case study bosnia and herzegovina

11

Click here to load reader

Upload: dodung

Post on 04-Jan-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Case StudyBOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

[email protected]

Agency for Development of HigherEducation and Quality Assurance

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Tempus Regional Seminar on Human Resource Managementin Higher Education in the Western Balkans

Sarajevo, 14-15 June 2012

Page 2: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

Public Universities in Bosnia and Herzegovina

University of Tuzla

University of Sarajevo University of East Sarajevo

University Džemal Bijedić of MostarUniversity of Mostar

University of Zenica

University of Bihać University of Banja Luka

8 public universities –about 120.000 students

34 private HEIs – about 25.000students

About 15% of students attend private HEIs

Total population:

3,84 mil.

Page 3: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

BiH HE education system(s)

• 44 HEIs – 25 universities and 19 high schools• 12 responisble eudcation authorties (ministries)• Ministry of Civil Afairs (MoCA)• Conference of Educational Ministers (CoEM)• Rectors’ Conference (RC)• Agency for Development of Higher Education and

Quality Assurance (HEA)• Centre for Information and Recognition of

Documents in the Area of Higher Education (CIP)

Page 4: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

BiH HE education system(s), ctd.

• Complex country: 2 entities (Republic of Srpska and Federation of BiH) and a District (Brčko).

• Constitutional responsibility for all levels of education (including HE) are on the entities and the District, while in the entity of Federation are on 10 cantons – so, we have 12 responsible educational authorities.

• On central level are role of coordination of policies (MoCA, CoEM, RC), part of development and QA (HEA) and part of recognition (CIP).

Page 5: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

Development of HE

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Students 57722 63425 64629 70671 77009 84422 91263 99557 104280 105358 105137 124376 119292

Graduates 6039 6848 8127 10103 12199 15103 16981 18177 17822

% of grad. 7,84 8,11 8,91 10,15 11,70 14,33 16,15 14,61 14,94

Faculties 94 98 99 99 105 113 137 160 174 154 161 172 191

57.222 119.292x 2

x 2

x 219194

14,947,84

Data source: BiH State Agency for Statistics www.bahs.ba

Universities High Schools TotalPublic Private Total Public Private Total Public Private Total

2009 8 12 20 2 13 15 10 25 352010 8 14 22 2 15 17 10 29 392011 8 14 22 2 13 15 10 27 372012 8 17 25 2 17 19 10 34 44

+5 +4

HE institutions

LACK OF REGULATIONS

x 3! x 2

Page 6: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

HE has doubled – response of academic comunity

Total staff * FTE Full time staff2009 5.204 No data 3.9362010 8.463 5.954 4.6742011 8.643 6.498 5.1392012 8.729 6.340 4.852

Data source: BiH State Agency for Statistics www.bahs.ba

Year PhD2004 502005 692006 912007 1262008 1442009 1782010 1572011 2052012 186

Ʃ 1.206

* Since members of academic staff may teachat two and more higher education institutions, the number presented in full-time equivalent approximately corresponds to the actual number of natural persons. Full-time equivalent is calculated only for teachers and assistants who work part-time and it is product of ratio of achieved and fulltime hours, number of people and share in the school year.

X 4

Number of academic staff

Page 7: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

The Policy

• Laws (Framework Law on HE and Laws on entity/cantonal level) stipulate academic freedoms and criteria for appointment of academic staff

• Sub-laws (Standards and Normative for performing HE – input standards of HE authorities) stipulate the quantity of staff, including academic staff workload

• HEA documents related to QA (Criteria for Accreditation and output standards) are about the quality of staff and HRD policies on the level of HE institutions

• Working conditions, professional development, career management (evaluation, training, motivation) are responsibility of the HE institutions and depend on their resources

• There is no common HRD strategy or common approach

Page 8: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

Conclusions 1

• HE in Bosnia and Herzegovina has been doubled in last 10 years.

• HEIs have „produced” its own staff and that was the only response on HE expansion.

• There is still a lack of academic staff. Academic staff is overladed by teaching!

• Quality of staff should be improved.• There is no HRD strategy.• There is a lack of regulation (licensing was partly

conducted, accreditation is still on pending).

Page 9: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

Conclusions 2

• Working conditions: generally speaking academic staff is well paid and administrative staff at HEIs is average paid, so jobs in public HE are attractive

• Professional development of staff is highly depended on resources and management of HEI –very various situation and there is no a system

• Career management is weak – there are no regular trainings, systems of evaluation of administrative staff, systems of internationalization (academic mobility), systems of research funding, etc.

Page 10: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

Conclusions – Recomendations: The Strategy

• Investments should follow:– to strength scientific research, – new schemes for PhD, – pedagogical trainings, – trainings for administrative staff and staff in HE

authorities• Administrative staff at HE authorities should be

included in the reform• The main obstacle: political consensus and the

model – should it be on cantonal/entity or on national level

Page 11: Case Study BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

www.hea.gov.ba

Agency for Development of Higehr Education and Quality AssuranceBA – 78000 Banja Luka, Blvd. Stepe Stepanovića 11

P: +387 51 430 510, F: +387 51 462 302e-mail: [email protected]