case problem 4 by a. haris awang & m. zaini zakariah
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
Case Problem 4: Major League Baseball Team Values
By
A. Haris Awang (MBA2016041001) & Mohd Zaini Zakariah (MBA2016041025)
Presented on
24th July, 2016
Submitted to:
Mr. Demudu Naganaidu
Senior Vice President Operations
Tel: 03-9080 5888
27th July, 2016
![Page 2: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
1
MANAGERIAL REPORT
1. Develop numerical and grapical summaries of the data.
The scatter plot for value vs income does not show any trend or correlation between value &
income. There is zero correlation between these variables. It can be concluded that the variables
are not related to one another. Increases or decreases in income have no effect on increases or
decreases in value.
![Page 3: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
2
As for value vs revenue, there a positive trend in this scatter plot. There is a positive correlation
between these variables. Increases in revenue are correlated with increases in value. Similarly,
decreases in revenue are correlated with decreases in value.
2. Use regression anlaysis to investigate the relationship between value and income. Discuss
your findings.
Based from the above results, p-value = 0.163 > α = 0.05 at 95% confidence interval. So the
relationship between value and income is not significant.
R Square = 0.034 means that the model only explains 3.4% of the data.
![Page 4: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
3
The scatter plot for residual analysis for homoscedasticity shows that the residual variance is constant
and the residual statistics shows that residuals are linear with 0.000 mean and not cyclical or non-
linear.
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 213.89 323.16 286.30 24.509 30
Std. Predicted Value -2.954 1.504 .000 1.000 30
Standard Error of Predicted
Value
24.098 76.313 32.186 11.385 30
Adjusted Predicted Value 102.84 333.83 281.57 39.191 30
Residual -165.040 407.066 .000 129.685 30
Std. Residual -1.250 3.084 .000 .983 30
Stud. Residual -1.279 3.270 .016 1.042 30
Deleted Residual -172.533 457.571 4.729 146.750 30
Stud. Deleted Residual -1.294 4.084 .049 1.146 30
Mahal. Distance .000 8.729 .967 1.759 30
Cook's Distance .000 1.059 .073 .221 30
Centered Leverage Value .000 .301 .033 .061 30
a. Dependent Variable: Value ($millions)
![Page 5: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
4
3. Use regression analysis to investigate the relationship between value and revenue. Discuss
your findings.
Based from the above results, p-value = 0.000 < α = 0.05 at 95% confidence level. It indicated that
there is a significant relationship between value and revenue.
The adjusted R square obtained was 0.928, indicating that 92.8% of the variance in value was
explained by revenue.
![Page 6: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
5
The scatter plot for residual analysis for homoscedasticity shows that the residual variance is constant
and the residual statistics shows that residuals are linear with 0.000 mean and not cyclical or non-
linear.
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 72.61 648.17 286.30 127.323 30
Std. Predicted Value -1.678 2.842 .000 1.000 30
Standard Error of Predicted
Value
6.495 19.752 8.747 2.669 30
Adjusted Predicted Value 67.30 611.09 285.21 124.771 30
Residual -89.630 81.826 .000 34.753 30
Std. Residual -2.534 2.314 .000 .983 30
Stud. Residual -2.671 2.789 .014 1.052 30
Deleted Residual -99.530 118.913 1.093 40.161 30
Stud. Deleted Residual -3.038 3.223 .018 1.130 30
Mahal. Distance .011 8.078 .967 1.520 30
Cook's Distance .000 1.763 .089 .324 30
Centered Leverage Value .000 .279 .033 .052 30
a. Dependent Variable: Value ($millions)
4. What conclusions and recommendations can you derive from your analysis?
Conclusions & Recommendations:
a. Based on the above table, the revenue contributed strongly (96.5%) to the variation in value
of the team but the income has no significant relationship to the value. The results show
that income is not significantly related to value of the team since the p-value is more than
.05.
![Page 7: Case Problem 4 by A. Haris Awang & M. Zaini Zakariah](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022022203/5877c1f01a28ab39588b4b85/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MBA 6073 – BUSINESS STATISTICS
6
b. The final model used to describe this case is the Simple Linear Regression Model,
Yi = β0 + β1Xi + εi
Where
Yi is dependent variable,
β0 is population Y intercept,
β1 is population slope coefficient,
Xi is independent variable,
εi is random error.
c. The results suggested that $1 million increase in revenue was followed by $3.787 million
increase in value of the team and can be estimated by the Simple Linear Regression
Equation, ŷi = b0 + b1xi
Where
ŷi is estimated (or predicted) y value for observation i,
b0 is estimate of the regression intercept,
b1 is estimate of the regression slope,
xi is value of x for observation i.
d. The estimated value of the team is only valid for any given revenue between $63 million
(min) and $215 million (max).
END