scott Madry and Chuck Colvard with some subsequent modification by Rick Lathrop. Additional slides were produced by Rick Lathrop.
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
The remote sensing cycle
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Design of A Remote Sensing Effort
• Clear definition of the problem and information need
• Evaluation of the overall potential of remote sensing
• Identification of appropriate remote sensing data & acquisition procedures
• Determination of the data interpretation & analysis techniques
• Identification of the criteria by which the quality of information can be evaluated
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Resolution• Four kinds of resolution determined by user needs:• Spatial Resolution: How small an object do you need
to see (pixel size) and how large an area do you need to cover (swath width)
• Spectral Resolution: What part of the spectrum do you want to measure
• Radiometric Resolution: How finely do you need to quantify the data
• Temporal Resolution: How often do you need to look
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Detection vs Discrimination vs Identification
• Detection: spectral signal from object of interest is above background noise
- there is some kind of signal there• Discrimination: spectral signal from object of interest
is detectable and also different from surrounding features
- I can discern a distinct feature • Identification: spectral signal whose spectral pattern
can be discriminated and uniquely attributed to a specific type of biophysical surface material or object
- I can positively identify the feature
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Spatial resolution
Instantaneous Field of View (IFOV)determines the dimension, D, of the Ground Resolution Cell (GRC) imaged on the ground
IFOV
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
In scanning systems, the Ground Resolution Cell (GRC) is similar to the concept of a Ground Sample Distance (GSD) in digital cameras. While not always strictly true, the GSD and GRC are equated with the pixel size of the image projected onto the ground. No guarantee that you will be able to discriminate objects that are the same size as the GSD – depend where the pixels fall in relation to the object of interest
How small a GRC do I need?
Object same size as GSD but doesn’t dominate any one pixel
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
General Rule of Thumb: GRC should be less than one half the size of the smallest object of interest (which at a minimum equals to 4 pixels for simple square object).
How small a GRC do I need?
For identification purposes, will often need to be much smaller, i.e., need multiple pixels within object.
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
19951 meter ground spatial resolution per
pixel
20021 foot ground spatial resolution per pixel
Digital Orthophotography: the new standard
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Mixed pixels: more than 1 land cover within GRC
Landsat TM 30m pixel/GRC boundaries on IKONOS 4m pixel image backdrop
How small a GRC do I need?
Can you identify the rectangular objects in the IKONOS image?
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Spatialresolutionkeeps gettingbetter...
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Spatial resolution
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
1, 3, and 10 meters
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
ultra-high spatial resolution
• 24 inch (60 cm)
• 6 inches (15 cm)
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Tradeoffs: Swath width vs. GRC vs. disk storageLandsat GRC:30m SW:185km
SPOT GRC:10-20m SW:60 km
IKONOS GRC:1-4m SW:11km• 80 m = 40 Mb-4 bands (MSS)• 30 m = 320 Mb-6 bands (TM)• 10 m = 342.25 Mb-1band• 1 m = 34.225 Tb - 1 band
How broad of a region do we need?
How much data can we store and process? 185 by 185 km
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Spectral Resolution: slicing up the EMR
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
The electromagnetic spectrum
Comparative Sizes: from subatomic to human scales
Atom Nucleus
Atom
Molecule
Bacteria
Pinhead
Honeybee
Human & larger
From NY Times graphic 4/8/2003
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Spectral wavebands of Landsat TM
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Landsat TM-7 bands-8 bit dataSpectral(where we look)
Radiometric(how finely can wemeasure the return)0-63, 0-255, 0-1023
Landsat TM BAND 1 2 3 4 5 7 6
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
An example-plant leaves• Chlorophyll absorbs large % of red and
blue for photosynthesis- and strongly reflects in green (.55um) um=micrometers or microns=1 millionth of a meter
• Peak reflectance in leaves in near infrared (.7-1.2um) up to 60% of infrared energy per leaf is scattered up or down due to cell wall size, shape, leaf condition (age, stress, disease), etc.
• Reflectance in Mid IR (2-4um) influenced by water content-water absorbs IR energy, so live leaves reduce mid IR return
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Landsat TM: each waveband provides different information about earth surface features
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Hyperspectral Data: contiguous spectral channels of narrow bandwidth
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
AVIRIS image of Goldfield, NV http://visibleearth.nasa.gov
Hyperspectral sensing
To detect narrow absorption features of specific chemical or mineral composition in rock, soils or vegetation
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
4 m multi-spectral
1 m panchromatic
Space Imaging IKONOS Imagery Sample: Bound Brook NJ
Tradeoffs: Higher spectral resolution generally has lower spatial resolution
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Radiometric resolution
Dark Bright
Determined by the A-to-D quantization
6 bit = 0-63, 8 bit = 0-255, 10 bit = 0-1023
•Sensitivity of the detector to differences in EMR signal strength determines the smallest difference in brightness value that can be distinguished
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Radiometric resolution
• Higher radiometric resolution is especially important for quantitative applications such as sea-surface temperature mapping where the user wants to distinguish small differences in temperature
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Satellite remote sensing orbits give repeat coverage
• Geostationary Polar Sun-synchronous• Constant view of hemisphere Covers entire Earth
35,800 km
700-900 km
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Hurricane Isabel hits the Outer Banks
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories/s2091.htm
Sept 18, 2003 from NOAA satellite image
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
SPOT has steerable mirror to increase overpass frequency
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Change Detection• The ability to
monitor change is one of the benefits of remote sensing
• We can monitor human and natural changes in the landscape
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Many different systems. Which to choose?
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Different sensors and resolutionssensor spatial spectral radiometric temporal----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AVHRR 1.1 and 4 KM 4 or 5 bands 10 bit 12 hours 2400 Km .58-.68, .725-1.1, 3.55-3.93 (0-1023) (1 day, 1 night) 10.3-11.3, 11.5-12.5 (um)Landsat TM 30 meters 7 bands 8 bit 16 days
185 Km .45-.52, .52-.6, .63-.69, .76-.9, 1.55-1.75, 10.4-12.5, 2.08-2.3 um
SPOT 10m P / 20m X P -1 band X- 3 bands 8 bit 26 days 60 Km P - .51-.73 um (0-255) (2 out of 5)
X - .5-.59, .61-.68, .79-.89 um IRS1 5.8 meters 1 band 6 bit 22 days
70 km .5-.75 (0-63)
IKONOS 1m P/ 4m X P -1 band .45-.9 10 bit 1-2 days11 km X-4 bands.44-.51, .52-.60, .63-.70, .76-.85 um (0-1023) (1.5 out of 3)
Quickbird .6-1m P/ 2.5-4m X P -1 band .45-.9 11 bit 1-2 days
16-21 km X-4 bands .45-.52, .52-.60, .63-.69, .76-.90 um
GeoVantage .1-1.1m 4 bands .41-.49m .51-.59, .61-.69, .80-.90 um 8 bit airborneDigital Camera .15-1.5km
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Image Interpretation & Analysis
•Strong trend towards GIS-ready digital output products
•Computerized image analysis can help to enhance and extract information content of imagery in a time-efficient, cost-effective manner for direct input to GIS
•Computers can not replace the human image analyst; visual interpretation is still a valued technique
•Many recent advances in image analysis software
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
Digital Image Analysis software
Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University
• Design of a remote sensing effort must clearly define
information needs, analysis procedures and consider the 4 types of remote sensing resolution
spatial
spectral
radiometric
temporal
when considering the types of imagery to use
Remote Sensing - Summary