buddhism and competing authorities in thailand the history of thai buddhism is written 1) supportive...
TRANSCRIPT
Buddhism and Competing Authorities in Thailand
• The history of Thai Buddhism is written
• 1) supportive and 2) resistance• Both call for a return to an ideal
past, where Buddhist practice was canonical, and uncorrupted. Both see protective magic as corrupt and superstitious.
• This type of approach establishes a dichotomy of victim/victimizer among the Thai Buddhist community.
• It suggests that Thai Buddhism was a static entity that existed in a pristine state.
• Thai Buddhists are not simply the supine receivers of modernization who choose to profit from it or be overrun.
State Control of Buddhism
• 19th century the Rama IV and V formalized the ecclesiasia and educational practices. This was part of the nation-building and social control process.
• Ecclesiastical ranks, textbooks, monastic examinations, the Pali canon, Vinaya enforcement.
• Sangha Act of 1902
Pro-government Political Activism among Thai Buddhists
• 1934 gov’t examined Sangha finances
• 1941 gov’t control over internal Sangha organization.
• Military:“social engagement”to stop the spread of communism. “Thammadut.”
• Phra Kittivuddho had famous aggressive campaign to stop magicians and communists.
• Killing communists is ok.
Luang Ta Mahabua• Luang Ta Mahabua: Buddhists
should donate money to the government.
• “Thai Help Thai:” 500 million U.S. in gold.
• Got angry with Thaksin and Minister of Finance, Tarrin Nimmanahaeminda. Impeacement.
• Mahabua criticized for being becoming over-involved in lokiya.
• Westerners support “social engagement,” but often seen as “western,” Bangkok-centric, elitist, and potentially destructive to the supramundane status.
The Dhammakaya Movement
• Dhammajayo (glowing Buddha)
• Student of Khun Yai and Luang Po Sod (1906-1959) of Wat Pak Nam.
• Although criticized as psychological manipulation
• college students and middle class.
• Meditation “kit” and retreats.
• General Chaowalit Yongchaiyud and Bankers.
RESISTING THE STATE • Santi Asok started by
Bodhiraksa in 1973 -- return to early Buddhism.
• Against magic and ritual.• Forcibly disrobed in June
1989 for illegal ordinations.• He is against “Capitalistic
Buddhism” and promotes poverty reduction.
• But now strangely Nationalistic and anti-Cambodian.
Lay Buddhism/Social Engagement• Sulak Sivaraksa: grassroots
movement. • Journals and NGOs promote
democracy, women’s rights, land reform, environmental protection.
• Structural violence.• Buddhadasa (1906-1993)• Suan Mokh – foreigners • Dhammic Socialism -- humans
were “naturally” social creatures and needed to work together for “mutual benefit and support” and co-dependence.
Buddhist Environmentalism• “Low-impact” ideology of Thui
Chanthakaro and others not well-received by gov’t and pro-business.
• “Tree-planting day” and deemed as protecting communists in forest.
• Luang Po Naan and Luang Po Khamkian apply “Buddhist” approaches to ecology.
• Phrajak Kuttajitto. After leaving his wife and five children to take up the monastic life in 1977 in Dong Yai forest started to ordain trees.
• Staged many protests and gained the support of NGOs and the foreign press, but he was arrested in1991.
Buddhism and Nationalism
• In 2007 push to make Buddhism a “state religion.”
• Some saw it as promoted by Thaksin as anti-Muslim.
• Queen Sirikit said that Buddhism was beyond state and politics.
Monks and Pro-Democracy Protests
• Most monks were not involved
• Peace makers, some stood to protect civilians in fighting
• One kicked a car and some protested.
• Calls to get more monks involved by both sides did not work.
Beyond Victim-Victimizer
• Problems: 1) overestimate the influence of the central Thai ecclesia and the government’s Ministry of Religion and Culture on the practice of Thai Buddhism. Less than 1% of monks ever attend monastic universities or take eccleiastical examinations. State printed textbooks are not wiespread and very few monks ever actually read pronouncements from the mahatherasamakhom.
• 2) The Thai environmental movement and anti- financial corruption movements have either been ignored or criticized by many Thai Buddhists.
• 3) Dhammakaya is popular, but actually growing more popular outside the country and loosing support within it. Seen as elitest.
• Many continually revisit their practice not by searching for a pure Buddhism that exists somewhere in the golden past, but respond to the changing needs of the time.