catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy...

14
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information School Profile Description Remarks Period of Report ing Data Presentation Data Source/Forms 1. Enrolment Total number of learners enrolled Yea r M F Tot al 201 6- 201 7 3 6 3 7 73 201 7- 201 8 4 2 3 2 74 201 8- 201 9 4 5 3 5 80 The total number of learners increased by 2.5%. SF-1: School Register; EBEIS SY 2016- 2017 SY 2017- 2018 SY 2018- 2019 0 20 40 60 80 36 32 45 37 34 35 MALE FEMALE

Upload: others

Post on 19-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

School Profile Description RemarksPeriod of Reportin

gData Presentation Data Source/Forms

1. Enrolment ● Total number of learners enrolled

Year M F Total2016-2017

36 37 73

2017-2018

42 32 74

2018-2019

45 35 80

● The total number of learners increased by 2.5%.

SF-1: School Register; EBEIS

2. Health and nutritional status

Number of learners who are severely wasted/wasted

M FSeverelyWasted

10

1

Wasted 14

10

June 2018 – February 2019

Nutritional Status Report

SY 2016-2017

SY 2017-2018

SY 2018-2019

01020304050607080

36 3245

3734

35

MALE FEMALE

male female05

10152025

10 141

10

Severely wastes Wasted

Kinder to Grade 3

Grades 4 to 6

Page 2: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

3. Learners materials*

Some books are not available for Grade

Subject Excess Shortage

English 1-6 0Mathematics 2-6

0

Science 6 0Araling Panlipunan 2,3, & 4

0

ESP 2-4 0Filipino 2-5 0Mother Tongue 1-3

0

MAPEH 0EPP 0

SF-3: Books Issued and Returned; Physical Count of Inventories

4. Teachers’ professional development*

All teachers attended the ICT and INSET trainings but 1 teacher was not train in K to 12

Mid-yearYear-end

Accomplishment report

5. Funding sources*

● Funds from MOOE, Canteen, donations

MOOE – 209,000Canteen –

10,000

ICT LAC K-12 SBM OTHERS0

10

20

Teacher's Training, SY 2018-2019

Series 1

46%

2%

51%

Sources of School Funding, SY 2018-2019

MOOE Canteen Donations

Page 3: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Donation – 231,902

6. School awards and recognitions*

Title of Award

Award Giving Body

Level (International, National, Region, Division or School Level)

Category of Awards(Student, Teacher, School Head, School)

Brigada Eskwela Best Implementing School, 1st Placer

DepEd Laoag

Division School

Brigada Eskwela Best Implementing School, 10th Placer

DepEd, Region I

Region School

Table Tennis DepEd Laoag

District Student

Title of Award

Award Giving

Level (International,

Category of

46%

2%

51%

Sources of School Funding, SY 2018-2019

MOOE Canteen Donations

Page 4: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Body National, Region, Division or School Level)

Awards(Student, Teacher, School Head, School)

Brigada Eskwela Best Implementing School, 1st Placer

DepEd Laoag

Division School

*Data not found in the EBEIS

Page 5: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Performance Indicators

Description RemarksPeriod of Reporting

Data PresentationData

Source/FormsACCESS7. Number and rate of dropouts by cause

● No. of dropout for the last 3 years

0 dropout for the last 3 years

SF-2: Daily Attendance Report of Learners; EBEIS

QUALITY8. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year (Promotion Rate)

● Percentage of learners who completed the school year

100% promotion rate

EBEISSF-6: Summarized Report on Promotion and Level of Proficiency

2013-2014

2014-2015

2015-2016

00.5

1

Drop-out RateDrop-out Rate

Kinder Grade 10%

50%100%150%

Promotion Rate, SY 2018

Promotion Rate, SY 2013

Page 6: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

9. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by Mean Percentage Score (MPS)

10. Literacy level Phil-IRI Result

Fil EngFru

s8 6

Ins 22 16Ind 3 4

● 75% of pupils belong to Frustration level

Mid-yearYear-end

Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (PHIL-IRI)

GOVERNANCE11. School-Based Management Assessment Level

● Level 1 ● The school achieved 52% in Level I

12. Child-Friendly ● Based on CFSS point The school is Year-end Child-Friendly

Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

7 8 7 5

1722

17 16

93

3 4

Number of Learners by literacy level, SY 2018-2019

Frustration Instructional Independent

SBM Level1

Qualitative Interpretation:

Developing

CFSS Result31

Page 7: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

School Survey result*

system We come up with a total score of 35 points

very outstanding child friendly school

School Self-Assessment

13. Stakeholders’ participation*

Percentagea. Co-Curricular

Activities – attendance rate is 78%

b. Extra-Curricular activities like Brigada Eskwela is 98% and Oplan Dalus is 78%

Mid-yearYear-end

Attendance sheets;DepEd order 18: School Calendar

Qualitative Interpretation:

VERY OUTSTANDING

Co-Curricular

Extra

Curricu

lar

Major A

ctiviti

es0

50100150200250300

Stakeholder's Partici-pation

Column1

Brigada Oplan Dalus0

50

100

150

200

250

Stakeholder's Partici-pation

Column1

CFSS Result31

Page 8: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

14. Learner-Teacher ratio

● Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to teachers against the standard:

o Kinder (13:1)o Grades 1 (10:1)o Grades 2 (6:1)

Year-end SF-7: School Personnel List and Basic Profile; SF-1: School Register; EBEIS

Brigada Oplan Dalus0

50

100

150

200

250

Stakeholder's Partici-pation

Column1

Page 9: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

o Grades 3 & 4 (22:1)o Grade 5 (17:1)

o Grade 6 (12:1)

15. Learner-Classroom ratio

● Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to classrooms against the standard:

o Kinder (13:1)o Grade 1(10:1)o Grade 2(6:1)o Grades 3 & 4 (22:1)o Grade 5 (17:1)

o Grade 6 (12:1)

Year-end EBEIS: Facilities and Structures

16. Learner-Toilet ratio

The actual ratio of learners to functional toilet is 7:2:1

The toilet is for male and female

Year-end EBEIS: Facilities and Structures

50

1020304050607080 Learner-Toilet

Ratio

Series 1

Page 10: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

17. Learner-Seat ratio

● actual ratio of learners to seat is 1:1

The ratio is 1:1 including desk

Year-end Consolidated Report on Desk/Armchairs

50

1020304050607080 Learner-Toilet

Ratio

Series 1

10

Learner-Seat

Ratio, SY 2018

Learner-Seat Ratio, SY 2018

Page 11: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Note: CFS – Child-Friendly School (The Child-Friendly School Assessment was made by UNICEF. The concept for establishing a Child-Friendly School System (CFSS) in the Philippines was introduced in 1999 and is currently being reviewed so it can be utilized/integrated in school planning, monitoring and evaluation).

SF – School Forms

*Data not found in the EBEIS

Page 12: catabanelementaryschool.files.wordpress.com  · Web viewmale sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 36 32 45 female sy 2016-2017 sy 2017-2018 sy 2018-2019 37 34 35

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Status of School Projects

Description Remarks Period of Reporting Data PresentationData

Source/Forms18. Status of Annual Implementation Plan (AIP)/Continuous Improvement (CI) Projects*

● we have set priority projects in AIP

● Priority projects:1. water connection in the school2. replacement of jalousie into steal window of the canteen at FVR building3. extension of FVR building roofing

Mid-yearYear-end

19. Other stakeholders’ accomplishments*

● The stakeholders initiate different activities

Top 3 priority projects:1. water connection in the school2. replacement of jalousie into steal window of the canteen at FVR building3. extension of FVR building roofing

Mid-yearYear-end