brianjdixon dissertation defense
DESCRIPTION
Slides for dissertation defense of Dr. Brian J. Dixon focusing on reflective video journals.TRANSCRIPT
Reflective Video Journals
Dissertation Defense by Brian J. Dixon
Background
A popular websiteas an innovativelearning tool?
Statement of the Problem
How might reflective video journals be used to enhance students’ metacognitive reflection?
Literature Review
Metacognitive theoryMeasuring metacognitionTraditional journalsReflective video journals
http://flickr.com/photos/donkerdink/567265873
Literature Review
Kolb’s learning cycle (1984)
Literature Review
Brown’s metacognitive framework
Literature Review
Reflective journals
http://flickr.com/photos/noellhyman/457816932
Methodology
Formative experiment (six-phase methodology)allows researchers to test, modify, and develop pedagogical theories through innovative instructional interventions (Moll & Diaz, 1987; Reinking & Bradley, 2004)
especially useful for studying new technology innovations (Newman et al., 1989; Reinking & Pickle, 1993; Reinking & Watkins, 1996)
Phase One
Determining the pedagogical goal-increased metacognitive reflection of adolescent students
Planning the intervention-six session after school reflective video journaling program
Recruiting the participants-twelve high school students from a representative public charter school
The study participants
Phase Two
Creating a “thick description” of the setting using ethnographic methods
-description of school setting-student population-teacher technology survey
Phase Three
Establishing a baseline
Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
Technology attitudes survey
Phase Three
Teachers and students technology usage
Phase Four
Implementing the intervention-data collection and analysis-modifying the intervention -factors that enhance or inhibit -modifications and effects -unanticipated effects -changes in the environment
Phase Five: Results
Content Analysis
Mid-study survey
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
Phase Five: Results
Play video clips
Content analysis
Mitchell and Coltrinari's (2001) Reflective Journaling Map
Content analysis
Hatton and Smith's (1995) Reflective Writing Framework
Content analysis
Terrance
Content analysis
Chad
Content analysis
Sean
Content analysis
Juliana
Content analysis
Annette
Content analysis
Amy
Content analysis
Kyle
Mid-study survey
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
Phase Six
Consolidating findings
Factors that enhance the intervention
Highly structured prompts
Privacy during production
Content over production value
Inhibiting factors and modifications made
Student autonomy
Voluntary nature of this study
Prompts not tied to content area
Unanticipated effects
Positive:students discovered an outlet for personal expression understanding the role of technology in our changing society
Negative:students complaining about teachersstudents answering prompts without forethought
Recommendations
Classroom practice
School policy
Teacher education
Future research
Recommendations for classroom practice
Provide opportunities for student reflection-proposed model
Integrate today's technology tools into daily curricular activities
Model for reflective journaling process
Recommendations for school policy
Updated approach to technology-open access-open source-open dialogue
Support innovative tools-upgrade hardware-change approach
Recommendations for teacher education
Awareness of tools available today
Training to use these tools daily
Recommendations for future research
Further studies on social software tools
Updated approach to approving online research
More "teacher as designer" studies
Generalizability and limitations
Small number of participants
Relatively short period of study
Unique structure of school site
What's next?
Present findings at SITE conferenceReflective video journals at the GSELongitudinal study of student vloggersFurther studies on social software
Selected References
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. Advances in Instructional Psychology, 1, 77–165. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: DC Heath and Company.Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 19-26.Hubbs, D.L., & Brand, C.F. (2005). The paper mirror: understanding reflective journaling. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(1), 60-71.King, F.B., & LaRocco, D.J. (2006). E-Journaling: A Strategy to Support Student Reflection and Understanding. Current Issues in Education [On- line], 9(4). Available: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume9/number4/Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Gliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Moon, J. (1999). Learning journal: A handbook for academics, students and professional development. London: Kogan Page. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Selected References
Phipps, J. J. (2005). E-journaling: Achieving interactive education online. Educause Quarterly 28(1). Retrieved March 12, 2008 from: http://www.educause.edu/apps/eq/eqm05/eqm0519.asp?print=yesReinking, D., & Bradley, B.A. (2008). On formative and design experiments : approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students’ independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 384–419.Schraw, G., & Dennison (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460– 475. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Walters, J., Seidel, S., & Gardner, H. (1994). Children as reflective practitioners: Bringing metacognition to the classroom. In C. Collins-Block and J. Mangieri (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
Questions?