SY 2017-18 CHOICE APPLICATION ANALYSIS

Joe Gramelspacher, Special Assistant to the SuperintendentPatrick Herrel, Director of Enrollment and Options

June 2017

overview

2

1

2

4

5

3

Review of Choice Process Changes

3 September 2016 Board Approved Changes

narrow & uniform proximity priority zones

implement multiple-round application process to increase equitable access

analyze SY 2016-17 application data to inform recommendations2

Previous ‘Proximity’ Boundaries

4dsfdf

2016-17 K-8 ‘Proximity’ Boundaries

Approved SY 2017-18 Proximity Boundaries

5 Reduced boundaries projected increase KG seats available by 200+

dsfdf

2016-17 K-8 ‘Proximity’ Boundaries

Proximity Change Effects

6 Reduced Proximity Boundaries opened 219 seats compared to the previous year

374, 57%281, 43%

KG Seat Offers SY 2016-17

In Proximity BoundaryNot in Proximity Boundary

155, 24%

488, 76%

KG Seat Offers SY 2017-18

In Proximity BoundaryNot in Proximity Boundary

Multiple Round Application Process

7 Board Approved Process for SY 2017-18 Application Cycle

Key Points single offer per applicant repeat application permitted without risk gradual release of seats5 (grades Kg, 7th & 9th only) waitlist begins after round 3

Round 1• 70% of seats • Nov 19 – Jan 6• Jan 9 lottery week

Round 2• 20% of seats• Jan 16 – March 3• March 3 Round 1

response deadline• March 6 lottery week

Round 3• 10% of seats • March 13 – April 21• April 21 Round 2

response deadline• April 17 lottery week• Waitlists begin

Multiple Round Application Process

8 Race/Ethnicity by Round

36%28%

42%51%

25%

24%

27%21%

10%

11%

9% 8%

29%37%

22% 20%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Total Round 1 Round 2 Round 3

White

Multiracial

Hispanic

Black orAfricanAmerican

Multiple Round Application Process

9 Income Quartile by Round

25% 31% 19% 18%

25%24%

26% 26%

22%19%

24% 26%

28%26% 31% 30%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Total Round 1 Round 2 Round 3

4 - LowestIncome

3

2

1 - HighestIncome

ApplicationsBy Round

Disproportionality Effects

10 High Demand Programs (CFI 2, CFI 84, William Bell/Butler Lab)

86%

68%

28%

2%

11%

4%

5%

5%

24%

7%15%

44%

SY 2016-17 KG SY 2017-18 KG (Off + Acc) IPS 2016-17 KG ADMBlack or African American Hispanic/Latino Multiracial White

Disproportionality Effects

11 IPS Choice Programs (excluding 2, 84 & 60)

22%15%

24%

37% 38%28%

4%12%

4%

38% 35%44%

SY 2016-17 KG SY 2017-18 KG (Off + Acc) IPS 2016-17 KG ADM

Looking Ahead

12

• Maintain narrow & uniform proximity priorities• Continue multiple lottery rounds

Increase seats offered in later lottery rounds• Currently: 70/20/10• Proposed: 50/30/20

Recommendations

Next Steps

questions and answers

13

SY 2017-18 Choice Application AnalysisoverviewReview of Choice Process ChangesPrevious ‘Proximity’ BoundariesApproved SY 2017-18 Proximity BoundariesProximity Change EffectsMultiple Round Application ProcessMultiple Round Application ProcessMultiple Round Application ProcessDisproportionality EffectsDisproportionality EffectsLooking Aheadquestions and answers