bone marrow failure - cancer medicine & hematology · bone marrow failure robert a. brodsky, md...
TRANSCRIPT
Bone Marrow Failure
Robert A. Brodsky, MDJohns Hopkins Family Professor of Medicine and Oncology
Director, Division of Hematology Johns Hopkins University
Disclosures
• Dr. Brodsky serves as a Scientific Advisory Board member to AlexionPharmaceuticals.
• Alexion Pharmaceuticals – grant funding• Apellis: Scientific Advisor• Achillion: Scientific Advisor
Aplastic AnemiaDiagnosis And Nomenclature
• SAA – Bone marrow (< 25% cellular)– Peripheral cytopenias (at least 2 of 3)
• ANC < 500 per µl• Platelets < 20,000 per µl• Absolute retic < 60,000 or corrected retic < 1%
• VSAA: as above, but ANC < 200
• Moderate AA or (NSAA)– Hypocellular marrow but does not meet criteria for
SAA
2 yearmortality> 70%
APLASTIC ANEMIAEtiology
• Acquired AA (most cases idiopathic)– Drugs (5 – 10%)– Infection (hepatitis –usually seronegative)– Toxic (benzene, radiation)
• Inherited– Fanconi anemia– Shwachman-Diamond– Dyskeratosis congenita
Aplastic Anemia: Differential Dx
• Rule out inherited forms– Fanconi: all patients < 40yo (DEB,MMC)– Others: careful history
• PNH - flow cytometry
• Hypoplastic MDS – morphology, cytogenetics, CD34 count
• LGL - flow cytometry
156 patients with marrow failure, 20 of whom have IBMFS. None of the IBMSF patients had (PNH) clones.
Aplastic Anemia: Pathophysiology
• Autoimmune - mediated bone marrow failure– cytotoxic T cells attack hematopoietic
progenitors
• CD34 pool is markedly reduced– Usually < 0.05 % , (normal 0.5% to 1.0%)
SAACD34 Pool
High quality HSCLow quality HSCProgenitors
T cells
NormalCD34 Pool
APLASTIC ANEMIA: Pathophysiology
Autoimmune attack is a set-up for clonal hematopoiesis
Katagiri T et al. Blood 2011;118:6601-6609©2011 by American Society of Hematology Hanaoka et al, Blood 2006
6pLOH ~ 10-15%;
NKCell
NKG2D receptor
GPI-AP+
HSC
NKCell
GPI-AP-
HSC
Strong Cell kill
Weak Cell kill
ULBPs
MICA/B
Normal cell
PNH cell
GPI-anchored
PIGA mutations ~ 50%
Relationship among bone Marrow Failure Diseases
AA PNH
MDS
10~12%
PIGA
6pLOH
DNMT3AASLX1
Monosomy 7
Take Home: Autoimmune attack on stem cellsPredisposes to clonal escape/malignancy
CHIP + PIGA
CLASSICAL PNH
Acquired AA
PIGA clonal escapeAA/PNH
Initial Management - Essentials
• CBC, diff & retic, biochem profile
• Bone marrow aspirate, bx, FISH and cytogenetics, CD34 Count
• Peripheral blood for PNH and Fanconi
• Transfuse CMV-neg., Irradiated blood products (avoid family members)
• Consider prompt referral to specialized center
Severe Aplastic Anemia
• Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation– HLA-identical– unrelated– mismatched
• Immunosuppressive therapy– ATG/CSA
• High-dose cyclophosphamide
Definitive management
Years
0 2 61 3 4 5
Probability of Survival after Allogeneic Transplants for SAA, Probability of Survival after Allogeneic
Transplants for SAA, 2000-2009- By Donor Type and Age -
2000-2009- By Donor Type and Age -
0
20
40
60
80
100
10
30
50
70
90
0
20
40
60
80
100
10
30
50
70
90
Prob
abili
ty o
f Sur
viva
l, %
P < 0.0001
≤ 20y, Sibling Donor (N=1,191)
> 20y, Sibling Donor (N=1,256)
≤ 20y, Unrelated Donor (N=574)
> 20y, Unrelated Donor (N=550)
CIBMTR
Horse ATG is superior to rabbit ATG
Scheinberg et al, NEJM 2011,;365:430-38
Response to ATG/CSAis roughly 60%
Mortality DecreasingBut response fixed
ATG/CSA: Late complications
Risk of relapse > 40% in responders
Risk of clonal evolution
Rosenfeld et. al, Jama 2003;289: 1130-35
25-35% failure-free survival
ELTROMBOPAG ADDED TO STANDARD IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AS FIRST TREATMENT
IN APLASTIC ANEMIAh-ATG
Day 1 to 4
EPAG 150 mg Day 14 to 6 months
Hematologic response
EPAG 150 mg Day 14 to 3 mos
CSA x 6 months
Cohort
5 yearfollow-up
EPAG 150 mg Day 1 to 6 months
3 mo 6 mo
Supplemental methods: The protocol was amended starting with subject # 46 on cohort 2, so that cyclosporine was continued at a 6 fixed daily dose, 2mg/kg/day, for an additional 18 months in order to preventrelapse. Townsley, DM et al, NEJM 2017; 376:1540-50.
Supplemental Figure 4Median follow-up 23 months
Refractory SAA
• Repeat IST– low response rate
• Supportive care
• Eltrombopag (Olnes et al, NEJM 2012)
• BMT– usually from a MUD or alternative donor
Post Transplant High Dose Cy
• Mitigates GVHD
• Allows for greater use of alternative donors (haplo BMT)– No difference for engraftment or GVHD btw
matched sibs and HLA-haplo identical donors
• Average person in US has 4.5 HLA haplo-identical donors
Conditioning for HLA Haplo-identical BMT
20
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Flu FluFluFlu
CyCy
Flu
Cy TBI
= Fludarabine 30 mg/m2 IV daily
= Cyclophosphamide 14.5 mg/kg IV daily = 200 cGy
GVHD Prophylaxis:Tacrolimus, MMF, & Post-HSCT Cy
TBI
Cy = Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV daily
Cy Cy
Flu
rATG rATGrATG
rATG = Thymoglobulin 0.5 mg/kg (day-9) & 2 mg/kg (day -8,-7)
Mini Haplo BMT with PTCy forRefractory SAA
• 21 patients with refractory SAA (median f/u 24 mos (range 3-72)− Median age: 29 years (range 5-69)− 15/21 had evidence of clonality (PNH and/or cytogenetic abnormality)− 18 haplo 1 mm URD(9/10) 2 URD (10/10)
• Rapid and consistent engraftment− Day 60 chimerism 100% in 20/21 patients
• One primary graft failure (engrafted with 2nd BMT from different donor)− ANC 15 days Reds 25 days Platelets 28 days
• Excellent Disease Free Survival− All 21 alive, transfusion-independent, without clonality (KPS 100)− Acute GVHD grade II-IV 2/21 (9.5%)− Extensive chronic GVHD 0/21− All off IST – median f/u 30 months
Dezern et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017, 23:498-504
Conclusions
• SAA: IST vs BMT– Exciting clinical trials of IST and BMT– BMT advancing faster; solves problem of relapse and clonality– Upfront mini-haplo BMT: requires increased TBI to 400: 6/6
engrafted.
• Clonality underlies most of acquired SAA
• Post-transplant Cy is safely expanding the donor pool in SAA– Adopted by BMT-CTN– Standard of care for refractory SAA– Haplo BMT front-line?
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria
• Acquired Clonal Hematopoietic Stem Cell Disease
• PIG-A mutation– X(p22.1)
• PIG-A gene product necessary for 1st step in the biosynthesis of GPI anchors
• PNH cells have deficiency or absence of all GPI anchored proteins
Biology
GPI-AP Biosynthesis:Involves >10 steps and > 25 genes
N NN
PIG-A
endoplasmic reticulum
plasma membrane
raft
GlcNAc-PI
PI
PNH
• CD59 – Membrane inhibitor of reactive lysis– Prevents incorporation of C9 into C5b-8; thus, MAC
does not form
• CD55 – Decay accelerating factor– Block C3 convertase
• Protect cells from complement-mediated destruction
Pathogenesis of hemolytic anemia
Intact RBC
ComplementActivation
Effects of Terminal Complement on RBCs and Clinical Consequences in PNH
Anemia
Anemia/Transfusions
Free hemoglobin in the blood from destroyed
PNH RBC
Free hemoglobin isa nitric oxidescavenger
esophageal spasm, abdominal pain,
male ED
Fatigue
Thrombosis ?
Renal Failure
Flow Cytometric Diagnosis of PNH
PNH Aplastic anemia
Brodsky RA, Blood 2009; 113(26):6522-7.
PNH: Therapy
• Eculizumab:– FDA approved monoclonal antibody for PNH
• Allogeneic BMT - only curative therapy– Indications: severe cytopenias, poor response to
eculizumab– Non-myeloablative conditioning acceptable.
• Supportive care– Fe, folic acid, transfusions
Brodsky RA, Blood 2009, 113:6522-7
Lectin Pathway Classical Pathway Alternate Pathway
MBL, MASP, C4 + C2
C1q, C1r, C1sC4 + C2
C3Factor B + D
C3 convertasesC4b2a, C3bBb
C3b
C5 convertasesC4b2a3b, C3bBb3b
C 5C5a
C6,C7,C8,C9
Membrane attack complex (MAC)
EculizumabC5b
CD55
CD59
Dosing schedule:Intravenous infusion over 30 min
– Induction period• 600 mg every 7±2 days for 4 doses
– Maintenance period• 900 mg 1 week later, followed by…• 900 mg every 14±2 days for a total of 26 weeks
Hillmen et al, NEJM 2006, 355:1233-43Brodsky et al, Blood 2008, 111:1840-7
Effect of Eculizumab on Hemolysis –lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Study Week
Placebo
Eculizumab
Lac
tate
Deh
ydro
gena
se (I
U/L
)
P < 0.00000000001
Normal
Screening
Response to Eculizumab
Hematocrit Retic count LDH
Pre eculizumab 19.2 7.6 1650
post eculizumab 33.2 5.5 301
Patients continue to have compensated extravascular hemolysis
Intravascular and Extravascular Hemolysis in PNH
Absence of CD55 & CD59 MAC forms intravascular hemolysis
PNH p
atient
PNH p
atient
on
eculizum
ab
Absence of CD55 & CD59
= C3dg
Extravascularhemolysis
MAC
Long‐term safety and efficacy of sustained eculizumab treatment in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria
British Journal of HaematologyVolume 162, Issue 1, pages 62-73, 25 APR 2013 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12347
Lessons from Eculizumab Trials (TRIUMPH, SHEPHERD, EXTENSION)
• Safe– Mild side-effects– 1000-2000 fold increased risk for Neisserial infections (~0.5% per
year)– Strongly consider microbial prophylaxis
– PCN– Macrolide if Pen allergic
• Effective– Decreases intravascular hemolysis– Decreases (>90%) or eliminates (>75%) need for PRBC– Improves quality of life– Reduces the risk for thrombosis by >90%
Lessons from Eculizumab Trials – cont. (TRIUMPH, SHEPHERD, EXTENSION)
• Drawbacks– Lifelong therapy intravenous therapy– Cost (> 350K a year)– Some patients have a lot of extravascular hemolysis
• Indications– Severe anemia– thrombosis– Disabling fatigue or other severe symptoms– Labs: large clone, high retic, LDH > 2x ULN – Bone marrow: normal to hypercellular
• Not as effective in patients with AA/PNH– Does not treat bone marrow failure
How to monitor PNH pt of eculizumab
• CBC with retic, LDH, comp once a month– Draw labs before giving drug
• PNH clone every 12 months
• Direct coombs if persistent anemia– IgG neg– C3 pos
EculizumabALXN1210ALNCC5Conversin
APL-2
Future Complement Inhibitors
Near Future Drugs for PNH
•Ravulizumab•C5 Inhibitor (non-inferior to ecu in randomized phase III trial)•Intravenous every 8 weeks•May be approved in 2019
•APL2•C3 inhibitor•Add on to eculizumab•Daily subcutaneous
•ACH4471•Factor D inhibitor•Add on to ecu•TID oral
Pure Red Cell Aplasia
• Severe anemia
• Reticulocytes less than 1.0 %
• Paucity (< 0.5%) of erythroblasts in the marrow– Other lineages usually unaffected
Diagnostic Criteria
Pure Red Cell Aplasiapathophysiology
• Congenital - (Diamond-Blackfan anemia)• Acquired
– immunologic• Antibody-mediated - TEC, ABO in BMT, EPO• Neoplasia: thymoma, B cell malignancies • LGL T cell or NK cell• Drugs
– Pregnancy– MDS– Parvovirus
B-19 Parvovirus InducedRed Cell Aplasia
• Globoside (p-antigen)– Viral target on erythroid progenitors
• Susceptible hosts– immunosuppressed– Chronic hemolytic anemia
• Diagnosis– DNA based assays– Antibodies– Giant pronormoblast
• Treatment - IVIG
PRCA: Clinical Approach
• CBC, retic, bone marrow to establish diagnosis
• Look for LGL (PBS), flow cytometry if indicated
• Consider other associated diseases (SLE, MDS, thymoma, RA)
• Marrow culture – BFU-E maturation in vitro helps distinguish from
MDS and predicts response to immunosuppression
BFU-E ASSAY for PRCA
Systemic Inflammation
LGL
Normals
PRCA (no LGL)
MDS
p=0.0001
050
100
150
BFU
E (b
urst
s/ 1
0E5
nucl
eate
d ce
lls)
BFUE growth by Diagnosis
DeZern et al, Exp Heme 2013;41:808-16
Large Granular Lymphocytes
- may be T cells or NK cells
Neutropenia
Anemia
Thrombocytopenia
Pancytopenia
Immunologic ClassificationT-CELL LGL
• Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD8+, CD57+
• Clonal disorder: TCR (gamma chain) gene rearrangement assessed by PCR (Sensitivity is 90%).
Pure Red Cell Aplasia: Therapy
• Stop unnecessary drugs and establish etiology
• LGL mediated PRCA– First line drugs: CSA, Cy, MTX, steroids– Second line: ATG/CSA; CAMPATH, HiCy