behavior & classroom management:
DESCRIPTION
Behavior & Classroom Management:. Chris Borgmeier, Ph.D. Portland State University [email protected] www.sped521.pbworks.com. Reading Review. Scheuermann & Hall, Ch. 8 Kern & Clements – Antecedent Strategies Pacchiano – Instructional Variables Moore et al., 2010 – Praise & OTR - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Behavior & Classroom Management:
Chris Borgmeier, Ph.D.Portland State [email protected]
Reading Review
Scheuermann & Hall, Ch. 8 Kern & Clements – Antecedent Strategies Pacchiano – Instructional Variables Moore et al., 2010 – Praise & OTR Heward et al., 1996 – Everyone
participates
Active Engagement of Students:
Opportunities to Respond
Multiple Opportunities to Respond
An instructional question, statement or gesture made by the teacher seeking an academic response from students (Sprick, Knight, Reinke & McKale 2006)
A teacher behavior that prompts or solicits a student response (Simonsen et al, 2008)
Reading aloudWriting answers to a problemVerbally answering a questionResponding to a teacher’s cue
Opportunities to RespondANTECEDENT
Teacher Provides: Verbal Questions
PromptsCues
BEHAVIOR
Student Responses:Written
Choral VerbalMotor
CONSEQUENCE
Teacher Provides: Specific, Positive
Feedback
Opportunities to Respond: ExampleANTECEDENT
Teacher says, “When I give the signal everyone
answer this question:
What is 5 times 6?”
Teacher waits a few seconds and
gives signal.
BEHAVIOR
Students chorally respond, “30”
CONSEQUENCE
Teacher says, “Yes! The correct
answer is 30”.
Why Provide Multiple Opportunities to Respond?
Behavioral Outcomes: Increases student engagement with instruction Allows for high rates of positive, specific
feedback Limits student time for engaging in
inappropriate behavior Is an efficient use of instructional time
(Heward, 1994)
Why Provide Multiple Opportunities to Respond? Academic Outcomes: Improved Reading Performance:
increased percentage of reading responses, mastery of reading words, rates of words read correctly and decreased rates of words read incorrectly. (Carnine, 1976; Skinner, Smith & McLean, 1994)
Improved Math Performance: percentage of problems calculated correctly per minutes, number of problems completed and active correct responses. (Skinner, Belfior, Mace, Williams-Wilson, & Johns, 1997)
Rate of Opportunities to Respond
New Material: 4 – 6 student responses per minute with 80 % accuracy
Practice Work: 9 – 12 student responses per minute with90% accuracy
(CEC, 1987; Gunter, Hummel & Venn, 1998)
Observing Opportunities to Respond
Classroom: Frequency Observer tallies the number of instructional
questions, statements or gestures made by the teacher seeking an academic response.
Students: Rate of Academic Engagement Observer Records “+” symbol for on-task/engaged
behavior and “-” indicates off-task behavior.
Ratings: make sure to preview so you know what to look for
Positive/Negative Interactions:
Observation: Oppty to
Respond & Rate of Correct Responses
Positive v. Corrective Interactions
Positive Interaction any attention a teacher gives to a student when he or
she is doing something well or following rules and expectations
Corrective Interaction any attention a teacher gives to a student when he or
she is doing something incorrect or that does not follow expectations
Tally positive v. negative interactions
Specific v. General statements Positive & negative
S = Specific = Nice job getting your folders and quickly finding your seats
G = General = Good job
Coding ResponsesPositive to Negative Interactions
Coding ResponsesPositive to Negative Interactions
Place an “+” next to each student for positive interaction & “-” for each negative interaction
Place an ““+” next to teacher for each group positive interaction & “-” for each negative interaction
After Scoring transfer scores to front page of observation form
Practice Positive to Negative Ratio
Draw this map Watch the Video & Code (MS SPED Rdg Group)
Watch the first 6:30
PracticePositive to Negative Ratio
Observed for 6:30
Positive = 9Negative = 10Ratio = 9 to 10 < 1:1
If we include academic responding
Positive = 13Negative = 16Ratio = 13 to 16 < 1:1
Coding ResponsesOpportunities to Respond
Partner Any activity in which student is working with 1 or more peers (e.g. Think-Pair-Share)
Group Any activity in which the entire class responds in unison (choral response) or group
physical response (e.g. response cards, thumbs up)
Individual
Can do a simple Tally
Coding ResponsesOpportunities to Respond
Correct Mark a tally in the “Correct” box when an individual, pair of students, or
group make a correct response
Incorrect Mark a tally in the “Incorrect” box when an individual, pair of students, or
group make an incorrect response
Can do a simple Tally
Coding ResponsesOpportunities to Respond
Place an “I” next to each student for incorrect response & “C” for correct response
Place an “I” next to teacher for each incorrect group response & “C” for correct response Not always Correct/Incorrect -- May put an “N” for neutral or “Q” for question
After Scoring transfer scores to front page of observation form
PracticeOpportunities to Response
Draw this map Watch the Video & Code (MS SPED Reading Group)
Watch the first 6:30
PracticePositive to Negative Ratio
Observed for 5:30Parther = 0Group = 0
Individ = 10% grp/part = 0%
% CorrectCorrect = 4Incorrect = 6% Correct = 4/10
40%
Responses/Min10 resp/6:30< 2 resp/min
PracticePositive to Negative Ratio
Observed for 5:30
Observation Ratings Based on what you say… What do you think?
Practice
Parther = 0Group = 0
Individ = 10% grp/part = 0%
% CorrectCorrect = 4Incorrect = 6% Correct = 4/10
40%
Responses/Min10 resp/6:30< 2 resp/min
Summarize the Data
Start with the Candidate
Start with the Positive!
Use the Data to inform Targets & provide specific,
observable strategies
Providing Feeback
Start with the Positive
PROVIDING FEEDBACK
Based on Data PRIORITIZE 2-3 Targets
Give specific feedback with tangible, observable strategiesWhen possible give specific examples from
the teaching lesson
Using Data to Inform Feedback
Look at Observation Data
Using Data to Inform Feedback Look at Ratings
Activity With a Partner -- Based on this observation &
the data you collected:
1) Use the data you collected to identify your top 3 targets for improvement
2) Provide specific feedback and strategies for improvement
3) Practice providing the feedback to your partner
Targets for Continuing Development
Assignment #2
Conduct a peer observation
Debrief following observationUse your observation data to identify
suggestions Write out recommendations so clearly that it is
easy to understand what to do
Increasing Opportunities to Respond
Strategies to Increase StudentOpportunity for Response
A. Track Students Called On
B. Guided Notes
C. Response Cards
D. Think-Pair-Share
E. Direct Instruction
A. Track Students Called On
Are all students called on?Use a seating chart & mark off when a student is
called on to answer an academic question.Draw students’ names from a jarOther strategies you have used?
B. Guided Notes Opportunity to Respond is an instructional question,
statement or gesture made by the teacher seeking _______________________.
Rate of OTR for New Material: ____ responses from students per minute with __ % accuracy
Rate of OTR for Practice Work: ___ opportunities with __ % accuracy
Three common strategies to increase OTR are:1. Tracking students called on
2. Guided __________
3. Response ________
How To Develop Guided Notes
Examine Existing Lecture Outlines Delete Key Facts, Concepts & Relationships Insert Concept Maps, Graphs, Charts,
Diagrams & Other Resources Provide Formatting Cues (Blank Lines,
Numbers, Bullets, etc) Do Not Require Students Write Too Much
Use of Response Cards Teach, Model and Practice the Routine
1. Question 5. Cue to Show
2. Think 6. Hold up Card
3. Decide Answer 7. Put Down Card
4. Wait 8. Prepare for Next Question.
Maintain lively pace Short time between questions Give clear cues OK to look at classmates’ cards Specific, positive feedback for correct answers and
use of cards
C. Response Cards
Cards, Signs, or Items Simultaneously Held up By All Students to Display Their Responses
Types of Response Cards: Preprinted Cards: Yes/No, True/False, Agree/Disagree, Preprinted Cards with Multiple Answers: Letters, Numbers,
Parts of Speech, Characters in a Story Write-On Cards: 9X12 Response Cards & Dry-Erase
Markers Back side of recycled paper
Easy to Manipulate, Display and See
Response Card Practice
Distribute true/false cards to all participants. Routine:
I will ask a question and give you time to think.I will say “Answer”Show your card with your answer toward me. Hold card until I say “Cards down”.Place card on table and put eyes on me.
Practice
Handout 2
E. Direct Instruction
Direct Instruction (DI) is a teaching model that emphasizes carefully planned lessons designed around small learning increments with clearly defined and prescribed teaching tasks.
It is based on the theory that clear instruction eliminates misinterpretations and can greatly improve and accelerate learning. (NIFDI website)
E. Direct Instruction
Characteristics: Explicit, systematic instruction based on scripted
lesson plans. Ability grouping. Emphasis on pace and efficiency of instruction. Frequent assessment. Quick pace helps keep students on task. New material is worked on in highly interactive
format
Academic Learning Time: Typical School
1170 School Year (6.5 hours x 180 days) - 65 Absenteeism (1 day/month x 10 months)= 1105 Attendance Time (Time in School)- 270 Non-instructional time (1.5 hrs./day for recess, lunch, etc)
= 835 Allocated Time (Time scheduled for teaching)
- 209 (25% of allocated time for administration, transition, discipline-15 minutes/hour)
= 626 Instructional time (time actually teaching)- 157 Time off task (Engaged 75% of time)= 469 Engaged Time (On task)- 94 Unsuccessful Engaged Time (Success Rate 80%)= 375 Academic Learning Time
Education Resources Inc., 2005Efficiency Rating = 32%
Academic Learning Time: Effective School
1170 School Year (6.5 hours x 180 days) - 65 Absenteeism (1 day/month x 10 months)= 1105 Attendance Time (Time in School)- 270 Non-instructional time (1.5 hrs./day for recess, lunch, etc)
= 835 Allocated Time (Time scheduled for teaching)
- 125 (15% of allocated time for administration, transition, discipline-9 minutes/hour)
= 710 Instructional time (actually teaching-710 vs. 626)- 71 Time off task (Engaged 90% of time)= 639 Engaged Time (639 vs. 469 On task)- 64 Unsuccessful Engaged Time (Success Rate 90%)= 575 Academic Learning Time
Education Resources Inc., 2005Efficiency Rating = 49%
The Difference: Typical vs. Effective Schools Unallocated Non-Instructional Time
75% vs. 85% = 84 more hours Difference in 15 minutes vs. 9 minutes/hour Teaching expectations, teaching transitions, managing appropriate and
inappropriate behavior efficiently
Engagement Rate 75% vs. 90% = 86 more hours
Management of groups, pacing
Success Rate 80% vs. 90% = 30 more hours
Appropriate placement, effective teaching
So what? 200 hours more academic learning time (575 vs. 375) 53% more ALT 95 more days in school (4-5 more months of school!)
Education Resources Inc., 2005
Function-Based Support for Students with Reading Difficulties
Amanda Sanford
Jorge Preciado
http://www.alsig.org/images/trianglechart_
Three key elements Instructional design variables
Teaching explicitlyProviding multiple opportunities to respondCorrect academic placement
Reading acquisitionStudents must be on track early
Function-based behavior supportBehavior support is most effective when designed
based on the function of a student’s behavior
Ineffective Instructional Design and Delivery
Frustration-level task presented
Punishment/ extinction of academic
responding
Incorrect academic
responding
Decreased academic
engagement
Failure to acquire literacy
skills
Ineffective Instructional Design and Delivery
Frustration-level task presented
Punishment/ extinction of academic
responding
Incorrect academic
responding
Decreased academic
engagement
Failure to acquire literacy
skills
Frustration-level task presented
More severe problem behavior
Escape or avoid academic
task
Decreased academic
engagement
Failure to acquire literacy
skills
Inability to Read
Ineffective Instructional Design and Delivery
Frustration-level task presented
Punishment/ extinction of academic
responding
Incorrect academic
responding
Decreased academic
engagement
Failure to acquire literacy
skills
Instruction-level task presented
Correct academic
responding
Reinforcement for academic responding
Increased academic
engagement
Successful acquisition of literacy skills
Effective Instructional Design and Delivery:
•Explicit Teaching
•Frequent Opportunities to Respond
•Appropriate Placement
Function-Based Literacy Instruction Is designed to
Avoid presentation of aversive tasks through providing students with pre-skills needed to be successful in tasks by using effective instruction
Maintain high levels of reinforcement for academic engagement by being at the students appropriate instruction level
Includes the following critical elements: Explicit instruction Frequent opportunities to respond Appropriate placement (95% correct in text)
Intervention
Language Matched Instructional Priming (LMIP) Intervention Teaching decoding skills (Reading Mastery
Program) Review/Preview of grade level story basal
reader (Story being read in class) Review 2-3 key vocabulary words in the story Review directions and help student complete the
next day’s reading independent task Teach student how to ask for a break from task Teach student how to ask for peer or adult
assistance to complete a reading task
% Intervals with Problem Behavior and Peer Data
Implications for Teaching Prevention
Have prevention-oriented system for reading instruction that Matches instruction to student skills Is engaging and fast paced Is intensive enough to prevent reading difficulties
Intervention Screen students for reading problems to identify the possible
function of the problem behavior Include academic component to an intervention when
necessary Pre teaching Matching instruction to skill level of student
Linking Behavior & Instruction Avoiding Difficult Tasks is one of most common functions
of student problem behavior Responses
Provide the most effective instruction Provide instruction/ activities to meet/match students’ varying skill
levels Collect data to Monitor student work and error patterns to identify
what needs re-teaching Review, review, review Be active in scanning work to catch student errors early to
prevent frustration and practice of misrules
Good Instruction as a Behavior Management Tool
Linking Behavior & Instruction
Good instruction of academic content is the best and most important Behavior Management tool you have
Academic success is the most frequent reinforcer available to students in the classroom Students should experience at least a 90% success rate
To be successful students need 2 things:1. Effective Instruction with frequent review2. High rates of success with questions and assignments
PBS v. Traditional Approach to Problem Behavior
PBS v. Aversive Model (ABC)
A B CPBS (Positive Behavior Support) – ProactiveEmphasis on Interventions to prevent problem behavior
Emphasis on explicitly Teaching Alternate, Desired Behavior
Emphasis on Positive Reinforcement of desired behavior
Traditional Aversive Model - Reactive approachLimited focus on Antecedent Interventions
Little focus on teaching behavior
Emphasis on punitive response to negative behavior
PBS v. Aversive InterventionVignette Alex gets into a (B) yelling match that turns into
shoving and kicking the kickball across the yard when (A) another student told him he had to wait to join the game until their team played the field in the next inning. Meanwhile, supervision staff were huddled together talking right next to the school and didn’t respond until the boy who was shoved to the ground went in tears to tell on Alex.
What would be a traditional v. PBS approach to this situation?
Interventions for Vignette PBS v. Aversive
A B CA-B-C sequence
Alex wants in kickball game now, and peer says wait until inning is over
Alex yells at peer, shoves him to ground and kicks ball across yard
Desired: Alex wanted to get in game right away
Real: Alex didn’t get in game and game delayed
PBS approach
Increase supervision, in the future make sure there is supervision around student
Teach Rules w/ opportunities to practice
How to wait
How to ask nicely to enter game
Verbally praise student or provide corrective feedback
Get to play in game if ask approp’ly
Trad’l Aversive
Nothing – keep chatting w/ colleague by school
No emphasis on teaching – assume student should have the skills
Sent to office –no recess next day & can’t play kickball for a week
Good Instruction as a Behavior Management Tool
Good Instruction as a Behavior Management Tool Provide fast-paced, interactive, engaging
instructionMust be interactive & engaging for ALL
students, not just the best students
Structure activities from time students enter until they leave classroom “idle hands (or idle time) = devil’s workbench”
Good Instruction as a Behavior Management Tool Provide clear questions/instruction, and
directionsToo often I’ve been doing an observation & I
find that I’m confused about what students are supposed to be doing at a certain time
Involve all students in instruction/ classroom activities
Appropriate Instructional Placement
Placement in the appropriate level of instruction as a determining factor in student behavior Identify specific skill deficits Teach simple strategies or misunderstandings to
clarify problem Can Do v. Will Do problem
Impact of reading deficits on success in content areas
Open circles = Receiving SpEd services in reading
Black diamonds = no SpEd services
Curriculum Based Measurement - Reading Class Norms - 2nd grade
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
Wo
rds
Re
ad
Co
rre
ct
16 studentsRange = 3 to 107
Passages DIBELS - 2nd grade DORF - Assessed in January
Peer Median = 57 Intensive Support cut off = 50 WRC
Benchmark Spring of 2nd grade = 90 WRC
Interactive & Engaging
Requires high levels of participation for all students in instruction/ classroom activities
Ways to get Everyone involved: Use Chorale Responding – clear signal w/ think time to increase
responding Be Careful of relying too much on volunteers When reading aloud do not always go sequentially around the
room Use a random selection technique (i.e. choose from popsicle sticks
with student names on them) Provide effective instruction & ask clear questions based on
instruction that students can answer with high rates of success Establish consistent routines/ways of asking questions or
prompting responses and teach/practice to fluency
Choral Responding Exercise
Read
Each
Word
Together
Good InstructionTeach effective & efficient Strategies Increasing task efficiency through effective strategies
can greatly increase likelihood and student tolerance to do assigned tasks
This is where research based curriculum and strategies are important Having students talk through strategies or watching their work
can help to ID ineffective or inefficient strategies Examples
14 x 7 v. 14+14+14+14+14+14+14 7+5
Take 2 from 7 Add 5 +5 = 10 Add 2 taken away previously = 12
Independent Work
Define & Teach Expectations & Routines during Independent Work
High rates of reinforcement for early practice and independent work Practice at first with non-work activities Might want to link with a tangible reinforcer at first Active Movement & Scanning w/ frequent Precorrection,
Reinforcement, & Support
Provide independent work that students can be successful with independently (90% accurate)
Independent Work
Break long, multi-step tasks into smaller parts with opportunities for participation Instead of waiting 15 minutes to complete & present a
multi-step task, break task into portions & have students present progress on smaller steps in 5 minute intervals
Active Movement & Scanning w/ frequent Reinforcement & Support if struggling
Managing Volume & Talking
Identify your expectations Routines & Volume levels May use signs, signals or cues to identify different
requirements &/or Volume Levels (5-Level system) Use an attention signal
Explicitly teach expectation with practice
Give students something to do
During & After Instruction
Evaluate work to identify specific error patterns In class this can be done through monitoring and
looking at work Look for common mistakes across students, which
may signal the need for clearer, more explicit instruction
Look for individual student mistakes & provide 1:1 support while class during individual seatwork time
We don’t want students practicing misrules
Can Do v. Will Do Problem
Skill Deficit v. Motivation Problem How can we tell the difference? Try giving the student easier tasks that you know they
are capable of doing fluently and see how they respond… if they will do it
A task that students are 93+ % successful A task that is not so easy that it’s boring
Antecedent manipulation Antecedent = Difficult Task
manipulate it to make an easier task
Can Do v. Will Do Problem
Skill Deficit v. Motivation ProblemFor skill deficits we can:
Provide more instruction or support to alleviate specific skill deficit or
Provide the student with easier questions or assignments to increase participation
For motivation problems we can: Find incentives to motivate the student to engage
in the academic task
Manipulating Academic Tasks
Darch & Kameenui
Instr’l Classroom Mgmt
Instructional Classroom Management The nature, structure, and demands of a task
can set the stage for serious problem behavior
What can I do to change task presentation to make the student more likely to engage in the instructional task and less likely to avoid task/misbehave Depending on challenge of task, may also need to
alter/increase amount of reinforcement provided for some students
Dimensions of Instructional Classroom Management History Response form Modality Complexity Schedule Variation
Manipulating Task Dimensions
We can manipulate aspects of tasks (see arrows ) and/or the way we seek student responses to increase the chances that students will be successful with the task
Likelihood of Failure with TaskDecreased Increased
(task made easier) (task made more difficult)
Decreased IncreasedLikelihood of Problem Behavior/Refusal
Task History
Status of the task and extent that the task has been taught before and the likelihood that the learner will be familiar with it New v. familiar tasks
Likelihood of Failure with TaskDecreased (easier task) (more difficult) Increased
(more familiar/reviewed items) (newer material)
Decreased IncreasedLikelihood of Problem Behavior/Refusal
Task Response Form
The manner in which students are required to respond to the task or teacherYes/NoChoiceProduction
Task Modality
The mode of response required of the studentOralMotorWritten
Task Complexity
The extent to which a task involves multiple steps, new concepts, unfamiliar procedures and so onEasy v. Hard
Task Schedule
The amount of time allocated to complete a taskAbbreviated v. Extended
Task Variation
The sequence in which easy or hard tasks are sequenced within a lessonVaried v. Unvaried
Task Dimensions of Instructional Classroom Management Task History
New v. familiar tasks Task Response form
Yes or No/Choice/Production Task Modality
oral/motor/written Task Complexity
Easy v Difficult Task Schedule
Abbreviated v. extended Variation
Varied v unvaried
Small Group Activity
Break into teams
Assign a Task Dimension to each team
Come up with an academic task & show how to use your task dimension to modify the task to make it easier
Reference Darch & Kameenui pp.51-59
Each team will present their example to the class