capital improvement program - baltimore
TRANSCRIPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1. Capital Budget Overview & Trends2. Planning & Mayoralty Requests
CAPITAL BUDGET OVERVIEW & TRENDS
2
Overall City Budget (Operating and Capital)
3
$-
$1
$1
$2
$2
$3
$3
$4
$4
$5
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Billi
ons
Operating Capital
Budget Preparation – Who is Responsible?
4
Department of FinanceTax Rates, Debt Levels, Big-Picture Financial Planning
Dept. of Finance/ Bureau of Budget & Management
ResearchOperating Budget Preparation
Dept. of PlanningCapital Budget Preparation
OVERVIEW
CIP Overview
5Baltimore City Department of Planning
• By City Charter, the Planning Commission must submit a recommendation
for the six-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to the Board of
Estimates
• The budget year of the CIP becomes the basis for the capital component
of the Ordinance of Estimates, adopted by City Council
• The six-year CIP begins again each year.
Capital Project Requirements
6
The Board of Estimates (BOE) policy for a Capital Improvement is:
• A physical betterment or improvement and any preliminary studies relative thereto
• A Capital Improvement is NOT:
• Improvements costing less than $50,000,
• Vehicular equipment,
• Repairs or maintenance costing less than $100,000 or emergency in nature, and
• Salaries other than those which are capitalized as part of the cost of the project
Process – Formulating Recommendations
7
Planning Provides Agencies with
Instructions & Likely Funding Levels
Agencies Submit Projects for
Consideration
Planning Staff Meets with Agencies to
Review Submitted Projects
Agencies Present Priorities to Planning
Commission
Planning Staff Formulates
Recommendations
Planning Commission Vote
September/October December December - February
January February March
Process – Formal Approvals & Opportunities for Public Testimony
8
City Council Vote (First Year Only)
Board of Estimates Vote
Board of Finance Vote
Planning Commission Vote Early March
Late March
May
June
FY21 Funding by Agency
Amounts in thousands
Schools, $19,000 , 2%BCIT, $8,300 , 1%
DGS, $20,200 , 3%
Rec and Parks, $18,105 , 2%
HCD, $35,467 , 4%
BDC, $2,300 , 0%
Mayoralty-Related/Planning,
$1,295 , 0%
Transportation, $104,880 , 13%
DPW: Solid Waste, $5,600 , 1%
DPW: Utilities, $608,065 ,
74%
FY21 FUNDING
BYSOURC
EFY21 Funding by Fund Source
10
City Bond Funds, $80,000
City General Funds, $500
General Funds HUR, $0
Transp Revenue Bonds, $15,000
Short-Term Loan (BCIT), $7,300
Revenue Loans , 451,538
Utility Funds, $1,750 County Grants, $154,777
Federal Funds, $39,967
State Funds, $8,630
Other, $63,750
Amounts in thousands
Fund Source Trends (General Fund-Backed Sources)
11
$53,050
$64,000 $59,700
$125,700
$83,700
$97,000 $95,500 $101,400
$105,250
$145,000
$102,800
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Capital Budget Fund Source TrendsGeneral Fund-Backed Sources
FY 2011 – FY 2021
Short-Term Loan (IT)
Transp Revenue Bonds
General Funds HUR
City General Funds
City Bond Funds
FY21 Funding by Agency (General Fund-Backed Sources)
12Amounts in thousands
23.755
21.8
19
10.69.3
8.3
5.6
3.3
1.145
0
5
10
15
20
25
Transportation Housing &CommunityDevelopent
(HCD)
School System* GeneralServices (DGS)
Recreation &Parks
InformationTechnology
(BCIT)
Public Works(DPW) - Solid
Waste
BaltimoreDevelopmentCorporation
(BDC)
Mayoralty &Planning
Mill
ions
($)
Loan Authorization Guides GO Bond Programming
$19.0 $19.0 $19.0 $19.0
$32.5 $32.5 $36.0 $36.0
$5.0 $5.0 $5.0 $7.0
$23.5 $23.5 $20.0 $18.0
$-
$10.0
$20.0
$30.0
$40.0
$50.0
$60.0
$70.0
$80.0
$90.0
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
Million
s
Community andEconomicDevelopment Loan
Affordable HousingLoan
Recreation andParks and PublicFacilities
School Loan
13
Asset Management Updates
14
1. Inventory Baltimore city assets
• Identify Baltimore’s assets• Confirm the location of the asset• Determine the value of the assets• Determine the assets expected life cycle
2. Assess life-cycle cost
• Initial purchase cost• Maintenance cost• Capital cost• Disposal cost
3. Evaluate levels of service
• Assess the current status of service provided• Cost associated with the current service level• Determine if the service level is meeting user expectation• Cost associated with changing service level
Asset Management Updates (continued)
4. Proactive asset management
5. Asset management informs capital planning
• Provides insight into all capital needs• Ensures the funding of projects with the most significant impact• Consolidates all capital needs• Offers transparency to all stakeholders, including residents, about capital needs
15
Schedule
Dates Milestone
January 14 & 21 Agency Presentations to Planning Commission
February 25 Planning Commission Work Session
March 11 Planning Commission Vote
March 29 Board of Finance Vote
May Board of Estimates Vote
June City Council Vote
16
Current Evaluation Criteria
1. Necessary to protect public health and safety
2. City funding will leverage other fund sources
3. Capital investment will result in operating savings
4. Fulfills a state or federal mandate5. Necessary to implement a priority
housing or economic development project
6. Promotes private-public partnerships7. Implements the City’s Comprehensive
Master Plan, area master plans and/or agency/institution’s master plan
8. Implements the City’s Sustainability Plan9. Agency has prioritized project10.Promotes equity
Criteria to Consider/Test
1. Equity2. Health & Safety3. Asset Condition4. Regulatory Requirement5. Return on Investment6. Environmental Impact7. Collaboration & Alignment8. Quality of Life
17
% of CIP Allocations Attributed to a Location
18
52% 46%
63%67%
$-
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22*
Value of Recommendations/Requests, Mapped vs NOT Mapped, FY19-22 (Estimate)
Mapped $ NOT Mapped $
The FY22 figure is an initial estimate based on requested projects. FY19-21 figures are based on recommended projects.
PLANNING & MAYORALTY REQUESTS
19
127-021 INSPIRE Plan Implementation
• $500,000 in FY22 ($11.5 million budgeted to date)
• Funds for capital improvements in neighborhoods surrounding new 21st Century Schools
• Improvements include fixing sidewalks, creating or improving walking paths or pedestrian alleys, lighting, community gardens, upgrading parks and playgrounds, and more.
20
127-112 MOHS Shelter Improvements
• $4 million requested in FY22
• Funds to renovate buildings to accommodate and serve individuals experiencing homelessness
21
127-110 Baltimore National Heritage Area FY22 Small Capital Grant Program
• $100,000 in FY22 for Small Capital Grant Program
• $100,000 per year in outer years
• Small capital grants (<$15,000) for capital improvements at sites of historical significance in Baltimore
• Examples include Lovely Lane Church, African American Firefighters Museum, St. Mary’s Spiritual Center & Historic Site, and the Pride of Baltimore
22
188-010 Historic Public Monuments
• $50,000 in FY22• $50,000 per year in outer
years• Funds to maintain and restore
over 250 monuments & statues in the City of Baltimore that the Commission for Historical & Architectural Preservation (CHAP) is charged with conserving.
23
127- Various Cultural Spaces Capital Support Fund for Cultural Institutions
• Funds awarded to cultural institutions through an open, competitive process (Cultural Spaces Capital Support Fund)
• Commitments total $2,200,000 for two years• FY22: $1,295,000• FY23: $905,000
• Organizations with commitments for FY22 & 23 include:
24
•American Visionary Art Museum •Baltimore Center Stage•Baltimore Museum of Art•Baltimore Museum of Industry•Creative Alliance Patterson Theater•East Baltimore Historical Library•Le Mondo•Living Classrooms•Maryland Historical Library•Maryland Science Center•Maryland Zoo in Baltimore•National Aquarium
•Reginald F. Lewis Museum•Start Spangled Banner Flag House•The Eubie Blake Center•The Peale Museum•The Strand Theater•The Walters Art Museum
FY22-27 Request Highlights
• 127-054 Surplus Schools• $1,000,000 per year to
address schools returned to City stewardship from City Schools
• Funds would help retrofit buildings for re-use or be used to demolish buildings
25
QUESTIONS?
26