candidates' narrative strength part 2

109

Upload: dllavoy

Post on 26-Jan-2017

416 views

Category:

Marketing


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2
Page 2: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

NARRATIVE STRENGTH IS MEASURABLE.

CANDIDATES’ WEBSITES PROVE IT.PART

2

Page 3: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Part 1 of this deck talks about why this matters, and assesses the narrative strength (but not the merits of) HillaryClinton.com and DonaldjTrump.com

Page 4: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

This is part 2.We asses BernieSanders.com and TedCruz.org

And talk a little bit

Page 5: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Narratives win hearts and minds.

Page 6: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

When they’re powerful.

Page 7: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

But how do you make a narrative powerful?

Page 8: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

First you measure.

Page 9: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

You can measure how strong your narrative is.

We can use candidates’ websites to demonstrate.

Page 10: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

For the purposes of this discussion, we’re only looking at candidate websites.Yes. That’s a big simplification. But we’re making a point, not a campaign. So far.

Page 11: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Oh. You want to know what a narrative is?

Here are 3 useful definitions:

Page 12: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

1. A narrative is a system of beliefs that effect how you interpret the meaning of things.

Page 13: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

2. Your organizational narrative is the core of what you believe and why you matter.

Page 14: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

3. Your narrative is the basis of the many stories you need to tell to customers, prospects, employees.

Page 15: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

STORY VS NARRATIVE

Page 16: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

NARRATIVE

Page 17: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

STORY

Page 18: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

SO. HOW DO WE MEASURE NARRATIVE STRENGTH?

Page 19: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

WE NEED SOME CRITERIA. SO I’VE IDENTIFIED FIVE.

Page 20: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

PRESENTATIONHow well is the narrative is presented? Can I find it and follow it?Do I want to?

ONE

Page 21: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

How easy is it to understand? This can be the key issue in complex or technical narratives.

CLARITYTWO

Page 22: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Does it make me feel something? Does “it make sense”? Does it have supporting evidence?

RESONANCETHREE

Page 23: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

If I see it, and I get it, can I explain it to someone else? Do you encourage me to do that?

SHAREABILITYFOUR

Page 24: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

This measures how well your organization is managing its narrative internally. We have no inside knowledge of the campaigns, so we will skip this criterion in our assessments.

ORGANIZATIONFIVE

Page 25: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

So let’s check out HillaryClinton.com with this in mind.Note, we aren’t evaluating the merits, just the strength of the narrative.

Page 26: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

HOW STRONG IS THE NARRATIVE ON HILLARYCLINTON.COM?

Page 27: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

This is a simple page designed to engage existing supporters. “I’m with her” has morphed into “She’s with us” in recent days.

Page 28: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Scroll down and you see links to her “Racial Justice Plan” and “Economic Plan” People are probably interested in those. Wonder where that college plan is? Keep scrolling….

Page 29: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The likely next stop is this page.

Generic text. Generic image. Generic.Massive opportunity to do better.

Page 30: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Scroll down to an Issues List. It’s alphabetical .No prioritization, emotion, vision. No imagery. None.

Page 31: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

There are themes here, however. A little jiggering could slot all 28 issues into “Justice, Prosperity and Security”

That would be better.

Page 32: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

OK. There’s some vision and substance. Not very readable.

Page 33: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Further down the page. Good sharing buttons. A deeper, downloadable paper for nerds like me to read.

Page 34: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

FINDINGS

Page 35: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The narrative on this site is subtle and not particularly well presented. It is hard to point to the main message or themes. It would be challenging to explain it to someone else.

Page 36: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

We are surprised by the lack of interesting imagery or reference to her massive body of public service outside of her bio page.

We note a lack of any future focused theme or attempt to make an emotional connection with would be voters.

Page 37: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

SCSCORE – 8/32

Page 38: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

8/32. That score leaves a lot of narrative power, a lot of influence and a lot of impact on the table. This site is not serving its organization well. The only candidate site with a lower score was Jeb2016.com (we archived screenshots)

Page 39: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

8/32. But with a clear sense of what can be done to make it stronger. This score is both an “As-Is” and a way forward.

Page 40: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

If her campaign wanted to improve that score, they need to build out a narrative hierarchy and a presentation strategy.

Page 41: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

We’ll talk aout this more at the end.

Page 42: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

First, let’s check out DonaldJTrump.com with this in mind.Note, we aren’t evaluating the merits, just the strength of the narrative.

Page 43: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

HOW STRONG IS THE NARRATIVE ON DONALDJTRUMP.COM?

Page 44: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Vague but dramatic tag line.

Page 45: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Smirk face. Victory sign. Or maybe a peace sign?

Page 46: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Scroll down. This section changes frequently. This week it’s about his wins and anti-Rubio. Trumps site is very much about Trump.

Page 47: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

6 “Positions”. Up from 5. Of all the candidates, this is the fewest number of issues. Layout is OK.

Page 48: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Positions pages aren’t optimized for online reading and scanning. Easy to navigate on right. Yes. The wall is in there.

Page 49: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Look hard and you’ll find an Issues page in addition to the positions page. These are shorts of Trump speaking to the camera on hot topics. These are updated frequently.

Page 50: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

FINDINGS

Page 51: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The main theme of the home page “Make America Great Again” is referred to at the conclusion of each Position paper, but not elsewhere on the site.

Page 52: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The presentation is tidy and businesslike, but not exciting or engaging, though the issue videos are dramatic.

His position papers are clear, but not backed by data or details.

Page 53: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

There is minimal opportunity to share and minimal connection to social, which is surprising given the strength of the campaign’s social presence.

Again. We’re not evaluating the merits here.

Page 54: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

SCORE – 13/32

Page 55: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

13/32. Still leaving a lot on the table.

Page 56: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Hard to make recommendations about DonaldJTrump.com but there is a clear gap between “Make America Great” and the other information presented on the site.

Page 57: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Stay tuned for our analysis of the next candidates’ sites:

Berniesanders.comTedCruz.orgMarcoRubio.comJeb2016.comYours.

Page 58: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

HOW STRONG IS THE NARRATIVE ON BERNIESANDERS.COM?

Page 59: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

One, focused, statement.

Page 60: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Personal invokation

Page 61: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Generic image and headline. Emotional text. A little hard to scan. BUT…

Page 62: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The issues list is prioritized and action oriented, if not exactly organized around any core principles. And…

Page 63: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The issue pages are scannable, chart-rich, and evokative

Page 64: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

This volunteer form starts out the same as all the others BUT…

Page 65: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The rest of the form gets specific…

Page 66: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Every candidate has the “paid for by” footer (required by law) but Bernie makes a point with his. Details, details…

Page 67: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Lots of depth for the super-fans

Page 68: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

References external articles about him…. That adds credibility

Page 69: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Super-fans get a roadmap for volunteering

Page 70: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

They can start right from their homes, meeting others, they can get it on their calendars right away…

Page 71: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

The “organizers toolkit” is a complete activist in a box kit.This site is an organizer and activist factory. Pretty slick.

Page 72: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

What is interesting, is that this site has the means to serve as a hub for super-fans. Something none of the other sites have the capacity for.

Page 73: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

FINDINGS

Page 74: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Amongst the candidates websites, berniesanders.com is a standout. It demonstrates design savvy, narrative savvy and strategic engagement savvy.

Page 75: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

It is emotive, filled with many kinds of easily scannable and digestible supporting information, and reaches out to activate super-fans – something none of the others do.

Page 76: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

PRESENTATION0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.Is the narrative clearly presented on the organization’s website or other public-facing resource?

1

Is it easy to find and follow? 2

Is the presentation interesting? 2

Is the presentation connected to other digital assets that further develop the theme?(social, blog, video, whitepapers)

1

TOTAL 6

CLARITY0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.0-8 points. Each line Is it easy to understand? 2

Does it cover key points or are there significant gaps?

2

Does it flow naturally from one level of detail to the next?

2

Does it flow naturally from one topic to the next?

1

TOTAL 7

RESONANCE0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.0-8 points. Each line Does it evoke an emotional response in the viewer (emotional resonance)?

2

Does it “make sense” to people (intellectual resonance)?

2

Can it be applied to many situations and people?

1

Does it offer supporting information and proof points that lend credibility?

2

TOTAL 7

SHAREABILITY0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.Is it memorable? 2

Can most people explain it to someone else?

2

Do you encourage people to share the narrative?

2

Do you make it convenient for people to share it digitally?

2

TOTAL 8

SCORE – 28/32

Page 77: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

28/32 is a very strong score. But look at the score cards carefully, and there’s room to grow.

The improvements that will take this narrative to the top, however, will take real effort.

Page 78: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

What is the theme that holds all those policy positions together? How do we understand how those principles would apply to other situations?

Page 79: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

intHOW STRONG IS THE NARRATIVE ON TEDCRUZ.ORG?

Interesting that this is a .org. the rest are all .com

Page 80: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Lots of emotional words. “Join” “Movement” “Courageous”

Page 81: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Nice use of media.

(almost made me want to watch it)

Page 82: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Nice use of imagery. Powerful headlines.

Page 83: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

This is interesting… the only candidate app that I found.

Page 84: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Issue pages themselves have evolved since February. Many had read like a resume more than a position paper. They’ve added more proposals and positions. This is Cruz demonstrating his bona fides. (again, not on the merits)

Page 85: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

TedCruz.org has a slightly different approach to the volunteer thing.

Page 86: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

His site asks you to self-identify on your demographic and issue. This is smart. Now the campaign knows who his super-fans are.

Page 87: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

FINDINGS

Page 88: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

TedCruz.org is pretty clear on its message, and is relatively well organized.

Good use of imagery and video. Visible social sharing.

There is a strong conservative religious theme across all.

Page 89: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

His plans are often buried in resume, but he does get there in the end. We particularly note the simple tax plan and the 5 government agencies he plans to shut down. (including the IRS and the Depts of Energy, Education, Commerce, Housing and Urban Dev.).

Page 90: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

There’s a bit of “New Speak” reframing social issues as constitutional freedoms.

In particular, he uses the constitution to argue against secularism.

Page 91: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Reframing is a smart and effective narrative strategy. (NB. Not the merits)

Page 92: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

PRESENTATION0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.Is the narrative clearly presented on the organization’s website or other public-facing resource?

2

Is it easy to find and follow? 2

Is the presentation interesting? 1

Is the presentation connected to other digital assets that further develop the theme?(social, blog, video, whitepapers)

2

TOTAL 7

CLARITY0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.0-8 points. Each line Is it easy to understand? 1

Does it cover key points or are there significant gaps?

1

Does it flow naturally from one level of detail to the next?

1

Does it flow naturally from one topic to the next?

1

TOTAL 4

RESONANCE0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.0-8 points. Each line Does it evoke an emotional response in the viewer (emotional resonance)?

2

Does it “make sense” to people (intellectual resonance)?

1

Can it be applied to many situations and people?

2

Does it offer supporting information and proof points that lend credibility?

2

TOTAL 7

SHAREABILITY0-8 points. Each line 0-2 points.Is it memorable? 1

Can most people explain it to someone else?

2

Do you encourage people to share the narrative?

1

Do you make it convenient for people to share it digitally?

1

TOTAL 5

SCORE – 23/32

Page 93: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

23/32 is a respectable score. The website should focus on simplifying and clarifying the position papers, which it appears to be doing.

Page 94: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

So. What did we learn? How do you build a powerful narrative?

Page 95: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

First, examine, answer and refine the four questions:

Page 96: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

1. What’s the big idea and how do you want people to feel about it?

Page 97: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

2. What’s your approach, point of view or methodology for achieving that ideal?

Page 98: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

3. What’s your actual offer or plan? What are you doing to implement that point of view or approach?

Page 99: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

4. What’s your proof that your approach is right? Data? Testimonials? Respected third parties?

Page 100: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

(Answering those questions isn’t as easy as it looks.)

Page 101: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

(You knew that.)

Page 102: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Next, construct a presentation that evokes the right emotions, guides people to the right info, and is easy and delightful to consume.

Page 103: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Test it against the scorecard. Not you. Ask someone else.

How are you doing?

Page 104: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Measure, learn and improve.

Page 105: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Don’t forget. Your website is just one piece of your narrative.

Your content and social presence, your media presence, and importantly, what your market believes, is equally important.

Page 106: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Remember that narratives aren’t just for marketing and winning votes.

Narratives align your team, clarify business strategy and product roadmaps. They flavor customer service.

Page 107: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Narratives align your team, clarify business strategy and product roadmaps. They flavor customer service.

Page 108: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Your narrative is your organization.

Page 109: Candidates' narrative strength   part 2

Want to talk about narratives?www.narrativebuilders.com@[email protected]