care providers future heralds interpreters of gene tes ng
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture: Primary Care Providers – Future Heralds and Interpreters
of Gene c Tes ng
Alisdair Philp, PH D
2/23/2015
1
Primary Care Providers –
the future Gatekeepers, Heralds and
Interpreters of Genetic Testing
Alisdair Philp, PhD
Declaration of financial interests:
Shares:
Sequenom 10 shares
Nanostring technonogies 18 shares
Total value < $ 400.00
2/23/2015
2
Imperial College
USUHS
Affiliate Scientist
Associate Scientist
? ?
Objectives:
1- The changing role of the PCP
2- New testing options
3- Incidental findings
4- Physician judgment
2/23/2015
3
Gatekeepers-
access/referrals to testing
Heralds-
informed consent
Interpreters-
explaining the results
Gatekeepers-
access/referrals to testing
Personalized medicine
Direct to consumer testing
2/23/2015
4
Personalized medicine –
Pharmacogenetics
CYP2C19
Enzyme is associated
with conversion of
Clopidogrel to active
form
Clopidogrel
- Rx vs atherothrombotic
events.
- Drug is not metabolically
active
2/23/2015
5
CYP2C19 Enzyme is associated with conversion of Clopidogrel to active form
Clopidogrel - Rx vs atherothrombotic events. - Drug is not metabolically active
Examples of Polymorphisms in Genes That Alter Cardiovascular Function and Responses to Drugs.
. N Engl J Med 2003;349:60-72. As more studies are carried out and the costs of screening is reduced, it is not unreasonable to expect that in the near future patients prescreening for responses to drugs will be routine.
2/23/2015
6
Consultation with PCP
DNA
extracted and
interpreted Selection of
drug/dosage
for individual
patient
Personalized medicine
https://cpt.uchicago.edu/
Incorporating genetic information
into the decision making process
when prescribing medications as a
way to individualize therapies.
2/23/2015
7
Direct to Consumer Testing
Be careful what you ask for … because you
might just get it …
..
..
… and then some….
Case study 1
2/23/2015
8
15
Bloom’s Syndrome
Gaucher Disease
Phenylketonuria
Asthma
Floxacillin Toxicity
Height
Memory
Kidney Disease
Stomach Cancer
Type 2 Diabetes
Earwax Type
2/23/2015
9
Ermmmm .. … yeah… I’ll have one of everything thanks.
An equivalent would be taking samples from a patient and ordering every test the hospital offers… you are going to find something odd … testing is usually diagnosis driven…
The DTC companies state that they ‘do not provide medical advice based on their test results’. The family were unable to interpret the results they received from 23andme . A medical professional interpreted the results and indicated that the patient likely carries a pathogenic mutation. “The genotyping services of 23andMe are performed in LabCorp's CLIA-certified laboratory. The tests have not been cleared or approved by the FDA but have been analytically validated according to CLIA standards. The information on this page is intended for research and educational purposes only, and is not for diagnostic use.”
2/23/2015
10
This article was designed to survey how primary care physicians feel about DTCs…
Some of the data: 38% of Primary care physicians were aware of DTC testing 85% of PCPs did not feel prepared to answer questions about DTC tests.
20
“Last year in the US, only 135 medical geneticists and 331 genetic counselors were certified, and there are cumulatively <3000 of these professionals for a country of over 300 million people.”
“… 90% of consumers (of Direct to Consumer Tests) regard their physicians as the best resource for guidance about their genomic data but, at the same time, over 90% of physicians surveyed have indicated that they do not feel confident in using genetic information to guide their practice of medicine.”
Am J Med. 2012 Jan;125(1):5-6.
2/23/2015
12
Sales team directly contact PCPs and other providers – but patients can contact Counsyl directly ….
Family prep screen - carrier screening - over 100 conditions
Informed pregnancy screen - Non-invasive prenatal screen
Inherited cancer screen - BRCA1/2
“.. You have to sell that to the provider..”
Heralds-
informed consent
NIPS – Non-invasive Prenatal Screening
2/23/2015
14
Higher detection rate
Clearer results –
Typically combined results
reported as a risk e.g. 1/25
2/23/2015
15
…”should not be part of routine prenatal laboratory assessment, but should be an informed patient choice after pretest counseling”.. … “practitioners inform the patients of the risk of false positives as well as false negatives”… Patients …“should be referred for genetic counseling and offered invasive prenatal diagnosis for confirmation of test results”… … “should only be offered to ‘high risk’ women as it has not sufficiently been evaluated in other groups”…
Already some companies have expanded the test and there is a high likelihood that in the future it will be able to extend past aneuploidies and evaluate other genetic disorders… Patients are informed and are demanding this type of testing.
Informed consent – Providers must become familiar with the advantages and disadvantages … …physicians can provide pretest and posttest counseling… If a test is positive it should be followed up by diagnostic testing… either an amniocentesis or CVS
2/23/2015
16
Interpreters-
explaining the results
DNA sequencing … finding a change in the gene
CAG T TCGA
GTC A AGCT
CAG G TCGA
GTC C AGCT
Normal sequence
Pathogenic sequence
2/23/2015
17
Exome sequencing
Human genome – 3164 million bases of DNA
It may be sufficient to examine the coding sequence of genes (exome) to find most
pathogenic changes.
Only 1.5% are coding
introns exons
If we examine only the exons we will only need to look at around 50 million bases of
DNA.
The method used is called exome sequencing.
This is coupled with ‘massively parallel sequencing’ which examines all of the
coding sequences at the same time.
All of the coding part of all of the genes in the
genome are amplified at the same time but in short
fragments, they are then ‘read’ by a sequencer and
aligned … multiple alignments eventually produce
a ‘true read’.
2/23/2015
18
There are two caveats………
Caveat 1- What do you do with results you did not expect?
Incidental findings ----
In a similar manner – if a patient has a chest
x-ray following a positive TB skin test, and a
‘shadow’ is observed on the lungs – should
you report that or not?...
2/23/2015
19
ACMG original recommendations were that results should be reported and that
patients could NOT opt-out of having incidental findings reported.
But they could opt-out of testing.
What disorders are we talking
about?
What about age of onset?
What about testing in children?
What about patient ‘opt out’?
Who should explain these
things to the patient?
2/23/2015
20
“Primary care providers are likely gatekeepers
to referrals for this technology.
Clinical sequencing has proven successful in
the diagnosis of rare genetic disorders; is
finding a place in cancer care; and will soon be
available in the direct to consumer (DTC)
genetic testing marketplace.”
But the results are available in three flavours.
Positive – known pathogenic mutations…
Negative – no known pathogenic mutations found…
VUS – Variant of Unknown Significance….
Caveat 2- What do the results look like?
2/23/2015
21
Case study 2
28 year old female, family history of breast cancer
Presented for genetic testing –
elected to have a panel….
Case study 2 Patient was positive for a VUS in the promoter in PTEN….
PTEN Cowden syndrome …
Mucocutaneous lesions
Trichilemmomas (facial)
Acral keratoses
Papillomatous lesions
Musocal lesions
Breast cancer
Thyroid cancer
Macrocephaly
Endometrial cancer
Surveillance
Breast exams
Thyroid ultrasound
Endometrial biopsies
Issues:
Diagnostic testing / personalized medicine –
Pre-test counseling,
Post test counseling…
… what about her family members … ?
2/23/2015
22
Why should we care?
There was a lot of fuss over the Human Genome
Project, the practice of medicine didn’t change ..
…. It will continue pretty much as it was won’t it?
…………….. Probably NOT………..
The number of diseases that can be tested for is increasing exponentially. Advances in technology make the majority of single gene sequencing test redundant. For the larger genetic panels, it is estimated that there is a 30% chance of finding a VUS.
2/23/2015
23
Implications
…. Many new single gene disorders will be identified, especially congenital
diseases.
Pre and perinatal genetic testing will become routine.
Complex Diseases such as Heart Disease, T2D will have ‘risk factor’
calculations available.
DTC will increase (non-diagnosis directed testing)
Greater availability of WES testing, lower cost and DTC applications
More drug response testing will be available.
More genetic counseling will be needed
Legal issues need to be considered – ownership of samples, retrospective
testing, discrimination.
46
“Last year in the US, only 135 medical geneticists and 331 genetic counselors were certified, and there are cumulatively <3000 of these professionals for a country of over 300 million people.”
“… 90% of consumers (of Direct to Consumer Tests) regard their physicians as the best resource for guidance about their genomic data but, at the same time, over 90% of physicians surveyed have indicated that they do not feel confident in using genetic information to guide their practice of medicine.”
Am J Med. 2012 Jan;125(1):5-6.
2/23/2015
24
Practice Recommendations
PCPs become/remain aware of developments in genetic testing trends –
NIPS/Panels/WES
Awareness of changes in industry – specifically DTC companies and other
providers who may be primary point of contact with patients.
Familiarization of the implications of testing – types of results, counseling,
informed consent
Increase/improve the amount of genetics in education especially for PCPs.
Physicians PAs
Healthcare Providers
Associates & Affiliates: ACMG NSGC NCHPEG APHMG etc
Questions
Interaction with physicians
Questions…
FAQ…
CMEs…
Testing organization
Pharm tests
NCBI
Genetests.org
Links
CF Foundation
Eye diseases
Interest/support groups
ACOFP
Regional or national Organization
Web-resource page
… I would like to suggest a web base resource…..