barbour5

53
LIBERTIES

Upload: david-woodard

Post on 03-Dec-2014

826 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: barbour5

LIBERTIES

Page 2: barbour5

Conflicting Rights and Liberties conflict in two ways:

Individual rights conflict school prayer/different religions

Individual rights vs. the good of society drug laws/freedoms

Page 3: barbour5

Rights How we resolve conflicts about rights

1. The courts

2. Congress

3. The President4. The People (interest groups/pluralism)

Page 4: barbour5

Bill of Rights and States Why is the Bill of Rights so valuable? What was its original purpose? What didn’t it do when originally written? Applying Bill of Rights to the states 14th amendment--incorporation

Page 5: barbour5

History The original Constitution, unlike those of

several states, contained no listing of rights to be protected from government interference.

Page 6: barbour5

History Many delegates to the Constitutional

Convention felt that such a listing was unnecessary because the national government was structured to be one of limited powers.

Page 7: barbour5

History Nevertheless, the failure to include such

guarantees became the source of such heated debate at state ratifying conventions that the First Congress, as one of its first acts, proposed 12 amendments, 10 of which were ratified. These 10 amendments are known as the Bill of Rights.

Page 8: barbour5

History Originally, the Bill of Rights limited the

actions of only the national government. Chief Justice John Marshall’s decision in Barron v. Baltimore foreclosed the possibility that the Bill of Rights could be used to limit state governments.

Slavery was a key issue here.

Page 9: barbour5

History Ratification of the 14th Amendment in

1868 provided an opportunity to extend the Bill of Rights to the states.

The due process clause of the 14th Amendment became a means of incorporating the Bill of Rights.

Page 10: barbour5

History To some, most notably Justice Hugo Black,

this due process clause seemed an obvious attempt to incorporate the entire Bill of Rights. (Black’s position is referred to as total incorporation.)

Page 11: barbour5

History Since Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the

Supreme Court has used an approach known as selective incorporation: incorporating only those provisions of the Bill of Rights that a majority of justices feel are fundamental to a democratic society.

Page 12: barbour5
Page 13: barbour5
Page 14: barbour5

History Through this process of selective

incorporation, the Court eventually came to apply almost all provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states.

Page 15: barbour5

Bill of Rights You should probably all know the first ten

amendments Know all about the 14th amendment and

why it is important There are other important amendments that

we will discuss in class

Page 16: barbour5
Page 17: barbour5

FREEDOM of/from RELIGION

Page 18: barbour5

Freedom of/from Religion First Amendment guarantee that the

government will not create and/or support an official state religion.

Page 19: barbour5

First Amendment guarantee that citizens may freely engage in the religious activities of their choice

Must have a “compelling state interest” to limit religious freedom (Sherbert v. Verner, 1963)

Freedom of/from Religion

Page 20: barbour5

Freedom of/from Religion The First Amendment’s protection of

religious freedom is composed of two parts—the establishment and free exercise clauses—that often conflict with one another. Providing for the free exercise of religion may constitute an establishment of religion, especially if it entails special treatment for a religious group.

Page 21: barbour5

Freedom of/from Religion Why is religious freedom valuable? Why and how can a majority religion abuse

its privilege?

Page 22: barbour5

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Page 23: barbour5

Freedom of Expression Informed citizenry

Watchdog for government

Voice for the minority

Preservation of the truth

Page 24: barbour5
Page 25: barbour5

Free Speech Problem is not that it will necessarily be

legally taken away…..problem is often a “majority-minority” issue.

What is “allowed” by the system.

Page 26: barbour5

Free Speech You are either totally in favor of free

speech, or you are not—think about this.

You cannot pick and chose. Or can we? This is where the political system intervenes.

Page 27: barbour5

Expression/Speech Why is it valuable? Speech that criticizes government Speech that criticizes the majority Symbolic speech Freedom of assembly

Page 28: barbour5

Expression/Speech Obscenity and pornography Fighting words and offensive speech

Page 29: barbour5
Page 30: barbour5

Freedom of the Press Prior restraint Libel Right of a Fair Trial

Page 31: barbour5

Freedom of the Press Censorship on the Internet

Page 32: barbour5

CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS

Page 33: barbour5

Rights Why are the rights of criminal defendants

valuable?

Page 34: barbour5

Rights Unreasonable search and seizures

1. What is reasonable?

2. Exclusionary Rule

Page 35: barbour5

Rights Right against self-incrimination Right of counsel Cruel and unreasonable punishment

Page 36: barbour5

Rights

Right to counsel Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Protection against cruel and unusual punishment Furman v. Georgia (1972) McClesky v. Kemp (1987)

Page 37: barbour5
Page 38: barbour5
Page 39: barbour5

A Bill of Obligations?

What should one look like?

Voting?

Military service?

Others?

Page 40: barbour5

STUDY QUESTIONS

Page 41: barbour5

Study Questions Briefly discuss the meaning of rights in a democratic society.

What does the term "rights" actually mean--give me your own definition? Are right absolute?

The textbook authors suggest that there are obvious tensions in a democratic society between the power of the individual and the power of the state. When and how do those tensions come in conflict? And how are those tensions resolved?

Page 42: barbour5

Study Questions Comment on Justice William O. Douglas’s quote

that "Speech, except when linked with action, should be immune from prosecution." Do you agree with that statement?

Should there be any restrictions or limits on speech? Can you think of any examples: internet, hate speech, etc?

Page 43: barbour5

Study Questions Why is free speech and a free press so

important in a democracy? Can too much free speech have negative consequences? Are there times when we might want to restrict speech?

Page 44: barbour5

Study Questions How much courage does someone need

to fight for their civil liberties and rights? How can an individual prepare for the public rejection that so often accompanies efforts to guarantee rights such as religious freedom or free speech? 

Page 45: barbour5

Study Questions What does it mean to have academic freedom?

Should professors be able to discuss anything they want in class? If we restrict a professor's ability to discuss what he or she wants in class, how might that hinder the student's educational experience? What benefits might come from it?

Page 46: barbour5

Study Questions Do those accused of crimes have too

many protections? Should victims of crimes have more rights? If so, what should some of those rights be?

Page 47: barbour5

Study Questions Why is the Bill of Rights so valuable? What

would our society be like if we didn't have the Bill of Rights? Finally, briefly discuss the Bill of Rights and its relationship to the states. 

Page 48: barbour5

Study Questions Shouldn’t states be able to make their own

laws concerning rights?

Page 49: barbour5

Study Questions Should the United States have a Bill of

Obligations? If so, what should be included in it? Would a Bill of Obligations change citizens' views toward government and civic engagement?

Page 50: barbour5

Terms bad tendency test exclusionary rule due process of the law bills of attainder libel establishment clause

Page 51: barbour5

Terms clear and present danger test Miller test ex post facto law Lemon test police power

Page 52: barbour5

Terms Gideon v. Wainwright 14th amendment prior restraint Miranda v. Arizona habeas corpus sedition

Page 53: barbour5

Terms accommodationists freedom of assembly