brianjdixon dissertation defense

42
Reflective Video Journals Dissertation Defense by Brian J. Dixon

Upload: brian-dixon

Post on 21-Nov-2014

2.322 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Slides for dissertation defense of Dr. Brian J. Dixon focusing on reflective video journals.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Reflective Video Journals

Dissertation Defense by Brian J. Dixon

Page 2: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Background

A popular websiteas an innovativelearning tool?

Page 3: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Statement of the Problem

How might reflective video journals be used to enhance students’ metacognitive reflection?

Page 4: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Literature Review

Metacognitive theoryMeasuring metacognitionTraditional journalsReflective video journals

http://flickr.com/photos/donkerdink/567265873

Page 5: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Literature Review

Kolb’s learning cycle (1984)

Page 6: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Literature Review

Brown’s metacognitive framework

Page 7: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Literature Review

Reflective journals

http://flickr.com/photos/noellhyman/457816932

Page 8: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Methodology

Formative experiment (six-phase methodology)allows researchers to test, modify, and develop pedagogical theories through innovative instructional interventions  (Moll & Diaz, 1987; Reinking & Bradley, 2004)

especially useful for studying new technology innovations (Newman et al., 1989; Reinking & Pickle, 1993; Reinking & Watkins, 1996)

Page 9: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase One

Determining the pedagogical goal-increased metacognitive reflection of adolescent students

Planning the intervention-six session after school reflective video journaling program

Recruiting the participants-twelve high school students from a representative public charter school 

Page 10: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

The study participants

Page 11: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Two

Creating a “thick description” of the setting using ethnographic methods

-description of school setting-student population-teacher technology survey

Page 12: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Three

Establishing a baseline

Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory

Technology attitudes survey

Page 13: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Three

Teachers and students technology usage

Page 14: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Four

Implementing the intervention-data collection and analysis-modifying the intervention -factors that enhance or inhibit -modifications and effects -unanticipated effects -changes in the environment

Page 15: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Five: Results

Content Analysis

Mid-study survey

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory

Page 16: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Five: Results

Play video clips

Page 17: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Mitchell and Coltrinari's (2001) Reflective Journaling Map

Page 18: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Hatton and Smith's (1995) Reflective Writing Framework

Page 19: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Terrance

Page 20: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Chad

Page 21: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Sean

Page 22: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Juliana

Page 23: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Annette

Page 24: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Amy

Page 25: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Content analysis

Kyle

Page 26: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Mid-study survey

Page 27: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory

Page 28: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Phase Six

Consolidating findings

Page 29: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Factors that enhance the intervention

Highly structured prompts

Privacy during production

Content over production value

Page 30: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Inhibiting factors and modifications made

Student autonomy

Voluntary nature of this study

Prompts not tied to content area

Page 31: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Unanticipated effects

Positive:students discovered an outlet for personal expression understanding the role of technology in our changing society

Negative:students complaining about teachersstudents answering prompts without forethought

Page 32: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Recommendations

Classroom practice

School policy

Teacher education

Future research

Page 33: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Recommendations for classroom practice

Provide opportunities for student reflection-proposed model

Integrate today's technology tools into daily curricular activities

Page 34: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Model for reflective journaling process

Page 35: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Recommendations for school policy

Updated approach to technology-open access-open source-open dialogue

Support innovative tools-upgrade hardware-change approach

Page 36: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Recommendations for teacher education

Awareness of tools available today

Training to use these tools daily

Page 37: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Recommendations for future research

Further studies on social software tools

Updated approach to approving online research

More "teacher as designer" studies

Page 38: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Generalizability and limitations

Small number of participants

Relatively short period of study

Unique structure of school site

Page 39: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

What's next?

Present findings at SITE conferenceReflective video journals at the GSELongitudinal study of student vloggersFurther studies on social software

Page 40: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Selected References

Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. Advances in Instructional Psychology, 1, 77–165. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: DC Heath and Company.Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 19-26.Hubbs, D.L., & Brand, C.F. (2005). The paper mirror: understanding reflective journaling. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(1), 60-71.King, F.B., & LaRocco, D.J. (2006). E-Journaling: A Strategy to Support Student Reflection and Understanding. Current Issues in Education [On- line], 9(4). Available: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume9/number4/Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Gliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Moon, J. (1999). Learning journal: A handbook for academics, students and professional development. London: Kogan Page. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Page 41: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Selected References

Phipps, J. J. (2005). E-journaling: Achieving interactive education online. Educause Quarterly 28(1). Retrieved March 12, 2008 from: http://www.educause.edu/apps/eq/eqm05/eqm0519.asp?print=yesReinking, D., & Bradley, B.A. (2008). On formative and design experiments : approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students’ independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 384–419.Schraw, G., & Dennison (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460– 475. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Walters, J., Seidel, S., & Gardner, H. (1994). Children as reflective practitioners: Bringing metacognition to the classroom. In C. Collins-Block and J. Mangieri (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

Page 42: Brianjdixon Dissertation Defense

Questions?