c3 – applying implementation science to state & district level pbis systems steve goodman,...
TRANSCRIPT
C3 – Applying Implementation Science to State & District Level PBIS Systems
Steve Goodman, Michigan's Integrated Behavior & Learning Support Initiative
Carol Randall, Vermont Agency of Education
Maximizing Your Session Participation
When Working In Your Team
Consider 4 questions:
– Where are we in our implementation?
– What do I hope to learn?– What did I learn?– What will I do with what I learned?
Where are you in the implementation process?
Adapted from Fixsen & Blase, 2005
• We think we know what we need so we are planning to move forward (evidence-based)
Exploration & Adoption
• Let’s make sure we’re ready to implement (capacity infrastructure)
Installation
• Let’s give it a try & evaluate (demonstration)
Initial Implementation
• That worked, let’s do it for real and implement all tiers across all schools (investment)
• Let’s make it our way of doing business & sustain implementation (institutionalized use)
Full Implementation
Leadership Team Action Planning
Worksheets: StepsSelf-Assessment: Accomplishments & Priorities
Leadership Team Action Planning Worksheet
Session Assignments & Notes: High Priorities
Team Member Note-Taking Worksheet
Action Planning: Enhancements & Improvements
Leadership Team Action Planning Worksheet
EFFECTIVE & USABLE INTERVENTIONSWhat exactly are people saying and doing that makes things better for children, adults, and families?
STAGES What steps lead to successful implementation?
DRIVERSWhat critical supports are needed to make this change? What is the infrastructure?
TEAMSWho takes responsibility for and helps guide the change process?
IMPROVEMENT CYCLESHow can we create more hospitable environments, efficiently solve problems and get better?
Making It Happen
Effective & Usable Interventions
Stages
Drivers
Cycles
Teams
©Copyright Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase
Active Implementation Frameworks
Stages of ImplementationImplementation is not an event
The stages describe the current state of implementation within a district. The stages provide a framework to identify key activities and accomplishments that would expedite progress in implementation efforts. The speed at which schools/districts move through the stages of implementation vary, based on the experience of staff and allocation of resources.
Stages of ImplementationFocus Stage Description
Exploration/Adoption
Decision regarding commitment to adopting the program/practices and supporting successful implementation.
Installation Set up infrastructure so that successful implementation can take place and be supported. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit, develop plan.
Initial Implementation
Try out the practices, work out details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts.
Elaboration Expand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation.
Continuous Improvement/Regeneration
Make it easier, more efficient. Embed within current practices.
Work to do it right!
Work to do it better!
Should we do it?
Implementation Drivers – Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’
competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports.
– Help ensure sustainability and improvement at the organization and systems level
– Help guide leaders to use the right leadership strategies for the situation
The Infrastructure for Change
Performance Assessment (fidelity)
Integrated & Compensatory
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers O
rganization Drivers
Leadership Drivers
Consistent and Competent Use of Effective Innovations
Better Outcomes for Students
Integrated & Compensatory
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
How:
What:
Why:
Help to develop, improve, and sustain teachers’ and staff’s competence and confidence to implement effective practices
Help ensure sustainability and
improvement at the school and
District levels
Help guide leaders to use the right leadership strategies for the situation
Performance Assessment (fidelity)
Coaching
Training
Selection
Integrated & Compensatory
Systems Intervention
Facilitative Administration
Decision Support Data SystemC
ompe
tenc
y D
river
s Organization D
rivers
Leadership Drivers
Consistent and Competent Use of Effective Innovations
Better Outcomes for Students
Integrated & Compensatory
Implementation Drivers
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
APPLYING IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE TO STATE & DISTRICT LEVEL PBIS SYSTEMS
The Vermont Implementation Story
PBIS Participation
2007:
3 schools in
1 supervisory union
2014:
128 schools (43%) in 50 supervisory
unions (85%)
School Staff,
Students & Families
District Team
School Leadershi
p Team
SU/District Leadership
Team
Regional Training & Coaching
StatePlanning
& Technical Assistan
ce
Feedback Loops
Support Loops
feedback and data on implementation
efforts
supports for effective practices implemented
with fidelity
Vermont’s Cascade
SWIS-IS
IS
VTPB
iS In
tro For
um CPI
FBA/
BIP
Data
Days
Life
Spa
ce In
terv
entio
n
Unive
rsal (T
ier 1
)
Targ
eted
(Tier 2
)
Sum
mer
Institu
te
Social S
kills
Tier
1 R
eadine
ss
Trau
ma
Class
room
Man
agem
ent
Data
Day W
ebinar
Unive
rsal O
rient
ation
Targ
eted
Orie
ntat
ion
Inte
nsive
Orient
ation
Wra
paro
und
Orient
ation
Unive
rsal S
cree
ning
Swift
at S
WIS
0
20
40
60
80
100
SY 14 Professional Learning Events: % Highly Satisfied and Satisfied
Coaching Delivery Model Defined
at each level of the cascade across implementation stages selection, training, TA & accountability delivery method
The Vermont PBIS Framework for Technical Assistance, Coaching and Coordination is on our website.
Gradual Release and Transfer
build capacity at the regional, SU/District and school levels
recursive process with new practices
“A coach is one who makes himself progressively unnecessary.”
Thomas Carruthers
select the correct tool and learn it well systems: roles, time and access
Lesson Learned: Capacity to Use Data
New way of seeing things
Shifting gears
Irreversible
Transformation to something quite different
Requires new learning
A NEW story is told
Second Order Change
Effective Collaboration
Expertise (Well Designed Professional Learning)
High Quality Instruction and Intervention
Comprehensive and Balanced Assessment System
Systemic and Comprehensive Approach
Five Components
VT MTSS Field Guide & Self
Assessment
SWIFT
K-12 vtMTSSPBIS
(MTSS-B)School Effectiveness
Indicators
State-wide Context SettingVermont’s Education Quality Standards
host
environment
K-12 vtMTSS: We will meet you where you are and support you in reaching
your VT MTSS vision for ALL learners.
Fidelity to the model with differentiation in starting point and timeline
External Systems Coach
Build Capacity in SU/School Leadership Team
Dialog about WHY VT MTSS? Launch the VT MTSS Self-Assessment Facilitate VT MTSS Implementation Rubrics Guide the Data2Action process
Fidelity Conversation: Strengths and Areas for Attention
components
Created by Vermont Reads Institute and Vermont Statewide Steering Committee on RTII
Implementation Conversation: What is our capacity to implement…?
drivers
stages
components
VT AOE – State Personnel Development Grant
Actionable Information Applied to Continuous Improvement Planning
continuous
improvement
Adapted from Western Heights Independent School District, PLC Data Analysis Template 2008
A statewide structure to create capacity for an integrated Behavior and Reading Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) that can be implemented with fidelity, is sustainable over time and utilizes data-based decision making at all levels of implementation support
Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative (MiBLSi)
Model Demonstration: Does it work in a specific
setting with a specific population?
Replications:Can it be reproduced in different settings with different populations? Scale-Up:
Increase “reach” of practice to critical mass
of implementation
Embed within existing work: Provide access as
current practice
Examine Feasibility/Efficacy of Practice Being Developed
Modifying System for Standard Practice
Invest heavily in resources to produce results
Utilize typical/existing resources
Moving from Model Demonstration to Standard Practice
Why we moved from school to district model…
Schools do not always get to criteria for fidelity of implementation.
Schools do not always maintain implementation efforts.
Supporting a school based participation model cannot be scaled and is not durable as district based.
Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support for MiBLSi
Students
Building Staff
Building Leadership Team
LEA District Cabinet and
Implementation Team
Across State
Multiple ISD/LEA Teams
All staff
All students
Multiple schools w/in local district
Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support, and implementation supports
Provides coaching and TA for LEA and/or ISD Teams
Provides guidance and manages implementation
Provides effective practices to support students
Improved behavior and reading
ISD Cabinet and Implementation
Team
Regional Technical
Assistance
MichiganDepartment of
Education/MiBLSi Leadership
Multiple LEAs w/in intermediate district
Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support, and implementation supports
Statewide Structure of Support
Who is supported?
How is support provided?
Building Team
Local Education
Agency Team
Intermediate School
District Team
State Education
Agency Team
Practices (Innovation)
Supporting Infrastructure
(Implementation)
Grade Level Team
Framework for Addressing Practice and Supports
Teacher
Con
text
ual F
ocus
Con
text
ual F
ocus
Unit of Implementation
Focus on Practices Focus on Support
Cabinet Level Team Implementation Planning Team
• Vision
• Political support
• Priority
• Visibility
• Allocation of resources
• Barrier busting
• Collect, summarize, evaluate data
• Develop district plan
• Coordinate and monitor plan
• Create/modify materials and tools
• Identify barriers to implementation
Coordination
1
2
3
Leadership Function of District Teams
Transformational Process: Developing “Host Environments” for MTSS Implementation with Fidelity
Existing System of Practice
Transformation Zone: Make it easy to change
Desired System of Practice: Make it easy to sustain
Implementation Teams• Analyze existing system
of practice
• Develop Plan
• Coordinate and monitor Create/modify materials
• Identify barriers to implementation
• Modify plan for continuous improvement
• Adjust system to address new challenges/pressures to implementation fidelity
• Coordinate and monitor
Multi-Tiered System of Support Supports (MTSS)
Structure
MTSS Delivery
Local Education Agencies
Schools
Intermediate School District (ISD)
Cabinet Team Liaison
Implementation Team
MTSS Coordinator
MTSS Technical Assistance /Professional Development Providers
VisionPriorityFundingPolitical support
PlanningCoordinationTechnical Support
TrainingCoachingTechnical Assistance
FeedbackLoop
Stages of ImplementationFocus Stage Description
Exploration/Adoption
Decision regarding commitment to adopting the program/practices and supporting successful implementation.
Installation Set up infrastructure so that successful implementation can take place and be supported. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit, develop plan.
Initial Implementation
Try out the practices, work out details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts.
Elaboration Expand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation.
Continuous Improvement/Regeneration
Make it easier, more efficient. Embed within current practices.
Work to do it right!
Work to do it
better!
Should we do it?
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Admin Teams
Focus of Work: 2012- 2014
ISD Cabinet
LEA Cabinet
LEA Implementation Team
ISD Implementation Team
LEA Implementation Team
Exploration/AdoptionInstallationInitial Implementation
School Teams
Admin Teams
ISD Implementation Team
Developing the structures to help Local Education Agencies (LEAs) develop support structures or to directly support school implementation
District Cohort 1District Cohort 2Readiness work for District Cohort 3
Developing Intermediate School District (ISD)
Infrastructure
District Cohort 1District Cohort 2Readiness work for District Cohort 3LEA
Developing LEA Infrastructure
Accessing implementation support from ISD
District Cohort 1District Cohort 2Readiness work for District Cohort 3LEASchool
Training School Teams
Accessing implementation support from LEA or ISD
The number of schools to be selected for involvement in your training plan will depend on the constant tension of three factors regarding implementation
Resource Allocation
Implementation Timeframe
Implementation Quality
Support for first 50 schools (model demonstrations)Support for first 500 schools (learning how to scale and support implementation in complex systems)Support for scaling and beyond (becoming standard practice of how we do education)
Lessons Learned
• Use existing structures to scale up the work
• No new funding available, need to be creative with existing funding stream
• Re-allocate staff• Organize around efficiencies to
make room for the work
Supporting Infrastructure