A 9

s 3

CALEMDAR ITEM

CI3 03/06/91 PRC 7220 N. smith

ACCEPT QUITCL.~IM DEED FOR, AND AUTHORIZE TERMINATION OF, GENERAL LEASE - P.IGHT-OF-WAY USE PRC 7220,

AND ISSUE GENERAL PERMIT - PUBLIC AGENCY USE FOR PRC 7220

LESSEE: David Kenyon, et al 950 Northgate Drive, Suite 309 San Rafael, California 94903-3436

APPLICANT: City of Novato 901 Shennan Avenue Novato, California 94903

AREA, ~E LAND AND LOCA'rION: A U.34-acre parcel of sovereiqn tide and submerged~ land, Novato Creek, City of Novato (City), Marin county.

LAND USE: Const.ruction and maintenance of a bridge and utilities crossing over Ncvato Creek for a proposed public road.

TERMS OP OlUGINAL LEASE: Initial period:

Forty-·nine (49) years beginning July 1, l.988.

Public liability insurance: Combined single limit coverage of $1,000,000.

Consideration:: $7,420 per armum; five-year rent review.

-1-

CALENDAR ITEM' po,g , 3 CCONT 00}

TERMS OF PltOPOSED PuBLI~ AGENCY PERMIT: :Initial period:

Forty-nine (49) years beginning March 1, 1991.

CONSIDERA'l'ZON: $300 p.a~ ann:um and th& public use and benefit, with the state res~rving the right to fix a different rental on each fifth anniversary of the permit.

PRBREQtn:SXTB CONDITXOHS, PEES AND EXPENSES: Filing fee and processing costs have been received.

STA~"U'.rORY AND OTHER REFERENCES: A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, Parts 1 and 2; Div. 13~

B. Cal~ Code Regs.: Title 3, Div. 3; Title 14, Div. 6.

AB 884: N/A

~ER PERTINENT XNFO:RMATXON: l. Assignment of lease PRC 7220 from David Kenyon, et al,

to the City o~ Uovato upon completion of the new bridge, was approv·ed at the Commission's October 29, 1 990 meeting. However, sin~e that meeting, all parties have agreed that the lease premises should be transferred t~ the City before construction of the bridge. Therefore, staff of the Commission has determined it to be in t~e best interest of all parties to terminate, and accept a quitclaim deed for, the existing lease issued to David Kenyon, et al, and issue ~ new lease to the City.

2. The commission approved an "Agieement and Consent to Enc~rancing of Lease PRC 7220N on February 6, 1989 betwe~n David Kenyon, et al, and security Pacific Nationa1 Bank; this encumbrance is terminated upon execution cf the lease between the City of Novato and the State Lands Commission.

3. Annual rental charged to tt~e City of Novato is for the right to place privately owned utilities crossings on the bridge.

-2-

CALENDAR PAGE ~~1 .... 9...,5..__ MINUTE PAGE_, -5 ..... 311i11o16.......__

~·ENPAP ITEM NO. C 1 3 C CQH'J:' Ql

4. A Negative Declaration was prepared and adopted by the city of Nov~to for the Golden Gate Business Park of which the project (bridge) is a component. The State Lands Commission's staff has reviewed such document.

s. This activity invol~es lands identified as possessing significant environmental values pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq. Based upon the staff's consultation·wi:1:h the persons nominat:i.ng such lands and through the.CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is cf~'nsistent with its use classification.

1..PPROV1\LS OBTllNED: M~rin County Flood Control District and City of Novato.

FURTJ:Dm APPROVALS Rl?QuntED: None.

BDl:ilI'i'B: A. Land Description B. Location Map C;. Notice of Determination

IT IS RECOMMENDB!) THAT TRB COMMISSION:

1. FIND THAT A NF.GATIVE DECLARATION WAS P~EPARED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF NCiVATO ~OR THE GOLDEN GATE BUSINESS PARK, OF WHICH THE PROJECT (BRIPGE) IS A COMPONENT, AND THAT THE C~)MMISSION HAS REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN.

2. DETERl"'i"INE THAT THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED, WILL NOT HAVE A SIGIUFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.

3. FIND THAT THIS ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE USE CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATED FOR THE LAND PURSUANT TO P.R.C. 5370, ET SEQ.

4. AUTHORIZE ACCEPTANCE OF THE 'l'ERMINATION OF AGREEMENT B'fflEEN. DAVID KENYON, ET AL, AND SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BN..iK, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 28, 1991 UPON THE EXECUTION OF TH~ LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF NOVATO AND THE STATE LANDS COMMISSION.

-3-

----------------------196 ~ur~AGE .. 537 "=

!;;ALENDAR lTEti N0.11 "1 3 (CONT'Dl

5. ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR, AMO AUTHORIZE TERMJ:NATION OF, LEASE PRC 7220, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 28, 1991, ISSUED TO DAVID KENYON, ET 2'..L, UPOH THE EXECUTION OF THE LEASE BETWEID! THE CITY OF NOVATO AND THE STATE LANDS COMMISSION.

6. AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE TO CITY OF NOVATO OF A 49-YEAR GENERAL PERMIT ~ PUBLIC AGENCY USE, BEGINNING MARCH 31, 1991, IN CONSIDERATION OF AHNUAL RENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $300 AND THE PUBLIC USE AND BENEFIT, WITH THE STATE RESERVING THE RIGHT TO FIX A DIFFEREN::' RF..NTAL ON EACH FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE PERMIT, FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF A BRIDGE A.~D UTILITIES CROSSING OVER NOVATO CREEK FOR A PROPOSED PUBLIC ROAD.

-4-

EXHIBIT "A"

LA~D DESCRIPTION P~C 7220

Three pa:rccls of .iand in NoYAto, Marin County. California. said parccls beipg pomons1.">f the atea dc.c;aibed in the deed to the State of California by Ronald and Pamela,t'intonioli on:Ju~ 29. 1984, Recorded July 3. 1984, Recorders Serial Number 84 032105 Main~ .County Records. said pan:ds being ~bed as follows:

fhRCa-l

BEGINNING at a i:oint on L'1c nonhcrly line of said area S 77° 23' 00" E 441.~9 feet from 1he n~w-c.s.t corner of said area; ihcncc along Said nonhcrly line S 77° 23' 00" E 462.00 feet; thence leaving said northerly line S 12° 37' 00" W.8~00 fed; thence N 'n° 23' 00" W 185.00 feet; ~cn_cc s ll0 37' 00" w 150.00 feet to the soti~y lil;1c of said area; ~..encc ruor.g said soutJ ~i, line N 77° 23' 00" W 60.00 fef:t; thence leaving said southerly line N 12° 37' 00'' E 33.7t..::. ... c; thence N 77° 23' 00" W 30.00 foe~ thence N 12° 37' 00" E 20.00 feet; thence S 77° t?3' 00 .. E 30.00 feet; thence N 12° 37' 00" E 96.30 feeg;thcncc N 77° 23' 00" W ~17.00 f cer; ti,cna: N 12° 37' 00" E 8S.00 fc:ct to the point of beginning.

PARCEl.,2

BEQINNING at a point on lhe northerly lin~ of said mu S 77° 23' 00" E 391.89 fe.ct from the n~r.- IJwcst comer of said mu; thence along said northerly line S 77° 23' 00"' E S0.00 feet; thence leaving said nonhcdy line S 12" 37' 00" W 85.00 feet. thence S 77° 23' 00" E 217 .00 feet; thence S 12" 37' 00" W 96.30 feet; thence N n° 23• 00" W 30.00 f~t; thence S 12° 37' 00" W 20.00 feet; L'1cnce S 77° 23' ()()'" E 30.00 feet; thence S 12° 37' 00 .. W 33.70 feet to the southerly line of said m-ea; thence along said 'southcdy line N 77° 23' 00" W 100.00 feet; thence leaving said mutberly line N 12° 37' 00"' E 100.00 feet; thence N 77° 23' 00" W 167.00 feet; thence N 12° 37' 00" E 135.00 feet to the point of beginning.

PARCfJ,3

BEGINNING at a point on the n~y line bf wd area S 77° 23' 00" E 903.89 fact from the northwest comer of said aiea; ~;&long said northerly line s 77° 23:.w E 50.00 feet; thcm-,e leaving said northerly Jk'le Stt2° 37' 00" W 135.00 feet; ~"N77° 23' 00" W 135.00 f cet; thence S 12° 37' 00" w. ·'.i 00.00 feet to the southerly line of saU11m.a; thence. along said southerly line N 77° 23' 00" W 100.00 f~t; !hence ieaving said soo~Jy line N 12° 37' 00" E 150.00 fed; thence S Tr 23' 00" E 185.00 feet; thence N 12° 37' 00" E 85.00 feet io the point ~r beginning.

~;o OF DESCRIPTION

~VIS~D OCTOBER 3, m1t BY LLB.

,----·· ...

_ ...... ;: .... . ~~. , ....

·--~·:.· . ,.,. ., ..

/ /'

.~-~- ... ---------Sa

EXHIBIT "B" PRC 7220

(1

e

( t I LED EltlUBIT "c• J!\N 71988

TO:

. ~: PUlGg ot Kotf.ce of Determination in ~lhu.ce with Section 21.iuo ur

21!5:? ~ !!:: P~l!c ~.cso-.:..-:=.i Cc;:!c.

Pri>Ject fide -- - .. ," - , · -- - -- '

~~}Ef~'NT!&r f;us;IJ~~r· .tre& COde/Nlli&r/EJttenston cH Sub~tted ~ Cl'ear1tlgbouSe)A• h •• A'9t 't"M ·,~e::.) 041 A"".t A\ 01\~l-10)~ ~~~ ~"~ o• ·~~

-Project )7..~_:1ca "A.~$~ ~'3-\44•2..t f ~ - tS3-l10~ 13-fSl f~J.IUf,"'~ ~1'LJ~ l»Je.. DJ.: '11tf';.. ~ 2Q'i.. e;f=. c.J.~.10( J>roJect Dl?scrlptioa · - -Cfrl,~/U->Ol.>!ilr:tl~ f~ c:~ .. rCl\41UL\J4 ~ DOO ~&JA~ Pu:& cF M.Dc2 A~,, 2:! 11~7 ~; ~§.Dl\lt':»•O"' l&.rri> ,.,U./E. U"f'b

'ibis 1tt to advise that the C.rrt ",: /JDtlATD . . cnn A\Sency or fieSPOnsfble .\gency) " ' has approved the ~ 4esertbed PZ:OJ~t or1 1-:Z. f/I / 61 _ Nld bas mde the tol low­

te) t.ng detemin:a.t1003 regarding t..he above deseribed project:

t. Tbe proJeet _Yin~ J{.•111 not have ii,Si!Dilica.ct effect oa the environment. .

2. , 41.l Env1ronmeat;::,.\ tropact Report ns prepa.red tor this -project -- pursuau.t to tbe P?;Wts1oo.S of ctQI.. , - -1_ A Neg:;;_t"!ve ·~1aradon as prepa.1-Gd tor this project pursuant to

·~ Pl'0?1Si.Ot'.1S Of c::EQA. 3. IUUr:ation me&SU?"ifs 11..'M!rct, _were not made a coad1t1oa o! the :ip­

prcwa.1 ot the project~ 4. A ~t~t of 0Vernd1q Coos1den.t1~ filUI, ~wu aot adopted tor

t41a project. - '

'n..".iti 1s to cartUsr tNl.t the final E'J.R with canents &ad responses and recot'd ot project~ is a'ndlable to the ~ral PubU.c at: -

~--------------~---------------.,.._ __ _

\

E-2

( (

COLD£N CATE BUSINESS PARK ZO?i~~ CHANCE ZO 87-008 ·HASTER PI-J.N MP 87-003 Mm APPk"'.!.tl OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PUN PD &7-00~ (Al.) (OR.DI~ANCE.NOS. 1155 & 1156) RESOLUTION NO. 217;~7) (file 207-01) ..

TO CONSIDEa A il£GA?IV£ .0£CuRATION, ZONE CH>!-IGE. MASTER PLAN AND APPEAL OF TffE PRECISE DEVELOPMDn' PLAN' FOR AN IV.!illSTRIAL/OFFICE PARK WITH JOD.000 SQ. FT. OF .ft._9,0lt A.REA LOCATED /jN 20 ACRES AT THE SOUTH END OF FRA."IKI.IN AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF U~1S. 101; OWNER: CAPITAL PROPERTIES .\SSOCIATF.S; APPUCANT: INTERl".ARJC 1fn'EP.£STS; ·ENGINEER: SlVllER-S'rnOEH ASSOCIATES; ASSESS-OR'S PARCEL HOS. 153-144-2! AND 24 AND 153-170-13 AND 51

Senio:- l'lamner Alan L;azure in his staff rcpox-t n~ted that. e..,en if th~ -~zoning maacer plwi is •dopted. the property still could be developed in accordance with th~ preciae development ~l~n Approved ln 1984 for a 140-condom!niu.= project. He stated that the primary ~nvironmental concerns were ~.Oise. traffic and Yisu.il. The Design·R~viev C«x:aittee found this proposal to be the mo~c acceptable of the various plans •~en. althoush the?'a ar~ concerns that ic vill block views of the open space to the ccst. ff'. noted t~t the proposal includes cvo three-story buildings on-site; the oth=r seven buildings are propoGed &3 one-story stt11ctures.

The pub.tic hea?'ing ~as opened.

Dave Kenyon, pro~~rty GVner, advisGd that the sit~ vas originally zoned COlV'~rctAl and taen reaoiwd reaidsnttal, o~d that six ~cres wer• d•d1catcd to the Flood Control Diotr1ct. He noted, in respons~ to Council Member Kooro, ~~t the plan call• for 20% cover~ge for the footprints of the buildirls. Ana concluded th4t the proj~ct has the support of the ne!gh~rbood, Planning Co=misaian and Planning staff.

Patrick McD~~tt, Intan:i.ark Interest, Archic~ct. indicated th~t they havo &n uption on th~ pfop~ le • changed project koo- -the origi~l varehou=u concept vtth aore of a vida corridor !cage. He ~t4ted that $20.000 to fS0,000 por r&oAth in s•les tax could be gcner~ted mnd that th~y plan to attract more of an urban upscale clientele. He noted tbe estimated 660 jobs vill help -re>iuce the coag~ation en 101 if the eoployeas are local o~ coae froa S•n ~fael. ?hoy have heard from five, ftras 1n s~n Rafael who are 1nt•~•sted in locating in the ~ark. A bridge vill ~e construCtQd for access to th~ 1nduatrt~l park. Ha 1lluatrated on the plans hov th~ project 1• d1v1dod with a v1de corridor that vtll be landscap•d. "• raferred to a January 3 appeal lattur (of the prec!JJe devolop•ent planf and discussed tho conditions they vere app~4l1ni.

Council ~er Moore indicated that he vaa plc~aed they are mov1n; avay froe the varebouac type bu1ld1r.as and aske~- hcv tho project vould be •1gn~d. Pa~r1ck MeDel:"lllOtt.replied that t~ :iiajor focus of the sign~ would be tovards lloLlnd tl.11y.

-!-

...

CC87121S 01/06/88

NOVATO CITY COUNCU .. e· MINUTE EXCERPT DATlo~ l~-1>- 8'1 -

( (

Dave Kenyon spoke to aoi&Cll of the !SSUQO of tti'G ap?e&l of th• condit~~D.8 .:if a:he precise dev•lopm.cnt pun. Ha noceuS. that they do not plan to·.U­the Colden Cate Bridge pane~• stored on"th&ir property aa it vould be too e~ptn~ive. He requested ·that Coru!ition lld dealing v1th bridge · maintenance be elimJ.nated. He also addressed their concerns that a tonditions l2a. b £ c be olim:inoited and that they be allowed by the City to le~se the franklin Av~nue right-of-vay for employ~• p3~king until such t!ma as the City determines they need the property.

Dietric~ St~oeh. Stubar-Stroah Alaociates, advised that the bridge 1s a typical :X.alTrana concrete reinforced lov aaintenance bridge.

Ceorgtt Cohen, 2183 Feliz D:;ive, indicaud that he vas associated vitb th• Bedford.project next door .and that th• Colden Cate Dusin~ss Park was a good project th<lt fulfilled the need• for jobs ~nd a larger ~ax base. He b~licves the City should maintain the bridge, and noted that tha Colden C•te B~s!nesa Park and the Bedford Project are c011patible and .vtll reinforce each Qtber.

In re::pomse to Council Men~er Mcore • s qucunions regarding trip generation into cha Bedford property. John Dowden of OKS &.Associate•. noted that figures have improved since the last time Council considered the property.. Ha clarified chat the =oming peak hours are noc hicher ~nd ~hat tha evening hours are auch lover vith the currant proposed ai~ 1n the park. In response to Council Member Moore's ~oncern he

• acknovledged tbac there vaa no ret~il planned for th&: proposttd project.·

·Hanna Caupmann. 13 Fox Court, spoke in favor of the project 3nd support~d the cul-de-sec at the.north end of the free~ay.

Clark Blasdell. Executive Director of NEH, recommended that Council consider finding .Uttcac1cn zsech&ni~ to help aatablish -. job/houstnc balance. He also spoke in favor of the City allo~ing the develQper to l4ase the City property.

Pat Kc:Dei::sott re•pondsd to Council Kes~er Koore'a earlie~ queTC'ton that they Antici,ate 670 left-hand turne to the Bedford project during peak ~ouril.

1'ht publ~ be:rtng v.. closed.

touuctl Member Moore expressed eoncarn regArdxns traffic generation. He noted that vb•~ Colden Cate BUlSineae Park. l\ctdf ord and aftd the Hahn project ore ~uilt-outc a traffic lavel service of "D" 1• ant1c1p&ted. Me vaa al~o ccn:.cerncd by the lac:k of vie~ co~ridora and the sig~ina of ~~· project. Re not•d vhile Council aave a eignal early on by app~oving the zoning change, ha felt they should have aore infur.11.fitlon of vbat cha people to the north and aa..'t want. ·

CGUW:il Matber Cr~ agreed t~t he would ii~' to feel flllOriO, :~oafortalale vi.th the traffic.

qcnuu 01/06/08 13

( .. (

'C01.tru:il Mes:!ber Moore moved. seconded by Council ~insbor Cray. to direct a focutiad Ell for traffic iapacts.

Dave-Kenyon noted that the master plan ~nd precise development plan p:uvided fo? a vehicle reduction through a Traffic Systems Management ('!SM) Froaraa.. ) · >

John Dovden advised tMt: ,~he 1986 figures shov 565 outbound trips in peak houra aa~ that ~he cu~ent figures vhich are 8 1110nths old shov 318 trips. uhir:h, bring:ii it up to the beginning of level se~ice "D" and th.at TSM vill uduce it even further.

Th• City Plamier clarifi~d th&c TSK may b~ phased in over a two-year period frOlll the O?•ni.n: of each business. but after ch~t ~~ ;he goal is UOt. a:ll::t fH.ln&lUes may be .tmpose-ll.

In respons~ co Council Ma~b«r Cr~y. ~At McDel"ll'tott explained that a 20% reduction scant reducing the craf fic units during peak hours in peak turn l~nas. Eaployee surveys. which evaluate co~p!i~nce vith the TS.~ so~ls. eu:at be GUba1tted ·to the Collll.1:Nnity Developm•nt Director and begin vben full occupancy is a~hieYed and continues for another ten years. The City"Planner clar1fi~d to Council Ht=ber Cop~ that the •~ploy,e survoy is tied ~~ each business Ln the project.

Council Mntbcr Cray ·rHpoi::1~e~ to Pat McDer.~~-~~- :that t~ C9,l1ntyvide TSM Ord!n.tnce vo\IJ.d be voluntary 1n tbe beginn~~g.

Council Hm:iber HGore stated that, the tra!ftc·~tt1gat1ons should be imposed ~ ehe developar rather than on the individual businesses·.

Dave tcnyon argued tbat the project vill produce Joh~ th~t vill cause a countcr-cCQaute vbich could ·~tv. as a mitigation.

Council Hember Cray stated that he would vnt• ag~in~t a focused EIR because he V11S·satisficd that the pr~ject vould produce jobs for No~~to ~itizens. utilize 1'SH and ~~~u situ3ti~a... ___ _

The aotiou fsil~ 1-4. "1th Mayor Turner •nd Council Members Cope. Gray and ~1ght dissenting.

Haynf;·'T~~ ~d. uccmded ?ay Council Member Gray. to appl!'cvt the Ne~tivo 1'.4clue~~on. .lhe action canted 4-1 11 vir:h Couccil Me:iber Moon ~JilllDUng.

Council Habor Gray 1Nr1ed. mecanded by Couru:il Keaber Cope. to lntroduce ertd va1v$ !urther readin1 of the or~inAnce aeending the ~m"tinl desf.Anat!oa~

Council Meabe~ Moore seated that ho vould vote yes to avoid having the ordinance ~e&d in !tu entirety And vill vote no at the =ccond rcadtni.

~ aotioa ca~rtad U?Uaniaoualy.

•

(9

/" .''

., . . .

( ( ·Council Mccber Cray SGvad., seconded by Counc1l Meaber Copa, to introduce and va1ve further reading of the ordin3nc• approving the Colden Cate Bus1ness

0

P4rk Ma•ter Plna.·

Council Hs~ber' Cray scved, ser.cndcd by Council Member Cope, to 3mend the aain ~otion to OU11ond Condition J of the "'4&ter plan to read aa foiltJVs: "A barrier will be constructed at the Franklin Avenue and Alice s~re«t intersection to block the vehicul3r traffic of th• gener3l public in order to prevent vandalisa, and 47inking in pnrked cars on Franklin Avenue aa deacr1b~d by the neighborhood. Said barrier, how~er,. vould allOV' access by •merger.Cy vehicles, bicycles •nd pcdeatrian traffic.•• ·

I

Tluz City Enginoer rccommen~ed alternate language for Cond~tion 3. Dincussion follOVlld and ho clarified that 3tim1lar experic~~ea of obnoxiowi uees of tha risbt-of-vay hAd occurred at a project near the Fireman's fund building, ~nd that st~ff had f~l: there vere some translatable features th.at would vork vell .1t this project.

Council He~ber Cope noted that since the neighborhood vao vill!ng to hav~ the berri~r on their side of t~e freeway, he would support the ~~at to the l:B&St~r plan.

D1scue~1on followed regarding Condition 4 of the master P,~~n and ,the City Enigineer <llXpr~ssed concern re1ard1ng the .1pplicnnt•.~-, request to be &lloved to leaae the Fran~lin Avenue right-of-uay with~ii~ qualifying studies baiag don•. Re rc:c:o=:aended alternate langu~ge\ fo,t' Ccndit"ic;n 4. '

Dav& !Cenyoc ctated that the approval of the l•••• could be granted with tbe ccoditioD that 1: b• in conf ormanc• vith th• at•t• code and \that tho park buaine•~~§ vould b~ rcspotUS1ble for maintaining the land.8.capiag., bilte path and parking area.a.

Tbc City &.agineer cn'lph.a"sized that 4 revokable li~~nse or leaee tha~ v~s ~8Ccm:Mtnd8d by the developer vould n•ve CO be b~OUlht back f ~l' Council approvAl,,

Council Keaber Gray ~otcd that a policy decision vould have to be aade vhecher leam1ng th• Fr.anklin Avanu. right-o!-vay for parking vas an appropriate USCw ·

The City Planner responded that tha project could be subdivided and tbwn there vould be aor• than one property owner using the rigbt-of--vay. The Etisinatrina staff vaa concerned that th• blke path a,1'.d andacaping vould b& in tbe r1ght-of-vay as vdl.

Council Me.mber r:iight expreHCol4 tnta\"Glat in tho revenue that the City vould gllin if ths property uere leased.

Cwucil Mwar ltni.~ht iaoYed. seconded by Council Kftber Cray, to pend Co~d1t1on 4 aa follova1: "Ae a aatt•r of policy. the Council doe9 oot

...

./

·.

(~ (

obj•et to the use of the portion of Franklin Avenue adjacent to the project provtted that ~n ~ccep~~~le des1an to include the ~lc1cle path which me1:ts s:ate code and a lea'e"p3)111!ent can be nego;fa.tcd." Th~ auandment tc the main motion cari:ie~ unanimously.

Council &mbcr Moore stated thoit ~e vo\i'ld vote y::1s on the first readiag of the easter pl•n otd!nance to av~!d.:taving it read in its ~ntirety. and vote no at tbe second reading~

Ihe eaiti raotion as amt:ndfld t:arried unaniJ:oualy.

Council Membe~ Cope voved. second•d by Council He~bar Knight. to approve the Golden Cate Sbslneaa Park Precise Duv~lopcent Plan.

Council Manbers Moore and Gray expressed concern regardin& the appeal of Condition lld of ~he precise developocat plan and that :hey should be r~u.ired to take the respon5ib1lity of maint~ining the bridge •.

Council Member Knight ar3ued that thin project vould gen=rat• revenue acd an sGtimat•d 660 jobs, And that the City should be responsible for

the m.Aintcnance~

Council Ke~bcr Cope agreed and stated that it vas rema:rkable that the developer 1• v!lling to construct a $1.S million bridge. He recosiaendtd adding A condition that for a certain numb5r of years the bridge·vil.l be moltitored far construction defects.

Mayor Turner added that he was villing to accept responsibility to have the City na1n~a1n the bridge.

Council Member Knight soved. seconded by Mayor Turnee. to ainend t~ e&in motion aad.4clete ~ond1t1on lld. the aaendaent to the main motion carried 3-2, vi~h Council Haab•rs Cray and Moore dissenting.

C:Juncil Member ltnisht liSCved. seconded by Mayor Turner. to amend the ruin aaticn to add· "a~goal of" co tba..f.ir.!lt 11eru:ence betveen-"u~ ~ and "not l•lllS than' 20%. 11

•

~cil Kcaber Cray ~· concerned that if th~ condition was QO~~~i~d ·as requ••~cd, it ~uld zwt be aeaBurable •

th• amelldaene to th-~ aain motion failed 2-3, uith Council Hletllbet~ Cope. Gray &M Moors diuehting.

Cound.l Mua~er· Cray acved. Hconded by Mayor Turner .• to amend the aain motion to read: "for a period not to exceed aix yeat'.~ after 90% occupancy." The 111110tiou carri•~ unanimously. '

Council Member Cop•.& l\lOVed. nconde~ by Council Metllber Knight. :.to aaen.i the uln aoticm tc add tc the end of Condition 6: "Such stops ~~all be p:ecvid~d at the till• eervice is provided by th• Colden Cate Br1iigo Diatrict~ No phys~csl ~econf1gurat1on of the street profile sh~ll be req~~d vhen ~he ~tcpa are provided. The City shall requir~-a bond or

: CC8712l5 01.'06/88

• .C, .....

;- -.

..

(· ( .....

other siail~r guarantee that thcae •topm are provided •ubject to die .approv~~ of the City Engineer." ?he motion carried unaniaoualy.

Cou~c!! Kember Cray aoved. ~~conded by Council Hember Cope. to .amend the m:ain motion to add to the end of Condition n '!!~!'. detailed in the sub,"!litted precise de~:.~~nt plan~ and aa approved by' 1~he Destgn Revi~v Committee." 'the motion carried unanimously.

Council Hscber Cray lSlOVed. seconded by Mayor Turner. to.' amend the aaln motion to add the sentance: ~is shall not preclude t~e use of landscape !n!'!!lll for landscap1Qt ut1•» only. subject co tha ~pproval of the Cor:cuuity l\'9-.·dopmcnt otaff." The i:totion carded unanimously.

Council Heiiolber Cray coved. seconded by Mayor Turner. to aaend the aain cotion to delete the words "dredging beneath" and •ubstitute "sspan of" and add to the last scnter.ce "subject to the approv~l of the Karin County Flood Control District." the aotion carried ur1~n1aou1Jly.

Council Member Cope aoved. second~d by Council Member Cr~y. to &mend the asin moci~n to coDfor:n Conditiona 12a. bo c. d & f 1n che precise de~~lopaaot plan to Conditions 3 &nd 4 in the master plan~ th• action carried u:imi!Dausly.

The u1n eotl~n1 aa &&anded carr111d 4-1. vith Council Heather Moore dissenting.

l CC87lUS 01/06/U· 17

..

.. C .. ( City o! ~OV.lto Environaient.ll Rcvicv Guidelines : AP~F~iDIX C

£!:\"tr.o:~!!.\'TAt Cl!E£l'Lta q·o be completed by .shff •• P•rc ot the Intiol Study)

D.lte: .•· l0-t9-EJ7

A. PSOJ!CT I~70RlL\Tio:r ) St~ff Hc:mbcr: Alan f .. "lzure

., --------------------------~ 1. K.lme ~f Project:

3. P.-irc:cl Yo. (s):

2. File Reference: ~os1-noa. ~fP87-ooJ. ros1-nnz . 153-144-21 & 24. 153-170-IJ & St

E:.1'l>•nio11 for oil "yes• •nd "ouybe• •••"•ro sh•ll be pro•id•d oo the ><t>ebd. sheet together 1.:ith rccom:ne:ided mitig:it.ien 1111:.:i::ut"~:;.

Yes l. [.;i:-tt: I/ill tbe proposal result in: -- -

a. Subst.lntial exc.:ivation, fillini, displ~cem~n~ or other disturb3nce of tbc soil?, X

b. Incre.lse~ e:cposi.Jre of people or' property·te geologic h.lz~~;?

c. Subst~nti~l ~;~~ion or silt.itio~?,

d. Int~odu=tion of sub::t.lnti~l amounts of Cbetllic.ll, gaseous or r.ldi°'1c~ive =:atcri.lls into the natur~l envin,,nm!~t (including fer~ilizecs, pe~ticide=, etc.?

:2. ~· Vil! the propo:al tC$Ult in: ~. Subst.lnti2t ~ir c=i~:ion:

or detcrior::ition or ac.!Jic:nt .. .air 'lU.llity?

3.

b. The crc~tion nf objcc• tion.:1ble osfor:?

~. Sub:~ntiJl ~lter~tion of c~i=tin~ ~bso~t.ion rates. drain.l~c P.l~tcrn:, or th~

SS/A 1f)/~5/5l

r~tc ~r.d .lC:Ount ot surf.lee t:.\tcr cunoCt"? X

-is-

''

-

H:wbc ------

- - -·-------

x -

- x -

-

,

r· - --·- ·-·

4.

s •.

( e

6.

7.

(·

b. Subst.1nti.:il ~lt-cr.:i:ticms to !!.!.

the ponding or .course of flov x of flooJ waters? .

c. E~p~sure of people or property to watcr•rcl3ted fuz3rds?

d. Subst.:intial ch.:inge in the quantity o~ !low ch.:it3c~cr-·istics of .groundw.tter?

c. Adverse effects upon the quality of &ny surface body o! v .. ter?

~ Vill the propos.:il result in:

a. Subst.anti::&l incr~a$ed potenti~l tor destructive fires ~ithin n.:itur.:il are.:i$?

b. A subst.lntial r~duclion in the level of fire a.;afcty?

Pl~nt .:ind AnillL2i Lite. Will the -P~~sal result in:

a. Subst.:intial ch.lnJ;e in the diversity of species or nUR-ber ,of 1u1y species o! pl.ints or clni,r11.3ls?

b. Reduction: in·nuaber of any unique 9

r~ue o~: endangered pl.int.s or anim;als or coeaunit~ea of 5ucb?

c. lntroductioo of exotic plants and anltaals to .the dotri!M!at of ~nive specie:?

d. Subst~ntial reduction in p~i~ agricultur~l acrcose or U$C?

!2!!!· Wi~l the proposal .resuit in:•

a. Sigftif ic3ne iac~easc in existing a•.biea~ neise levels?

b. Exposure of .people to noise levels •bove thoa~ desir~bl~ for t.he intended use?

Aesth~tica. Will ~e pcoject result in • stanifican~ ~nd 4~nstr~blc nea~tlve a91thetlc ~!feet?

88/A l0/25/83

l

,:it/' .. ~·

-26-

-

-.::

-

-

( .

H:iybe ...!!!?... Mot Appllc:ihle

-x

.. . x ,_ x

x --x

";

X·

x -- -\

:< --. ... "'· ~~~

~ x -x

x

8.

,

~nd Us~. Will eh~ project result in 3n iailncemen~ t.o gro~~h in th~ •. surrounJing .>re3?

9. ll.>tur:il ·R~!:nurces·. Y~li .ch~· ~ropcul rCsU'i\: ··in i ·

a.. Subst:Snti.':&l focre3se in t.hl! r3te 0£ u.$~ ~r ~c~letion of any D3tur3l resource? .

10. Tr3nsnart.'.ltion/Circu13tio~. Vill the propo:3l resul~ in:

11.

a. Gcner3t.ion of subs~nti3l ~ddition3l tr:iff ic su~h th:it existina levels of service will deterior~te?

b. ·Dem3nd for new or improved tr~csport3tion f~cilit.ics?

c. Incre.>se in tr3ffi~ baz.,rd~?

~- Elicin3tion of po~sibility fo~ futa=e tr3nspor~tton system iQprove:nent.s or e~pansions?

e. !n3dequ3tc me.Jns of e1c3p~ or ev3c~~tion in ~n eaercency?

Pu~tic·S~zvices. Vill the propos3l ~ve aa s1~uitic3nt effect. upon, or re:;u1.t. in a need f~r ne11 er altered ~overmnen­t.Jl services?

12. Utilities. Yill the propo:3l h3ve ~ ~i;n1fic~nt. e£!ec~ upon utility :systt:m1 including un3ntlcip~tcd uellll:)nds on ~hoie systet.J:1

13. Com:nunitv. '<lill the ~ropo~:al result. in:

a. Si~ntfic.:ant public controversy rc:btc•i to oin cnviron111Cut.:al i::::uc?

b~ Si.s;ni.i-ic=-nt cii.::pbcc:•cnr. or ('C!OfllC er th~ di::ru?~ion o! c•t~~li::h~d nc isht>oehJ>o•l=-·~

·.

( " .....

x

x

x -

x -

• (

c. Crc;ation of un:inticipated 1l~nds on delivery of he3l~h or soci3l services?

14. Ener;;. Will the pr:opoul' result in:

~- Inefficienr. utiliz3tion of energy?

b. DiSc:ouril:emen~ of dtern3tive energy sources or tr3nsP,or~tion molles"l

15. Archeolo5ic3l/1tistoric:il. Will the propos3l result in 3n ~lter3tion of ~ signific3n~ ~rche~logic3l or historic3l site, stl'ucture, object, or building?

16. Pl3n Conformit¥·

3. Is this proposoal inconsistent vitb the oolicie~ ~nd intent of the NovAto General Pl~n or spcci£ic 3CC3 pl3ns of the City7

I~ the propos3l inc:onsi$tent vith the plans and polici~~ of other agenc:ie: ~vin1 jurisdiction?

17. H3nd3tO!)' Findings of Signific3nc:e

a. Does the project have the potential to degr3de the quality of the en• viro~nt, substantioally reduce the h.1bitat of a fi1h or wildlife species, c3use a, fish or vlldlife popul•tion to drop below self-sustaining levels,· threaten to elimin3te a pl3nt or 3Di~l coftllllunity~ reduce the ~WBber or ~estrict th~ r3nge o! a rar~ er end~naered plant or anlzal or eliain3te impG~tAnt ex3mplea of ,the .Ujor periods of Californi~ hista~ or pr~history?

b. Does the pr~jcct h~ve a potenti3l to.3chieve ahort-tcra, t~ the dis­a'C1vanuge of long-tet"a, envi.t"OnlM!nUl 10.\\ls?

-2a-

: ,

tfavbt! -.· x

.-x -

------

c •

• . ... ·~ c. Docs the: project h.lv~ imp3cts ~hi~h

~re individu3lly 1imiteJ. but cu.~ul3tively consider3ble? (~Cumu-1.ith·et~· consider.lblc:" CC3n$ th.:it the increocnt.il e!f~cts of an indiviJu3l proj~ct ~re con::ider~bl~~hen vie~cJ in connection wiUi the effects of p.lst projects, current projects, .lnd

:1o - ~:Ot. .\nr: t i ·=~ht ... . (.-

prob.lble fuiur.e project~.) X ---d. Does the project· h3vc environ­ment3l, effects vhich vill C3usc subsilnti~l adverse effects on hll:!Un beings, either directly or indirect!~,-?

---

C. Questions .:ins•.ered "yes" or ,;ID.lybe'' by st3f! in the >3bove H~tini cons::i:::.::: a reco=menJed finJing of signi!ic:mce until th~ Envirur~::u::nt.Jl C'3orrli.:::.:.:>r ~kc:: 2li;/hc:r dctcrmin~tion. tfodi f'ic:itior. uf findin-:t:: required by ::!°:•! EnviroMcnt;il Coordin.Jtor must be noteJ in the ch,~cl:li::t.

D. DE1'~1I~l,\TIO!I (To be !il!~d out by the £nviron:nent3l Coordinnor !oli.o~:i::; his/her cv.:al~tion o! the Initi.:al Study)

On the b.:asis of ~his !niti3~ Study:

l.

3.

83/,\ 10/251&3 •

.. .

It is found th.:at. th~ proposed projr.ct WILY. ~:or h:i·.·~ ,, si.;::i..!i.=.l:tt effect on the environment, onJ • DR.\FT >1'GATl\"E DE'1 .. l::.\!!G:: { vill he prep>ccd by the lc•J· City Jcportucgt. ~

It is found th.:at dthough thee propo:;eJ project could h;ivc .l

sj.gnifi.c.lnt effc..:t on the environrnc::nt. there vill nc.t. be .l s1;;­nific.:ant e!!cct in this inst.:ance bc.:c.:au:.t? fo:isil>le :miti~:?:t:.on me.:asurcs exist Cor imp~c:ts identified .:a: si~nific:.:ant in the In.iti.ll Stully. T.aezc mc.:isut'cs .:ire:: ____ _ ... b.

Re!lcc:tctl in revi::cu exhibit: suhmittcJ Cor .:irp:-.w.al by the applic:.:ant.

Described in St.ltcmcnt: :Jtt~chcrl with the 'IO'Cittcn concurrence of the .:applic~ut .:is to their fo.'.l:ibLlit;­and .;ic:ccpt.lbility.

13.:l!!:ctJ on the focc;oin;;;, .:a DILU"T ::EG:\TI'.'l: DtCL\i':.\TlQ~; \."ill l•c prcr.:arcd.

It i:; fo1mJ tt1.:at the pro11o::c1J 1sroj'!ct tt .. \Y h.av~ ~ s ii:ni fic.1nt cff'c:ct on thP. envfr rwc:it, :1nc1 .Jn E:•v rnu::m::rr:u. r:1r.\t:T l<El'O!~T b l'

e

(

e

ff ...

l -

. • • / /'

r '\.

, . ( ,.

COLDEN CATE BUSINESS PARK

Explanation and0

aitigation measures for ell Ccctnrs checked "ye~."

la. The l'lite has' 0

becn used extensively over the yca.ars .ass a disposasl ar~a !or excesa soils froa construction projects. includin1 ,. alteration due t~ the U.S. 101 freevay construction. the proposed developaent will entail substant1'll .mounts of impervious surfaces. including buildings. streets and parkin& areas. Several feet of fill aaterial vill be required to bring the finish floor elGvationa at minimum height• relative to a lOO-ye3r flood.

3a/b. As addressed in la above, the site vill-be subatanti3lly :i.ltered. An engineered surface and subsu~face gtorm drainage systes vill be installed. Disposition of site drainage vill be to a system along the railroad right-of-way and t~ ~ovcco Cr~ek. this nev dr~inage cystem will eliminate ponding 3nd sit• flooding for storms u~ to a 100-yoar strength.

~Ob. Neu transpor~ation faciliti•• such ·as an off-ramp ,extension for northbound 101 will be constructed a• a result of the Rovl~nd Pla~a development. This off-rmnp. however. is also needed 'tO

serva tbe subjc.:t site becawae it sh.ares 4 co:imson access with Rollland Pl3%&o that being ftovlend Vay. Add1tlon3lly to serve this site. a nev accesa bridge vill be required to ~xtend RovJond VGy • os~osa Novato Craek.

11. Once the east side of u~s. 101 is developed. additional police ~trols and Fire District response~ vill most likely result. For thi• project alone, new police and !i~a personnel vuuld not be nended, hovcYCtr. 48 a cumulative lapact la ~r•ated by full developaant of the ea.st aide. this aay not-be true.

17~~ The cuaulative impacts of this project and the associ4ted proj;cts along the east aide of U.S. 101 will primarily c•nter around additional traffic congegtion on u.s. 10!. Whil~ resolution of traffic coagescion on the freeway is a re1tonal problem. thi• 9rojecc. as vas required of the Rcvlmnd Plaza project. v111 need to 1nsc1tuta a TSH (traffic S7aceraa Kanageaent) pro1r::a to reduce iap&cts.

l . 1/5139 10/21/87 t