biblio aristote

7/28/2019 Biblio Aristote

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/biblio-aristote 1/15

Bibliography



Ackrill, J. L. 1962. ‘Critical Notice: Die Aristotelische Syllogistik . By Günther Patzig’. Mind 71. 107-17.

Ackrill, J. L. 1963. Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford.

Adamson, P. 2007. Al-Kind ī . Oxford.

Adamson, P. 2005. ‘On Knowledge of Particulars’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society105.3. 273-94.

Adamson, P. and R. C. Taylor (eds). 2005. The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy.Cambridge.

Adamson, P., H. Baltussen, and M. W. F. Stone (eds). 2005. Philosophy, science and exegesis

in Greek, Arabic, and Latin commentaries. Vol. 1. London: Institute of ClassicalStudies.

Allen, J. 2005. ‘The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology’. InFrede and Inwood (2005).

Allen R. E. 1969. ‘Individual Properties in Aristotle's Categories’. Phronesis 14.

Anton, J.P. 1969. ‘Ancient Interpretations of Aristotle’s Doctrine of “Homonyma”’. JHPh7.1. 1-18.

Anton, J.P. 1968. ‘The Aristotelian Doctrine of Homonyma in the Categories and its PlatonicAntecedents’. JHPh 6.4. 315-26.

Armstrong, A. H. 1967. The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval

Philosophy. Cambridge.Atherton, C. 2005. ‘Lucretius on what language is not’. Pp. 101-38 in Frede and Inwood

(2005).

Atherton, C. 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge.

Aubenque, P. (ed). 1980. Concepts et Catégories dans la pensée antique. Paris.

Austin, J. L. 1952. ‘Critical Notice: Aristotle’s Syllogistic. By Łukasiewicz, J.’ Mind 61.395-404.

Bäck, A.T. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Predication. Leiden.

Badawi, A. 1987. La transmission de la philosophie grecque au monde arabe. Études dephilosophie médiévale 56 (2nd ed). Paris.

Barnes, J. 1971. ‘Homonymy in Aristotle and Speusippus’. CQ n.s. 21. 65-80.

Barnes, J. 1981. ‘Boethius and the Study of Logic’. Pp. 73-89 in Gibson (1981).

Barnes, J. 1990. ‘Grammar on Aristotle’s Terms’. Pp. 175-202 in Frede and Striker (1990).

Barnes, J. 1993. ‘Meaning, Saying and Thinking’. Pp. 47-61 in Döring and Ebert (1993).

Barnes, J. 1994. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Oxford.

Barnes, J. 1997. ‘Roman Aristotle’. Pp. 1-70 in Barnes and Griffin (1997).

Bibliography Michael Griffin

Chapter submitted for D.Phil. Page 376



Barnes, J. 1999. ‘Aristotle and Stoic Logic’. Pp. 23-53 in Ierodiakonou (1999).

Barnes, J. 2005. ‘What is a Disjunction?’ Pp. 274-98 in Frede and Inwood (2005).

Barnes, J. 2007. ‘Peripatetic Logic’. Pp. 531-46 in Sorabji and Sharples (2007).

Barnes, J., S. Bobzien, K. Flannery S.J., and K. Ierodiakonou. 1991. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1-7 . Duckworth/Cornell UP.

Barnes, J. and M. Griffin. 1997. Philosophia Togata II . Oxford.

Barnes, J., S. Schofield, and R. K. Sorabji (eds). 1979. Articles on Aristotle. Volume 3.Duckworth.

Benson, H. 1988. ‘Universals as Sortals in the Categories’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69. 182-306.

Bertier, J. (ed.) Mnésithée et Dieuchès. Leiden.

Biesterfeldt, H. H. 1973. Dass die Kräfte der Seele den Mischungen des Körpers folgen.Steiner.

Blumenthal, H. J. 1993. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Later Greek Commentaries onAristotle's De anima’. In H.J. Blumenthal, Soul and Intellect. Studies in Plotinus and

Later Neoplatonism (Aldershot, Brookfield 1993). Originally published in J. Wiesner(ed.), Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung II (Berlin 1987), pp. 90-106.

Blumenthal, H. J. and H. Robinson (eds). 1991. Aristotle and the Later Tradition. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume. Oxford.

Bobzien, S. 1996. ‘Stoic Syllogistic’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. 133-92.

Bochenski, I.M. 1947. La Logique de Théophraste. Fribourgh.

Bodéüs, R. 2001. Categoriae. Paris.

Bonazzi, M. 2007. ‘Eudorus of Alexandria and Early Imperial Platonism’. in Sorabji andSharples (2007), vol. 2.

Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds). 2009. The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Collection d’études classiques 23.Louvain / Namur / Paris / Walpole, MA: Éditions Peeters—Société des études

classiques.

Bonitz, H. 1870. Index Aristotelicus. 5 Bde. Berlin. Repr. 1961.

Bostock, D. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Z and H . Oxford: Clarendon.

Boys-Stones, G. 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A study of its development from theStoics to Origen. Oxford.

Boys-Stones, G. 2003 (ed). Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford.

Boys-Stones, G. 2007. ‘Fallere Sollers: The Ethical Pedagogy of the Stoic Cornutus’, in

Sorabji and Sharples (2007), vol. 1. Pp. 77-88.


Chapter submitted for D.Phil. 77



Brennan, T. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford.

Brink, K. O. 1940. ‘Peripatos’. Paulys Realencyclopädie suppl. 7. Cols. 899-949.

Brown, L. ‘Being in the Sophist : A Syntactical Inquiry’. Pp. 457-80 in Fine (2000).

Brunschwig, J. ‘Epicurus and the problem of private language’. Pp. 21-38 in Brunschwig, J.(ed.), Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.

Brunschwig, J. 1991. ‘On a Book-Title by Chrysippus’. OSAP suppl. 1991. Oxford.

Brunschwig, J. and M. Nussbaum. 1993. Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic

Philosophy of Mind . Cambridge.

Burkert, W., L. Gemelli, Elisabetta Matelli, and Lucia Orelli. 1998. Fragment-sammlungen

philosophischer Texte der Antike - Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi. Aporemata. Kritische Studien zur Philologiegeschichte. Band 3. Göttingen.

Burnyeat, M. F. 2005. ‘Archytas and Optics’. Science in Context 18.1. 35-53.Cancik, H. and H. Schneider (eds). 2009. Der Neue Pauly [Antike]. Brill Online.

Capelle, W. 1927. 'Lukios 1'. RE 13.2. 1791-97.

Caston, V. 1997. ‘Epiphenomenalisms Ancient and Modern’. Philosophical Review 106.309-63.

Caston, V. 1999. ‘Something and Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals’. OSAP.

Caston, V. Forthcoming. Alexander: De Anima. Duckworth and Cornell.

Celluprica, V. and C. D'Ancona (eds). 2004. Aristotele e i suoi esegeti neoplatonici.Bibliopolis.

Celluprica, V. (ed). 2003. Il libro B della Metafisica di Aristotele. Naples.

Chaniotis, A. 2004. ‘Epigraphic evidence for the philosopher Alexander of Aphrodisias’. BICS 47. 79-81.

Chiaradonna, R. 2002. Sostanza, Movimento, Analogia. Plotino critico di Aristotele.Bibliopolis.

Chiaradonna, R. 2004. 'Plotino e la teoria degli universali. Enn. VI 3 [44], 9'. Pp. 1-35 in

Celluprica and D'Ancona (2004).

Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford.

Chase, M. 2003. Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 1-4. Duckworth.

Code, A. 1984. ‘The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z’, in J.Pelletier and J. King-Farlow (edd.), New Essays on Aristotle, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 10 (1984), 1-20.

Corazzon, R. 2009. Theory and History of Ontology: A Resource Guide for Philosophers.[Bibliography and Excerpts on the history of ontology]. Accessed online at http://formalontology.it/.



http://formalontology.it/








Corcoran, J. 1972. ‘Completeness of an Ancient Logic’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 37.4.696-702.

Corcoran, J. 1974a. ‘Aristotle’s Natural Deduction System’. Pp. 85-131 in Corcoran (1974b).

Corcoran, J. (ed). 1974b. Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht-Holland.

Corcoran, J. 1994. ‘The Founding of Logic: Modern Interpretations of Aristotle’s Logic’. Ancient Philosophy 14. 9-24.

Cornford, F. M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. Routledge.

Courcelle, P. 1948. Les Lettres grecques en Occident de Macrobe à Cassiodore. 2nd ed.Paris. Translated into English as Late Latin Writers and their Greek Sources. 1969.Cambridge, Mass.

D'Ancona, C. 2002. ‘Commenting on Aristotle’. Pp. 201-51 in Geerlings and Shulze (2002).

Dancy, R. 1975. 'On Some of Aristotle's First Thoughts about Substances.' Philosophical Review 84. 338-373.

De Rijk, L. M. 2002. Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology. Vol. I. Leiden: Brill.

De Rijk, L. M. 1996. ‘On Aristotle’s Semantics in De Int. 1-4’ in K. A. Algra, P. W. van derHorst and D. T. Runia (edd.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of

Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld = Phil. Ant. 72 (Leiden: Brill, 1996).

De Rijk, L. M. 1951. ‘The Authenticity of Aristotle’s Categories’. Mnemosyne 4. 129-59.

Diels, H. and F. Susemihl. 1879. ‘ Die Lebenszeit des Andronikos von Rhodos’. Neue Jahrb. f.

cl. Philologie 151. 226.

Dillon, J. 1977. The Middle Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell.

Dillon, J. 1990. Dexippus on Aristotle’s Categories. Duckworth/Cornell.

Dillon, J. 1996. The Middle Platonists (2nd ed.) Ithaca: Cornell.

Dillon, J. 1997. ‘Iamblichus’s Noera Theoria of Aristotle’s Categories’, Syllecta Classica 8.65-77.

Dillon, J. 1998. ‘Gathering Fragments: The Case of Iamblichus’. IV. in Burkert et al. (1998).

Dillon, J. 1999. ‘A Case-Study in Commentary: The Neoplatonic Exegesis of the Prooimia of Plato’s Dialogues’. Pp. 206-222 in Most (1999).

Dillon, J. and A.A. Long (eds). 1988. The Question of Eclecticism: Studies in later Greek

philosophy. Berkeley.

Donini, P. 1988. ‘The history of the concept of eclecticism’. Pp. 15-33 in Dillon and Long(1988).

Donini, P. 1982. Le scuole, l'anima, l'impero: la filosophia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin.





Donini, P. 1971. ‘L’anima e gli elementi nel De Anima di Alessandro di Afrodisia’. Atti dell’ Accademia delle Scienze di Torino. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 105.61-107.

Döring, K. and T. Ebert (eds). 1993. Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer

Vorläufer. Stuttgart.Dörrie, H. 1959. Porphyrios’ ‘Symmikta Zetemata’. Ihre Stellung in System und Geschichte

des Neuplatonismus nebst einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten (Zetemata Heft 20).Munich.

Dörrie, H. and M. Baltes. 1987-2002. Der Platonismus in der Antike: Grundlagen, System,

Entwicklung. 6 vols. Stuttgart.

Düring, I. 1957. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg.

Ebbesen, S. 2005. ‘Theories of language in the Hellenistic age and in the twelfth and

thirteenth centuries’. In Frede and Inwood (2005).

Ebbesen, S. 1990. ‘Porphyry’s legacy to logic: A reconstruction’. Pp. 141-72 in Sorabji(1990).

Ellis, J. 1994. ‘Alexander’s Defense of Aristotle’s Categories’. Phronesis 39. 69-89.

Evangeliou, C. 1988. Aristotle’s Categories and Porphyry. Brill.

Falcon, A. 2005. ‘Commentators on Aristotle’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-commentators/

Ferejohn, M. T. 1980. ‘Aristotle on Focal Meaning and the Unity of Science’. Phronesis 25.117-28.

Fine, G. (ed.) 2000. Plato. Oxford.

Flannery, K. L. ‘Mathematical Entities in Alexander and pseudo-Alexander of Aphrodisias’.Pp. 127-57 in Celluprica (2003).

Flannery, K. L. 1995. Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Brill.

Fleet, B. 2002. Simplicius on Aristotle, Categories 7-8. Duckworth and Cornell UP.

Fleet, B. 2001. Simplicius on Aristotle, Categories 5-6 . Duckworth and Cornell UP.

Fraser, K. 2003. ‘Seriality and Demonstration in Aristotle’s Ontology’. OSAP 25.131-58.

Fraser, P. M. 1972. Ptolemaic Alexandria. 2 vols. Oxford.

Frede, D. and B. Inwood (eds). 2005. Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language inthe Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.

Frede, M. 1990. ‘The Definition of Sensible Substance in Metaphysics Z’. Pp. 117-21 inPellegrin (1990).

Frede, M. 1989. ‘Chaeremon der Stoiker’. ANRW II 36 3. 2067-103.

Frede, M. 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford.



http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-commentators/









Frede, M. and G. Striker. 1996. Rationality in Greek Thought . Oxford.

Frede, M. and G. Patzig. 1988. Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik’: Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar.Munich. Vol II.

Frege, G. 1892. ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische

Kritik , NF 100. 25-50.

Funk, K. 1907. ‘Unt. über die lucianische Vita Demonactis’. Philologus Suppl. 10. 558-674.

Furley, D. J. (ed). 1997. Routledge History of Philosophy. Vol. 2: From Aristotle to

Augustine. London.

Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge.

von Fritz, K. 1936. ‘Nikostratos 26’. RE 17.1. Cols 547-51.

Gaskin, R. 2000. Simplicius on Aristotle, Categories 9-15. Duckworth and Cornell UP.

Geerlings, W. and Ch. Schulze (eds). 2002. Der Kommentar in Antike und Mittelalter. Leiden/Boston/Köln.

Gera, D. L. 2003. Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilisation. Oxford.

Gibson, M. 1981. Boethius: His Life, Thought, and Influence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Gibson, R. K. and C. S. Kraus. 2002. The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices,Theory. Leiden.

Gill, C. 2007. ‘Galen and the Stoics: Mortal Enemies or Blood Brothers?’ Phronesis 52.

88-120.Gillespie, C. M. 1925. ‘The Aristotelian Categories’. CQ 19. 79-84. Reprinted in Barnes,

Schofield, and Sorabji, vol. 3 (1979), 1-12.

Glibert-Thirry, A. 1977. Pseudo-Andronicus de Rhodes: Περὶ παθῶν = Corpus latinumcommentariorum in Aristotelem graecorum, suppl. 2. Leiden.

Gottschalk, H. B. 1987. ‘Aristotelian Philosophy in the Roman World from the Time of Cicero to the End of the Second Century AD’. ANRW 2.36.2. 1079-174.

Gottschalk, H. B. 1990. ‘The Earliest Aristotelian Commentators’. In Sorabji (1990).

Goulet, R. (ed.) 2000. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Paris.

Graeser, A. 1977. ‘On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy’. Dialectica 31. 359-88.

Graver, M. 1999. ‘Philo of Alexandria and the origin of the Stoic Propatheiai’. Phronesis 44.300-25.

Griffin, M. and J. Barnes (eds.). 1989. Philosophia Togata. Oxford.

Grilli, A. ‘Un frammento d’Aristone Alessandrino in Porfirio’, GIF 23, 1971, 292-307.

de Haas, F.A.J. 2001. 'Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's Categories?'Phronesis 46. 492-526.





de Haas, F.A.J. 'Context and Strategy of Plotinus' Treatise On the Genera of Being ( Enn. VI1-3 [42-44])'. Pp. 37-53 in Celluprica and D'Ancona (2004).

Hadot, I. 1990. Commentaire sur les Catégories I-III = Philosophia Antiqua 50. Leiden.

Hadot, I. 1991. ‘The Role of the Commentaries on Aristotle in the Teaching of Philosophyaccording to the Prefaces of the Neoplatonic Commentaries to the Categories’. Pp.175-89 in Blumenthal and Robinson (1991).

Hadot, I. 2007. ‘Versuch einer doktrinalen Neueinordnung der Schule der Sextier’. RhM 150.

Hadot, P. 1968. Porphyre et Victorinus. 2 vols. Paris.

Hadot, P. ‘The Harmony of Plotinus and Aristotle according to Porphyry’. In Sorabji (1990).

Hamlyn, D. W. 1978. ‘Focal Meaning’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78 (1977-78).1-18.

Harari, O. 2005. ‘ Methexis and Geometrical Reasoning in Proclus’s Commentary on Euclid’s Elements’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29. 361-90.

Harari, O. 2004. Knowledge and Demonstration: Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Springer.

Henry, P. 1987. ‘Apories orales de Plotin sur les Catégories d’Aristote’. Pp. 120-56 inWiesner (1987).

Hijmans, B. L. 1975. ‘Athenodorus on the Categories and a Pun on Athenodorus’. Pp.105-14 in Mansfeld and De Rijk (1975).

Hintikka, J. 1959. ‘Aristotle and the Ambiguity of Ambiguity’. Inquiry 2.

Hoffmann, Ph. and I. Hadot. 1990. Simplicius, Commentaire sur les Catégories, I: Introduction, Première partie. Traduction de Ph. Hoffmann. Commentaire et notes parI. Hadot. Leiden/New York/Cologne/Copenhague.

Huby, P. and G. Neal (eds). 1989. The Criterion of Truth: Essays written in honour of GeorgeKerferd . Liverpool.

Hülser, K. 1987. Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. Neue Sammlung der Texte mit deutscher Übersetzung und Kommentaren. Göttingen.

Ierodiakonou, K. 1999. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.

Inwood, B. 1993. ‘Seneca and Psychological Dualism’. In Brunschwig and Nussbaum(1993).

Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford.

Irwin, T. 1990. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford.

Irwin, T. 1982. ‘Aristotle’s Concept of Signification’. Pp. 241-66 in Schofield and Nussbaum(1982).

Irwin, T. 1981. ‘Homonymy in Aristotle’. Review of Metaphysics 34.3. UK 523.

Jones, B. 1972. 'Individuals in Aristotle's Categories'. Phronesis 17. 107-23.





Jones, B. 1975. ‘An Introduction to the First Five Chapters of Aristotle’s Categories’.Phronesis 20. 146-72.

Kahn, C. 1981. ‘Some Philosophical Uses of “To Be” in Plato’. Phronesis 26. 107-09.

Kahn, C. 1973. The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek . Dordrecht.

Kahn, C. 1966. ‘The Greek Verb “To Be” and the Concept of Being’. Foundations of Language 2.

Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement: Platonists on Aristotle from

Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.

Kneale, W. and M. 1984. The Development of Logic.

Konstan, D. 2007. Aspasius on Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 1-4, 7-8. Duckworth.

Kretzmann, N. ‘Aristotle on Spoken Sounds and Significance by Convention’. In Corcoran

(1974b).Larsen, B.D. 1972. Iamblique de Chalcis: Exégète et Philosophe. Aarhus.

Lewis, F. A. 1991. Substance and Predication in Aristotle. Cambridge.

Littig, F. 1890-95. Andronicus von Rhodos. 3 vols. Munich.

Lloyd, A. C. 1990. The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford.

Lloyd, A. C. 1978. ‘Emotion and Decision in Stoic Psychology’. Pp. 233-46 in Rist (1978).

Lloyd, A. C. 1955. ‘Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic – 1’. Phronesis 1. 58-72.

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. ‘Plato and Archytas in Plato’s Seventh Letter’, Phronesis 35. 159-74.

Long, A. A. 2005. ‘Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus, and Augustine’s De dialectica’. InFrede and Inwood (2005).

Long, A. A. 1989. ‘Ptolemy: Epistemology for the Scientist’. Pp. 151-78 in Huby and Neal(1989).

Long, A. A. 1978. ‘Dialectic and the Stoic Sage’. In Rist (1978).

Long, A. A. 1971. Problems in Stoicism. London.

Long, A. A. and D. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge.

Łukasiewicz, J. 1951. Aristotle’s syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic.

Oxford.

Łukasiewicz, J. 1935. ‘Zur Geschichte der Aussagenlogik’. Erkenntnis 5. 111 ff.

Luna, C. 2001. Trois études sur la tradition des commentaires anciens à la Métaphysique.Leiden/Boston/Köln.

Lynch, J. P. 1972. Aristotle’s School. Berkeley.

Maas, M. (ed). 2005. The Age of Justinian. Cambridge.Madigan, A. 1994. ‘Alexander on Species and Genera’. Pp. 74-91 in Schrenk (1994).





Magee, J. 1998. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii De Divisione Liber. Philosophia Antiqua 77.Leiden.

Magee, J. 1989. Boethius on signification and mind . Philosophia antiqua. Leiden.

Mahé, J. P. 1990. ‘David l’Invincible dans la tradition arménienne’. Pp. 189-207 in Hadot(1990), Vol. I.

Maier, H. 1896-1900. Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles. 2 in 3 vols. Tübingen.

Mann, W. R. 2000. The Discovery of Things. Princeton.

Mansfeld, J. 1994. Prolegomena: Questions to be settled before the study of an author, or atext. Leiden: Brill.

Mansfeld, J. and D. T. Runia. 1996. Aëtiana: The method and intellectual context of adoxographer. Volume 1. Leiden: Brill.

Mansfeld, J. and L. M. De Rijk. 1975. Kephalaion: Studies in Greek Philosophy and itsContinuation Offered to Professor C. J. de Vogel. Assen.

Mariotti, I. Aristone d’Allessandria. Bologna.

Marquardt, J., I. Müller, and G. Helmreich (1884-1909). Galeni Scripta Minora. Leipzig.

Mason, H. J. 1983. ‘The Distinction of Lucius in Apuleius’ “Metaphorphoses”’. Phronesis37.2. 135-43.

Matthen, M. 1983. ‘Greek Ontology and the “Is” of Truth’. Phronesis 28. 113-35.

Mazzarelli, C. 1985. ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti delmedioplatonico Eudoro di Allesandria’. Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 77. 197-209,535-555.

Meineke, A. 1859. ‘Zu Stobaeus’, in Mützells Zeitschrift 13. 563-65.

Mendelson, E. 1997. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Chapman & Hall.

Menn, S. 1999. ‘The Stoic Theory of Categories’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17.215-48.

Merlan, P. 1960. ‘The Peripatos’. Pp. 899-949 in Armstrong (1967).

Merlan, P. From Platonism to Neoplatonism. Nijhoff: The Hague.

Moraux, P. 1967. ‘Aristoteles, der Lehrer Alexanders von Aphrodisias’. Arch. f. Gesch. d.Philos. 49, 169-82.

Moraux, P. 1973. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. I. Berlin-NY.

Moraux, P. 1984. Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jahrhundert n. Chr. II. Berlin-NY.

Most, G. W. 1989. ‘Cornutus and Stoic Allegoresis’. ANRW II.36.3, 2014-2065 and in A.A.Long, ‘Stoic Readings of Homer’, 53-54 = Stoic Studies, 71-72.

Most, G. W. 1999. Commentaries–Kommentare . Aporemata Band 4. Göttingen.





Mullach, F.W.A. 1867. Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum. Paris.

von Müller, I. 1897. ‘Über Galen’s Werk vom wissenschaftlichen Bew eis’. Abhandlungen

der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historischeKlasse. Vol. 20. Pp. 403-478. Munich.

Newton, L. A. (ed). 2008. Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories. Leiden: Brill.

Nussbaum, M. 1982. ‘Saving Aristotle’s Appearances’. Pp. 267-95 in Schofield andNussbaum (1982).

Nutton, V. (ed). 1981. Galen: Problems and Prospects. London.

Oehler, K. 1997 (third edition). Aristoteles Kategorien. Übersetzt und erläutert. Aristoteles.

Werke in deutscher Übersetzung. Band I, Teil I. Berlin, 1984, 3rd ed. 1997.

Oliver, J. H. 1981. ‘Marcus Aurelius and the Philosophical Schools at Athens’. The American Journal of Philology 102.2. 213-225.

Opsomer, J. and R. W. Sharples. 2000. ‘“I heard this from Aristotle”: A modest proposal’.Classical Quarterly n.s. 50.1. 252-56.

Owen, G. E. L. 1965. ‘Inherence’. Phronesis 10. 97-105.

Owen, G. E. L. 1960/1979. 'Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle', inAristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, ed. I Düring and G. E. L. Owen(Göteborg: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1960), repr. in Articles on Aristotle, ed. J. Barnes, M.Schofield, R. Sorabji (London: Duckworth, 1979).

Patzig, G. 1968. Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism. Dordrecht. Translation by J. Barnes of Die Aristotelische Syllogistik (Göttingen, 1963).

Pellegrin, P. (ed). 1990. Biologie, logique et métaphysique. Paris.

Pépin, J. 1980. ‘Clément d’ Alexandrie, les Catégories d’Aristote et le fragment 60d’Héraclite’. Pp. 271-84 in Aubenque (1980).

Perin, C. 2007. ‘Substantial Universals in Aristotle’s Categories’. OSAP 33. Oxford.

Pinborg, J. 1962. ‘Das Sprachdenken der Stoa und Augustins Dialektik’. Classica et Mediaevalia 23. 148-77.

Pines, S. 1961. ‘Omne quod movetur necesse est ab aliquo moveri: A refutation of Galen byAlexander of Aphrodisias and the Theory of Motion’. Isis 52. 21-54.

Plezia, M. 1961. Aristotelis Epistularum fragmenta cum Testamento. Warsaw.

Plezia, M. 1946. De Andronici Rhodii studiis aristotelicis. Naak.

Praechter, K. 1922. ‘Nikostratos der Platoniker’. Hermes 57, 481-517 = id., Kleine Schriften

(Hildesheim, 1973). 101-37.

Prantl, C. 1855 and 1861 (repr. 1925). Geschichte der Logik im Abendland . Leipzig.

Primavesi, O. 2007. ‘Ein Blick in den Stollen von Skepsis: Vier Kaptiel zur frühenÜberlieferung des Corpus Aristotelicum’. Philologus 151. 51-77.





Quine, W. van Orman. 1960. Word and Object . Repr. MIT, 1988.

Radt, S. L. 1988. ‘OI (AI etc.) Peri + acc. nominis proprii bei Strabon’. ZPE 71. 35-40.

Rappe, S. 2000. Reading Neoplatonism. Cambridge.

Rashed, M. 2007. Essentialisme: Alexandre d'Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.

Rashed, M. 2004. ‘Priorité de l’εἶδος ou du γένος entre Andronicos et Alexandre: vestigesarabes et grecs inédits’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 14. 9-63.

Rehn, R. 2000. Sprache und Dialektik in der Aristotelischen Philosophie. K. Flasch, R.Imbach, B. Mojsisch, O. Pluta (edd.), Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, Band 31(Amsterdam, 2000).

Reinhardt, T. 2007. ‘Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories’.

Pp. 513-29 in Sorabji and Sharples (2007).Reinhardt, T. 2008. ‘Epicurus and Lucretius on the origins of language’. Classical Quarterly

58.1. 127-40.

Reisman, D. C. 2007. ‘Al-Fārābi’. Pp. 52-71 in Adamson and Taylor (2005).

Rescher, R. and M. E. Marmura. 1965. The refutation by Alexander of Aphrodisias of Galen’s

treatise of the theory of motion. Islamabad.

Rist, J. 1989a. The Mind of Aristotle. Toronto.

Rist, J. 1989b. ‘Seneca and Stoic Orthodoxy’. ANRW II 36 3. Berlin.

Rist, J. 1986. Review of H. Tarrant, Scepticism or Platonism? Phoenix 40. 468.

Rist, J. (ed). 1978. The Stoics. Berkeley.

Rist, J. 1971. ‘Categories and their uses’, Pp. 38 ff. in Long (1971).

Ross, W.D. 1924. Aristotle's Metaphysics. 2 vols. Oxford.

Russell. B. 1905. ‘On Denoting’. Mind n.s. 14. 479-93.

Russell, B., and A. N. Whitehead. 1910-1913. Principia Mathematica. 3 Vols. Cambridge.

Ryle, G. 1961. ‘Categories’. In A. N. Flew (ed.), Logic and Language: Second Series (Oxford, 1961), 65-81.

Sachs, D. 1948. ‘Does Aristotle have a Doctrine of Secondary Substances?’ Mind 57. 221-25.

Sandbach, F. H. 1985. Aristotle and the Stoics. Cambridge Philological SocietySupplementary Volume 10. Cambridge.

Sandbach, F. H. 1971. ‘ Ennoia and Prolepsis in the Stoic Theory of Knowledge’. Pp. 22-37in Long (1971).

de Saussure, F. 1916. ‘Nature of the Linguistics Sign’. In C. Bally and A. Sechehaye (edd.),

Cours de linguistique générale (McGraw Hill Education, 1916).





Schmidt, E. 1966. ‘Alexander von Aphrodisias in einem altarmenischen Kategorien-Kommentar’. Philologus 110. 277-86.

Schmidt, H. 1907. De Hermino Peripatetico. Diss. Marburg.

Schofield, M. and M. C. Nussbaum (eds). 1982. Language and Logos. Cambridge.

Schrenk, L. P. (ed.) 1994. Aristotle in Late Antiquity. Washington, DC.

Sedley, D. 2000. ‘Aristotelian Relatives’. Mélanges for Jacques Brunschwig. Paris.

Sedley, D. 1998. ‘The etymologies in Plato’s Cratylus’. JHS 118. 140-54.

Sedley, D. 1997. ‘Plato's Auctoritas and the Rebirth of the Commentary Tradition’. Pp.110-29 in Griffin and Barnes (1997).

Sellars, J. 2004. ‘The Aristotelian Commentators: A Bibliographical Guide’. Pp. 239-68 inAdamson, Baltussen and Stone (2004).

Sharples. R. W. 2008. ‘Habent Sua Fata Libelli: Aristotle’s Categories in the first centuryBC’. Acta. Ant. Hung. 48. 273-87.

Sharples, R. W. 2005. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts’.Phronesis 50. 43-55.

Sharples, R. W. 2005b. ‘Implications of the new Alexander of Aphrodisias inscription’. BICS 48.

Sharples, R. W. 1997. ‘The Peripatetic School’. Pp. 147-87 in Furley (1997).

Sharples, R. W. 1990. ‘The School of Alexander?’ in Sorabji (1990).Sharples, R. W. 1987. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: Scholasticism and Innovation’. ANRW II

36 2. Berlin.

Shiel, J. 1990. ‘Boethius’s Commentaries on Aristotle’. Pp. 349-72 in Sorabji (1990).

Sidwell, K. 2005. Lucian: Chattering Courtesans and Other Sardonic Sketches. Penguin.

Sluiter, I. 1999. ‘Commentaries and the Didactic Tradition’. Pp. 173-205 in Most (1999).

Smiley, T. J. 1973. ‘What is a Syllogism?’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 2. 136-54.

Smith, A. 1993. Porphyrii philosophi fragmenta edidit A. Smith. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle: Topics I and VIII. Oxford.

Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation, and the Continuum. London.

Sorabji, R. (ed.) 1990. Aristotle Transformed . London.

Sorabji, R. 2002. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation.Oxford.

Sorabji, R. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators 200-600 AD. A Sourcebook. Volume

1: Psychology. Volume 2: Physics. Volume 3: Logic and Metaphysics. London/Ithaca.





Sorabji, R. 2007. ‘Time, Place, and Extracosmic Place’. Pp. 563-74 in Sorabji and Sharples(2007).

Sorabji, R. 2007b. ‘Adrastus: Modifications to Aristotle’s Physics by Peripatetics and Others,100 BC to 200 AD’. in Sorabji and Sharples (2007).

Sorabji, R. and R. W. Sharples (eds). 2007. Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-200 AD. 2vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 94. London.

Spruit, L. 1994. Species Intelligibilis. Brill.

Strange, S. 1992. Porphyry: On Aristotle, Categories. Duckworth/Cornell.

Strange, S. 1987. ‘Plotinus, Porphyry, and the Neoplatonic Interpretation of the Categories’. ANRW 2.36.2. 955-74.

Striker, G. 1991. ‘Following nature: A study in Stoic ethics’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9. 1–73.

Strobel, B. 2009. ‘Von einem Subjekt ausgesagt werden und an einem Subjekt vorliegen: zurSemantik genereller Terme in der aristotelischen Kategorienschrift’. Phronesis 54.40-75.

Szlezak, T. A. 1972. Pseudo-Archytas Über die Kategorien. Berlin.

Tarán, L. 2001. Collected Works. Leiden: Brill.

Tarán, L. 1978. Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione (Codex ParisinusGraecus 2064). Meisenheim am Glan 1978 = Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 95.

Tarán, L. 2001a. 'Aristotelianism in the First Century B.C.' Review of Moraux 1973 inGnomon 53 [1981], 721-50. Reprinted in Tarán (2001), 479-524.

Tarán, L. 2001b. ‘Speusippus and Aristotle on Homonymy and Synonymy’. Hermes 106.73-99. Reprinted in Tarán (2001), 401-54.

Tarrant, H. 2008. ‘Eudorus and the Early Platonist Interpretation of the Categories’. Laval

Philosophique et Théologique. 64. 583-95.

Tarrant, H. (Unpublished). ‘From Categories as enemy to Categories as friend’. Online athttp://categories.scu.edu.au/TarrantCategories.htm. Accessed 2009.

Tarrant, H. 1985. Scepticism or Platonism? The philosophy of the Fourth Academy.Cambridge.

Thiel, R. 2004. Aristoteles' Kategorienschrift in ihrer antiken Kommentierung. Tübingen.

Thillet, P. 1984. Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Traité du destin. CUF . Paris.

Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De

Placitis II-III. Leiden.

Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’s On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden.

Todd, R.B. 1976. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. Brill.



http://categories.scu.edu.au/TarrantCategories.htm






Tselemanis, P. 1985. ‘Theory of Meaning and Signification in Aristotle’, in Language and Reality in Greek Philosophy (Athens, 1985, 194-9).

Turner, J. D. 2001. Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Laval.

Tweedale, M. M. 1984. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias’s View on Universals’. Phronesis 29.279-303.

Verlinsky, A. 2005. ‘Epicurus and his predecessors on the origin of language’. Pp. 56-100 inFrede and Inwood (2005).

Vlastos, G. 1973. ‘An Ambiguity in the Sophist ’. Repr. in Platonic Studies (Princeton, 1973),270.

Vlastos, G. 1974. ‘A Note on “Pauline Predications” in Plato, Phronesis 19 (1974), 95-101,repr. Platonic Studies 404 ff.

Wedin, M. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. Oxford.

Wehrli, F. 1967-69. Die Schule des Aristoteles [2]. Basel.

Weidemann, H. Aristoteles, Peri Hermeneias. Übersetzt und erläutert. Aristoteles. Werke in

deutscher Uebersetzung. Band 1, Teil II (Berlin, 1991).

Westerink, L.G. 1990. ‘The Alexandrian Commentators’. Pp. 325-48 in Sorabji (1990).

Westerink, L. G. 1961. ‘Introduction to Elias On the Prior Analytics’. Mnemosyne S. IV, vol.14.

Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996. De Interpretatione. Oxford.

Wiesner, J (ed). 1987. Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung, Paul Moraux gewidmet . Zweiter Band:Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben. Berlin/NY.

Wildberg, C. 2007. ‘Olympiodorus’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Ancient Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/olympiodorus/

Wildberg, C. 2005. ‘Philosophy in the Age of Justinian’. Pp. 316-40 in Maas (2005).

Wildberg, C. 2003. ‘David’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Ancient Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david

Wildberg, C. 1990. ‘Three Neoplatonic Introductions to Philosophy: Ammonius, David,Elias’. Hermathena 149. 33-51.

Wooten, C. W. 1987. Hermogenes’On Types of Style. Chapel Hill/London.

Zeller, E. 1844-52. Die Philosophie Der Griechen In Ihrer Geschichtlichen Entwicklung.Repr. 1990.

Ziai, H. 2005. ‘Recent Trends’. Pp. 405-25 in Adamson and Taylor (2005).

Zoubos, A.N. 1958. ‘Εὔδωρος ὁ Ἀλεξανδρεύς’, Athena 62. 194-203.



http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david




http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/olympiodorus/













biblio aristote

Documents