beam observations with different bunch spacings and synthesis g. arduini – be/abp

Beam observations with different bunch spacings and synthesis

G. Arduini – BE/ABP

with input from: V. Baglin, H. Bartosik, O. Dominguez Sanchez De La Blanca, U. Iriso, J.M. Jimenez, K. Li, H. Maury, E. Métral, F. Roncarolo,

G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, F. Zimmermann

Acknowledgements: BI, Cryo, Injection Team, OP, RF

Chamonix 2011 - Beam observations with different bunch spacings and overall synthesis

2

Outline

• Beam stability observations and expectations• Summary of the observations• Why a scrubbing run?• Scrubbing run plan• Summary and outlook

24/01/2011

3

Beam stability at 450 GeV/c (50 ns)

• E-cloud build-up over more trains instabilities, e blow-up (mostly V)

• Expected behaviour of instability driven by electron cloud in the arcs: coupled bunch instability in H-plane ( damper)

• single bunch instability in the V-plane

F. Roncarolo

12+4x24 – 1.85 ms spacing

24/01/2011Chamonix 2011 - Beam observations with different bunch spacings and overall

synthesis

H: ~1 s rise time V: ~0.2 s rise time

E. Métral


4


• Single bunch instability can be stabilized by increasing chromaticity to very large values (up to 18 units) and by transverse emittance blow-up in the injectors (~3-3.5 mm @ SPS extr.) although blow-up is still observed.

• Effect of the chromaticity predicted by simulations (E. Benedetto, F. Zimmermann 2006)

• This is the way we have to run for scrubbing but not possible for physics due to the low lifetime and blow-up

F. Roncarolo

24/01/2011


5

Beam stability at 450 GeV/c (75 ns)High chromaticity allows stabilizing the beam but blow-up

(mainly vertical) is still observed Larger blow-up in the vertical plane compatible with instability and incoherent effects generated by e-cloud close to thresholdBunch population = 1.2×1011 p – batch spacing 1.005 ms

24/01/2011

F. Roncarolo


6

Instability thresholds

• No single bunch e-cloud instability expected at 450 GeV/c (worst case) and 3.5-4 TeV/c if electron density <1011 e-/m3 at the beam position.

• Once the threshold electron density is reached the beam is unstable

E. Benedetto, F. Zimmermann (2006)

24/01/2011


7

Incoherent effects

• Tune spread due to electron cloud pinching can reach 0.01 for 1011 e-/m3 at 450 GeV/c (worst case) at the beam position

• At 75 ns (>600 bunches) the heat load measured in the arcs was ~10 mW/m (close to resolution limit) AVERAGE e- density of 6 x 1010 e-/m3 assuming an average e- energy of 100 eV and ~800 bunches

• 75 ns beam is at the limit of single bunch stability/incoherent effects even for low cryo activity in the arcs24/01/2011

450 GeV/c (for 30% of LHC field free and 70% of LHC dipole field)

K. Li, G. Rumolo


8

Summary of the observations• Reduced vacuum activity with 75 ns spacing as compared to 50

ns but important pressure rise observed for large number of bunches also for 75 ns need scrubbing to ramp and collide more than ~200-300 bunches with 75 ns spacing with no significant pressure rise

• Low heat load (close to detection limit) due to e-cloud in the beam screens for 75 ns beam ( slow scrubbing in the arcs)

• Typical signature of ECI observed with 50 ns. For 75 ns beam blow-up is visible correlated to coherent and incoherent effects close to ECI threshold leading to low lifetime and losses scrubbing

• Comparison of 50ns vacuum and heat load during the ramp and at 3.5 TeV before and after scrubbing at 450 GeV shows clear improvement in the straight sections as mentioned in the previous talk but we never achieved so far 100 mW/m during the scrubbing period with 50 ns nor with 75 ns (max. ~40 mW/m)

24/01/2011


9

Aim of the scrubbing run• Limit the electron cloud density at the beam centre to less than

1010 e-/m3 for 75 ns beam operation to:– Remain well below the threshold for the onset of the electron cloud single

bunch instability– Limit the tune spread which is at the origin of the incoherent blow-up

• At the end of the scrubbing run we should aim at getting heat loads in the arcs below or close to detection limits for 50 ns beam to stay below these densities for 75 ns operation

• SEY < 1.7 - 1.8 are required from simulations in the dipoles and in the field free regions for a 75 ns beam at 450 GeV/c and at 3.5-4 TeV/c.

• The above values are within reach within ~1 week of scrubbing (see JM Jimenez presentation) even assuming an efficiency of ~30% although based on an optimistic electron dose rate not assuming reduction of the flux of electrons in the last part of the scrubbing24/01/2011


10

Why scrubbing? (SPS experience)

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.7

0 2 4 6 8 10DAYS

BL

OW

-UP

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

CH

RO

MA

TIC

ITY

/ I

NT

EN

SIT

Y

[101

3 ]

BLOW-UP

CHROMATICITY

INTENSITY

Reduction of the V-emittance blow-up along a 15 s injection plateau BUT still blow-up at injection for the beam that is used for scrubbing

Scrubbing 2002

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.41.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

PS SPS @ inj SPS @ 16 s

BUNCH INTENSITY [1011]

V-N

OR

M. E

MIT

TA

NC

E [

mm

]

24/01/2011


11

StSt MD 3 (Oct, 2008)

StSt MD 8 (Nov, 2009)

CNe13 MD3 (Oct, 2008)

CNe13 MD8 (Nov, 2009)

StSt MD 9 (March 2010)

StSt MD 13 (Sept 2010)

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

25ns50ns75ns

log

(no

rma

lize

d e

-clo

ud

cu

rre

nt)

StSt StSt (cond.)

a-C a-C StSt StSt

Why scrubbing with 50 ns for operation at 75 ns? (SPS experience)

24/01/2011

M. Taborelli

• An electron-cloud free environment cannot be achieved efficiently for the beam that is used for scrubbing as the cleaning become less and less efficient as the SEY reduces scrubbing with tighter spacing than those used in operation 50 ns scrubbing for operation with 75 ns


12

Scrubbing run requirements

• Pre-conditions for the start of the scrubbing run:– In the injectors:

• 50 ns beam with up to 1.5x1011 p/bunch with emittances in the range 2-3.5 mm

• 75 ns beam with up to 1.2x1011 p/bunch with emittances in the range 1.5-3.5 mm

– In the LHC:• Injection of 4x36 bunches with 50 ns spacing (up to nominal transverse

emittance at least) must be set-up in advance (3-4 days work)• Machine protection set-up for high intensity at 450 GeV/c (up to 1404

bunches)• RF should be conditioned for operation at high intensity• Transverse feedback set-up for high intensity operation with 75 and 50 ns

beams

• During the scrubbing run: • Solenoids (experimental and anti e-cloud) should be OFF• Vacuum interlock levels should be temporarily increased to 2x10-6 mbar

where and when needed and compatibly with machine and experiment protection requirements

24/01/2011


13

Scrubbing run with 50 ns beam• First half of the scrubbing run (Day 1-2):

– Inject trains of up to 4x36 bunches (1.3-1.5x1011 p/bunch assuming operation with 75 ns at 1.2x1011 p/bunch to allow for current decay) with nominal emittance up to >1000 bunches compatibly with vacuum rise, heat loads and beam stability.

– Monitoring of the heat load on the beam screen and RF stable phase ( µ energy loss) as well as vacuum evolution to follow-up the scrubbing progress

– Large chromaticity and nominal emittances will be required to stabilize the beams expect low lifetime as observed during the scrubbing

• In the middle of the run (Day 3-4):– Evaluation of the sensitivity to orbit, radial position, energy

• collapse the separation bumps, crossing angles with circulating beam with high intensity circulating single beam at 450 GeV main unknown is the localization of the scrubbing in dipole field regions and possibly “scrub” in these conditions

• Ramp with 50 ns beam (few hundred bunches according to progress)24/01/2011


14

Scrubbing run with 50 ns beam

• Second half of the scrubbing run (Day 5-7):– Reduction of the transverse emittance to maximize the energy

of the electrons and reduce chromaticity (if possible) to maximize lifetime

• End of the scrubbing run (Day 8): – ramp with a 50 ns beam with few hundred bunches to assess

effectiveness of the scrubbing and provide input for requirements for operation at 50 ns

• Start physics with 75 ns with fast ramp-up in intensity to 900 bunches

24/01/2011


15

Summary and outlook• SPS experience + LHC observations scrubbing with 50 ns

beams at 450 GeV should allow:– operation with 75 ns below multipacting threshold– Suppression of electron-cloud related coherent and incoherent effects– Unwanted pressure rise in uncoated areas– Allow machine development with 50 ns beams with large number of bunches

during the year and evaluation of next step (50 ns operation)

• This imply having a period of at least 7 days of scrubbing + 1 day for validation and scrubbing result evaluation.

• Simulation effort (build-up, instability thresholds, tune spread) for the LHC has been re-started (but takes time!) to provide best fit to the data and complete simulations to investigate parametric dependancies (energy, bunch length, 50 ns limitations) and provide additional input for the scrubbing run.

24/01/2011


16

Spare slides

24/01/2011


1724/01/2011


18

Simulations (e-cloud build-up)

• Preliminary simulation results indicate that the observations with 50 ns beam for the pressure rises in the uncoated field free regions are consistent with SEY>2.2-2.5 and r~0.5 assuming emax of 230 eV and initial pressure of 10-9 mbar.

O. Dominguez, G. Rumolo, F. Zimmermann

24/01/2011

• 75 ns is certainly better than 50 ns but scrubbing will be required in order to ramp with 936 bunches also taken into account that the nominal scheme assumes trains of up to 96 bunches (here maximum train length is 48 bunches)

75 ns – 824 bunches

V. Baglin, G. Bregliozzi, G. Lanza


20

75 ns beam and vacuum at 450 GeV

24/01/2011

Evian Workshop - 50 and 75 ns operation 21

Cryogenics: 75 ns vs. 50 ns75 ns up to 824 bunches (Beam 1). ~10 mW/m heat load (close to detection limit) AVERAGE density ~6x1010 e-/m3

50 ns up to 444 bunches (Beam 1) heat load due to e-cloud: ~ 40 mW/m AVERAGE density ~5x1011 e-/m3

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

11/1

9/10

0:0

0

11/1

9/10

1:1

2

11/1

9/10

2:2

4

11/1

9/10

3:3

6

11/1

9/10

4:4

8

11/1

9/10

6:0

0

11/1

9/10

7:1

2

11/1

9/10

8:2

4

11/1

9/10

9:3

6

[W p

er h

alf-

cell]

, [Te

V], [

1013

p]

Qbs21L3 (calculated with T increase) Qbs33L6 (calculated with T increase)

Qbs13R7 (calculated with T increase) Qbs (IC+SR calculated with beam parameter)

Beam energy Intensity Beam1

Intensity Beam2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

11/2

0/10

4:4

8

11/2

0/10

5:1

6

11/2

0/10

5:4

5

11/2

0/10

6:1

4

11/2

0/10

6:4

3

11/2

0/10

7:1

2

11/2

0/10

7:4

0

11/2

0/10

8:0

9

11/2

0/10

8:3

8

[W p

er h

alf-

cell]

, [Te

V], [

1013

p]

Qbs21L3 (calculated with T increase) Qbs33L6 (calculated with T increase)

Qbs13R7 (calculated with T increase) Qbs (IC+SR calculated with beam parameter)

Beam energy Intensity Beam1

Intensity Beam2

L. Tavian

Visible e-cloud activity~ 40 mW/m on beam1

07/12/2010


22


Q’H,V=14 Q’H,V=24

B. Salvant

Observed oscillation (coupled-bunch mode) could be related to sources other than e-cloud as not only the tail of the batch is oscillating to disentangle need to test operation with low chromaticity in the H-plane.

24/01/2011


23

Instability thresholds

• No single bunch e-cloud instability expected at 450 GeV/c (worst case) and 3.5-4 TeV/c if electron density <1011 e-/m3 at the beam position.

• Once the threshold electron density is reached the beam is unstable

• If dominated by:– e-cloud in field free regions single bunch instability (SBI) in both planes,– e-cloud in dipole field regions SBI in V-plane only

K. Li, G. RumoloPRELIMINARY

24/01/2011

1010 [e-/m3]

450 GeV/c field free

1010 [e-/m3]

450 GeV/c dipole


24

Ongoing simulations work

4 TeV/c dipole

K. Li, G. Rumolo

PRELIMINARY

4 TeV/c field free

24/01/2011

• If dominated by – e-cloud in field free regions single bunch instability (SBI) in both planes,– e-cloud in dipole field regions SBI in V-plane only

LHC injection, Nb=1.15x1011, re=6x1011 m-3

at re=6x1011m-3

instabilitysuppressed for Q’>15similar to LHC

E. Benedetto, Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, 2006

slowemittancegrowthbelow threshold

beam observations with different bunch spacings and synthesis g. arduini – be/abp

Documents

beam observations

ns beam blowup

different bunch spacings

coupled bunch instability

nssingle bunch instability

beam screens

ns vacuum

ecloud close