boulder, colorado march 3, 2011 lucille e. davy, senior advisor
TRANSCRIPT
SHEEO Working Conference onCollege Readiness
and the Common Core Assessments
Boulder, ColoradoMarch 3, 2011
Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor
Why Common Core State Standards?
• Disparate standards across states – student mobility
• College remediation• Entry-level workforce skill
deficiencies• 21st century global competition• Technology’s impact on the workplace
Advantages of common standards
Consistent learning goals for all students regardless of where they live; faithful implementation
Too many students graduating from high school and passing required tests but not ready for college and career success
Opportunities for system efficiencies so resources can be dedicated to improving student performance
Criteria for the CCSS• Fewer, clearer and higher• Aligned with college and work
expectations• Collaborative development building
upon the best of existing state standards
• Based on evidence and research• Internationally benchmarked to
ensure students are globally competitive
Advances in the ELA Standards• Text complexity• Clear vertical progressions across grades
• Balance of literature and informational texts; background knowledge
• Literacy standards for science and history/social studies – content teachers also responsible for literacy skills
• Writing to persuade and inform
Advances in the ELA StandardsSpeakingListeningMedia and technology are integrated
http://www.dubuque.k12.ia.us/cartoons
Advances in the Math Standards• Address the “math wars” –
conceptual understanding and computational fluency
• Eliminate the “mile wide – inch deep” approach
• Focus in the early grades on numbers to build a solid foundation including mastery of arithmetic, operations, and fractions
Algebra is the gateway…
Learninglaffs.com
Advances in the Math Standards• High school math focus on using and
applying math to solve complex and real world problems
• Develop understanding of real world applications and data in middle and high school years
• Optional path described for students interested in STEM-focused college programs and careers
Implementation – Critical Next Steps
• Curriculum• Instructional materials (including
technology based; open source)• Assessment system• Accountability• Teacher pre-service preparation and
professional development
Higher Education Collaboration
Higher education engagement and partnerships are needed for several aspects of implementationAssessmentsProfessional developmentTeacher/school leader preparation
Implementation – Teacher Preparation and Professional Development
• Professional development to support teaching of the Common Core – new expectations
• Attention to the needs of all learners – including students with disabilities and English language learners
• Transformation of teacher education programs
Changing Assessments…
learninglaffs.com
Implementation of Assessments
• Review of current state assessments• Analysis of improved alignment to
the Common Core – and possible modifications
• Transition to new assessment system – including formative and benchmark
• Accountability transition – raising the bar to meet true college and career-readiness
Two Assessment ConsortiaPartnership for the Assessment of
Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)“governing” states include NY, FL, MA,
AZ, MD, LA, IL and IN; participating states include CA, PA, OH, NJ, KY
quarterly “through-course” testsperformance tasks and computer
enhanced items
Two Assessment ConsortiaSmarter Balanced Assessment
Consortium“governing” states include NC, WA,
OR, WI, MI and CT; participating states include CO, SC, KY, NJ and PA
common summative; formative tools curriculum embedded performance
tasksonline adaptive; artificial intelligence
James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute for Educational Leadership and Policy
www.corestandards.orgwww.hunt-institute.orglucille.davy@gmail.com