budget update fy 12 mid year revenue analysis and fy 13 budget planning
DESCRIPTION
Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis and FY 13 Budget Planning. Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCIL JANUARY 26, 2012. 1. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis
andFY 13 Budget Planning
Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis
andFY 13 Budget Planning
Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning
PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCILJANUARY 26, 2012
Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning
PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCILJANUARY 26, 2012
1
UT System Office of Strategic Initiatives Report
UT System Office of Strategic Initiatives Report
Undergraduate Fall Tuition & Fee Price & Operational Revenue – January 12, 2012
Posted at Financial Affairs /Budget Website:
http://www.utsa.edu/financialaffairs/Budget/docs/pdf/uts-undergradFallTuition.pdf
Undergraduate Fall Tuition & Fee Price & Operational Revenue – January 12, 2012
Posted at Financial Affairs /Budget Website:
http://www.utsa.edu/financialaffairs/Budget/docs/pdf/uts-undergradFallTuition.pdf
2
Cumulative Rate Increase since Fall 03UT Dallas 110%UTSA 98.2%UT Arlington 96.4%UTEP 89.4%UT Austin 79.9%
3
Amounts above adjusted for inflation
Cumulative Change since 03-04UT Arlington -33.7%UTEP -17.4%UT Dallas -16.8%UT Austin -12.3%UTSA - 5.6%
4
Above amounts adjusted for inflation 5
Mid Year Tuition & Fee Revenue Projections
6
Tuition and Student Fee Revenue ProjectionsTuition and Student Fee Revenue Projections
TOTAL Tuition Statutory Tuition Designated Tuition
Lab & Supplemental Fees
TOTAL Mandatory Student Fees Designated - Mandatory Fees Auxiliary - Mandatory Fees
TOTAL Incidental Student Fees Designated Program, Course Fees Auxiliary Student Parking
TUITION AND STUDENT FEES(before set asides for Tuition)
Budget FY2012
$143,90644,69599,211
261
$68,07741,57726,500
$22,36118,976
3,385
$234,605
Forecast FY2012 *
$149,86347,602
102,261
281
$70,39743,03027,367
$23,28719,887
3,400
$243,828
% Increase over Budget
4.1%6.5%3.1%
7.7%
3.4%3.5%3.3%
4.1%4.8% 0.4%
3.9%
($000)
* Preliminary forecast pending Spring Census review
7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Frcst FY 2012
Grad Non-Res
Grad Res
UG Non-Res
UG Res
671.0
Revenue Generating Semester Credit HoursRevenue Generating Semester Credit Hours
693.1 714.3 716.4
(in th
ousa
nds)
SCH (in thousands)
81.5% of exemptions due to Hazelwood-a 3
fold increase over 3 yrs
8
HC%
Chg SCH%
ChgTotal
Revenue Exempted
% Chg
FY 11-12 ESTIMATE
2,221 28% 23,434 36% 7,431,000 40%
FY 10-11 1,740 113% 17,170 165% $5,317,039 162%
FY 09-10 816 20% 6,488 23% 2,025,978 29%
FY 08-09 681 <8%> 5,263 <7%> 1,566,792 <3%>
FY 07-08 738 -- 5,665 -- 1,616,761 --
Hazelwood Exemption Trend
• Total revenue exempted includes all tuition & fees, except Student Service fees.• Hazelwood exemptions comprise 84% of total exemptions (FY12 est. = $8.9 Mil)
9
We expect Hazelwood exemptions to continue to grow at a higher rate as more veterans exit the military.
10
Revenue ProjectionsRevenue Projections Estimated revenue generating SCH (non-exempted) or
headcount depending on how fee is assessed TERM
FY 11 Actual
SCH
FY 12 Budgeted
SCH
Revised Projection
SCH
Chgover PYActual
Chg over CY
Budget
“Pending” Mid Yr
Adjstmt
FALL 334,735 327,740 342,659 7,924 2.4%
14,9194.6%
342,659
SPR 309,483 301,150 309,483 0 8,3332.8%
315,673
SUM 70,121 66,110 64,220 -5,901<8.4%>
-1,890<2.9%>
59,600
TOTAL
714,339 695,000 716,362 2,0230.28%
21,3623.1%
717,9323.3%
increase over budgetWill be adjusted based on Spring Census review
Actual FY 10-11 Certified “Paying” SCH and Headcount
Fall HC Fall 10 Spring
HC Spring 11 Sum
HC Sum 11 Total HC
% HC
Total SCH
% SCH
UG - Res 24,462 299,942 22,593 274,622 8,911 57,834 55,966 82.2%
632,398 88.5%
UG - NR 513 6,967 521 7,177 286 1,741 1,320 1.9%
15,885 2.2%
G - Res 3,456 21,580 3,353 21,468 1,756 8,522 8,565 12.6%
51,570 7.2%
G - NR 229 1,615 241 1,741 103 455 573 0.8% 3,811 0.5%
Doctoral Res 630 4,566 603 4,407 394 1,557 1,627 2.4%
10,530 1.5%
Doctoral NR 14 65 14 68 6 12 34 0.05%
145 0.1%
Total FY 11 29,304 334,735 27,325 309,483 11,456 70,121 68,085 100% 714,339 100%
Frcst FY12 29,840 342,659 27,325 309,483 10,746 64,219 67,911 -- 716,362 --
11
1.2% 2.8% 1.7% <0.3%>
5.0% 5.5% 12.4% 1.3%
18.6% 17.8% 19.4%<4.1%>
14.0% 61.6% .9%<19.0%>
TOTAL
TOTAL
5.4% incr.
26.0% incr.
50.6% incr.
1.3% 23.3%3.1% 0.3%
60.0% incr.
8.1% incr.
12
Cumulative Change
• Biggest % growth increase due to non-resident students• UG students account for 91% of SCH & 90% of Tuition & Fee revenue
FALL 2011 Semester
13
14
Mid Year Budget Adjustments Mid Year Budget Adjustments
Current Year FY12• Mid Year Budget adjustments will be made to all
revenue accounts using Fall 11 Actual, Spring Census & 85% of prior year Summer SCH/Headcounts• Summer 12 enrollment unpredictable due to lack
of Pell awards• Financial Aid suggests Summer 12 enrollment
will be closer to FY09 – which is roughly 85% of what we budgeted
• Adjustments will be completed by end of February
15
Tuition & Fee ProposalTuition & Fee Proposal
Graduation Rate Improvement Plan was very well received by UT System but required changes to draft proposal: Eliminate Energy fee and change designated tuition
rates to reflect exactly 2.600% increase in T&F net of Athletics increase for undergraduate total academic costs. Resulted in: New designated tuition rates: Increased designated tuition set asides for
financial aid Less total revenue to replace the lost funding to
the utility budget
16
Tuition & Fee ProposalTuition & Fee Proposal
Undergraduate Designated Tuition
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY2014
New Rate $142.75 $150.25 $158.10
Proposed Rate $148.75 $156.75
Revised Per Semester Total Academic Cost (TAC)15 SCH
$4,541.25 $4,671
Proposed TAC $4542 $4674
Change to DT Set Aside $185,455 <$18,542>
Budget Planning Impact <$600,000> Utilities
<$125,000> Summer Session
17
Tuition & Fee ProposalTuition & Fee Proposal
Graduate Designated Tuition
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY2014
New Rate $142.75 $159.50 $173.75
Proposed Rate $156.00 $169.50
Revised Per Semester Total Academic Cost (TAC)9 SCH
$3,566.80 $3,704.05
Proposed TAC NAV NAV
Change to DT Set Aside $30,793 $6,592
Revised proposal found at:http://www.utsa.edu/financialaffairs/docs/TF/TuitionandFeesProposalF12-F14.pdf
18
FY13 Budget Planning FY13 Budget Planning
SCH basis for revenue projections will continue to be conservative
All new tuition revenue due to rate increases if approved, must be allocated towards the Graduation Rate Improvement Plan and graduate education as detailed in the Tuition & Fee proposal
Limits flexibility for other new funding awards, e.g. merit Possible reductions to state appropriations in the next
biennium beginning FY 14, including changes to formula could have a significant impact to UTSA
FY 13 “Resources & Requirements” will be developed for CMO to review in February
FY 13 Budget Planning CalendarFY 13 Budget Planning Calendar
Feb 1 Census Date Spring 2012 Semester
Feb 8 Board of Regents Budget Policies and Guidelines
Feb 24 Revenue Projections and Debt Service Budgets to Fee Funded areas
Mar 6 FY13 Status Quo Budget Preparation Begins by Departments
March Budget Planning by CMO & Strategic Resource Planning Council
March 30 FY13 Budget Documents are due to Budget Office
April 2 - 9 Preparation for UT System Budget Goals & Priorities Hearing
May 7 -10 Draft FY13 Operating Budget due to UT System
August 22 FY13 Operating Budgets approved by Board of Regents
19