cameroon economic update no.6, july2013

Upload: world-bank-cameroon

Post on 08-Aug-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    1/40

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    2/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update

    Twa Geate Equt

    A Special Focus on Health

    July 2013

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    3/40

    2013 International Bank or Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank

    1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433

    Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org

    Some rights reserved

    This work is a product o the sta o The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank

    does not necessarily own each component o the content included in the work. The World Bank thereore does

    not warrant that the use o the content contained in the work will not inringe on the rights o third parties.

    The risk o claims resulting rom such inringement rests solely with you.

    The ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily relect the views o

    The World Bank, its Board o Executive Directors, or the Governments they represent. The World Bank does not

    guarantee the accuracy o the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other

    inormation shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part o The World Bank concerning

    the legal status o any territory or the endorsement or acceptance o such boundaries.

    Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver o the privileges and immunities

    o The World Bank, all o which are specically reserved.

    Photo credits:

    Raju Singh/World Bank - Cover: Middle photo

    Edmond Bagde Dingamhoudou/World Bank - Cover: Let & Right photos; pages vii, 1 & 25.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    4/40

    table of Contents

    AbbrEiATions And Acronyms .......................................................................................... v

    AcKnoWLEdGEmEnTs ........................................................................................................... v

    inTrodUcTion .......................................................................................................................... 1

    rEcEnT Economic dEELopmEnTs ....................................................................................3

    Growth ........................................................................................................................................................3

    Inflation .......................................................................................................................................................4

    Fiscal Performance ....................................................................................................................................5

    Outlook for 2013.........................................................................................................................................6

    Options for Going Forward ........................................................................................................................ 7

    HEALTH in cAmEroon........................................................................................................... 15Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 15

    Cameroons Health Prole ........................................................................................................................ 15

    Resource Allocation ...................................................................................................................................19

    Options for Going Forward ...................................................................................................................... 25

    rEFErEncEs ........................................................................................................................... 29

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    5/40

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    6/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update

    abbreviations and aCronyms

    BEAC Banque des tats dArique Centrale (Central Bank o Central Arican States)

    CAR Central Arican Republic

    CEMAC Communaut conomique et Montaire de lArique Centrale

    (Economic and Monetary Community o Central Arica)CFAF CFA Franc

    CPI Consumer Price Index

    CU Customs Union

    DHS Demographic Health Survey

    DRC Democratic Republic o Congo

    ECCAS Economic Community o Central Arican States

    ECOWAS Economic Community o West Arican States

    GDP Gross Domestic ProductHMIS Health Management Inormation System

    IMF International Monetary Fund

    LPG Liqueed Petroleum Gas

    MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey

    MOH Ministry o Health

    OPSF Oil Price Stabilization Fund

    RBF Results-Based Financing

    SAM Social Accounting Matrix

    SNH Socit Nationale des Hydrocarbures (national oil company)

    SONARA Socit Nationale de Rafnage (national renery)

    US$ United States Dollar

    VAT Value Added Tax

    WEO World Economic Outlook

    WHO World Health Organization

    y-o-y Year-on-year

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    7/40

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    8/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update

    aCKnoWledGements

    The Cameroon Economic Updates are produced by

    a Team led by Raju Jan Singh. Abel Bove and Paul

    Jacob Robyn prepared the chapter on health under

    the supervision o Gaston Sorgho. For this purpose,

    the Team has built upon the recently-completed

    Country Health Status Report or Cameroon. Franck

    Adoho, Thomas Dickenson, Carlo del Ninno, and

    Christian Zamo carried out the work on uel subsidies.

    OtherTeam members include Simon Dietrich, Sylvie

    Ndze, and Manuella Lea Palmioli.

    Comments received rom Ulrich Bartsch, Jrome

    Bezzina, Dominic Haazen, Santiago Herrera,

    Faustin-Ange Koyasse, Katherine Manchester, Ha Thi

    Hong Nguyen, Hannah Nielsen, Dominique Njinkeu,

    Cia Sjetnan, and Erik von Uexkull are grateully

    acknowledged. Greg Binkert (Country Director or

    Cameroon), Mark Thomas (Sector Manager), and

    Olivier Godron (Country Program Coordinator)

    provided guidance and advice, and have been an

    invaluable source o encouragement.

    The Team has also greatly beneted rom consultations

    with Cameroons key policy makers and analysts, who

    provided important insights, in particular the ollowing

    institutions: the BEAC, the Technical Monitoring

    Committee (CTS), the Ministry o Economy and

    Planning, the Ministry o Finance, and the National

    Institute o Statistics. The Team is also grateul to their

    colleagues at the International Monetary Fund.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    9/40

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    10/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update 1

    introdUCtion

    With these Cameroon Economic Updates, the World

    Bank is pursuing a program o short and requent

    reports analyzing the trends and constraints in

    Cameroons economic development. Each issue,

    produced bi-annually, provides an update o recent

    economic developments, as well as a special ocus

    on a topical issue.

    The Cameroon Economic Updates aim to share

    knowledge and stimulate debate among those

    interested in improving the economic management

    o Cameroon and unleashing its enormous potential.

    The notes thereby oer another voice on economic

    issues in Cameroon, and an additional platorm

    or engagement, learning and exchange. This sixth

    issue o the Cameroon Economic Updates is entitled

    Towards Greater Equity A Special Focus on Health.

    There has been little improvement in Cameroons

    health indicators over the past two decades. The

    under-ve child mortality rate has only been reduced

    slightly, while lie expectancy has, in act, declined.

    The burden o health care nancing is largely born by

    households, and risk-pooling mechanisms are quasi-

    inexistent. Furthermore, the limited public resources

    allocated to health do not seem to be deployed

    where they are most needed. As a result, substantial

    disparities exist in health outcomes between rural and

    urban areas, as well as across socio-economic groups.

    The introduction o program budgeting in 2013

    should improve the efciency o public spending. Line

    ministries will have now more lexibility in preparing

    and executing their budgets, but will also be held

    accountable or results. In addition, an eective

    data collection and management system would help

    decision-makers monitor health outcomes more

    regularly and ensure that budgetary allocations are

    based on needs and perormance. Cameroon could

    also begin taking steps towards an extension o

    prepayment and risk-pooling mechanisms, such as

    mutual health organization and mandatory ormal

    sector insurance. By reducing individual costs, such

    policies would increase access to health services or

    the poor and protect them rom spending shocks due

    to health emergencies.

    A results-based approach in health, which provides

    unding based on results and rewards perormance

    through additional budgetary allocations and

    bonuses, is currently being piloted in Cameroon.

    The preliminary results o this approach are

    encouraging. An extension o this initiative may be an

    option to improve health services and outcomes, and

    ensure greater coverage o health services.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    11/40

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    12/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update 3

    reCent eConomiC developments

    Growth

    In spite o slow economic growth worldwide, recent

    estimates conirm that Cameroons economy

    continued to gain momentum in 2012 (Figure 1).

    Growth is estimated to have reached 4.4 percent

    in 2012 (compared with 4.2 percent in 2011) on the

    back o continued strong perormance both in oil and

    non-oil activities. Credit to the economy has, however,

    been subdued, rising by 2.6 percent.

    As in 2011, the tertiary sector was the main driver

    o growth, expanding by more than 5 percent, with

    transports, communications and nancial services

    being particularly dynamic. In the primary sector,

    economic growth was mainly driven by industrial

    and export-oriented agriculture, especially by the

    production o coee, cotton and rubber (Figure 2).

    Cotton production, or instance, is estimated to have

    expanded by more than a third ollowing the return

    o armers to the sector coupled by an expansion o

    production areas.

    Problems related to electricity production and

    delays in the oil sector have dampened, however,

    economic perormance and pushed growth to

    the lower end o our projection range. Activities in

    electricity, gas, and water slowed down in 2012,

    expanding by a mere 0.4 percent (compared with

    3.6 percent in 2011) because o low rainall and

    delays in the operations o the new gas-ired power

    plant in Kribi. Worsening electricity shortalls have,in turn, hampered the aluminum sector: estimated

    exports were down by a third in 2012.

    In the oil sector, as expected, the downward trend

    in production observed over the past years was

    reversed in 2012 and oil production expanded to

    22.4 million barrels, compared to 21.6 million barrels

    the year beore (Figure 3). This reversal also allowed

    an expansion in oil exports, narrowing the countrys

    external trade deicit rom 2.3 percent o GDP in

    2011 to 1.6 percent o GDP in 2012. The pick-up in

    oil production was, however, lower than projected

    fiGUre 1: sc Cu

    Gdp Gwh, 200712(n rcnt)

    2007

    Primary Sector Secondary Sector (excl . oi l)

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    6

    4

    2

    0

    2

    GDP Growth

    Oil

    Tertiary Sector

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 2: ex pc, 2012(y-o-y rcnt chng n volum )

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    Aluminum Cocoa Logsand woodproducts

    Bananas Coffee Cotton

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    13/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update4

    (at 3.5 percent instead o 5.1 percent) because o

    operating delays in new elds.

    Economic growth remains nevertheless disappointing

    in Cameroon. Poor inrastructure, an unavorable

    business environment, and weak governance

    continue to hamper economic activity and make

    it diicult to reach the growth rates needed to

    reduce poverty in a sustainable manner. The rates

    o economic growth observed over the recent

    past have not been ast enough to deliver tangible

    improvements in the living conditions or the average

    Cameroonian. Overall, poverty rates in Cameroon

    have virtually stagnated between 2001 and 2007,

    and disparities between regions have widened, as

    pointed out in previous issues o our Cameroon

    Economic Update. Meanwhile, many other Arican

    countries have managed to reduce their poverty

    rates, sometimes quite signicantly (Figure 4).

    Ination

    The pace o inlation slowed down in 2012, remaining

    below the 3 percent regional convergence criterion

    (Figure 5). The overall price level increased by

    2.5 percent in December (y-o-y) compared to

    2.7 percent over the same period the year beore.

    fiGUre 4: ruc p, sc

    Cu, e 2000-l 2000,(n rcnt o oulton)

    Cameroon

    Tanzania

    Burkina

    Faso

    Benin

    Swaziland

    Zambia

    Mali

    Botswana

    Rwanda

    16

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 5: sc pc: 200612(y-o-y chng n rcnt)

    Total (Headline) CPIFood Price Index

    4

    2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    Ap

    r-

    06

    Au

    g-

    06

    De

    c-

    06

    Ap

    r-

    07

    Au

    g-

    07

    De

    c-

    07

    Ap

    r-

    08

    Au

    g-

    08

    De

    c-

    08

    Ap

    r-

    09

    Au

    g-

    09

    De

    c-

    09

    Ap

    r-

    10

    Au

    g-

    10

    De

    c-

    10

    Ap

    r-

    11

    Au

    g-

    11

    De

    c-

    11

    Ap

    r-

    12

    Au

    g-

    12

    De

    c-

    12

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 3: o puc 20022012(n mo rrl)

    Source: SNH.

    4

    9

    24

    19

    14

    29

    39

    44

    34

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    14/40

    reCent eConomiC developments 5

    Inlation was mainly driven by pressures on ood

    prices, peaking at 4.5 percent (y-o-y) in May, but

    subsiding ollowing improved ood distribution

    and strong harvests. The stability o retail prices

    or petroleum products has also contributed to

    containing inlationary pressures.

    The rise in prices is, however, unevenly spread across

    the countrys territory (Figure 6). In 2012, inlation

    was lowest in Yaound and Douala, the two main

    cities, with rates at 1.0 and 2.1 percent on average,

    respectively. Price pressures were the highest in

    Maroua (Far North) at 5.5 percent. These price

    pressures were partly the result o the widespread

    loods in the region in August and September which

    caused substantial material destruction, including

    homes, agricultural land (rice ields primarily),

    and killed an important number o livestock. Thedierence in inlation rates may also indicate poor

    inrastructure, especially in the North, making it

    expensive to transport goods.

    Fiscal Performance

    On the iscal side, the latest estimations or 2012

    are consistent with the projections presented in

    the January 2013 issue o the Cameroon Economic

    Update (see Table 1). On a cash basis, the overall

    2012 deicit (including grants and beore payment

    obligations) is estimated to be lower than budgeted,

    primarily as a result o higher oil revenues caused

    by stronger-than-expected international oil prices.

    Estimated total spending was in line with the

    budget, with slight slippages in current spending

    compensated by lower capital outlays in the last

    quarter o the year. As a result, the non-oil primary

    deicit is estimated to have shrunk by almost two

    percentage points o non-oil GDP, going rom

    8.6 percent o non-oil GDP in 2011 to 6.7 percent o

    non-oil GDP in 2012.

    fiGUre 6: ag i mj C(n rcnt)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Yaound

    Douala

    Bua

    National

    Ngaoundr

    Garoua

    Bertoua

    Ebolowa

    Bamenda

    Bafoussam

    Maroua

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    table 1: fc pc, 201112(n rcnt o Gdp)

    2011Est. 2012Budget 2012Jan Proj. 2012Est.

    revenue and Gant 18.8 17.8 18.9 18.9

    Oil Revenue 5.3 4.4 5.1 5.4

    Non-oil Revenue 13.0 12.9 13.2 13.1

    Grants 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4

    Ttal spending 21.8 20.0 19.7 20.0

    Current Spending 15.4 13.8 13.5 14.1

    Capital Spending 6.4 6.2 6.2 5.9

    oveall balance 3.0 2.2 0.8 1.1

    Payment Obligations 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.9

    oveall balance n a cah ai 3.5 2.4 1.0 2.0

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    15/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update6

    These narrower scal decits on a cash basis relect,

    however, a continued accumulation o new payment

    obligations (particularly related to uel subsidies).

    These payment obligations the stock o which is

    estimated to have reached about 5 percent o GDP

    at end 2012 will continue to put pressure on the

    Governments cash position. SONARA, the national

    oil renery, as well as uel importers, aces revenue

    shortalls stemming rom the Governments policy

    o reezing retail prices or petroleum products.

    As mentioned in previous issues o our Economic

    Update, the budgeted amount or compensating

    or these costs alls short o the likely actual gures:

    in 2012 an estimated CFAF 450 billion (3.5 percent

    o GDP) was needed instead o the CFAF 170 billion

    that was budgeted. Despite the cancellation o

    substantial levels o unpaid taxes, an accumulation

    o new payment obligations to SONARA reaching

    0.3 percent o GDP could not be prevented in 2012.

    Outlook for 2013

    With the construction o large inrastructure projectsand continued eorts to improve agricultural

    productivity, the economic momentum observed

    in 2012 is expected to carry over into 2013. The

    production at the Kribi gas station (216 MW) is

    expected to reduce power bottlenecks. In addition,

    the arrival o a new operator in the telecommunication

    sector is expected to oster investment and activity in

    this sector. Furthermore, the oil sector is projected to

    continue its recovery, with production estimated to

    increase by a urther 15 percent in 2013. This wouldpush overall economic growth to about 5 percent

    in 2013.

    Uncertainty, however, will likely continue to surround

    developments in advanced economies, making

    any economic projections particularly challenging.

    According to the most recent release rom the

    European Commission, condence remains weak in

    the Eurozone and will continue to weigh on investment

    and big-ticket consumption decisions (Figure 7). The

    regular quarterly surveys o proessional orecasters,

    carried out by the European Central Bank, capture

    this growing gloom. The average 2013 growth orecast

    or the Eurozone has declined over the past quarters,indicating now the expectations o a continued

    economic contraction (Figure 8).

    More worrisome, the latest vintages o the IMFs World

    Economic Outlook indicate continuous downward

    revisions or projected imports or Cameroons

    main export markets, with demand in many markets

    expected to decline in 2013 (Figure 9). Import

    volumes are now expected to decrease in Spain and

    Italy the irst and ith largest export markets or

    Cameroon by about 5 percent and 3.5 percent,

    respectively. Furthermore, the pick-up in the economy

    fiGUre 8: eu-Z 2013 Gdp Gwh m

    p pjc(n rcnt)

    1

    0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    2010 2011 2012 2013

    Fourth Quarter 2012

    First Quarter 2013

    Second Quarter 2013

    Sources: Survey o Proessional Forecasters, European Central Bank.

    fiGUre 7: eu-z ecc s

    ic, 201013(inx 100 = 2000)

    80

    85

    90

    95

    110

    105

    100

    Feb-10

    Apr-10

    Jun-10

    Aug-10

    Oct-10

    Dec-10

    Feb-11

    Apr-11

    Jun-11

    Aug-11

    Oct-11

    Dec-11

    Feb-12

    Apr-12

    Jun-12

    Aug-12

    Oct-12

    Dec-12

    Feb-13

    Apr-13

    Source: European Commission.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    16/40

    reCent eConomiC developments 7

    expected in the Netherlands and France six months

    ago has given way to a prospect even gloomier than

    a year ago. Although remaining in posit ive territory,

    even projections or demand in China have been

    subject to downward revisions.

    Concerning scal perormance, on the basis o the

    rst quarter, the projections or 2013 would indicatea wider overall iscal deicit in Cameroon than in

    2012. Budgeted revenues are based on ambitious

    expectations or the countrys economic growth

    and or international prices or crude, and thereby

    are subject to downside risks. Furthermore, the

    cost o uel subsidies remains under budgeted,

    which undermines transparency, and will weigh

    again on the cash position and execution o the

    budget. A continued reeze o retail petroleum prices

    would require an estimated CFAF 430 billion (about

    3 percent o GDP), but only CFAF 220 billion have

    been budgeted. Upcoming local elections could add

    urther pressure on spending, as could the resolution

    o the situation o some nancially troubled banks and

    nancial losses expected rom certain state-owned

    enterprises.

    Options for going forward

    Against this backdrop, eorts to increase the

    Cameroonian economys resilience to shocks should

    be strengthened, possibly through increased trade

    diversiication, prudent debt management, and

    increased eiciency in public spending. The latter

    would include an examination o the various possible

    options to reduce the budgetary burden caused by

    subsidies, especially those or petroleum products.

    Diversiying trade partners

    W i t h h i g h - i n c o m e c o u n t r i e s c o n t i n u i n g t o

    restructure, rebalance, and restore their iscal

    policies to a sustainable path, export prospects to

    table 2: fc pc, 2013(n Cfaf llon)

    2013Budget

    2013Q1

    2013Est.

    revenue and Gant 2649 586 2582

    Oil Revenue 705 100 711

    Non-oil Revenue 1878 486 1815

    Grants 66 0 56

    Ttal spending 2971 468 3078

    Current Spending 2014 366 2207

    Capital Spending 957 102 871

    oveall balance 322 118 496

    Arrears 26 44 44

    oveall balance n a cah ai 348 74 540

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 9: 2013 i vu pjc,

    m tg p(vrton n rcnt)

    6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

    Italy

    France

    China

    Netherlands

    Spain

    WEO Apr-2012 WEO Sep-2012 WEO Apr-2013

    Source: International Monetary Fund.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    17/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update8

    Cameroons traditional markets will remain limited.

    In this environment, Cameroon could think about

    diversiying its export markets even urther away rom

    its traditional partners. A more diversiied product

    base, as well as more diversiied markets, would

    increase the resilience o the economy and reduce

    its vulnerability to external shocks.

    More than hal o developing country trade is now

    with other developing countries (up rom 37 percent

    in 2001). Even excluding Chinas exports to other

    developing countries and its imports rom them, trade

    between the remaining developing countries has also

    outpaced trade with high-income countries by a wide

    margin over the last decade. Interestingly, the rapid

    expansion o intra-developing country trade relects

    more than just trade in commodities, with the value

    o developing-country exports o manuactures rising

    at about the same rate as the value o commodities

    as a whole.

    As already pointed out in last years July issue o

    ou r Cameroon Economic Update, Cameroon is

    ideally positioned to take advantage o the economicopportunities oered by greater trade. Due to its

    strategic location neighboring Nigeria, the Democratic

    Republic o Congo (DRC), and Gabon, and potential

    crossing point to the landlocked countries o Central

    Arica (Chad and the CAR), Cameroon is a natural

    hub or the region with the port o Douala as the main

    entrance.

    In addition, the country is diverse with a geography

    that ranges rom Sahelian semi-desert in the norththrough grassland to equatorial orest in the south,

    avoring varied economic and agricultural activities.

    Furthermore, Cameroon is endowed with signicant

    natural resources, including oil, high value timber

    species, and agricultural products (coee, cotton,

    cocoa). Untapped resources include natural gas,

    bauxite, diamonds, gold, iron, and cobalt.

    Seizing trade opportunities in the regional context

    could provide a good learning ground or becoming

    competitive on the world scene. The region seems to

    oer promising markets or Cameroonian products,

    especially agricultural ones, and may be easier to

    enter, as their standards would be closer to those o

    Cameroon. In this regard, the CEMAC Customs Union

    (CU) should become a reality through the adoption

    o a harmonized tari nomenclature, standards,

    common customs regulations, and a regional

    payment system. Beyond CEMAC, there would be a

    need to acilitate trade between CEMAC countries and

    the DRC, as well as the rest o the ECCAS.1 Cameroon

    could also capitalize on the trading potential with

    the vast consumer market in Nigeria and, through

    Nigeria, access the entire ECOWAS regional market.2

    Traders in Cameroon are still aced, however, with

    burdensome procedures or both exports and

    imports. It takes or instance 12 documents to import

    a commodity and 11 documents to export one in

    Cameroon as compared to an average o about 6 to

    8 in a sample o emerging economies. Port efciency

    needs to be improved. Dwell time at Douala the

    amount o time a shipment waits at the port was

    18.6 days in 2010, compared to an average dwell

    time o our days in Durban (South Arica), 11 days

    in Mombassa (Kenya) and 14 days in Dar es Salaam

    (Tanzania). Movements o reight inland should also

    be made easier and cheaper. This would require, in

    addition to better roads, a more competitive transport

    sector and ewer roadblocks.

    Prudent debt management

    The most recent joint IMF-World Bank low-income

    country debt sustainability analysis indicates thatCameroons risk o debt distress remains low, opening

    the possibility or some limited non-concessional

    1 CEMAC reers to the Economic and Monetary Community o

    Central Arica. Member countries include Cameroon, Chad, the

    Central Arican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and the

    Republic o Congo. ECCAS (the Economic Community o Central

    Arican States) is a wider grouping o Central Arican States and

    includes, in addition to the CEMAC countries, Angola, Burundi,

    the Democratic Republic o Congo, Rwanda, and Sao Tome and

    Principe.

    2 ECOWAS (the Economic Community o West Arican States)includes Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Cte dIvoire, Gambia,

    Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria,

    Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    18/40

    reCent eConomiC developments 9

    borrowing. In this context, the authorities are actively

    using the room provided by the countrys low level

    o public debt to tap non-traditional creditors and

    the nascent domestic capital market by issuing a

    Government bond and Treasury bills (Figure 10).

    These provide alternative sources o inancing or

    the budget, complementing any possible shortall in

    scal savings.

    Tapping the emerging domestic capital market could,

    however, also be a source o vulnerability. In this

    regard, eorts to create a liquid secondary market

    or Government bonds would help sustain investors

    interest in uture bond issues. Improvements in scal

    reporting would also oster investors conidence,

    since it will make the Governments iscal position

    more transparent. Furthermore, stronger project

    selection and preparation would contribute to

    ensuring that the proceeds o new borrowing wouldbe put at the most productive use.

    As the Government is turning to non-traditional

    creditors and non-concessional external borrowing,

    its debt management capacity would also need to

    be strengthened, building on recent achievements.

    The ongoing crisis in advanced economies oers in

    this regard both opportunities and challenges. Banks

    in advanced economies seem to be increasingly

    interested in Cameroons economy, attracted by itseconomic growth and low debt levels. At the same

    time, the nancial conditions attached to these loans

    may not always be attractive or the country or be

    easily analyzed.

    The National Committee or Debt Management hasbecome ully operational and its Technical Committee

    is meeting regularly to discuss technical issues on

    debt management. The authorities are strengthening

    their analytical capacity to better analyze oreign

    lending proposals and are making progress in the

    preparation o a Medium-Term Debt Management

    Strategy. Protection against operational risks has

    also improved with a more rigorous and secure debt

    recording system, ensuring sae backups o the

    databases. However, the legal ramework governingdebt management could be claried and institutional

    responsibilities centralized.

    More efective public spending

    Cameroon could also try to increase the value o

    the public money it spends. In many areas, public

    spending does not seem to be going where it

    could have the highest impact. Per student public

    investment in primary education does not seem to be

    driven by the needs o classrooms, or instance (i.e.

    the number o students by classrooms). According

    to the data rom the project logbook (Jo ur na l

    des projets), the departments where the number

    o pupils per classroom was the highest in 2011

    fiGUre 10: puc d, 200412(n rcnt o Gdp)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 11: puc i p

    euc (2012) . nu su(2011)

    0

    0 80 120 140604020

    Number of students per classroom

    100 160

    6

    4

    2

    8

    12

    14

    10

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    19/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update10

    received the least investment per pupil the ollowing

    year (Figure 11).3 As we will see in the next chapter, a

    similar observation can be made in the health sector.

    Reducing the fiscal burdeno uel subsidies

    The composition o public spending could also be

    examined to enhance its eiciency. In this regard,

    the increasingly signiicant burden represented by

    subsidies, particularly uel subsidies, is a source o

    concern. The costs in terms o GDP related to the

    3The project logbook covers public investment by project. Only3050 percent o the total investment o budget (deconcentrated

    and decentralized spending, as well as some centralized

    expenditure) can be mapped geographically.

    fiGUre 13: C fu su sc

    Cu, 2012(n rcnt o Gdp)

    0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    Cameroon Congo Chad EquatorialGuinea

    Gabon Averageoil-exporters

    Sources : CEMAC member countries and IMF Staf estimations.

    fiGUre 15: du fu su

    (xc. k) ic Gu

    lc(n rcnt)

    Urban Rural

    0

    20

    40

    60

    50

    30

    10

    2Thepoorest

    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Therichest

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 14: du fu su

    lc(n rcnt)

    Urban Rural

    0

    20

    60

    40

    100

    80

    Fuel (minus kerosene) Kerosene

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 12: C fu su, 20082012(n rcnt o Gdp)

    0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    .

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities, IMF Staf estimations.

    decision to reeze retail uel prices have steadily

    increased and are the highest in the region (Figures 12

    and 13), putting pressure on other budgetary items

    that may be more conducive to growth or shared

    prosperity.

    Subsidies on petroleum products (excluding

    kerosene) benet mainly the richest segment o the

    urban population: the richest 10 percent (Figures 14

    and 15). By contrast, subsidies on kerosene, used

    mostly or lighting, avor more the rural areas and

    are less biased, although the richest still benet the

    most rom this policy (Figure 16). Even in terms o

    peoples income (estimated by their consumption),

    uel subsidies do not avor the poorest segments

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    20/40

    reCent eConomiC developments 11

    o Cameroons population, representing only about

    2 percent o their income (Figure 17).

    Transport, public administration and orestry are the

    most important consumers o petroleum products

    and thus the largest beneiciaries in absolute

    terms o the reeze in uel prices (Figure 18). The

    transport sector accounts or 30 percent o total

    intermediary uel consumption (i.e. uel not directly

    used by consumers or exported), while the public

    administration and orestry each account or about

    15 percent. Agriculture, although representing a

    large share o economic activity and employment,

    is only a marginal consumer o uel even when

    the transport o agriculture products is taken into

    account (1.3 percent o total intermediary uel

    consumption).

    The need or these subsidies, as well as the various

    possible options to reduce the budgetary burden they

    represent, should be openly and candidly discussed.

    As highlighted by other countries experience (Box 1),

    a comprehensive and careully planned approach

    is essential. The context and constraints to reorm

    should be appropriately analyzed and understood

    beore making any decisions on the sequencing,

    timing, and extent o price changes. Consultations

    with stakeholders and the population at large should

    also be undertaken to determine an acceptable and

    sufcient package o compensatory measures and

    avoid surprises.

    In this regard, interviews and discussions with ocal

    groups undertaken in Cameroon on the subject o uelsubsidies have revealed a very low level o knowledge

    on the issue. This would suggest that a signiicant

    eort is still required to communicate both the cost

    and benets o the current subsidy policies, and the

    importance o reorm, notably in terms o scal space

    available or public investments. A phasing out o uel

    subsidies would create the scal space or urgently

    needed investments in other sectors. Reallocating the

    CFAF 430 billion (3 percent o GDP and 17 percent o

    total Government revenue) projected to be spent onuel subsidies in 2013 to sectors such as education or

    health could signicantly improve the living conditions

    fiGUre 16: du K su

    ic Gu lc(n rcnt)

    Urban Rural

    0

    2

    6

    8

    4

    10

    12

    2Thepoorest

    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Therichest

    Sources:Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 17: fu su sh

    Cu ic Gu(n rcnt)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    2Thepoorest

    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Therichest

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 18: fu Cu sc(n rcnt o totl ntrmry ul conumton)

    Fishing2%

    Forestry

    14%

    Transport

    30%

    Agriculture

    1%

    Other

    37%

    Public

    Administration

    16%

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    21/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update12

    bx 1: rg fu su - sc C su

    Indonesia (1997-2005)

    Context: Reorming uel subsidies has been a persistent policy challenge in Indonesia. Indonesia has attempted to

    tackle subsidy reorm a number o times to improve the scal position and achieve other policy objectives such as

    improving energy efciency and protecting the environment.

    Reforms since 1997: The rst two attempts o cutting subsidies in 19 98 and 2003 were unsuccessul. Drastic cuts

    instead o a gradual approach, poor communication and general dissatisaction with the Government led to violent

    protests and the measures were nally rolled back. Concerned over the increasing scal pressure rom uel subsidies,

    the Government undertook two large uel price increases in 2005. As a result, the price o diesel uel doubled and that

    o kerosene nearly tripled. Protests again took place in opposition to the reorm, but with less intensity than beore. The

    Government was led by President Yudhoyono who was rst elected in 2004 and won a convincing reelection in 2009.

    Mitigating measures: The 2005 reorms were accompanied by unconditional cash transers or the poor which

    covered 19.2 million households (35 percent o the population). Other measures included the health insurance or thepoor program, school operational assistance program, and expanded rural inrastructure support project. A number

    o analyses have credited the reduced intensity o protests in 2005 to the creation o these welare programs.

    Lessons: A rapid reduction in subsidies can generate opposition to reorm, while a popular Government and a clear

    communication strategy increase the likelihood o success. Targeted cash transers have proved to be eective and

    popular mitigating measures.

    Philippines (1996)

    Context: The Philippines are a net oil importer. Until the late 1990s, the downstream oil sector was heavily regulated,

    resulting in price subsidies o uel products when international oil prices rose. The Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF)

    stabilized domestic prices o uel products by collecting or paying out the dierence between regulated domestic pricesand actual import costs. Increases in domestic prices were politically difcult to implement. As a result, the national

    Government had to replenish regularly the OPSF.

    Reforms: Initially, the political environment was not conducive to a uel subsidies reorm, because President Ramos

    had won the election only by a small margin and his party was a minority in both chambers o Congress. Nevertheless,

    a public communication campaign began at an early stage and included a nationwide road-show to inorm the public

    o the problems o oil price subsidies. While the presidents party was a minority in Congress, he set up a coordination

    body between the executive and the two chambers o Congress and used it to prioritize the oil deregulation bill and

    orge consensus on it. In 1996, the Government passed the law to abolish the OPSF and allow the prices to move

    reely. The industry remains liberalized today and movements in international oil prices have been passed through

    onto domestic prices.

    Mitigating measures: The 1996 law included a transition period during which uel product prices were adjusted monthly

    using an automatic pricing mechanism. During this period, the Government provided transers to the OPSF to absorb

    price increases in excess o a threshold. More recently, the authorities announced several measures to mitigate the

    impact o the ood and uel crisis in mid-2008. The Government launched a package o pro-poor spending programs

    that are nanced by windall VAT revenue rom high oil prices. The policy package included electricity subsidies or

    indigent amilies, college scholarships or low-income students, and subsidized loans to convert engines o public

    transportation to less costly LPGs. In addition, the Government distributed subsidized rice to low-income amilies and

    started a conditional cash transer program.

    Lessons: The Philippines experience underscores the importance o planning, persistence, and a good communication

    plan in achieving a successul outcome. The survival o the reorm to date can be attributed due to its comprehensiveness

    and mitigating measures or the poor during the 2008 uel price hike which helped maintain popular support.

    Source: International Monetary Fund (2013a).

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    22/40

    reCent eConomiC developments 13

    o Cameroons people, its human capital, and its

    productivity. The eect on the overall price level would

    also be limited.

    An increase in uel prices could have direct and

    indirect eects on the cost o living or households.

    Directly, households are aected through their own

    consumption o gasoline or kerosene. Indirectly, they

    are also aected since petroleum products are used

    as intermediary products in many sectors and their

    higher price will eed into the price o the nal good

    produced by these sectors.

    To capture both these eects, the interdependence o

    sectors needs to be taken into account and a Social

    Accounting Matrix (SAM) multiplier analysis has

    been used or this purpose. A SAM is an input-output

    table, representing the transactions being carried

    out between sectors or a given year. It describes

    all the income received and expenditures made by

    households and various sectors, thus capturing the

    linkages within the economy.

    Using this ramework, the hypothetical eect on

    prices o several scenarios or uel price reorm can

    be simulated or il lustrative purposes. Removing all

    uel subsidies, or instance, would imply an increase

    o 43 percent, 55 percent, and 105 percent or

    gasoline, diesel, and kerosene, respectively, and lead

    to a one-time adjustment o about 3 percent in the

    overall price level (Figure 19). The highest increases

    fiGUre 20: ag t pc: a G

    C, 2007

    (n Us cnt r tkm)

    0 5 10 15

    Africa: Mombasa-Kampala

    Africa: Douala-NDjamena

    Africa: Lome-Ouagadougou

    Africa: Durban-Lusaka

    China

    United States

    Brazil

    Pakistan

    West EuropeLong Distance (France)

    Source: World Bank.

    would be observed in transport, shing, and orestry

    (7.5 percent, 7 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively).

    The eects o alternative scenarios could be worked

    out. Assuming these same increases as above or all

    petroleum products except kerosene would suggest a

    one-time overall price adjustment o about 2 percent.

    Because subsidies or kerosene do not account or the

    bulk o the scal costs, excluding them rom a price

    adjustment would not erode much the potential scal

    savings o this action. This scenario would generate

    scal savings o about CFAF 350 billion (2.7 percent

    o GDP). Yet another example where the prices or all

    petroleum products except again kerosene would rise

    by CFAF 150 would lead to a one-time overall price

    adjustment o only 1.1 percent, but save the budget

    about CFA 210 billion (1.6 percent o GDP).

    These one-time price adjustments could be urther

    contained through accompanying measures. The

    price structure or petroleum products contains or

    instance a number o taxes that could be revisited

    and simpliied. Furthermore, as mentioned in last

    years July issue o the Cameroon Economic Update,

    over-regulation plagues the transport systems in

    Cameroon. Transport prices charged to shippers tend

    to be disconnected rom the actual vehicle operating

    costs. The system seeks to protect existing transport

    fiGUres 19: pc Chg puc(n rcnt)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    Transport Machinemaintenance

    Waterand

    sanitation

    Vehiclemaintenance

    Agricultureproducts

    ForestryFishing Overallpricelevel

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    23/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update14

    operators at the expense o encouraging competition.

    Inefcient operators and aging truck leets are thus

    kept aloat, pushing down the quality o road transport

    services to the lowest level possible, since there is

    no incentive to oer better services. As a result, the

    average transport price on the Douala-NDjamena

    corridor, or instance, is about 11 cents per ton Km:

    almost double than that o China, three times higher

    than in Brazil, and more than ve times higher than in

    Pakistan (Figure 20).4

    4 Teravaninthorn and Raballand (2009).

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    24/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update 15

    HealtH in Cameroon

    Introduction

    Over the past two decades, Cameroon has achieved

    one o the smallest reductions in the under-ve child

    mortality rate in the world and lie expectancy has even

    declined. The burden o health care nancing is largely

    born by households and risk-pooling mechanisms

    are quasi-inexistent. The limited public resources

    allocated to health do not seem to be deployed where

    they are the most needed. As a result, substantial

    disparities exist in health outcomes between rural and

    urban areas, as well as across socio-economic groups,

    thereby perpetuating poverty and vulnerability.

    In light o the aim o making Cameroon an emerging

    economy, the lack o progress in health outcomes

    should be a source o concern. The role o human

    capital has been recognized as being indispensable

    to economic growth. Good health raises human capital

    and thereore the economic productivity o individuals

    and, thereby, the economic growth rate o the country

    as a whole. Better health increases workorce

    productivity, whether skilled or unskilled, by improving

    general physical and mental capacities, such as vigor,

    cognitive unctioning and reasoning ability, and by

    reducing illness and incapacity. Furthermore, good

    health helps improve levels o education by increasing

    levels o schooling and scholastic perormance.

    Without a labor orce with the minimum levels o

    education and health, an economy is not able to

    sustain an appropriate and continuous growth path.

    The availability o appropriate and timely data on

    health is problematic in Cameroon. No annualreport on health statistics has been produced in

    over a decade. This does not mean that there is no

    data on health generated in Cameroon, but there is

    little standardization, collection, consolidation, and

    analysis. Health centers routinely ll in reports to the

    district authorities which are ofcially in charge o data

    collection, planning, and monitoring and evaluation. In

    addition, donors and the regional MOH administration

    regularly request reports on health activities. This

    routine data is, however, rarely compiled at the

    national level. As a result, Government and donors

    rely on ad hoc and punctual surveys such as national

    household survey or Demographic and Health

    Surveys (DHSs) to assess and measure outcomes in

    Cameroons health sector.

    This chapter draws on the recently-completed

    Country Health Status Report or Cameroon and is

    able to describe Cameroons health prole, discuss

    the resources allocated to health (inancial and

    staing), and suggest some options going orward.

    The introduction o program budgeting in 2013 should

    improve the efciency o public spending, narrowing

    the gap between needs and budgetary allocations.

    In addition, a more eective data collection and

    management system would be called or; prepayment

    and risk-pooling mechanisms such as mutual health

    organization and mandatory ormal sector insurance

    may need to be extended; and approaches rewarding

    perormance currently being piloted in Cameroon

    could be rolled out urther.

    Cameroons Health Prole

    Over the last two decades, there has been littlechange in Cameroons health indicators. The

    under-ve child mortality rate has slightly improved.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    25/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update16

    About 16 more children out o every 1,000 survive

    their rst ve years in Cameroon than two decades

    ago. This slight progress pales, however, compared

    to an average o 65 additional children surviving in

    Sub-Saharan Arica (Figure 21). Lie expectancy in

    Cameroon has even declined since 1990 by about two

    years, while countries in Sub-Saharan Arica have on

    average gained about ve years (Figure 22).

    As a result, Cameroons health indicators lag behind

    those o the rest o Sub-Saharan Arica and behind

    those observed in countries to which Cameroon is

    economically comparable (Figures 23 and 24). For

    instance, Cameroon has one o the highest under-ve

    child mortality rates in the world (122 deaths per

    1,000 live births), exceeding the average in developing

    Sub-Saharan Arica (108 deaths per 1,000 live births)

    with malaria, pneumonia and diarrhea being the main

    causes o death. Similarly, its maternal mortality ratio

    is also higher than the average or Sub-Saharan Arica

    and has increased substantially over the past decade.

    The ratio is slightly higher than those observed in

    countries such as Liberia and Sudan, and even higher

    than neighboring CAR and Chad. Pregnancy and

    fiGUre 21: Chg U-5 Ch m

    r, 19902010(r 1,000 lv rth)

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    CAR

    Cameroon

    Burundi

    Ghana

    Lowermiddle

    income

    BurkinaFaso

    Low

    income

    Sub-

    Saharan

    Africa

    Senegal

    Benin

    Nigeria

    Sources: World Development Indicators, Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 22: Chg l excc

    bh, 19902010

    (n yr)

    4

    2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    Cam

    eroon

    CAR

    Coted'Ivoire

    B

    urundi

    Sub-S

    aharan

    Africa

    S

    enegal

    Nigeria

    Lower

    middle

    income

    Low

    income

    Burkin

    aFaso

    Benin

    Ghana

    Sources: World Development Indicators, Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 23: U-5 Ch m, 2011(r 1,000 lv rth)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Cameroon

    Sub-SaharanAfrica

    (developingonly)

    Low

    income

    countries

    Lowermiddle

    incomecountries

    Middleincome

    countries

    Source: World Development Indicators.

    fiGUre 24: m m, 2010(r 100,000 lv rth)

    0

    100

    300

    200

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    Cameroon

    Sub-SaharanAfrica

    (dev

    elopingonly)

    Low

    income

    countries

    Lowermiddle

    inco

    mecountries

    M

    iddleincome

    countries

    Source: World Development Indicators.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    26/40

    HealtH in Cameroon 17

    childbirth remain signicant risk actors or mortality:

    One woman dies every two hours rom complications

    rom pregnancy or childbirth, and one pregnancy out

    o 127 is atal.

    Within Cameroon, substantial disparities exist in

    health outcomes between rural and urban areas and

    across socio-economic groups. According to data

    rom DHS, progress has been made between 2004

    and 2011 in reducing inant mortality rates both in

    rural and urban areas, and across income levels

    (Figures 25 and 26). Reductions in under-ve child

    mortality rates have been most pronounced in the

    middle quintiles. Indicators o malnutrition (height

    and weight or age) also suggest that the nutritional

    status o the population has overall improved since

    2004, although the share o children signiicantly

    below the average has increased in the poorest

    quintile (Figure 27). Despite this progress, mortality

    levels remain substantially higher, however, among

    the poor and in the rural areas (Figures 28 and 29).

    For instance, the under-ive child mortality rate in

    households in the poorest quintile (i.e. the poorest

    20 percent o households) is more than twice as high

    as that observed in households in the richest quintile.

    At the regional level, a similar story can be told.

    Signicant progress has been made to reduce inant

    and under-ve child mortality in many regions, but

    major geographic discrepancies remain (Figures 30

    and 31). The greatest reductions in chi ld mortality

    were observed in the East (90 per 1,000 live births)

    fiGUre 25: Chg i m r

    lc, 20042011(r 1,000 lv rth)

    Urban Rural

    30

    20

    10

    0Infant Mortality Under 5 Mortality

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), DHS (2004), Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 26: eu U 5 mr sc-cc su, 200411(r 1,000 lv rth)

    30

    20

    10

    5

    15

    25

    35

    0The poorest Q2 Q3 Q4 The richest

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), DHS (2004), Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 27: Chg mu, 200411

    sc-cc su(n rcnt low -2se)

    10

    5

    0

    10

    5

    Height-for-age Weight-for-height Weight-for-age

    Poorest quintile Second Middle Fourth Richest quintile

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), DHS (2004), Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 28: i m r blc, 2011(r 1,000 lv rth)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Infant Mortality Under 5 Mortality

    Urban Rural

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    27/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update18

    and the South (50 per 1,000 live births), while the rate

    hardly changed in Douala5. Child mortality remains

    nevertheless extremely high in the poorest parts o

    the country, such as the North or the Far North, where

    close to 20 percent o the children born die beore

    their ith birthday (191 deaths and 168 deaths per

    1,000 live births in the North and the Fart North,

    respectively).

    5 Changes in under-ve mortality rates between 2004 and 2011

    may be over-estimated or the Eastern region because o sample

    size constraints in that region in the 2011 DHS-MICS.

    fiGUre 31: U 5 m rg, 2011(r 1,000 lv rth)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    North-W

    est

    Douala

    Yaound

    East

    West

    South

    Littoral(excl

    Douala)

    Centre(excl

    Yaound

    )

    South-W

    est

    Adamawa

    FarNorth

    North

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 30: Chg U-5 Ch m

    rg, 200411(r 1,000 lv rth)

    100

    60

    20

    40

    80

    0

    20

    East

    South

    Yaound

    North-West

    West

    FarNorth

    South-West

    North

    Littoral(excl.

    Douala)

    Adamawa

    Douala

    Centre(excl.

    Yaound)

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), DHS (2004), Bank Staf calculations.

    Similar observations can be made in terms o

    utilization o health services. While the use o pre-natal

    health service is close to 100 percent or the richest

    quintile o the population, it is below 60 percent or

    the poorest. The richer you are, the more likely you

    are to beneit rom delivery assisted by a qualiied

    proessional (nurse and/or doctor). The poorest are

    more likely to be assisted by a riend or a traditional

    midwie. Coverage or assisted deliveries among therichest quintile is almost ive times higher to that

    observed in the poorest quintile (Figure 32).

    Geographically, the Northern Regions have the ewest

    assisted deliveries (Figure 33). Between the two most

    recent DHS surveys (2004 and 2011), the percentage

    fiGUre 32: a d

    sc-cc su, 2011(n rcnt)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Poorest

    quintile

    Second Middle Fourth Richest

    quintile

    Source: DHS-MICS (2011).

    fiGUre 29: U 5 m r

    sc-cc su, 2011(r 1,000 lv rth)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    The poorest Q2 Q3 Q4 The richest

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), Bank Staf calculations.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    28/40

    HealtH in Cameroon 19

    preventing individuals rom alling into poverty as the

    result o catastrophic unplanned medical expenses,

    and protecting and improving the health status o

    populations by ensuring inancial access to these

    essential services.

    The way health care is inanced aects the overall

    perormance o health systems. Direct purchasing

    o health services when needed by an individual

    (user ee) is a driver o inequity, as it depends on

    this individuals wealth. This eect can be mitigated,

    however, through prepayment mechanisms such

    as health insurance, pooling the risk at the level o a

    group o contributors. Alternatively, public spending

    inanced by general taxation and external support

    could und the delivery o health services and acilitate

    cross-subsidization rom the wealthy to the poor.

    In light o the poor results in health indicators,Cameroon overall spends quite a lot compared

    to Sub-Saharan Arican countries (Figure 35).

    o childbirth deliveries that were assisted by a health

    proessional increased on average rom 61.7 percent

    to 63.6 percent. In the Far North, however, only

    21.8 percent o births were attended by skilled

    personnel, compared to 93 percent in the Littoral and

    91.6 percent in the West.

    Substantial dierences in maternal mortality also

    show that pregnancy-related deaths are substantially

    higher in rural than in urban areas. Women and

    newborns in poor and rural communities have a

    higher risk o death and higher chances o early

    childbirth (young people aged 10 to 24 in these

    segments o the population have a 33 percent

    pregnancy rate). Similarly, as shown in Figure 34,

    the proportion o children aged 1223 months with

    ull immunization varies rom 30.9 percent in the FarNorth to 82.5 percent in the North West.

    Resource Allocation

    Why are there such great variations in health

    outcomes across geographic locations and socio-

    economic status? An ef cient and well-perorming

    health system should ensure that individuals have

    access to eective preventive and curative healthcare. A good health care inancing strategy would

    thus aim at reducing inequalities in access to services,

    fiGUre 33: a d

    rg, 2011(n rcnt)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Douala

    West

    Littoral(excl.

    Douala)

    North-West

    Yaound

    South

    South-West

    Center(excl.

    Yaound)

    East

    Adamawa

    North

    FarNorth

    Source: DHS-MIS (2011).

    fiGUre 34: pcg ch g

    1223 h u cc, 2011

    Bua

    Douala

    Ebolowa

    Bertoua

    Bafoussam

    Bamenda

    Ngaoundr

    Garoua

    Maroua

    YAOUND

    N I G E R I A

    C H A D

    C E N T R A L A F R I C A NR E P U B L I C

    C O N G OG A B O NEQUATORIAL

    GUINEA

    EQUATORIALGUINEA

    N O R D -

    O U E S T

    S U D -

    O U E S TO U E S T

    L I T T O R A L

    C E N T R E

    S U D

    E S T

    A D A M A O U A

    N O R D

    E X T R E M E

    N O R D

    Bua

    Douala

    Ebolowa

    Bertoua

    Bafoussam

    Bamenda

    Ngaoundr

    Garoua

    Maroua

    YAOUND

    N O R D -

    O U E S T

    S U D -

    O U E S TO U E S T

    L I T T O R A L

    C E N T R E

    S U D

    E S T

    A D A M A O U A

    N O R D

    E X T R E M E

    N O R D

    N I G E R I A

    C H A D

    C E N T R A L A F R I C A NR E P U B L I C

    C O N G OG A B O NEQUATORIAL

    GUINEA

    EQUATORIALGUINEA

    Bno

    u

    Vina

    Djr

    em

    Sanaga

    Kade

    i

    Boumba

    DjaKom

    Nyong

    Mbam

    Mbu

    Faro

    Lom

    Wouri

    Gulf o f

    Guinea

    LakeChad

    10E 12E 14E 16E

    12E

    10E8E

    14E 16E

    2N

    4N

    6N

    8N

    10N

    12N

    2N

    4N

    6N

    8N

    10N

    12N

    0 40 80 120

    0 40 80 120 Miles

    160 Kilometers

    JUNE 2013

    30.9 EXTREMENORD35.2 SUD

    38.1 NORD

    47.3 EST

    51.6 CENTRE(EXCLUDINGYAOUND)

    53.7 ADAMAOUA

    63.7 OUEST

    66.3 LITTORAL (EXCLUDINGDOUALA)

    75.2 SUD-OUEST

    82.5 NORD-OUEST

    PROVINCECAPITALS

    NATIONAL CAPITAL

    PROVINCEBOUNDARIES

    INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES

    This mapwas producedby the MapDesignUnitofThe WorldBank.The boundaries,colors,denominations andanyother informationshownonthis mapdo notimply,onthe partofThe WorldBankGroup,anyjudgmentonthe legalstatus ofanyterritory,oranyendorsementoracceptance ofsuch boundaries.

    GSDPMMap DesignUnit

    CAMEROON

    VACCINATIONS, 2011

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    29/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update20

    Cameroon spends US$61 per person on health,

    above the average or Sub-Saharan Arica excluding

    South Arica (US$ 51), and in line with countries

    such Senegal and Nigeria. These numbers include

    spending in health sector rom Government, external

    donors, and private sources (i.e. out-o-pocket

    payments rom beneciaries).

    Public spending in the health sector in Cameroon

    is, however, low. While public resources allocated to

    health have progressively increased over the past

    ten years, they remain one o the lowest in Arica

    in terms o GDP (Figure 36) at 1.5 percent o GDP.

    Relative to the total budget o the Government, the

    share allocated to the health sector in Cameroon

    also alls below the average o Sub-Saharan Arican

    countries and has only recently moved above theaverage o CEMAC countries (Figure 37). The budget

    share allocated to health in Cameroon also alls short

    o the WHO recommendation o 10 percent, as well

    as o its Abuja commitment. The Government o

    Cameroon pledged in 2001 in Abuja, along with other

    members o the Arican Union, to allocate 15 percent

    o its annual budget to the health sector. In spite o

    this, public spending or health over the last decade

    has never exceeded 9 percent o the total budget.

    As a result, out o the US$61 per Cameroonian spent

    on health in 2010, the Government contributed

    only US$ 17 (i.e. 28 percent o which US$ 8 were

    provided by international donors). Compared to

    other CEMAC countries, Cameroon has been or the

    last decade the country that has allocated the lowest

    share o its public spending to health (Figure 38). The

    cost o health care is thus largely borne by households

    and Cameroon has one o the highest levels o direct

    payments rom the users (out-o-pocket) relative to

    total health expenditure in all o Sub-Saharan Arica.

    Out o 37 countries in Arica with available data or

    2009, Cameroon had the th highest level o out-o-

    pocket spending relative to total spending (Figure 39).

    fiGUre 37: puc Hh exu,

    200110

    (n rcnt o bugt)

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    Abuja commitment WHO target Sub-Saharan Africa

    CEMAC Cameroon

    Source: World Development Indicators.

    fiGUre 35: Hh exu, 2010(n Us$ r ct)

    0

    20

    10

    40

    30

    60

    50

    80

    70

    DRC

    Ethiopia

    CAR

    Burundi

    Mozambique

    Gambia

    Chad

    Benin

    Kenya

    BurkinaFaso

    Senegal

    Cameroon

    Nigeria

    Ghana

    CotedIvoire

    Sub-

    Saharan

    Africa*

    Source:World Development Indicators.* excluding South Arica, Somalia and Zimbabwe.

    fiGUre 36: puc Hh exu,

    sc Cu, 2010(n rcnt o Gdp)

    0.0

    1.0

    0.5

    2.0

    1.5

    2.5

    3.5

    3.0

    4.0

    4.5

    Cameroon

    Nigeria

    Kenya

    Gabon

    CAR

    Benin

    Ethiopia

    Sub-

    Saharan

    Africa

    Low

    &middle

    income

    Ghana

    Burundi

    Senegal

    Mozambique

    BurkinaFaso

    Source: World Development Indicators.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    30/40

    HealtH in Cameroon 21

    Usually when user ees are charged, all patients

    pay the same price regardless o their capacity to

    pay. Consequently, the risk o nancial catastrophe

    and impoverishment is high. When prepayment

    mechanisms are not available and patients pay at the

    point o service, the sick bear all o the nancial risks

    associated with paying or care. The user must decide

    i he can aord to receive care, and oten or poorhouseholds this means choosing between paying or

    health services and paying or other essentials, such

    as ood or education. Oten households are orced to

    sell household goods or livestock in order to cover

    the cost o health services. According to the 2011

    Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey-Multiple

    Indicator Cluster Survey (DHS-MICS), among

    households who sought any type o health care, the

    poorest income quintile was eight times more likely

    to cover medical expenditures through the sale o

    household goods than the richest quintile (Figure 40).

    One way to reduce reliance on direct payments is to

    encourage risk-pooling and prepayment methods toinance health care. Risk-pooling mechanisms are,

    however, quasi non-existent in Cameroon. In 2006,

    there were 120 micro-insurance schemes covering

    approximately one percent o Cameroons population.

    Since then, Cameroon has put in place a Strategic

    Plan or the Promotion and the Development o

    fiGUre 38: puc Hh sg, sc

    Cu, 1995-2012(n rcnt o totl hlth xntur)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    Low & middle income Sub-Saharan Africa

    Cameroon CEMAC

    Source: World Development Indicators.

    fiGUre 40: suc Huh Hh

    C fcg, 2011(n rcnt)

    0

    80

    60

    40

    20

    The richest Fourth Middle Second The poorest

    Salary/liquid funds

    Savings

    Loan (with & without interest)

    Sale of goods or animals

    Sources: DHS-MICS (2011), Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 39: ou--ck Hh exu, 2009(n rcnt o totl hlth xntur)

    0

    20

    10

    40

    30

    60

    50

    80

    70

    90

    Namibia

    Botswana

    EquatorialGuinea

    Mozambique

    SouthAfrica

    Lesotho

    Djibouti

    Rwanda

    C

    apeVerde

    Zimbabwe

    Liberia

    Senegal

    Zambia

    Bu

    rkinaFaso

    Burundi

    Ghana

    Av

    erageSSA

    Niger

    Benin

    Guin

    ea-Bissau

    Ethiopia

    Tchad

    Congo

    Kenya

    Mali

    Gabon

    Uganda

    Eritrea

    CAR

    Togo

    Cameroon

    Sudan

    C

    ted'Ivoire

    SierraLeone

    Guinea

    Source: World Development Indicators.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    31/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update22

    Mutual Health Insurance (20052015), which

    aims to cover 40 percent o the population by 2015

    through mutual health insurance schemes, but little

    progress has been made with only one percent o

    the population being covered in 2010. Here, also,

    important regional disparities can be observed, with

    health insurance coverage in the North-West about

    thirty times higher than in the East (Figure 41).

    Even when public resources are allocated, available

    data suggest that they may not be deployed where

    they are most needed. According to the data rom the

    DHS and rom the project logbook, or instance, public

    investments do not seem to be related to the needs

    o the population. Regions where under-ive child

    mortality was high in 2004, or instance, received on

    average less investment in health in per capita terms

    during 201012 (Figure 42).6 The same observation

    can be made with regards to assisted deliveries:

    regions with lower rates o assisted deliveries in

    2008 received, on average, less public unding in

    subsequent years (Figure 43).

    A similar story unolds regarding health personnel.

    Cameroon enjoys one o the highest densiti es onurses and doctors in Sub-Saharan Arica (Figure 44).

    With 1.9 doctors per 10,000 people, or instance,

    Cameroon is signiicantly above the average o

    1.3 doctors per 10,000 people in Sub-Saharan Arica.

    The country has also almost twice as many doctors

    as the minimum recommended by the WHO (1 doctor

    per 10,000 people). The main issue regarding

    6 These numbers take also into account each regions area torecognize that providing a given service to a population sparsely

    scattered will cost more than i the population was more densely

    concentrated.

    fiGUre 41: Hh iuc Cg, 2009(n rcnt o oulton)

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    North-West

    Adamawa

    South-West

    West

    Littoral

    South

    Centre

    FarNorth

    North

    East

    Total

    Sources: Etude Diagnostique des Mutulles de Sante au Cameroun

    (2010), Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 42: puc i Hh

    (g 2010-12) . Ch m (2004)

    rg

    Adamawa

    Center

    EastFar North

    Littoral

    North

    North-West

    West

    South

    South-West

    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230

    Under 5 Child Mortality (per 1,000 live births)

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    Several actors contribute to the low coverage and

    sustainability o these schemes. Inormation and

    awareness among the beneciary populations are not

    widespread. Membership is low and in turn revenue

    collection is limited. Relations with contracted health

    care providers are poor. In addition, inancial and

    technical support as well as leadership rom the

    associated ministries tends to be limited.

    Longer-term plans or expanding prepayment and

    incorporating community and micro-insurance

    into the broader pool are also important. Pools that

    protect the health needs o only a small number o

    people are not viable in the long run. A ew episodes

    o expensive illness will wipe them out. Multiple pools,

    each with their own administrations and inormation

    systems, are also inefcient and make it difcult to

    achieve equity. Usually, one o the pools will provide

    high beneits to relatively wealthy people, who will

    not want to cross-subsidize the costs o poorer, less

    healthy people.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    32/40

    HealtH in Cameroon 23

    human resources in the health sector is thus not the

    numbers, but their distribution across the country.

    The distribution o health proessionals is highly

    urban-ocused and varies signiicantly by region

    (Figures 45 and 46). The majority o physicians inthe country are based in urban areas and more than

    hal o Cameroons health workorce is employed in

    three administrative regions: the Center, Littoral and

    the West, which are home to the three largest cities

    in Cameroon (Yaound, Douala, and Baoussam).

    The Center Region (including Yaound), home to only

    18 percent o the population, accounts or almost

    40 percent o the physicians. On the other hand, the

    Far North, which is also home to 18 percent o the

    population, has only eight percent o physicians. In

    addition, absenteeism in Cameroon is a problem,

    especially in rural remote areas, and contributes tothe migration o health personnel towards urban

    centers. Data rom a recent World Bank study (2012a)

    showed that only 32 percent, 45 percent and 58 percent

    o health acilities in the South-West, North-West and

    East regions, respectively, operated with ull sta on

    the day o the survey.

    fiGUre 44: phc d, sc Cu, 2009(r 10,000 ol)

    Physicians density (per 10,000 population) WHO recommendation (minimum)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    Liberia

    S

    ierraLeone

    Malawi

    Niger

    Ethiopia

    Rwanda

    M

    ozambique

    Burundi

    Chad

    Guinea-

    Bissau

    Mali

    Lesotho

    Eritrea

    Togo

    Zambia

    Senegal

    Benin

    BurkinaFaso

    CAR

    Ghana

    Congo

    Guinea

    DR

    C

    Uganda

    Average

    SSA

    Kenya

    C

    ted'Ivoire

    Zimbabwe

    Cameroon

    Gabon

    Botswana

    Namibia

    CapeVerde

    S

    outhA

    frica

    Source: World Development Indicators.

    fiGUre 43: puc i Hh

    (g 2010-12) . a d

    (2008) rg

    Adamawa

    Far North East Center

    Littoral

    North

    North-West

    West

    South

    South-West

    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    1009080706050403020100

    Assisted Deliveries (in percent of total)

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 45: Hh s rg

    du, 2011(n rcnt o totl)

    0

    20

    10

    40

    30

    50

    Center

    Littoral

    West

    FarNorth

    SouthWest

    North

    North-West

    East

    Adamawa

    South

    Nurses Doctors

    Source: Cameroon Health Workorce Census (2011).

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    33/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update24

    Incentives or health sta to work in diicult

    environments or to perorm are limited. Even though

    bonuses to health sta are provided, they are based

    on skills (i.e. training) and vary based on grade and

    years o services rather than perormance. Similarly,

    there are limited career options or opportunities

    or career development working in rural areas. In

    act, being ar rom urban centers tends to have a

    negative impact on promotion opportunities. Overall,

    health sta are thereore better o working in urban

    centers, where living conditions are better, salary

    and premium identical, and the chances o being

    promoted higher relative to sta in rural areas.

    Financial incentives are, however, not the only driver

    o motivation. A recent survey o health proessionals

    conducted in the Center, North and East Regions o

    Cameroon showed that an increase o 50 percent

    in salaries was not as important as good working

    conditions, i.e. the availability o equipment and

    material (Figure 48).7 Were health workers, doctors

    and nurses to be given appropriate equipment and

    supply o medicine, they would be more than twice

    more likely to choose a rural posting than without this

    incentive. Rewarding working in difcult conditions

    by accessing training and oering opportunities to

    progress career-wise is also an important actor o

    motivation to ensure retention and service delivery

    in remote areas.

    7 The survey covered 351 health proessionals (doctors and

    nurses) and medical students.

    fiGUre 47: U 5 Ch m r (2004)

    . Hh p d (2011)

    North-West Far North

    Adamawa North

    South-West East

    West

    South

    Littoral

    Center

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    90 110 130 150 170 190 210

    Under 5 Child Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births, 2004)

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 48: pc ru J pg(o rto)

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    Infrastructure

    50%B

    onus

    Career

    Development

    Lodging

    Urban

    Transfer

    25%B

    onus

    Accessibility

    Sources: Cameroonian authorities and Bank Staf calculations.

    fiGUre 46: nu dc

    rg, 2011(r 10,000 ol)

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    North-West

    FarNorth

    Adamawa

    North

    South-West

    East

    West

    South

    Littoral

    Center

    Public Private

    Sources: Cameroon Health Workorce Census (2011), Bank Stafcalculations.

    Furthermore, the distribution o health workers does

    not seem to ollow health needs. Looking at the inant

    mortality rates across regions in 2004 and the density

    o health workers (measured as a ratio to population)

    in 2011, density is the lowest in the regions where

    health outcomes are the poorest (Figure 47). The

    North, Far North and Adamawa Regions had the

    highest inant mortality rates in the country, but some

    o the lowest densities o health workers.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    34/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update 25

    Options for Going Forward

    Program Budgeting

    The introduction o program budgeting starting in

    2013 should improve efciency o public spending.

    The new approach places the line ministries at the

    center o the budget cycle. These ministries will have

    now more lexibility in preparing and executing their

    budgets, but will also be held accountable or results.

    As such, program budgeting addresses many o the

    critical short-comings that have aected the countrys

    public expenditure management in the past: excessivecentralization o the budget processes, leading to low

    budget execution and poor strategic allocation o

    resources; and poor value-or-money and quality o

    service delivery.

    Production and use o highquality data

    In this new budget environment, one major

    challenge or Cameroon will be to ensure that

    resource allocation in the health sector is evidence-

    based. Setting up an eective data collection and

    management system would be critical to help

    decision-makers monitor health outcomes more

    regularly, and ensure that budgetary allocations

    are based on needs and perormance. Data to

    be collected would have to be prioritized and

    standards provided or, to ensure that the additional

    data collected by external actors are comparable

    and usable. A well-designed unctioning health

    management inormation system (HMIS) would not

    only enable the Ministry o Public Health to design

    evidence-based policy and be reactive to unoreseen

    shocks (e.g. capturing early signs o epidemic), but

    also assess implemented policies.

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    35/40

    Cameroon eConomiC Update26

    bx 2: m Hh e d: ru-b fcg

    What is Results-based nancing?Results-Based Financing (RBF) is an instrument that links nancing to pre-determined results, with payment made

    only upon verication that the agreed-upon results have actually been delivered. RBF or health reers to any program

    that transers money or goods to either patients when they take health-related actions (such as having their children

    immunized) or to healthcare providers, when they achieve perormance targets (such as immunizing a certain percentage

    o children in a given area).

    What Makes Results-based Financing different?

    Traditionally unding or health has been directed toward inputssalaries, construction, training, equipment. Improved

    health was assumed to ollow, but this has not always happened. Despite billions o dollars over the last dec ade, many

    countries in Arica are still alling short, particularly in areas that require a unctioning health system. Sub-Saharan

    Arica, or instance, has the highest rate o maternal deaths in the world with an average o about 900 deaths per

    100,000 live births. Child deaths and malnutrition are also serious problems.

    The undamental issue is the poor perormance o the public health care system, including low levels o physical access

    in some places; poor quality o care; a lack o adequate incentive structures or health workers; weak management;

    and inadequate data o sufcient quality to monitor and evaluate progress. Individuals must demand services; health

    workers must be motivated to deliver adequate care; and the institutions they work or must be encouraged to make

    the systemic changes required to achieve health goals. RBF lips the whole equation on its head, starting with the

    resultmore children immunized, or exampleand letting health workers and managers on the ground decide how

    to achieve them.

    The Potential of RBF

    A number o developing country experiences strongly suggest that RBF can work. There are currently three countries

    (Rwanda, Burundi and Sierra Leone) with nationwide programs and 14 countries with ongoing pilots. These programs help

    improve health; strengthen health systems; spur innovation, creativity and country ownership; and encourage reorms

    that coner authority and lexibility to local service-delivery levels, ostering problem-solving where it is most n eeded.

    When poor patients or households have been oered nancial or material rewards or adopting health-promoting

    practices, they respond and health indicators improve. Similarly, when health workers and acilities are given bonuses

    upon achieving targets, those targets tend to be met. Results-based nancing has also been shown to help to increase

    patient demand or health services.

    In addition to improving health, results-based nancing can also contribute to strengthening a countrys health

    inormation system. Because accurate monitoring and evaluation o RBF schemes require the development o robust

    health inormation and management systems, incorporating the RBF concept, even into donor unds aimed at specic

    diseases, reinorces eorts to improve the timeliness, credibility and accuracy o national reporting and monitoring,

    thus contributing to improving the overall capacity o a countrys health system.

    Source: L. Morgan (2012)

    In Rwanda, Burundi and Burkina Faso, or example,

    the Ministries o Health are able to maintain an

    up-to-date HMIS thanks to the use o incentives and

    sanctions or the generation and use o HMIS data

    at the health acility, district and sub-national levels.

    Health acilities receive poor perormance points

    and even inancial sanctions i they do not submit

    their monthly HMIS report on time. Management o

    acility-level data is a key criterion in the evaluation

    o the perormance o managers.

    Risk-sharing mechanisms and accessor the poor

    Cameroon could take steps towards designing

    policies that oster access by the poor to health-

    enhancing services and protect the poor rom

    catastrophic health spending. The extension o

    prepayment and risk-pooling mechanisms such

    as mutual health organizations, mandatory ormal

    sector insurance and potentially cross-subsidization

  • 8/22/2019 Cameroon Economic Update No.6, July2013

    36/40

    HealtH in Cameroon 27

    between the two could contribute to reducing

    nancial risks associated with illness.

    Second, the introduction o pro-poor inancing

    mechanisms, such as conditional and unconditional

    cash transers and vouchers or health services, could

    improve equity and eiciency by increasing public

    investments in health while reducing private spending

    by the poor. The introduction o voucher-type

    systems such as kits obsttricaux to subsidize the

    monitoring o pregnancy are currently being piloted

    in the Far North, North, Adamawa and East regions.

    Getting the incentives right

    The national health workorce should be distributed

    in a manner that responds to the severe geographic

    imbalances in health outcomes in Cameroon and

    improve coverage o essential health services. The

    question is how to ensure health personnel will

    stay in rural areas. In this regard, health workorce

    retention policies should include a combination o

    both monetary and non-inancial incentives. The

    package could include the provision and maintenance

    o supplies and equipment or the delivery o a

    clearly deined set o basic services, in addition to

    salary bonuses or rural postings. Implementation o

    this policy may be mo