casereport osteoblastic metastases mimickers on contrast...

5
Case Report Osteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast Enhanced CT Fahad Al-Lhedan, 1 Sam Samaan, 2 and Wanzhen Zeng 2 1 Medical Imaging Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, e Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Fahad Al-Lhedan; fahad [email protected] Received 31 March 2017; Accepted 14 June 2017; Published 26 July 2017 Academic Editor: Samer Ezziddin Copyright © 2017 Fahad Al-Lhedan et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Secondary osseous involvement in lymphoma is more common compared to primary bone lymphoma. e finding of osseous lesion can be incidentally discovered during the course of the disease. However, osseous metastases are infrequently silent. Detection of osseous metastases is crucial for accurate staging and optimal treatment planning of lymphoma. e aim of imaging is to identify the presence and extent of osseous disease and to assess for possible complications such as pathological fracture of the load-bearing bones and cord compression if the lesion is spinal. We are presenting two patients with treated lymphoma who were in complete remission. On routine follow-up contrast enhanced CT, there were new osteoblastic lesions in the spine worrisome for metastases. Additional studies were performed for further evaluation of both of them which did not demonstrate any corresponding suspicious osseous lesion. e patients have a prior history of chronic venous occlusive thrombosis that resulted in collaterals formation. Contrast enhancement of the vertebral body marrow secondary to collaterals formation and venous flow through the vertebral venous plexus can mimic the appearance of spinal osteoblastic metastases. 1. Background Approximately 16% of lymphoma patients will eventually have osseous involvement [1]. Osseous manifestations of lymphoma in the spine commonly occur as a result of direct invasion from adjacent lymph nodes; however, hematoge- nous osseous metastases are also a possibility [2]. e osseous involvement usually occurs during the course of the disease rather than at the initial presentation. Multiple osseous metastases are more common than a solitary metastasis. Most lymphomatous metastases tend to be osteolytic; however, osteoblastic and mixed metastases may also be encountered [2]. Osseous metastases can cause significant morbidity as a result of pathologic fracture and spinal cord compression [3, 4]. 2. Discussion 2.1. Case 1. A 54-year-old male with Hodgkin lymphoma, who was in complete remission, had several new osteoblastic spinal lesions on routine follow-up contrast enhanced CT of the neck (Figure 1) which were worrisome for new osteoblastic metastases. A whole-body SPECT bone scan was performed to evaluate the extent of osseous disease (Figure 2). In addition, FDG PET/CT was performed to evaluate the disease extent within the body (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). e patient has a history of leſt innominate and leſt subclavian veins chronic occlusive thrombosis in addition to a partially occlusive thrombosis of the leſt internal jugular and leſt axillary veins. e routine follow-up contrast enhanced CT of the neck demonstrated at least partial occlusion of the proximal leſt subclavian vein with numerous collaterals in the leſt shoulder and leſt upper back region. e lack of uptake on bone scan and FGD PET along with disappearance of lesions on the non-contrast enhanced CT portion of the PET/CT (Figure 3(b)) implies that the apparent osteoblastic lesions were merely vertebral marrow enhancement secondary to collaterals formation and venous flow through the vertebral venous plexus in the cervical and thoracic spine [5]. 2.2. Case 2. A 22-year-old male with non-Hodgkin lym- phoma, who was in complete remission, had a new osteoblas- tic lesion at the T5 vertebral body on routine follow-up contrast enhanced CT of the chest (Figure 4) which was Hindawi Case Reports in Radiology Volume 2017, Article ID 7278016, 4 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7278016

Upload: others

Post on 28-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CaseReport Osteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crira/2017/7278016.pdf · 2 CaseReportsinRadiology Figure1:(NeckcontrastenhancedCT):SagittalbonewindowCTdemonstratingseveralosteoblasticlesionsatC3,C4,C5,C7,andT2(white

Case ReportOsteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast Enhanced CT

Fahad Al-Lhedan,1 Sam Samaan,2 andWanzhen Zeng2

1Medical Imaging Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia2Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Fahad Al-Lhedan; fahad [email protected]

Received 31 March 2017; Accepted 14 June 2017; Published 26 July 2017

Academic Editor: Samer Ezziddin

Copyright © 2017 Fahad Al-Lhedan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

Secondary osseous involvement in lymphoma ismore common compared to primary bone lymphoma.Thefinding of osseous lesioncan be incidentally discovered during the course of the disease. However, osseous metastases are infrequently silent. Detection ofosseous metastases is crucial for accurate staging and optimal treatment planning of lymphoma. The aim of imaging is to identifythe presence and extent of osseous disease and to assess for possible complications such as pathological fracture of the load-bearingbones and cord compression if the lesion is spinal. We are presenting two patients with treated lymphoma who were in completeremission. On routine follow-up contrast enhanced CT, there were new osteoblastic lesions in the spine worrisome for metastases.Additional studies were performed for further evaluation of both of themwhich did not demonstrate any corresponding suspiciousosseous lesion. The patients have a prior history of chronic venous occlusive thrombosis that resulted in collaterals formation.Contrast enhancement of the vertebral body marrow secondary to collaterals formation and venous flow through the vertebralvenous plexus can mimic the appearance of spinal osteoblastic metastases.

1. Background

Approximately 16% of lymphoma patients will eventuallyhave osseous involvement [1]. Osseous manifestations oflymphoma in the spine commonly occur as a result of directinvasion from adjacent lymph nodes; however, hematoge-nous osseousmetastases are also a possibility [2].The osseousinvolvement usually occurs during the course of the diseaserather than at the initial presentation. Multiple osseousmetastases aremore common than a solitarymetastasis.Mostlymphomatous metastases tend to be osteolytic; however,osteoblastic and mixed metastases may also be encountered[2].

Osseous metastases can cause significant morbidity as aresult of pathologic fracture and spinal cord compression [3,4].

2. Discussion

2.1. Case 1. A 54-year-old male with Hodgkin lymphoma,who was in complete remission, had several new osteoblasticspinal lesions on routine follow-up contrast enhanced CTof the neck (Figure 1) which were worrisome for new

osteoblastic metastases. A whole-body SPECT bone scan wasperformed to evaluate the extent of osseous disease (Figure 2).In addition, FDG PET/CT was performed to evaluate thedisease extent within the body (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

The patient has a history of left innominate and leftsubclavian veins chronic occlusive thrombosis in addition toa partially occlusive thrombosis of the left internal jugular andleft axillary veins. The routine follow-up contrast enhancedCT of the neck demonstrated at least partial occlusion of theproximal left subclavian vein with numerous collaterals in theleft shoulder and left upper back region.

The lack of uptake on bone scan and FGD PET alongwith disappearance of lesions on the non-contrast enhancedCT portion of the PET/CT (Figure 3(b)) implies that theapparent osteoblastic lesions were merely vertebral marrowenhancement secondary to collaterals formation and venousflow through the vertebral venous plexus in the cervical andthoracic spine [5].

2.2. Case 2. A 22-year-old male with non-Hodgkin lym-phoma, who was in complete remission, had a new osteoblas-tic lesion at the T5 vertebral body on routine follow-upcontrast enhanced CT of the chest (Figure 4) which was

HindawiCase Reports in RadiologyVolume 2017, Article ID 7278016, 4 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7278016

Page 2: CaseReport Osteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crira/2017/7278016.pdf · 2 CaseReportsinRadiology Figure1:(NeckcontrastenhancedCT):SagittalbonewindowCTdemonstratingseveralosteoblasticlesionsatC3,C4,C5,C7,andT2(white

2 Case Reports in Radiology

Figure 1: (Neck contrast enhanced CT): Sagittal bone window CT demonstrating several osteoblastic lesions at C3, C4, C5, C7, and T2 (whitearrows).

Figure 2: (SPECT): Sagittal SPECT bone scan does not demonstrate any abnormal focal uptake within the cervical or thoracic spine.

(a) (PET/CT): Sagittal FDG PET doesnot demonstrate any abnormal focaluptake within the cervical or thoracicspine

(b) (PET/CT): Sagittal non-contrastenhanced CT does not demonstrate anyosteoblastic lesions within the cervicalor thoracic spine

Figure 3

Page 3: CaseReport Osteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crira/2017/7278016.pdf · 2 CaseReportsinRadiology Figure1:(NeckcontrastenhancedCT):SagittalbonewindowCTdemonstratingseveralosteoblasticlesionsatC3,C4,C5,C7,andT2(white

Case Reports in Radiology 3

Figure 4: (Chest contrast enhanced CT): Axial bone window CT demonstrating a solitary osteoblastic lesion at T5 (white arrow).

(a) (SPECT/CT): Axial SPECT bone scan does notdemonstrate any abnormal focal uptake within T5

(b) (SPECT/CT): Axial non-contrast enhanced CT doesnot demonstrate the previously described osteoblasticlesion at T5

Figure 5

worrisome for a new solitary osteoblastic metastasis. Awhole-body SPECT bone scan was performed to evaluate theextent of osseous disease (Figure 5).

The patient has a history of chronic occlusive thrombosisof bilateral brachiocephalic and left subclavian veins whichwas demonstrated on contrast enhanced CT of the chest.

Again the lack of uptake on bone scan along withdisappearance of lesion on the non-contrast enhanced CTportion of the SPECT/CT (Figure 5(b)) implies that theapparent osteoblastic lesion was merely vertebral marrowenhancement secondary to collaterals formation and venousflow through the vertebral venous plexus in the thoracic spine[5].

3. Conclusion

The apparent osteoblastic lesions on both contrast enhancedCTs were merely marrow enhancement of the vertebralbodies. In the presence of chronic subclavian vein occlusion,collaterals often form and may result in venous flow throughthe vertebral venous plexus after contrast administration.

Contrast enhancement of the vertebral body marrowsecondary to venous flow through the vertebral venous plexuscan mimic the appearance of spinal osteoblastic metastases.Therefore, focal contrast enhancement of a vertebral body

should be considered as a mimicker of an osteoblastic lesionon contrast enhanced CT in the presence of significantchronic venous occlusion and collaterals formation.

Additional Points

Objective. Identify mimickers of osteoblastic metastases oncontrast enhanced CT.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] P. C. Malloy, E. K. Fishman, and D. Magid, “Lymphoma ofbone, muscle, and skin: CT findings,” American Journal ofRoentgenology, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 805–809, 1992.

[2] J. O’Neill, K. Finlay, E. Jurriaans, and L. Friedman, “RadiologicalManifestations of Skeletal Lymphoma,” Current Problems inDiagnostic Radiology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 228–236, 2009.

[3] R. L.Theriault and R. L.Theriault, “Biology of bonemetastases,”Cancer Control, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 92–101, 2012.

Page 4: CaseReport Osteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crira/2017/7278016.pdf · 2 CaseReportsinRadiology Figure1:(NeckcontrastenhancedCT):SagittalbonewindowCTdemonstratingseveralosteoblasticlesionsatC3,C4,C5,C7,andT2(white

4 Case Reports in Radiology

[4] G. R. Mundy, “Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences andtherapeutic opportunities,” Nature Reviews: Cancer, vol. 2, no.8, pp. 584–593, 2002.

[5] M. Kara, C. Pradel, C. Phan, A. Miquel, and L. Arrive, “CTfeatures of vertebral venous congestion simulating scleroticmetastases in nine patientswith thrombosis of the superior venacava,”American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2016.

Page 5: CaseReport Osteoblastic Metastases Mimickers on Contrast …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crira/2017/7278016.pdf · 2 CaseReportsinRadiology Figure1:(NeckcontrastenhancedCT):SagittalbonewindowCTdemonstratingseveralosteoblasticlesionsatC3,C4,C5,C7,andT2(white

Submit your manuscripts athttps://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com