breast milk vs non-nutritive sucking to reduce pain from minor invasive procedures in neonatus

5
Paediatrica Indonesiana VOLUME 53 NUMBER 4 July Original Article 204 Paediatr Indones, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2013 Breast milk vs. non-nutritive sucking to reduce pain from minor invasive procedures in neonates Sevina Marisya, Guslihan Dasa Tjipta, Supriatmo, Emil Azlin Abstract Background Neonates undergo many uncomfortable, invasive pharmacological interventions may provide valuable alternatives for pain relief in neonates during minor procedures. Objective To compare the analgesic effect of orally administered underwent minor invasive procedures. Methods A randomized, open trial was performed at the Haji Adam healthy, term infants who received injections of either intramuscular hepatitis B immunization or vitamin K. Subjects were randomly minutes before the injection. The events were recorded by video times were recorded. Two observers used the premature infant pain Results We observed significantly less O injection in the breast milk group compared to that of the NNS group. However, there was no significant difference in heart rate between the two groups throughout the observation period. Conclusion Breast milk administered before an invasive minor procedure effectively reduces pain in neonates. Breast milk scores, crying times, and O desaturation, compared to neonates who received NNS in the form of pacifiers. [Paediatr Indones. 2013;53:204-8.]. Keywords: breast milk, non-nutritive sucking, pain, invasive minor procedure, neonates From the Department of Child Health, University of North Sumatera Reprint requests to: Sevina Marisya, Department of Child Health, P ain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage. The definition also states that pain is always subjective and learned through Routine medical care of neonates includes blood sampling during the first day of life, as well as injection of vitamin K or vaccines. These procedures are performed in both healthy and ill neonates. The ability of neonates to perceive and react to pain has been acknowledged. 3 but they provide behavioral and physiological cues to indicate the presence of pain. 4 Treating pain in neonates is essential, both for ethical reasons and hemodynamic instability, and increased intracranial 3 pharmacologic pain management includes swaddling,

Upload: bunga-tri-amanda

Post on 05-Nov-2015

5 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Breast Milk vs Non-nutritive Sucking to Reduce Pain From Minor Invasive Procedures in Neonatus

TRANSCRIPT

  • Paediatrica IndonesianaVOLUME 53 NUMBER 4July

    Original Article

    204Paediatr Indones, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2013

    Breast milk vs. non-nutritive sucking to reduce pain from minor invasive procedures in neonates

    Sevina Marisya, Guslihan Dasa Tjipta, Supriatmo, Emil Azlin

    AbstractBackground Neonates undergo many uncomfortable, invasive PLQRU SURFHGXUHV GXULQJ WKHLU ILUVW KRVSLWDO VWD\ 1RQpharmacological interventions may provide valuable alternatives for pain relief in neonates during minor procedures.Objective To compare the analgesic effect of orally administered EUHDVWPLON YV QRQQXWULWLYH VXFNLQJ 116 LQQHRQDWHVZKRunderwent minor invasive procedures.Methods A randomized, open trial was performed at the Haji Adam 0DOLN+RVSLWDOIURP6HSWHPEHUWR'HFHPEHU6XEMHFWVZHUHhealthy, term infants who received injections of either intramuscular hepatitis B immunization or vitamin K. Subjects were randomly DOORFDWHGLQWRWZRJURXSVWKRVHZHUHWKHEUHDVWPLONJURXSQ DQGWKH116JURXSQ %UHDVWPLONDQG116ZHUHJLYHQWZRminutes before the injection. The events were recorded by video UHFRUGHU7UDQVFXWDQHRXVKHDUWUDWHR[\JHQVDWXUDWLRQDQGFU\LQJtimes were recorded. Two observers used the premature infant pain SURILOH3,33VFDOHWRHYDOXDWHDOOVXEMHFWVResults ,QWKHEUHDVWPLONJURXSWKHUHZDVVLJQLILFDQWUHGXFWLRQLQPHDQ3,33VFRUH3 DQGPHDQFU\LQJWLPH3 FRPSDUHGWRWKH116JURXS7KHUHZHUHQRVLJQLILFDQWGLIIHUHQFHVLQPHDQ3,33VFRUHDQGFU\LQJWLPHVEHWZHHQPDOHVDQGIHPDOHV3 DQG3 UHVSHFWLYHO\+RZHYHUWKHUHZDVDVLJQLILFDQWO\ORZHUPHDQ3,33VFRUHIRUYLWDPLQ.LQMHFWLRQWKDQIRUKHSDWLWLV%LPPXQL]DWLRQ3 DOWKRXJKPHDQFU\LQJWLPHVZHUHQRWVLJQLILFDQWO\GLIIHUHQW3 We observed significantly less OGHVDWXUDWLRQDWVHFRQGVSRVWinjection in the breast milk group compared to that of the NNS group. However, there was no significant difference in heart rate between the two groups throughout the observation period.Conclusion Breast milk administered before an invasive minor procedure effectively reduces pain in neonates. Breast milk DGPLQLVWHUHGWRQHRQDWHVSULRUWRLQMHFWLRQKDVUHGXFHGPHDQ3,33scores, crying times, and Odesaturation, compared to neonates who received NNS in the form of pacifiers. [Paediatr Indones. 2013;53:204-8.].

    Keywords: breast milk, non-nutritive sucking, pain, invasive minor procedure, neonates

    From the Department of Child Health, University of North Sumatera 0HGLFDO6FKRRO+$GDP0DOLN+RVSLWDO0HGDQ,QGRQHVLD

    Reprint requests to: Sevina Marisya, Department of Child Health, 8QLYHUVLW\RI1RUWK6XPDWHUD0HGLFDO6FKRRO+$GDP0DOLN+RVSLWDO-O%XQJD/DX1R0HGDQ7HO)D[(PDLOVHYLQDPDULV\D#JPDLOFRP

    Pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain ,$63DVDQXQSOHDVDQWVHQVRU\ DQG HPRWLRQDO H[SHULHQFH DVVRFLDWHGwith actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage. The definition also states that pain is always subjective and learned through H[SHULHQFHUHODWHGWRLQMXU\LQHDUO\OLIH

    Routine medical care of neonates includes blood sampling during the first day of life, as well as injection of vitamin K or vaccines. These procedures are performed in both healthy and ill neonates. The ability of neonates to perceive and react to pain has been acknowledged.3

    1HRQDWHVDUHLQFDSDEOHRIYHUEDOVHOIUHSRUWLQJbut they provide behavioral and physiological cues to indicate the presence of pain.4 Treating pain in neonates is essential, both for ethical reasons and EHFDXVH SDLQ FDQ OHDG WR GHFUHDVHG R[\JHQDWLRQhemodynamic instability, and increased intracranial SUHVVXUH ,QWHUYHQWLRQV IRU WUHDWLQJ SDLQ PD\EH SKDUPDFRORJLF RU QRQSKDUPDFRORJLF3 1RQpharmacologic pain management includes swaddling, IDFLOLWDWHG WXFNLQJ QHVWLQJ KROGLQJ VNLQWRVNLQ

  • Sevina Marisya et al: %UHDVWPLONYVQRQQXWULWLYHVXFNLQJWRUHGXFHSDLQLQQHRQDWHV

    Paediatr Indones, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2013205

    FRQWDFW QRQQXWULWLYH VXFNLQJ 116 DVZHOO DVconsuming sucrose solutions or breastmilk.

    Evaluation of pain in neonates is difficult and relies on infant reactions, such as changes in behavior, modifications in physiological variables, or release of stress hormones to infer pain. Assessments that rely on various behavioral changes appear to be more accurate for pain evaluation in neonates.3 A commonly used test is the Premature Infant Pain Profile3,33VFDOH7KH3,33 VFDOH LV DYDOLGDWHGLQGLFDWRU VFDOH IRUassessment of acute pain in preterm and term infants. 3,33XVHVPHDVXUHPHQWVRIJHVWDWLRQDODJHEHKDYLRUDOVWDWHKHDUWUDWHR[\JHQVDWXUDWLRQDQGWKUHHIDFLDODFWLRQV EURZ EXOJH H\H VTXHH]H DQG QDVRODELDOfurrow) to yield a pain score. The score ranges from QRSDLQWRPD[LPXPSDLQ

    We aimed to compare the analgesic effect between orally administered breast milk vs. NNS in neonates who underwent minor invasive procedures.

    Methods

    We conducted a randomized, controlled, open trial LQ+DML$GDP0DOLN+RVSLWDO0HGDQ ,QGRQHVLDIURP6HSWHPEHU WR'HFHPEHU $OO QHRQDWHVadmitted to the special care nursery were recruited by consecutive sampling.

    Neonates with normal gestational age, no contraindication to taking substances orally, and appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, respiration (APGAR)VFRUHVJUHDWHUWKDQDWWKHst and 5th minutes after ELUWKZHUHHOLJLEOHIRUWKHVWXG\:HH[FOXGHGQHRQDWHVfrom high risk pregnancies, who were delivered from mothers under general anesthesia, from mothers with drug abuse problems, as well as those with congenital DQRPDOLHVDQGVHSVLV,QIRUPHGFRQVHQWZDVREWDLQHGfrom subjects parents or guardians. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research at the University of North Sumatera.

    7KHUHTXLUHGVDPSOHVL]HZDVHVWLPDWHGWREHQHRQDWHVIRUHDFKJURXS:HFROOHFWHGWKHIROORZLQJGHPRJUDSKLF GDWD IURP VXEMHFWV DJH VH[ W\SH RIinjection, delivery mode, body weight, and APGARVFRUHV1HRQDWHVZHUHUDQGRPO\DVVLJQHGWRJURXSVthe breast milk group or the NNS group, using a random number table. They received injections, either intramuscular hepatitis B immunization or vitamin K,

    by the clinician in charge of the neonates. Two minutes EHIRUHWKHLQMHFWLRQVXEMHFWVUHFHLYHGP/RIEUHDVWmilk or a pacifier. Primary measurements included KHDUWUDWHR[\JHQVDWXUDWLRQ3,33VFDOHVFRUHDQGFU\LQJWLPHV,QIDQWVZHUHUHFRUGHGRQYLGHRWDSH

    The comparison of breast milk vs. NNS for reducing pain in neonates was analyzed by Chi VTXDUH WHVW ZKHUH QXPHULFDO GDWD ZDV DQDO\]HGXVLQJ LQGHSHQGHQW7WHVW'DWDZDV FRQVLGHUHG WREH VWDWLVWLFDOO\ VLJQLILFDQW IRU 3 DQG FRQILGHQFH LQWHUYDOV ,QWHUREVHUYHU FRPSDWLELOLW\IRU 3,33 VFDOH HYDOXDWHUVZDV DQDO\]HG E\.DSSDcoefficient test for interrater agreement, with VLJQLILFDQFH DFFHSWHG WR EH EHWZHHQ WR 7KHcorrelation between two observers was also analyzed with Pearsons correlation test. Data was processed DQGDQDO\]HGZLWK6366YHUVLRQVRIWZDUH

    Results

    :HHYDOXDWHGQHRQDWHVZKRIXOILOOHGWKHLQFOXVLRQcriteria. No subjects dropped out of the study. EachJURXSFRQVLVWHGRIQHRQDWHV6XEMHFWVIURPERWKgroups had similar baseline characteristics, including DJHVH[W\SHRILQMHFWLRQGHOLYHU\PRGHERG\ZHLJKWand APGAR scores (Table 1).

    There was good agreement between the two REVHUYHUVIRU3,33VFDOHHYDOXDWLRQVDVPHDVXUHGE\.DSSDFRHIILFLHQWZLWK. Figure 1).

    Figure 1. PIPP scale measurements between the two QDUGTXGTUD[-CRRCVGUV

    PIPP

    II

    PIPP I

    20100-10

    30

    20

    10

    0

    -10

  • Sevina Marisya et al: %UHDVWPLONYVQRQQXWULWLYHVXFNLQJWRUHGXFHSDLQLQQHRQDWHV

    206Paediatr Indones, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2013

    Table 1. Baseline characteristics of subjects Characteristics Breastmilk group(n=48)

    NNS group(n=48)

    Gender, n (%)Male 18 (37.5) 25 (52.1)Female 30 (62.5) 23 (47.9)

    Injection type, n (%)8KVCOKP- 20 (41.7) 15 (31.2)Hepatitis B 28 (58.3) 33 (68.8)

    Delivery mode, n (%)Vaginal 24 (50) 27 (56.3)Caesarean 24 (50) 21 (43.7)

    Mean gestational age (SD), weeks 36.3 (3.7) 36.9 (4.1)Mean age (SD), days 1.9 (1.2) 1.7 (1.0)Mean birth weight (SD), grams 3,134.6 (356.3) 3,165.4 (467.8)Mean weight (SD), grams 3,115.6 (361.2) 3,133.8 (469.9)Mean APGAR score at 1st minute (SD) 8 (0.9) 8.4 (0.8)Mean APGAR score at 5th minute (SD) 9.8 (1.6) 10 (1.5)

    Table 2. Compatibility in PIPP scale measurements between the two observers by Pearsons correlation testPIPP II **

    TotalMild pain Moderate pain Severe painPIPP I * Mild Pain 15 0 0 15

    Moderate Pain 0 42 0 42Severe Pain 0 0 39 39

    Total 15 42 39 962+22+2+22UEQTKPID[VJGTUVQDUGTXGT** PIPP II : PIPP scoring by the second observer

    Table 3. PIPP scores and crying times according to breast milk vs. NNS, gender, and injection type Groups PIPP Score (SD) Crying time (SD), min Breast milk (n=48)NNS (n=48) P value 95% CI of differences

    9.3 (3.6) 12.5 (3.3) 0.00114.6 to -1.8

    19.1 (17.1) 29.4 (28.1) 0.0319.7 to -0.9

    Male (n=43)Female (n=53) P value 95% CI of differences

    11.3 (3.8) 10.6 (3.9) 0.4 0.4 to -0.9

    22.3 (23.6) 25.9 (23.7) 0.5 4.1 to 0.9

    8KVCOKP-PHepatitis B (n=61) P value 95% CI of differences

    9.3 (3.9) 11.8 (3.5) 0.00219.3 to -0.4

    18.3 (17.7) 27.7 (26.0) 0.0618.3 to 0.6

    3HDUVRQVFRUUHODWLRQWHVWUHYHDOHGWKDWU 3 LQGLFDWLQJDVWURQJLQWHUREVHUYHUFRUUHODWLRQ(Table 2).

    We observed no significant differences in mean 3,33VFRUHVRUPHDQFU\LQJWLPHVEHWZHHQPDOHVDQGIHPDOHV 3 +HSDWLWLV % LQMHFWLRQV FDXVHG

    KLJKHUSDLQOHYHOLQWHUPVRIKLJKHUPHDQ3,33VFRUHthan that of vitamin K injections, however, mean crying times did not significantly differ. Furthermore, neonates who received breast milk had significantly ORZHUPHDQ3,33VFRUHDQGPHDQFU\LQJWLPHWKDQthat of the NNS group (Table 3).

  • Sevina Marisya et al: %UHDVWPLONYVQRQQXWULWLYHVXFNLQJWRUHGXFHSDLQLQQHRQDWHV

    Paediatr Indones, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2013207

    We observed no significant differences in mean heart rates between the breast milk and NNS JURXSVDWVHFRQGVRUVHFRQGVDIWHUDPLQRULQYDVLYHSURFHGXUH3 E\LQGHSHQGHQW7WHVW(Figure 2). However, there was significantly higher R[\JHQVDWXUDWLRQLQWKHEUHDVWPLONJURXSWKDQLQWKH116JURXSREVHUYHGDWVHFRQGV3 (Figure 3).

    Discussion

    ,Q WKLV VWXG\ZH IRXQG QR VLJQLILFDQW GLIIHUHQFHVEHWZHHQPDOHVDQGIHPDOHVLQ3,33VFRUHVRUFU\LQJtimes, consistent with a previous study of similar UHVXOWVDOWKRXJKIHPDOHVKDGPRUHH[SUHVVLYHIDFLDOfeatures than males.

    A significant change in a physiological parameter ZDVWKHGHFUHDVHGR[\JHQVDWXUDWLRQDWVHFRQGVSRVWLQMHFWLRQLQWKH116JURXS+RZHYHUWKHODFN

    of a significant difference in heart rate between the breast milk and NNS groups may have been due to the insensitivity of the instrument used to measure heart rate. However, a study in Turkey revealed no significant differences in the breast milk group which was administered during the vaccination process, but this result was due to instrument insensitivity.An,QGLDQVWXG\FRPSDUHGQHRQDWHVZKRUHFHLYHGHLWKHUH[SUHVVHGEUHDVWPLONRUDGLVWLOOHGZDWHUSODFHERLQterms of their reactions to pain. The breast milk group had significantly lower heart rate, O desaturation and crying time than the placebo group. As such, giving neonates breast milk before they undergo minor invasive procedures may be a simple and effective method for pain reduction.

    A previous study reported no significant difference in crying time between groups who received either colostrum or NNS.,QFRQWUDVWZHIRXQGWKDWneonates who received breast milk had significantly decreased crying time than neonates in the NNS group. Previous studies also concluded that breast milk was effective for reducing pain in neonates undergoing minor invasive procedures, as shown by a spontaneous decreased crying time and heart rate. This procedure can be recommended for reducing pain in neonates undergoing minor invasive procedures.

    :HXVHGWKH3,33VFDOHDVLWZDVVKRZQWREHYDOLGscale according to the International Pain Consensus, and HTXDOWRRWKHUVFDOHVVXFKDVWKHNeonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS), the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale1,36the Pain Assessment in Neonates3$,1WKHInfant Body Coding System,%&6DQGRWKHUSDLQDVVHVVPHQWVFDOHVin neonates.

    A limitation of our study was that observers were not blinded to subjects groups when they evaluated the video recordings. Nevertheless, high agreement among observers during their initial evaluations indicated objectivity. A second limitation was the LQVHQVLWLYLW\RIWKHSXOVHR[LPHWHULQPHDVXULQJKHDUWUDWH+RZHYHU WKH3,33 VFDOH VKRZHGD VLJQLILFDQWdifference between the two groups, so this limitation did not lead to bias.

    ,QFRQFOXVLRQEUHDVWPLONDGPLQLVWHUHGEHIRUHan invasive minor procedure effectively reduces pain LQQHRQDWHVLQWHUPVRIORZHU3,33VFRUHDQGFU\LQJWLPHDVZHOODVKLJKHUR[\JHQVDWXUDWLRQFRPSDUHGWRQRQQXWULWLYHVXFNLQJ

    Figure 2. Mean heart rates of the two groups before and after injection

    Figure 3. Mean oxygen saturation of the two groups before and after injection

    /GCPJGCTVTCVG

    DGCVURGTOKPWVG

    $TGCUVOKNM

    005

    /GCPQZ[IGPUCVWTCVKQP

    $TGCUVOKNM

    005

  • Sevina Marisya et al: %UHDVWPLONYVQRQQXWULWLYHVXFNLQJWRUHGXFHSDLQLQQHRQDWHV

    208Paediatr Indones, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2013

    References

    :DOGHQ0 3DLQ LQ WKH QHZERUQ DQG LQIDQW ,Q.HQQHUC, Lott JW, editors. Comprehensive neonatal care an interdisciplinary approach. 4thHG6W/RXLV6DXQGHUV(OVHYLHUS

    $QDQG.-6$UDQGD-9%HUGH&%%XFNPDQ6&DSSDUHOOLEV, Carlo W, et al. Summary proceedings from the neonatal SDLQFRQWUROJURXS3HGLDWULFV

    &DUEDMDO5&KDXYHW;&RXGHUV60DUWLQ025DQGRPLVHGtrial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in WHUPQHRQDWHV%0-

    4. Hummel P, Puchalski M, Creech SD, Weiss MG. Clinical UHOLDELOLW\DQGYDOLGLW\RI13$66QHRQDWDOSDLQDJLWDWLRQand sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol.

    5. Khurana S, Hall RW, Anand KJS. Treatment of pain and stress in the neonate: when and how. Neoreviews.

    %DOODQW\QH06WHYHQV%0F$OOLVWHU0'LRQQH.-DFN$Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical VHWWLQJ&OLQ-3DLQ

    *XLQVEXUJ53HUHV&$$OPHLGD0)%%DOGD5%HUHQJXHORC, Toneletto J, et al'LIIHUHQFHVLQSDLQH[SUHVVLRQEHWZHHQPDOHDQGIHPDOHQHZERUQLQIDQW3DLQ

    (IH (2]HU =&7KH XVH RI EUHDVWIHHGLQJ IRU SDLQ UHOLHIduring neonatal immunization injections. Appl Nurs Res.

    8SDGK\D\$$JJDUZDO51DUD\DQ6 -RVKL03DXO9.'HRUDUL$.$QDOJHVLF HIIHFW RI H[SUHVVHG EUHDVWPLON LQSURFHGXUDOSDLQLQWHUPQHRQDWHVDUDQGRPL]HGSODFHERFRQWUROOHGGRXEOHEOLQGWULDO$FWD3DHGLDWU

    %ODVV(00LOOHU/:(IIHFWRIFRORVWUXPLQQHZERUQKXPDQVdissociation between analgesic and cardiac effects. J Dev %HKDY3HGLDWU

    3KLOOLSV50&KDQWU\&-*DOODJKHU03$QDOJHVLFHIIHFWVRIEUHDVWIHHGLQJRUSDFLILHUXVHZLWKPDWHUQDOKROGLQJLQWHUPLQIDQWV$PEXO3HGLDWU

    8\DQ=62]HN(%LOJHQ+&HEHFL'$NPDQ , (IIHFWof foremilk and hindmilk on simple procedural pain in QHZERUQV3HGLDWU,QW

    *UDGLQ0)LQQVWURP26FKROOLQ-)HHGLQJDQGRUDOJOXFRVHaddictive effects on pain reduction in newborns. Early Hum 'HY

    &RUER0*0DQVL* 6WDJQL$5RPDQR$+HXYHO -9Capasso L, et al. Nonnutritive sucking during heelstick procedure decreases behavioral distress in the newborn LQIDQW%LRO1HRQDWH

    6HUSD$%*XLQVEXUJ5%DOGD5GH&GRV6DQWRV$0$UHFRKC, Peres CA. Multidimensional pain assessment of preterm QHZERUQVDWWKHst, 3rdDQGth days of life. Sao Paulo Med-

    'HUHEHQW(